Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Productivity and efficiency changes in primary care: a Malmquist index approach

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reforms of the National Health System in the UK introduced in 1990 led to substantial changes in the organisation of primary health care. In this paper we analyse the efficiency of primary care provision in the English Family Health Service Authorities (FHSAs) over the period 1990/91–1994/95. We use Data Envelopment Analysis to measure Malmquist indices of productivity changes, which are then decomposed into indices of pure technical efficiency change, scale efficiency change and technological change. The analysis indicates a small improvement in the productivity over the period considered. The increase is attributed to pure technical efficiency improvement and positive change in scale efficiency, while the technology does not show significant change. The analysis suggests that there is very limited scope for productivity gains in this sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.J. Aigner, C.A.K. Lovell and P. Schmidt, Formulation and estimation of stochastic production function models, Journal of Econometrics 6 (1977) 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Allen, A. Athanassopoulos, R.G. Dyson and E. Thanassoulis, Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: evolution, development and future directions, Annals of Operational Research 73 (1997) 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.E. Atkinson and P.W. Wilson, Comparing mean efficiency and productivity scores from small samples: A bootstrap methodology, Journal of Productivity Analysis 6 (1995) 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.D. Banker, Estimating most productive scale size using Data Envelopment Analysis, European Journal of Operational Research 17 (1984) 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.M. Bates, D. Baines and D.K. Whynes, Measuring the efficiency of prescribing by general practitioners, Journal of Operational Research Society 47 (1996) 1443–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Leese and N. Bosanquet, Change in general practice and its effects on service provision in areas with different socioeconomic characteristics, British Medical Journal 311 (1995) 546–550.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.F. Burgess and P.W. Wilson, Decomposing hospital productivity changes 1985-1988: A nonparametric Malmquist approach, Journal of Productivity Analysis 6 (1995) 343–363.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.A. Carr-Hill, N. Rice and M. Roland, Socioeconomic determinants of rates of consultation in general practice based on fourth national morbidity survey of general practices, British Medical Journal 312 (1996) 1008–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.W. Caves, L.R. Christensen and W.E. Diewert, The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity, Econometrica 50 (1982) 1393–1414.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Department of Health, NHS White Paper, Department of Health, London, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.E. Dismuke and V. Sena, Has the DRG system really influenced hospital productivity growth in Portugal? An empirical analysis using parametric and non-parametric methods, Paper presented to the 5th European Workshop on Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Copenhagen, October 9-11, 1997.

  12. B. Efron, The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans, CBMS-NFS Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 38 (SIAM, 1982).

  13. M. Fall, S. Walters, S. Read, M. Deverill, M. Lutman, P. Milner and R. Rodgers, An evaluation of a nurse-led ear care service in primary care: benefits and costs, British Journal of General Practice 47 (1997) 699–703.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Fare, S. Grosskopf, B. Lindgren and P. Ross, Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: A Malmquist output index approach, Department of Economics, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, 1989. Published in: Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications, eds. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, A. Lewin and L. Seiford (Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Fare, S. Grosskopf and C.A.K. Lovell, The Measurement of Efficiency of Production (Kluver-Nijhoff, Boston, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Fare, S. Grosskopf and C.A.K. Lovell, Production Frontiers (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Fare, S. Grosskopf and N. Norris, Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries: Reply, American Economic Review 87 (1997) 1040–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Fare, S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang, Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries, American Economic Review 84 (1994) 66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M.J. Farrell, The measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 120(3) (1957) 254–281.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Foster, B. Jackson, M. Thomas, P. Hunter and N. Bennett, General Household Survey 1993 (HMSO, London, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Giuffrida and H. Gravelle, Measuring performance in primary care: Econometric analysis and DEA, Paper presented to the 25th Health Economists' Study Group Meeting, York, 2-4 July, 1997.

  22. E. Grifell-Tatjé and C.A.K. Lovell, A generalised Malmquist productivity index, University of Georgia (1998).

  23. Z. Griliches, Economic data issues, in: Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 3, eds. Z. Griliches and M. Intriligator (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Grosskopf, Efficiency and productivity, in: The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, eds. H.O. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell and S. Schmidt (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Hibble, Practice nurse workload before and after the introduction of the 1990 contract for general practitioners, British Journal of General Practice 45 (1995) 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  26. B. Jarman, Identification of underprivileged area, British Medical Journal 286 (1983) 1705–1709. 26 A. Giuffrida / Productivity and efficiency changes in primary care

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Lenehan and A. Watts, Nurse practitioners in primary care: Here to stay?, British Journal of General Practice 44 (1994) 291–292.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Levitt, A. Wal and J. Appleby, The Reorganized National Health Service, 5th ed. (Chapman & Hall, London, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Linna, Measuring the hospital cost efficiency with panel data models, Health Economics 7 (1998) 415–427.

    Google Scholar 

  30. C.A.K. Lovell, A. Sarkar and R.C. Sickles, Output aggregation and the measurement of productive efficiency, Working Paper Series No.87-6, University of North Carolina (1987).

  31. M. Lynch, Effect of practice and patient population characteristics on the uptake of childhood immunizations, British Journal of General Practice 45 (1995) 205–208.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Magnussen, Efficiency measurement and the operationalization of hospital production, Health Services Research 31 (1996) 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  33. N. Maniadakis and B. Hollingsworth, The impact of internal market on hospital efficiency productivity and service quality, Paper presented to the 26th Health Economists' Study Group Meeting, Sheffield, 5-6 January, 1997.

  34. N. Maniadakis and L. Read, A note on productivity measurement with Malmquist indexes, Research Paper No. 278, Warwick Business School (1997).

  35. N. Maniadakis and E. Thanassoulis, A cost Malmquist type productivity index, Research Paper No. 270, Warwick Business School (1997).

  36. A. Maynard, Developing the health care market, Economic Journal 101 (1991) 1277–1286.

    Google Scholar 

  37. A. Maynard, Can competition enhance efficiency in the health care? Lessons from the reform of the UK National Health Service, Social Science and Medicine 39 (1994) 1433–1445.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Medeconomics, NHS Pay Database, Medeconomics 16(10) (1995) 74–87.

    Google Scholar 

  39. W. Meeusen and J. Van Den Broeck, Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error, International Economic Review 18 (1977) 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  40. NHS Executive, Health Service Indicators Handbook (NHS Executive, Leeds, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  41. NHS Executive, 1996/7 Purchaser Efficiency Index and HA Resources, FDL(95) 60 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  42. F. Pedraja-Chaparro, J. Salinas-Jimenez and P. Smith, On the role of weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis, Journal of Productivity Analysis 8 (1997) 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  43. N. Porter and S. Clements, Municipal Year Book (Newman Books, London, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  44. S.C. Ray and E. Desli, Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries: Comment, American Economic Review 87 (1997) 1033–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  45. J. Salinas-Jimenez and P. Smith, Data Envelopment Analysis applied to quality in primary health care, Annals of Operational Research 67 (1996) 141–161.

    Google Scholar 

  46. R.W. Shephard, Theory of Cost and Production Functions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  47. P. Smith, Model misspecification in Data Envelopment Analysis, Annals of Operational Research 73 (1997) 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Tambour, The impact of health care policy initiatives on productivity, Health Economics 6 (1997) 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  49. E. Thanassoulis, A. Boussofiane and R.G. Dyson, Exploring output quality targets in the provision of prenatal care in England using DEA, European Journal of Operational Research 80 (1995) 588–607.

    Google Scholar 

  50. E. Thanassoulis, A. Boussofiane and R.G. Dyson, A comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis as tools for performance assessment, Omega, International Journal of Management Science 24 (1996) 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  51. J.M. Yates and M.G. Davidge, Can you measure performance?, British Medical Journal 288 (1984) 1935–1936.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO1 5DD, UK E-mail:

    Antonio Giuffrida

Authors
  1. Antonio Giuffrida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giuffrida, A. Productivity and efficiency changes in primary care: a Malmquist index approach. Health Care Management Science 2, 11–26 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019067223945

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019067223945

Search

Navigation