Skip to main content
Log in

Alternative Solution for a Robotic Stereotactic System

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of robotic technology applications in the stereotactic neurosurgical method has reached the stage of high acceptation, which is the driving force for searching for other solutions. The article describes an alternative robotic system solution for stereotaxis and compares it with other known solutions. It is characterised by a minimal number of the controlled robot axes, while preserving required articulation possibilities. Since it is a non-traditional robotic architecture, the article outlines its kinematic analysis with the specification of transformation matrices for an inversion problem. At the same time, outputs from the robot computer animation, which is an indispensable aid in the development of kinematic mechanisms, are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flury, P., Lopez P., Glauser, D., Villotte, N., and Burckhardt, C. W.: MINERVA, a robot dedecated to neurosurgery operations, in: Proc. of the 23rd ISIR, Barcelona, 6–9 October 1992, pp. 729–733.

  2. Gildenberg P. L.: What is stereotactic surgery?, Huston Stereotactic Center, http://www.stereotactic.net/what is.htm.

  3. Horsley, V. and Clarke, R. H.: The structure and functions of the cerebellum examined by a new method, Brain 31 (1908), 45–124.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kwoh, Y. S., Reed, I. S., Chen, J. Y., Shao, H. M., Truong, T. K., and Jonckheere, E.: A new computerized tomographic-aided robotic stereotaxis system, Robotics Age 7(6) (1985), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leksel, L: Stereotactic apparatus for intracranial surgery, Acta Chir. Scand. 99 (1950), 229–233.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McInerney, J. and Roberts D. W.: Frameless stereotaxy of the brain, Mount Sinai J. Medicine 67(4) (2000), 300–305.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Modrák, V. and Paško, J.: The design of robotic system for stereotactic neurosurgery, in: Proc. of Annotations Production Systems with Industrial Robots, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic, 5–7 September 2000, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paško, J., Seman, J., and Pavlenko, S.: Utilisation of robotic system in stereotactic surgery, in: Fine Mechanics and Optics, Vol. 7/8 (2000), Institute of Physics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic and SPIE/CS, pp. 236–238.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schiffbauer, H.: Neuronavigation in Brain Tumour Surgery, University of Oulu, Finland, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shamma, J. S. and Whitney, D. E.: A method for inverse robot calibration, J. Dyn. Systems Measm. Control 109 (1987), 37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Modrák, V., Paško, J. & Pavlenko, S. Alternative Solution for a Robotic Stereotactic System. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 35, 193–202 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021197828796

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021197828796

Navigation