Skip to main content
Log in

Conventions and Commitments in Distributed CSCW Groups

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventions are necessary to establish in any recurrentcooperative arrangement. In electronic work, they are importantso as to regulate the use of shared objects. Based on empiricalresults from a long-term study of a group cooperating inelectronic work, I present examples showing that the group failedto develop normative convention behavior. These difficulties informing conventions can be attributed to a long list of factors:the lack of clear precedents, different perspectives among groupmembers, a flexible cooperation media, limited communication, thedesign process, and discontinuous cooperation. Further, I arguethat commitments to the conventions were difficult, due to theconventions not reaching an acceptance threshold, uneven payoffs,and weak social influences. The empirical results call for aspecific set of awareness information requirements to promoteactive learning about the group activity in order to support thearticulation of conventions. The requirements focus on the roleof feedback as a powerful mechanism for shaping and learningabout group behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, M.S., D. Hindus, S.D. Mainwaring and B. Starr (1997): Hanging on the 'Wire': A Field Study of an Audio-Only Media Space. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S.E. (1956): Studies of Independence and Conformity: A Minority of One Against a Unanimous Majority. Psychological Monographs, vol. 70, no. 9 (Whole No. 416).

  • Ashworth, T. (1980): Trench Warfare, 1914–1918: The Live and Let Live System. NewYork: Holmes & Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984): The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baecker, R., D. Nastos, I. Posner and K. Mawby (1993): The User-Centred Iterative Design of Collaborative Writing Software. Proceedings INTERCHI'93. Amsterdam, pp. 399–405.

  • Bakeman, R. and J.M. Gottman (1986): Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballay, J.M. (1994): Designing Workscape: An Interdisciplinary Experience. In B. Adelson, S. Dumais and J. Olson (eds.): Proceedings of CHI'94 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, pp. 10–15.

  • Bandura, A. (1971): Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, E.E. and W. Bellotti (1993): Informed Opportunism as Strategy: Supporting Coordination in Distributed Collaborative Writing. Proceedings of ECSCW'93, September 13–17, Milan. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, R. and P. Dourish (1995): Medium versus Mechanism: Supporting Collaboration Through Customization. In H. Marmolin, Y. Sundblad and K. Schmidt (eds.): Proc. of Fourth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW' 95). Stockholm, Sweden: Kluwer, pp. 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordetsky, A. and G. Mark (2000): Memory-Based Feedback Controls to Support Groupware Coordination. Information Systems Research, vol. 11, no. 4.

  • Carroll, J.M. and J.C. Thomas (1982): Metaphors and the Cognitive Representation of Computing Systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-12, no. 2.

  • Clark, H.H. (1985): Language use and Language Users. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.): Handbook of Social Psychology. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, R. and C. Castelfranchi (1995): Cognitive and Social Action. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P., J. Lamping and T. Rodden (1999): Building Bridges: Customisation and Mutual Intelligibility in Shared Category Management. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (Group'99).

  • Dourish and V. Bellotti (1992): Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces. Proceedings of CSCW'92, Oct. 31–Nov. 4, Toronto, pp. 107–114.

  • Feldman, D.C. (1984): The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms. Academy of Management Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1959): Informal Social Communication. Psychological Review, vol. 57, pp. 271–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M. and K. Sikkink (1998): International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization (Autumn), vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 887–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, S. (1975): Tonic Aspects of Behavior in Interaction. Organization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction. The Hague: Mouton Publishers, pp. 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. (1999): AREA: A Cross-Application Notification Service for Groupware. To appear in Proceedings of ECSCW'99, Copenhagen, Denmark, 12–16 September. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W., R. Smith and T. O'shea (1991): Effective Sounds in Complex Systems: The ARKola Simulation. Proceedings CHI'91. New Orleans, pp. 85–90.

  • Gerson, E.M. and S.L. Star (1986): Analyzing Due Process in the Workplace. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems (July), vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinter (1996): Supporting Articulation Working Using Software Configuration Management Systems. CSCW Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 447–465.

  • Grudin, J. (1988): Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Organizational Interfaces. Proceedings CSCW'88, September 26–29. Portland, pp. 85–93.

  • Gutwin, C. and S. Greenberg (1998): Design for Individuals, Design for Groups: Tradeoffs between Power and Workspace Awareness. Proceedings of CSCW'98, Nov. 14–18. Seattle, pp. 207–216.

  • Hackman, J.R. (1976): Group Influences on Individuals. In M.D. Dunnette (ed.): Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall E.T. (1966): The Hidden Dimension. Anchor Books. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R.H.R. and J.A. Hughes (1993): What a F-ing System! Send' em All to the Same Place and Then Expect Us to Stop' em Hitting. Managing Technology Work in Air Traffic Control. In G. Button (ed.): Technology in Working Order, Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C.C. and P. Luff (1992): Collaboration and Control: Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms. CSCW Journal, vol. 1, nos. 1–2, pp. 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., M. Jirotka, P. Luff and J. Hindmarsh (1993): Unpacking Collaboration: The Interactional Organization of Trading in a City Dealing Room. Proceedings of ECSCW'93, Sept. 13–17, Milan. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, T. and A. Misch (1999): Anforderungen an lehrunterstützende Kooperationssysteme aus kommunikationstheoretishcher Sicht. In A. Schwill, (ed.): Informatik und Schule – Fachspezifische und fachübergreifende didaktische Konzepte, Tagungsband zur 8. GI-Fachtagung: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, C. (1985): The Challenge of Open Systems. BYTE (April), vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 223–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoschka, P., B. Butscher and N. Streitz (1993): Telecooperation and Telepresence: Technical Challenges of a Government Distributed between Bonn and Berlin. Informatization and the Public Sector, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 269–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J.A., D. Randall and D. Shapiro (1992): Faltering from Ethnography to Design. Proceedings CSCW'92, Oct. 31–Nov. 4. Toronto: ACM Press, pp. 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klöckner, K., P. Mambrey, M. Sohlenkamp, W. Prinz, L. Fuchs, S. Kolvenbach, U. Pankoke-Babatz and A. Syri (1995): PoliTeam: Bridging the Gap between Bonn and Berlin for and with the Users. Proc. of ECSCW'95. Stockholm: Kluwer, pp. 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenke, N., H.D. Lutz and M. Sprenger (1995): Grundlagen Sprachlicher Kommunikation. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J.M. (1989): Reaction to Opinion Deviance in Small Groups. In P. Paulus (ed.): Psychology of Group Influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 187–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.K. (1969): Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. and K. Crowston (1994): The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 87–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mambrey, P., G. Mark and U. Pankoke-Babatz (1998): User Advocacy in Participatory Design: Designers Experiences with a New Communication Channel. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), an International Journal, vol. 7, pp. 291–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, G. and P. Mambrey (1997): Models and Metaphors in Groupware: Towards a Group-Centered Design. In S. Howard, J. Hammond and G. Lindgaard (eds.): Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT'97 (IFIP TC13 Int'l. Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, July 14–18, Sydney). London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 477–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, R.L. and J.M. Levine (1989): Newcomers and Oldtimers in Small Groups. In P. Paulus (ed.): Psychology of Group Influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 143–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, T.M. (1968): Interpersonal Balance. In R.P. Abelson (ed.): Theory of Cognitive Consistency – A Sourcebook. Chicago: McNally, pp. 10–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. (1996): Improvising Organizational Transformation over Time: A Situated Change Perspective. Information Systems Research (March), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. and D.C. Gash (1994): Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 174–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W., G. Mark and Pankoke-Babatz (1998): Designing Groupware for Congruency in Use. Proceedings of the ACM 1998 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'98). New York: ACM Press, pp. 373–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. and S. Kolvenbach (1996): Support for Ministerial Workflows. In M.S. Ackermann (ed.): Proc. of Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'96). Boston, MA: ACM Press, pp. 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. (1993): Design for Unanticipated Use. Proceedings of ECSCW'93, Sept. 13–17, Milan. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. (1991): Double-Level Languages and Co-Operative Working. AI and Society, vol. 5, pp. 34–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Yvonne (1993): Coordinating Computer-Mediated Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), an International Journal, vol. 1, pp. 295–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E.H. (1985): Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. and C. Simone (1996): Coordination Mechanisms: Towards a Conceptual Foundation of CSCW System Design. CSCW: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 5, nos. 2–3, pp. 155–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. and L. Bannon (1992): Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), an International Journal, vol. 1, nos. 1–2, pp. 7–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1970): On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simone, C., G. Mark and D. Giubbilei (1999): In D. Georgakopoulos, W. Prinz and A. Wolf (eds.): Proceedings of ACM Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration (WACC'99), Feb. 22–25. San Francisco: ACM Press, pp. 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.E. and S.S. Kight (1959): Effects of Feedback on Insight and Problem-Solving Efficiency in Training Groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 43, pp. 209–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohlenkamp, M., L. Fuchs and A. Genau (1997): Awareness and Cooperative Work: The PoliTeam Approach. Proceedings of HICSS 30, Jan. 9–11, Wailea. Hawaii: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 549–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L. and J.R. Griesemer (1989): Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, vol. 19, pp. 387–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefik, M., G. Foster, D. Bobrow, K. Kahn, S. Lanning and L. Suchman (1987): Beyond the Chalkboard: Computer Support for Collaboration and Problem Solving in Meetings. Communications of the ACM, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syri, A. (1997): Tailoring Cooperation Support Through Mediators. In J. Hughes et al. (eds.): Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW'97). pp. 157–172.

  • Tajfel, H. (1969): Social and Cultural Factors in Perception. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.): Handbook of Social Psychology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatar, D., G. Foster and D. Bobrow (1991): Design for Conversation: Lessons from Cognoter. IJMMS. vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 185–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.C. and Oakes (1989): Self-Categorization Theory and Social Influence. In P.B. Paulus (ed.): Psychology of Group Influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 233–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, B. (1994): Der Stachel des Fremden. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K.N. (1979): Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1969): The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V. (1997): Storing and Retrieving Documents in a Shared Workspace: Experiences from the Political Administration. In S. Howard, J. Hammond and G. Lindgaard (eds.): Human Computer Interaction: INTERACT'97. UK: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mark, G. Conventions and Commitments in Distributed CSCW Groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 11, 349–387 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021289427473

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021289427473

Navigation