Skip to main content
Log in

Relevance of Outlier Cases in Case Mix Systems and Evaluation of Trimming Methods

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the most appropriate outlier trimming method when the main source of information for case mix classification is length of stay (LOS) because cost information is unavailable. Methods: Discharges (35,262) from two public hospitals were analysed. LOS and cost outliers were calculated using different trimming methods. The agreement between cost and LOS trimming was analysed. Results: The trimming method using the geometric mean with two standard deviations (GM2) showed the highest level of agreement between cost and LOS and revealed the greatest proportion of extreme costs. Nearly 5% of cases were outliers, containing 16% of total LOS. This was the best approximation to 18% of extreme cost because when GM2 was applied to LOS, 88% of outlier cost was revealed. Conclusions: The methods were analysed because they are the most frequently used but the same methodology could be employed to compare other outlier determination methods. Outliers should be calculated because they ought to be valued differently from inlier cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Armitage and G. Berry, Statistical Methods in Medical Research (Blackwell Science Ltd., 1994).

  2. C. Beaver, Y. Zhao, S. McDermid and D. Hindle, Casemix-based funding of northern territory public hospitals: Adjusting for severity and socio-economic variations, Health Economics 7 (1998) 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Briggs and A. Gray, The distribution of health care costs and their statistical analysis for economic evaluation, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 3 (1998) 233–245.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.R.G. Butler, Hospital Cost Analysis (Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.R.G. Butler, C.M. Furnival and R.F.G. Hart, Estimating treatment cost functions for progressive disease: A multiproduct approach with an application to breast cancer, Journal of Health Economics 14 (1995) 361–385.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K.A. Calore and L. Iezzoni, Disease staging and PMCs. Can they improve DRGs? Medical Care 25 (1987) 724–737.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.M. Carter, P.D. Jacobson, G.F. Kominski and M.J. Perry, Use of diagnosis-related groups by non-Medicare payers, Health Care Financing Review 16 (1994) 127–158.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.M. Carter and J.D. Rumpel, Payment Rates for Unusual Medicare Hospital Cases (RAND, Santa Mónica, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Casas, Sistemes d'informació hospitalària basats en la casuística: Grups relacionats amb el diagnòstic, Impacte en la gestió hospitalària, Thesis/Dissertation (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Casas and R. Tomas, Producing DRG statistics at the European level: Lessons from the EURODRG Project, in: Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe. Uses and Perspectives, eds. M. Casas and M. Wiley (Springer, Berlin, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. I.R. Chandler, R.B. Fetter and R.C. Newbold, Cost accounting and budgeting, in: DRGs. Their Design and Development, eds. R.B. Fetter, D.A. Brand and D. Gamache (Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Cots and X. Castells, Cómo pagamos a nuestros hospitales. La referencia de Cataluña y el contrapunto desde Andalucía, Gaceta Sanitaria 15 (2001) 172–181.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Cots, X. Castells, A. Garcia and M. Saez, Relación de los costes directos de hospitalización con la duración de la estancia, Gaceta Sanitaria 11 (1997) 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Cots, D. Elvira, X. Castells and E. Dalmau, Medicare's DRGWeights in a European environment: The Spanish experience, Health Policy 51 (2000) 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Cots, L. Mercadé and X. Castells, El outlier es un problema estadístico, clínico o asistencial? Red pÚblica de hospitales de Catalunya 1996, Gaceta Sanitaria 14(suplemento 1) (2000) 12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Elixhauser, C. Steiner, R. Harris and R.M. Coffey, Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data, Medical Care 36 (1998) 8– 27.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.R. Feinstein, Clinical epidemiology, The Architecture of Clinical Research (Sounders Company, 1985).

  18. R.B. Fetter and J.L. Freeman, Grupos relacionados con el diagnóstico: Gestión por líneas de productos en los hospitales, in: Los Grupos Relacionados por el Diagnóstico: Experiencia y Perspectivas de Utilización, ed. M. Casas (Masson/ S.G. Editores, Barcelona, 1991).

  19. L.I. Iezzoni, A.S. Ash, M. Shwartz, J. Daley, J.S. Hugues and Y.D. Mackiernan, Judging hospitals by severity-adjusted mortality rates: The influence of the severity-adjustment method, American Journal of Public Health 86 (1996) 1379–1387.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L.I. Iezzoni, A.S. Ash, M. Shwartz, B.E. Landon and Y.D. Mackiernan, Predicting in-hospital deaths from coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Do different severity measures give different predictions? Medical Care 36 (1998) 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  21. E.B. Keeler, G.M. Carter and S. Trude, Insurance aspects of DRG outlier payments, Journal of Health Economics 7 (1988) 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D.A. Kenny, Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Lee, Outliers in business surveys, in: Business Survey Methods, eds. B.G. Cox, D.A. Binder, B.N. Chinnappa, A. Christianson, M.J. Colledge and P.S. Kott (Wiley, New York, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  24. L.K. Lichtig, Hospital Information Systems for Casemix Management (Wiley, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. López Casasnovas and A. Wagstaff, La financiación hospitalaria basada en la actividad en sistemas sanitarios pÚblicos, regulación de tarifas y eficiencia: El caso de la concentración hospitalaria en Cataluña, in: La Regulación de los Servicios Sanitarios en España, eds. G. López Casasnovas and D. Rodríguez (Editorial Civitas, Madrid, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.P. Newhouse, Reimbursing health plans and health providers: Effi-ciency in production versus selection, Journal of Economic Literature 34 (1996) 1236–1263.

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Peiró, Limitaciones en la medición de los resultados de la atención hospitalaria: Implicaciones para la gestión, in: Instrumentos Para la Gestión en Sanidad, ed. AES (SG-Editores S.A., Barcelona, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  28. G. Rhodes, M. Wiley, R. Tomas, M. Casas and R. Leidl, Comparing EU hospital efficiency using diagnosis-related groups, European Journal of Public Health 7 (1997) 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  29. D.L. Sackett, R.B. Haynes, G.H. Guyatt and P. Tugwell, Epidemiología clínica, in: Ciencia Básica para la Medicina Clínica (Panamericana, Buenos Aires, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  30. H.F. Sanderson, P. Anthony and L.M. Mountney, Healthcare resource groups. Version 2, Journal of Public Health Medicine 17 (1995) 349– 354.

    Google Scholar 

  31. T. Smith, D. Archer and F. Butler, Healthcare resources groups and general practitioner purchasing, in: Casemix for All, eds. H. Sanderson, P. Anthony and L. Mountney (Radcliffe Medical Press, Oxon, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  32. N. Söderlund, Product definition for healthcare contracting: An overview of approaches to measuring hospital output with reference to the UK internal market, Journal of Epidemiology Community Health 48 (1994) 224–231.

    Google Scholar 

  33. N. Söderlund, A. Gray, R. Milne and J. Raftery, The construction of resource-weights for healthcare resource groups: A comparison of alternative data sources and methodological approaches (National Casemix Office, London, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  34. N. Söderlund, A. Gray, R. Milne and J. Raftery, Case mix measurement in english hospitals: An evaluation of five methods for predicting resource use, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 1 (1996) 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  35. J.L. Temes, J.L. Díaz and B. Parra, El Coste por Proceso Hospitalario (Editorial Interamericana McGraw-Hill, Madrid, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  36. J.W. Thomas and M.L.F. Ashcraft, Measuring severity of illness: Six severity systems and their ability to explain cost variations, Inquiry 28 (1991) 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. Udpa, Activity-based costing for hospitals, Health Care Management Review 21 (1996) 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  38. D.W. Young and L.K. Pearlman, Managing the stages of hospital cost accounting, Healthcare Financial Management 47 (1993) 58–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cots, F., Elvira, D., Castells, X. et al. Relevance of Outlier Cases in Case Mix Systems and Evaluation of Trimming Methods. Health Care Management Science 6, 27–35 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021908220013

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021908220013

Navigation