Skip to main content
Log in

Methodology for close up studies – struggling with closeness and closure

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper critically reviews some themesand methods within qualitative research andargues for self-ethnography as an approach tostudy universities and other settings which theresearcher is highly familiar with, and hasdirect access to. Advantages and disadvantagesare discussed. In particular the strugglebetween utilizing closeness to empirically richsituations and avoid the closure following frombeing (staying) native is highlighted. Someideas for self-ethnographic work inorganization studies are developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agar, M.H. (1986). Speaking of Ethnography. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. (1993). Cultural Perspectives on Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. (1996). Communication, Power and Organization. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. (2003). 'Beyond neo-positivism, romanticism and localism. A reflexive approach to the research interview', Academy of Management Review 28, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. (2000). Doing Critical Management Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. and Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive Methodology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asplund, J. (1970). Om undran inför samhället (On Reflecting on Society). Lund: Argos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P. and Hammersley, M. (1994). 'Ethnography and participant observation', in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baszanger, I. and Dodier, N. (1997). 'Ethnography: relating the part to the whole'. in Silverman, D. (ed.), Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannick, T. and Coghlan, D. (2001). In Defense of Being 'Native': The Case for Insider Research. Paper. University College, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.H. (1977). A Poetic for Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. (eds.) (1986). Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. (1994). 'The art of interpretation', in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. (1997). Interpretive Ethnography. Thousend Oaks: Sage.

  • Dingwall, R. (1997). 'Accounts, interviews and observations', In Miller, G. and Dingwall, R. (eds.), Context and Method in Qualitative Research. London, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. and Bochner, A. (2000). 'Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity', in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1993). 'Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: the universities', Discourse and Society 4(2), 133–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A. and Frey, J. (1994). 'Interviewing: the art of science', in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. ( e d s. ), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1976). The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1988). Work and Lives. The Anthropologist as Author. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. et al. (1995). 'Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence', Organization Science 5(3), 363–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammarsley, M. (1990). 'What is wrong with ethnography? The myth of theoretical description', Sociology 24, 597–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, R. (1988). Moral Mazes. The World of Corporate Manager. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. (1995). ' "Déjà Entendu": The liminal qualities of anthropological fieldnotes', in Van Maanen, J. (ed.), Representation in Ethnograhy. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. (1989). 'Love and knowledge. Emotion in feminist epistemology', Inquiry 32, 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981), 'Introduction. The micro-sociological challenge of macro-sociology: Towards a reconstruction of social theory and methodology', in Knorr-Cetina, K. and Cicourel, A. (eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolker, A. (1996). 'Thrown overboard: The human costs of health care rationing', in Ellis, C. and Bochner, A. (eds.), Composing Ethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering Culture. Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. and Fischer, M. (1986). Anthropology as Cultural Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1977). 'Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony', American Journal of Sociology 83, 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1997). 'Towards ethnographies of institutional discourse: Proposal and suggestions', in Miller, G. and Dingwall, R. (eds.), Context and Method in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C.W. (1940). 'Situated actions and vocabularies of motives', American Sociological Review 5, 904–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. and Jary, D. (1995). 'The McUniversity: Organization, management and academic subjectivity', Organization 2(2), 319–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1978). 'Demystifying organizations', in Sarri, R. and Hasenfeld, Y. (eds.), The Management of Human Services. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology. Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (1994). 'Writing: A method of inquiry', in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (2000). 'Writing: A method of inquiry', in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, M. (1985). 'Breakfirst at Spiro's: Dramaturgy and dominance', Journal of Management 11(2), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. and Gergen, K. (eds.) (1989). Texts of Identity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. and Gergen, K. (1994). 'Social construction: knowledge, self, others, and continuing the conversation', in Deetz, S. (ed.), Communication Yearbook, Vol. 17. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1985). Qualitative Methodology and Sociology. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1989). 'Six rules of qualitative research: A post-romantic argument', Symbolic Interaction 12(2), 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting Qualitative Data. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1984). 'Case studies', in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. (1993). 'The cedar closet', Qualitative Studies in Education 6(4), 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (1998). Academics Responding to Change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the Field. On Writing Ethnography. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (ed.) (1995). Representation in Ethnograhy. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. (1994). In Search of Management. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. (1996). 'Motivation: That's Maslow, isn't it?', Management Learning 27(4), 447–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. (2000). 'Ethnographic fiction science', Organization 7, 493–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widerberg, K. (1995). Kunskapens kön (Gender of knowledge). Stockholm: Norstedts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. (1995). 'Making a study "more ethnographic" ', in Van Maanen, J. (ed.), Representation in Ethnograhy. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (1983). 'Irony in the social studies of science', in Knorr-Cetina, K. and Mulkay, M. (eds.), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alvesson, M. Methodology for close up studies – struggling with closeness and closure. Higher Education 46, 167–193 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024716513774

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024716513774

Navigation