Skip to main content
Original communication

Real-world outcomes of endovascular treatment in a non-selected population with peripheral artery disease – prospective study with 2-year follow-up

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000798

Summary.Background: The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients. Patients and methods: A multi-centre, observational study was performed with 32 German and Austrian centres contributing data to the PTA registry. Data of 1,781 patients with lower-leg and pelvic PAD who were suitable for endovascular PTA treatment were contributed from participating centres. Data from 1,533 patients are reported here (1,055 male and 478 female). This study did not have exclusion criteria. Quality of life (QOL) questionnaire (EQ-5D) scores, Rutherford classification, mortality, patency rate and details of major adverse cardiovascular events were collected at 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow ups. Results: PTA with/without stenting achieved 90.3 %, 86.5 %, 82.7 %, and 71.9 % technical success (recanalisation achieving ≥ 70 % patency, no evidence of embolisation, recoiling or dissection) in iliac, femoral, popliteal, and below-the-knee arteries, respectively. Procedural/postprocedural complications occurred in 142 (9.3 %, 1 death) and 74 (4.8 %) patients. QOL, mobility, self-care, activity, and pain/discomfort scores improved (p < 0.01), anxiety/depression was insignificantly improved. During follow-up, 409 (26.7 %) patients were hospitalised for PAD, 281 (18.3 %) required reintervention, and 145 (9.5 %) died or needed amputation (n = 49; 3.2 %). Multivariate analysis demonstrated poorer outcomes in patients with comorbidities. Conclusions: PTA with/without stenting is effective, safe, and widely applicable, with few complications. It improves QOL, but not anxiety/depression.

References

  • 1 Sampson UK, Fowkes FG, McDermott MM, et al. Global and regional burden of death and disability from peripheral artery disease: 21 world regions, 1990 to 2010. Glob Heart. 2014;9:145–158. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 2 Malyar N, Fürstenberg T, Wellmann J, et al. Recent trends in morbidity and in-hospital outcomes of in-patients with peripheral arterial disease: a nationwide population-based analysis. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2706–14. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 3 Wu A, Coresh J, Selvin E, et al. Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease and Quality of Life Among Older Individuals in the Community. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e004519. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 4 Alahdab F, Wang AT, Elraiyah TA, et al. A systematic review for the screening for peripheral arterial disease in asymptomatic patients. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:42S–53S. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 5 Reinecke H, Unrath M, Freisinger E, et al. Peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischaemia: still poor outcomes and lack of guideline adherence. Eur Heart J. 2015;14(36):932–8. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 6 Bradbury AW, Adam DJ, Bell J, et al. Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: A survival prediction model to facilitate clinical decision making. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:52S–68S. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 7 Lawall H, Huppert P, Espinola-Klein C, et al. German guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery disease – a comprehensive update 2016. Vasa. 2017;46:79–86. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • 8 Iida O, Nakamura M, Yamauchi Y, et al. 3-year outcomes of the olive registry, a prospective multicenter study of patients with critical limb ischemia: A prospective, multi-center, three-year follow-up study on endovascular treatment for infra-inguinal vessel in patients with critical limb ischemia. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1493–502. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 9 Robertson L, Paraskevas KI, Stewart M. Angioplasty and stenting for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 10 Hardman RL, Jazaeri O, Yi J, et al. Overview of Classification Systems in Peripheral Artery Disease. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2014;31:378–388. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 11 Poku E, Duncan R, Keetharuth A, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review of psychometric properties. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14:161. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 12 Klein WM, van der Graaf Y, Seegers J, et al. Long-term cardiovascular morbidity, mortality, and reintervention after endovascular treatment in patients with iliac artery disease: The Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study. Radiology. 2004;232:491–8. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 13 Bypass vs. angioplasty. Comparisons have produced mixed results, but the heyday for both procedures (especially bypass) may be winding down. Harv Health Lett. 2011;36:7. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • 14 Carthy ER. Lower Limb Peripheral Arterial Disease (Clinical Guideline 147): A Guideline Summary. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2013;2:26–30. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 15 Oesterling C, Kalia A, Chetcuti T, et al.. Atypical leg symptoms: does routine measurement of the ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) in primary care benefit patients? London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2015;7:97–102. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 16 de Vos MS, Bol BJ, Gravereaux EC, et al. Treatment planning for peripheral arterial disease based on duplex ultrasonography and computed tomography angiography: consistency, confidence and the value of additional imaging. Surgery. 2014;156:492–502. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 17 Grigoropoulou P, Eleftheriadou I, Jude EB, et al. Diabetic foot infections: An update in diagnosis and management. Curr Diab Rep. 2017;17:3. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 18 Greenhalgh RM, Belch JJ, Brown LC, et al. Mimic Trial Participants. The adjuvant benefit of angioplasty in patients with mild to moderate intermittent claudication (MIMIC) managed by supervised exercise, smoking cessation advice and best medical therapy: results from two randomised trials for stenotic femoropopliteal and aortoiliac arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36:680–8. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 19 Murphy TP, Cutlip DE, Regensteiner JG, et al. Supervised exercise versus primary stenting for claudication resulting from aortoiliac peripheral artery disease: six-month outcomes from the claudication: exercise versus endoluminal revascularization (CLEVER) study. Circulation. 2012;125:130–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 20 Hamburg NM, Balady GJ. Exercise rehabilitation in peripheral artery disease: Functional impact and mechanisms of benefits. Circulation. 2011;123:87–97. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 21 Piepoli MF, Hoes WA, Agewall S, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2016;69:939. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 22 Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: Executive summary: A report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Vasc Med. 2017 Jun;22(3):NP1–NP43. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar