Abstract
Background. Good quality, ethically sound research is needed in order to better understand, appropriately respond to, and reduce the incidence of suicide. There is, however, a lack of clarity around the nature of ethical problems associated with suicide research and how to resolve them. This is a formidable challenge for ethics committee members in approving and monitoring research. Aims. To describe the views that members of health research ethics committee hold regarding ethical problems and ethical practice in research involving people who are, or who have, been suicidal. Methods. Ethics committee members were invited to complete an online survey addressing the risks, benefits, and ethical problems associated with suicide research. Findings were aggregated into themes using an inductive form of content analysis. Results. Concerns of ethics committees centered on accessing the population, potential harm to participants or the researcher, researcher competency, maintaining confidentiality, providing support to participants, and responding sensitively to the needs of family. Conclusions. Ethical research involving suicidal people requires both procedures to protect participants, and consideration of ethics as an ongoing negotiated process. The findings of this research provide a snapshot of views held by a number of ethics committee members.
References
2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
(2002). Ethical issues in including suicidal individuals in clinical research. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 24(5), 9–14.
(2002). Reducing suicide: A national imperative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
(2004). Operational procedures for research ethics committees. Dublin: Author.
(in press ). Ethical suicide research: A survey of researchers. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 18.2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal] Retrieved December 8, 2007, from www. qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2–00/2–00mayring-e.htm.
(2006). Operational standard for ethics committees. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Health.
(2005). Ethical and legal issues in suicide research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 28(1), 23–41.
(2007). Social research ethics governance in Irish universities: Observational data and analysis. Dublin: Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences.
(2007). National statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans. Canberra: Author.
(2001). Governance arrangements for NHS Research Ethics Committees. London: Central Office for Research Ethics Committees.
(1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Elkridge, MD: The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
(2001). Issues to consider in intervention research with persons at high risk for suicidality. Retrieved August 13, 2007, from www. nimh.nih.gov/SuicideResearch/highrisksuicide.cfm.
(2004). Suicidal ideation, plans, and attempts in chronic pain patients: Factors associated with increased risk. Pain, 111(1), 201–208.
(1998). Tri-Council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa, Canada: Public Works and Government Services.
(