Being Drunk to Have Fun or to Forget Problems?
Identifying Enhancement and Coping Drinkers Among Risky Drinking Adolescents
Abstract
Prevention programs in adolescence are particularly effective if they target homogeneous risk groups of adolescents who share a combination of particular needs and problems. The present work aims to identify and classify risky single-occasion drinking (RSOD) adolescents according to their motivation to engage in drinking. An easy-to-use coding procedure was developed. It was validated by means of cluster analyses and structural equation modeling based on two randomly selected subsamples of a nationally representative sample of 2,449 12- to 18-year-old RSOD students in Switzerland. Results revealed that the coding procedure classified RSOD adolescents as either enhancement drinkers or coping drinkers. The high concordance (Sample A: κ = .88, Sample B: κ = .90) with the results of the cluster analyses demonstrated the convergent validity of the coding classification. The fact that enhancement drinkers in both subsamples were found to go out more frequently in the evenings and to have more satisfactory social relationships, as well as a higher proportion of drinking peers and a lower likelihood to drink at home than coping drinkers demonstrates the concurrent validity of the classification. To conclude, the coding procedure appears to be a valid, reliable, and easy-to-use tool that can help better adapt prevention activities to adolescent risky drinking motives.
References
(2000). Preventing drug abuse in schools: Social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 887–897.
(2007). Why do high school seniors drink? Implications for a targeted approach to intervention. Prevention Science, 8, 241–248.
(1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
(2006). Efficacy of cognitive behavioral interventions targeting personality risk factors for youth alcohol misuse. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35, 550–563.
(1994). Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 6, 117–128.
(1995). Drinking to regulate positive and negative emotions: A motivational model of alcohol use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 990–1005.
(2004). Behavioral economics: Basic concepts and clinical applications. In , Handbook of motivational counseling (pp. 49–64). Chichester: Wiley.
(2001). Cluster analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2003). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
(1996). Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. Interdisciplinary statistics. London: Chapman & Hall.
(2003). Binge drinking in Europe: Definitions, epidemiology, and consequences. Sucht, 49(2), 105–116.
(2001). Developmental processes. In , International handbook of alcohol dependence and problems – Part III: Antecedents of drinking, alcohol problems, and dependence (pp. 339–356). Chichester: Wiley Ltd.
(2004). The ESPAD report 2003 – Alcohol and other drug use among students in 35 European countries. Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs, CAN Council of Europe, Co-operation Group to Combat Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking in Drugs (Pompidou Group).
(2004). Making licensed venues safer for patrons: What environmental factors should be the focus of interventions? Drug and Alcohol Review, 23(1), 19–29.
(2001). LISREL software version 8.51. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
(1996). Coping, drinking motives, goal attainment expectancies, and family models in relation to alcohol use among college students. Journal of Drug and Alcohol Education, 26, 243–255.
(2007). Tell me .. . why do you drink? A study of drinking motives in adolescence. Lausanne: SIPA-Press.
(2004). Emotional well-being and violence among social and solitary risky single-occasion drinkers in adolescence. Addiction, 99, 331–339.
(2005). Why do young people drink? A review of drinking motives. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 841–861.
(2006). Replication and validation of the Drinking Motive Questionnaire Revised (DMQ-R, Cooper, 1994) among adolescents in Switzerland. European Addiction Research, 12, 161–168.
(2008). How stable is the motive-alcohol use link? A cross-national validation of the drinking motives questionnaire revised among adolescents from Switzerland, Canada, and the United States. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69, 388–396.
(2003). Reaching adolescents who drink harmfully: Fitting intervention to developmental reality. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24, 347–355.
(1998–2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
2005). SPSS Base 14.0 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
(2005). Stata multivariate statistics – Release 9. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
(2002). Identifying patterns of adolescent drinking: A tri-ethnic study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 156–168.
(2005). New developments in prevention and early intervention for alcohol abuse in youths. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29, 278–286.
(2000). Relations between personality and drinking motives in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 495–511.
(2002). Affective priming of alcohol schema in coping and enhancement motivated drinkers. Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 31, 63–80.
(2003). Individual- and school-level effects of perceived harm, perceived availability, and community size on marijuana use among 12th-grade students: A random effects model. Prevention Science, 4(2), 89–98.
(2006). Is alcopop consumption in Switzerland associated with riskier drinking patterns and more alcohol-related problems? Addiction, 101, 522–533.
