Skip to main content
Original Article

Assessment of Psychopathy in Austria

Psychometric Properties of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000177

The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) is a clinician rating instrument for psychopathic personality disorder. Although the instrument is routinely used in forensic assessment in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, data on its psychometric properties in German-speaking countries are lacking. Based on a national sample of adult male sexual offenders assessed at a federal evaluation unit in Austria (N = 1,046), reliability and factor structure were estimated. More specifically, measurement invariance was assessed with respect to the North American normative data of male offenders. In the sample, the PCL-R achieved similar levels of reliability as those reported in the manual for North American male offenders. According to confirmatory factor analysis, a four-factor model of psychopathy described the data well. More specifically, weak measurement invariance (i.e., equivalence of loadings, not of thresholds) held in comparison with the North American data. The present findings support the suitability of the PCL-R for assessment purposes in German-speaking countries. However, the total score is not directly comparable to North American data given that only weak measurement invariance was observed.

References

  • Ayearst, L. E. , Bagby, R. M. (2010). Evaluating the psychometric properties of psychological instruments. In M. M. Antony, , D. H. Barlow, (Eds.), Handbook of assessment and treatment planning for psychological disorders (2nd ed.). (pp. 23–61). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bowman, A. W. , Azzalini, A. (1997). Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: The kernel approach with S-Plus illustrations. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W. , Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conger, A. J. , Lipshitz, R. (1973). Measures of reliability for profiles and test batteries. Psychometrika, 38, 411–427. doi: 10.1007/BF02291663 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cooke, D. J. , Michie, C. , Hart, S. D. (2006). Facets of clinical psychopathy: Toward a clearer measurement. In C. J. Patrick, (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 91–106). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eher, R. , Rettenberger, M. , Hirtenlehner, H. , Schilling, F. (2012). Dimensionale Struktur und prognostische Relevanz der PCL-R in einer Population österreichischer Sexualstraftäter [Factorial structure and predictive validity of the PCL-R in an Austrian sexual offender population]. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 95, 235–251. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eid, M. , Gollwitzer, M. , Schmitt, M. (2011). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden [Statistics and research methods] (2nd ed.). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Forth, A. E. , Kosson, D. , Hare, R. D. (2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL: YV). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, J. M. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 930–944. doi: 10.1177/0013164406288165 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hare, R. D. (2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hare, R. D. , Black, P. , Walsh, Z. (2013). The PCL-R: Forensic applications and limitations. In R. P. Archer, , E. M. Archer, (Eds.), Forensic uses of clinical assessment instruments (2nd ed.). (pp. 230–265). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hare, R. D. , Harpur, T. J. , Hakstian, A. R. , Forth, A. E. , Hart, S. D. (1990). The revised psychopathy checklist: Reliability and factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 2, 338–341. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.2.3.338 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hare, R. D. , Neumann, C. S. (2005). Structural models of psychopathy. Current Psychiatry Reports, 7, 57–64. doi: 10.1007/s11920-005-0026-3 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hare, R. D. , Neumann, C. S. (2006). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, structural properties, and new directions. In C. J. Patrick, (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 58–88). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hare, R. D. , Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–246. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091452 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hare, R. D. , Neumann, C. S. , Widiger, T. A. (2012). Psychopathy. In T. A. Widiger, (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 478–504). New York, NY: Oxford University Press doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.233692 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hart, S. D. , Cox, D. , Hare, R. D. (1995). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL: SV). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. , Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lynam, D. R. , Miller, J. D. (2012). Fearless dominance and psychopathy: A response to Lilienfeld et al. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 341–353. doi: 10.1037/a0028296 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , Hau, K. T. , Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. doi: 10.1007/BF02294825 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Millsap, R. E. , Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mokros, A. , Hollerbach, P. , Vohs, K. , Nitschke, J. , Eher, R. , Habermeyer, E. (2013). Normative data for the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in German-speaking countries: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0093854813492514 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mokros, A. , Neumann, C. S. , Stadtland, C. , Osterheider, M. , Nedopil, N. , Hare, R. D. (2011). Assessing measurement invariance of PCL-R assessments from file reviews of North-American and German offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 34, 56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp. 2010.11.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mokros, A. , Vohs, K. , Habermeyer, E. (2013). Psychopathy and violent reoffending in German-speaking countries: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000178 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Neumann, C. S. , Hare, R. D. (2008). Psychopathic traits in a large community sample: Links to violence, alcohol use, and intelligence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 893–899. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.76.5.893 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neumann, C. S. , Johansson, P. T. , Hare, R. D. (2012). The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), low anxiety, and fearlessness: A structural equation modeling analysis. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 129–137. doi: 10.1037/a0027886 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neumann, C. S. , Hare, R. D. , Newman, J. P. (2007). The super-ordinate nature of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 102–117. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.2.102 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neumann, C. S. , Kosson, D. S. , Forth, A. E. , Hare, R. D. (2006). Factor structure of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth version (PCL: YV) in incarcerated adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 18, 142–154. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.142 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neumann, C. S. , Pardini, D. (2012). Factor structure and construct validity of the Self-Report Psychopathy (SRP) scale and the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory (YPI) in young men. Journal of Personality Disorders. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2012_26_063 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Neumann, C. S. , Uzieblo, K. , Crombez, G. , Hare, R. D. (2013). Understanding the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI) in terms of the unidimensionality, orthogonality, and construct validity of PPI-I and –II. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 77–79. doi: 10.1037/a0027196 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rettenberger, M. , Matthes, A. , Boer, D. P. , Eher, R. (2010). Prospective actuarial risk assessment: A comparison of five assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 169–186. doi: 10.1177/0306624X08328755 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenthal, R. , Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350–353. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.350 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simms, L. J. , Watson, D. (2007). The construct validation approach to personality scale construction. In R. W. Robins, , R. C. Fraley, , R. F. Krueger, (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 240–258). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Skeem, J. L. , Cooke, D. J. (2010). Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychological Assessment, 22, 433–445. doi: 10.1037/a0008512 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, G. T. , McCarthy, D. M. , Zapolski, T. C. (2009). On the value of homogeneous constructs for construct validation, theory testing, and the description of psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 21, 272–284. doi: 10.1037/a0016699 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893–898. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sullivan, E. A. , Kosson, D. S. (2006). Ethnic and cultural variations in psychopathy. In C. J. Patrick, (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 437–458). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vitacco, M. J. , Neumann, C. S. , Jackson, R. L. (2005). Testing a four-factor model of psychopathy and its association with ethnicity, gender, intelligence, and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 466–476. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.466 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vitacco, M. J. , Rogers, R. (2009). The assessment of psychopathy and response styles in sex offenders. In F. M. Saleh, , A. J. Grudzinskas, , J. M. Bradford, , D. J. Brodsky, (Eds.), Sex offenders: Identification, risk assessment, treatment, and legal issues (pp. 130–143). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Walters, G. D. , Knight, R. A. , Grann, M. , Dahle, K.-P. (2008). Incremental validity of the Psychopathy Checklist facet scores: Predicting release outcome in six samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 396–405. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.117.2.396 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wernke, M. R. , Huss, M. T. (2008). An alternative explanation for cross-cultural differences in the expression of psychopathy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 229–236. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2008.04.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yang, M. , Wong, S. C. P. , Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 740–767. doi: 10.1037/a0020473 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar