Decision-Making Tools for Aeronautical Teams: FOR-DEC and Beyond
Abstract
Abstract. Many case studies show that unstructured decision-making processes in teams are contributing factors to accidents. In situations without any preconfigured solutions, airlines have developed decision models. In our article, we give an overview and comparative analysis of different models. We discuss FOR-DEC, developed by Lufthansa and the German Aerospace Center. Findings from an explorative study on pilots’ experiences with FOR-DEC and from a workshop with pilots and experts from non-aviation high-risk domains are reported. The model is useful for structured decision-making in complex situations when there is enough time. Moreover, some extensions to FOR-DEC could be beneficial, for example, the integration of expert knowledge into the decision process and the explicit integration of the team in the decision-making process. Results give advice for the useful implementation, application, and training of decision-making tools using the example of FOR-DEC.
References
(1975). DECIDE in hazardous materials emergencies. Fire Journal, 69, 13–18.
(2011). Denken – Urteilen, Entscheiden, Problemlösen. Allgemeine Psychologie für Bachelor
[Thinking – judgement, decision making, problem solving. General Psychology for bachelor students] . Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.(1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user friendly guide for social scientists. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
(1976). Problemlösen als Informationsverarbeitung
[Problem solving as information processing] . Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.(1996). The logic of failure. Recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
(2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.
(2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.
(2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). London, UK: Sage.
(1994). Urteilsverhalten und Entscheidungsfindung.
[Judgement and decision-making] . In H. EißfeldtK.-M. GoetersH.-J. HörmannP. MaschkeA. SchieweEds., Effektives Arbeiten im Team: Crew Resource-Management-Training für Piloten und Fluglotsen[Effectice team work: Crew resource management training for pilots and air traffic control] (pp. 73–96). Hamburg, Germany: Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt.(1995).
FOR-DEC. A prescriptive model for aeronautical decision-making . In R. FullerN. JohnstonN. McDonaldEds., Human factors in aviation operations. Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the European Association for Aviation Psychology (EAAP) (Vol. 3, pp. 17–23). Aldershot, UK: Avebury Aviation.(2005). Die Psychologie der Entscheidung
[Psychology of decision making] . Heidelberg, Germany: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.(1981). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2012). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
(1989).
Recognition-primed decisions . In W. B. RouseEd., Advances in man-machine system research (Vol. 5). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.(2003). The Power of intuition. How to use your gut feelings to make better decisions at work. New York, NY: Random House.
(1993). Decision-making in action: Models and methods. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
(2005). Aeronautical decision-making: Instructor-pilot evaluation of five mnemonic methods. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 76, 1156–1161.
(2008). Naturalistic decision-making and macrocognition. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
(1989).
Beyond CRM to decisional heuristics: An airline generated model to examine accidents and incidents caused by crew errors in deciding . In R. S. JensenEd., Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on aviation psychology (pp. 439–444). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.(1997). Deliberate decision-making by aircraft pilots: A simple reminder to avoid decision-making under panic. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7, 83–100.
. (2006). Untersuchungsbericht Flugunfall mit dem Motorflugzeug Type Airbus A310 am 12. Juli 2000 am Flughafen Wien-Schwechat, Niederösterreich
[Reports on the accident with the aircraft type Airbus A310 on July 12, 2000 near airport Vienna-Schwechat] . GZ.85.007/0001-FUS/2006. Retrieved from http://versa.bmvit.gv.at/Uploads/media/A310_GZ._85007_vom_12._Juli_2000_2_03.pdf [01.10.2012](1992). The “artful” decision maker: A framework model for aeronautical decision-making. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2, 175–191.
(2003).
Aeronautical decision-making: Metaphors, models, and methods . In P. TsangM. VidulichEds., Principles and practice of aviation psychology (pp. 201–238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.(1995). Pilot decision-making – an alternative to judgment training, XXIV Organisation Scientific et Technique International du Vol a Voile (OSTIV) Congress, Omanara, New Zealand
(1993).
Decision-making in the cockpit . In E. L. WienerB. KankiR. HelmreichEds., Cockpit resource management (pp. 137–172). New York, NY: Academic Press.(1993).
Training and research for teamwork in the military aircrew . In E. L. WienerB. G. KankiR. L. HelmreichEds., Cockpit resource management (pp. 337–366). San Diego, CA: Academic.(1990). Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2011). Crisis management in acute care settings: human factors and team psychology in a high stakes environment 2nd updated and enlarged edition. New York, NY: Springer.
(2000). Gütekriterien qualitativer Forschung
[Criteria for qualitative research] . In U. FlickE. von KardoffI. SteinkeEds., Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch[Handbook of qualitative research] (pp. 319–331). Reinbek, Germany: Rowohlt.(1974).
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases . Science, 185, 1124–1131).(1981). Force management decision requirements for air force tactical command and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 11, 618–639.
(1988).
Information processing . In E. L. WienerD. C. NagelEds., Human factors in aviation (pp. 111–156). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
