Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Acute Leukemia

Second reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplant as a rescue strategy for acute leukaemia patients who relapse after an initial RIC allogeneic transplantation: analysis of risk factors and treatment outcomes

Abstract

Limited therapeutic options are available after relapse of acute leukaemia following first reduced intensity conditioning haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (RIC1). A retrospective study on European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry data was performed on 234 adult patients with acute leukaemia who received a second RIC transplantation (RIC2) from 2000 to 2012 as a salvage treatment for relapse following RIC1. At the time of RIC2, 167 patients (71.4%) had relapsed or refractory disease, 49 (20.9%) were in second CR and 18 (7.7%) in third or higher CR. With a median follow-up of 21 (1.5–79) months after RIC2, 51 patients are still alive. At 2 years, the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence (RI), leukaemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were 22.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 17–28.4), 63.9% (56.7–70.1), 14.6% (8.8–18.5) and 20.5% (14.9–26.1), respectively. In patients with acute myelogenous, biphenotypic and undifferentiated leukaemia (representing 89.8% of all patients), duration of remission following RIC1 >225 days, presence of CR at RIC2, patient’s Karnofsky performance status >80 at RIC2 and non-myeloablative conditioning were found to be the strongest predictors of patients’ favourable outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Porter DL, Alyea EP, Alyea JH, DeLima M, Estey E, Falkenburg JH et al. NCI First International Workshop on the Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Report from the Committee on Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 1467–1503.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pollyea DA, Artz AS, Stock W, Daugherty C, Godley L, Odenike OM et al. Outcomes of patients with AML and MDS who relapse or progress after reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007; 40: 1027–1032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmid C, Labopin M, Nagler A, Niederwieser D, Castagna L, Tabrizi R et al. Treatment, risk factors, and outcome of adults with relapsed AML after reduced intensity conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2012; 119: 1599–1606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mielcarek M, Storer BE, Flowers ME, Storb R, Sandmaier BM, Martin PJ . Outcomes among patients with recurrent high-risk hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 1160–1168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weisdorf D, Zhang MJ, Arora M, Horowitz MM, Rizzo JD, Eapen M . Graft-versus-host disease induced graft-versus-leukemia effect: greater impact on relapse and disease-free survival after reduced intensity conditioning. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 1727–1733.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Foran JM, Pavletic SZ, Logan BR, Agovi-Johnson MA, Pérez WS, Bolwell BJ et al. Unrelated donor allogeneic transplantation after failure of autologous transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia: a study from the center for international blood and marrow transplantation research. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2013; 19: 1102–1108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong JY, Choi MK, Kim DH, Kim SJ, Kim K, Kim WS et al. Feasibility of second hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and melphalan after a failed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Transplant Proc 2010; 42: 3723–3728.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shaw BE, Mufti GJ, Mackinnon S, Cavenagh JD, Pearce RM, Towlson KE et al. Outcome of second allogeneic transplants using reduced-intensity conditioning following relapse of haematological malignancy after an initial allogeneic transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008; 42: 783–789.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan EL, Meier P . Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE . Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med 1999; 18: 695–706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, Buckner CD, Neiman PE, Clift RA et al. Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HLA-matched sibling donors. Transplantation 1974; 18: 295–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shulman H, Sullivan KM, Weiden PL, McDonald GB, Striker GE, Sale GE et al. Chronic graft-versus-host syndrome in man. A long-term clinicopathologic study of 20 Seattle patients. Am J Med 1980; 69: 204–217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Andersen PK, Gill RD . Cox’s Regression Model for Counting Processes: A Large Sample Study. Ann Statist 1982; 10: 1100–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM . Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer Science+Business Media: : New York, NY, USA, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Simon R, Makuch RW . A non-parametric graphical representation of the relationship between survival and the occurrence of an event: application to responder versus non-responder bias. Stat Med 1984; 3: 35–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cox DR . Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Assoc 1972; 34: 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abdul Wahid SF, Ismail NA, Mohd-Idris MR, Jamaluddin FW, Tumian N, Sze-Wei EY et al. Comparison of reduced-intensity and myeloablative conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a meta-analysis. Stem Cells Dev 2014; 23: 2535–2552.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Alyea EP, Kim HT, Ho V, Cutler C, DeAngelo DJ, Stone R et al. Impact of conditioning regimen intensity on outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for advanced acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 1047–1055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aoudjhane M, Labopin M, Gorin N, Shimoni A, Ruutu T, Kolb HJ et al. Comparative outcome of reduced intensity and myeloablative conditioning regimen in HLA identical sibling allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients older than 50 years of age with acute myeloblastic leukaemia: a retrospective survey from the Acute Leukaemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Leukemia 2005; 19: 2304–2312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Munoz A, Badell I, Olive T, Verdeguer A, Gomez P, Bureo E . Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in hematologic malignancies in children: long-term results of a multicenter study of the Spanish Working Party for Bone Marrow Transplantation in Children (GETMON). Haematologica 2002; 87: 331–332.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bosi A, Laszlo D, Labopin M, Reffeirs J, Michallet M, Gluckman E et al. Second allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in acute leukemia: results of a survey by the European cooperative group for blood and marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3675–3684.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolff SN . Second hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of graft failure, graft rejection or relapse after allogeneic transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 29: 545–552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Michallet M, Tanguy ML, Socie G, Thie´baut A, Belhabri A, Milpied N et al. Second allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed acute and chronic leukaemias for patients who underwent a first allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: a survey of the Societe Francaise de Greffe de moelle (SFGM). Br J Haematol 2000; 108: 400–407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bosi A, Bacci S, Miniero R, Locatelli F, Laszlo D, Longo G et al. Second allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in acute leukemia: a multicenter study from the gruppo italiano trapianto di midollo osseo (GITMO). Leukemia 1997; 11: 420–424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Christopoulos P, Schmoor C, Waterhouse M, Marks R, Wasch R, Bertz H et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and thiotepa for second allogeneic transplantation of relapsed patients with AML. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48: 901–907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Christopeit M, Kuss O, Finke J, Bacher U, Beelen DW, Bornhauser M et al. Second allograt for hematologic relapse of acute leukemia after first allogeneic stem-cell transplantation from related and unrelated donors: the role of donor change. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3259–3271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Radich JP, Sanders JE, Buckner CD, Martin PJ, Petersen FB, Bensinger W et al. Second allogeneic marrow transplantation for patients with recurrent leukemia after initial transplant with total-body irradiation-containing regimens. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 304–313.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Eapen M, Giralt SA, Horowitz MM, Klein JP, Wagner JE, Zhang MJ et al. Second transplant for acute and chronic leukemia relapsing after first HLA-identical sibling transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004; 34: 721–727.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pawson R, Potter MN, Theocharous P, Lawler M, Garg M, Yin JA et al. Treatment of relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with reduced intensity conditioning (FLAG +/Ida) and second allogeneic stem cell transplant. Br J Haematol 2001; 115: 622–629.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sica RA, Vosganian GS, Tuscano JM, Law LY, Richman CM . Reduced intensity stem cell transplant (RIST) as salvage treatment for relapse following myeloablative allogeneic transplantation in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13 (Suppl 2) 133 (abstract 367).

  31. Kishi K, Takahashi S, Gondo H, Shiobara S, Kanamaru A, Kato S et al. Second allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for post-transplant leukemia relapse: results of a survey of 66 cases in 24 Japanese institutes. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 19: 461–466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Levine JE, Braun T, Penza SL, Beatty P, Cornetta K, Martino R et al. Prospective trial of chemotherapy and donor leukocyte infusions for relapse of advanced myeloid malignancies after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 405–412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmid C, Labopin M, Nagler A, Bornhauser M, Finke J, Fassas A et al. Donor lymphocyte infusion in the treatment of first hematological relapse after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective risk factors analysis and comparison with other strategies by the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 4938–4945.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Oran B, Giralt S, Couriel D, Hosing C, Shpall EJ, de Meis E et al. Treatment of AML and MDS relapsing after reduced-intensity conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 2007; 21: 2540–2544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mrsic M, Horowitz MM, Atkinson K, Biggs JC, Champlin RE, Ehninger G et al. Second HLA-identical sibling transplants for leukemia recurrence. Bone Marrow Transplant 1992; 9: 269–275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kedmi M, Resnick IB, Dray L, Aker M, Samuel S, Gesundheit B et al. A retrospective review of the outcome after second or subsequent allogeneic transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15: 483–489.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hosing C, Saliba RM, Shahjahan M, Estey EH, Couriel D, Giralt S et al. Disease burden may identify patients more likely to benefit from second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to treat relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 36: 157–162.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mielke S, Barrett AJ. Management of relapse and minimal residual disease after stem cell transplantation. In: Treleaven J, Barrett AJ (eds). Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Clinical Practice. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier: : London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2009, pp 409–416.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

MM would like to thank Pr JV de Melo (University of Adelaide, Australia) for critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Vrhovac.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vrhovac, R., Labopin, M., Ciceri, F. et al. Second reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplant as a rescue strategy for acute leukaemia patients who relapse after an initial RIC allogeneic transplantation: analysis of risk factors and treatment outcomes. Bone Marrow Transplant 51, 186–193 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2015.221

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2015.221

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links