Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Protein

Aspects of protected mealtimes are associated with improved mealtime energy and protein intakes in hospitalized adult patients on medical and surgical wards over 2 years

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

Protected mealtimes programs aim to improve inpatient intakes. Yet its efficacy has not yet been established. We aimed to determine which patient-related factors and aspects of protected mealtimes, for example, mealtime assistance and meal within reach, were associated with energy and protein intakes of adult inpatients on medical and surgical wards.

Subjects/Methods:

Patient characteristics and dietary intake data were collected at main meals over 2 years. Proportions of individual foods and drinks consumed were visually estimated and converted to nutrients using averaged ready reckoner data. Mealtime factors associated with energy and protein intakes were determined using multivariate linear hierarchical regression analyses.

Results:

Over 2 years, mealtime nutrient intakes of 798 inpatients were calculated ((63±19) years, 52% male). Average intakes at main meals were 1419±614 kJ and 15±7 g protein. Inpatient intakes were significantly associated with gender, age, season, stopping or refusing a meal, time until discharge and eating at dinner (B=−829–222 kJ, B=−8.8 to 2.2 g protein, P=0.000–0.032). Protected mealtimes program implementation was not associated with inpatient intake (P=0.094–0.157). However, aspects of protected mealtimes were associated with intake. This included requiring and documenting the need for mealtime assistance, introduction of mealtime volunteers, time to eat and appropriate positioning during mealtimes (B=177-296 kJ, B=0.07–3.9 g protein, P=0.000–0.014, R2=0.148–0.154). In those specifically requiring mealtime assistance, inpatient protein intake was associated with mealtime volunteers and appropriate positioning (B=4.1–4.4 g protein, P=0.013–0.026, R2=0.197).

Conclusions:

Aspects of protected mealtimes were associated with improved intake. Identifying these achievable aspects during planning and ensuring successful implementation of protected mealtimes may be critical for optimizing acute inpatient intake.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal E, Ferguson M, Banks M, Batterham M, Bauer J, Capra S et al. Nutrition care practices in hospital wards: results from the Nutrition Care Day Survey 2010. Clin Nutr 2012; 31: 995–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. NHS National Patient Safety Agency Protected Mealtimes Review — Findings and Recommendations report. http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/?entryid45=59806. (Accessed 19 November 2012).

  3. Cheung G, Pizzola L, Keller H . Dietary, food service, and mealtime interventions to promote food intake in acute care adult patients. Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics 2013; 32: 175–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wade K, Flett M . Which 'nutritional models-of-care' improve energy and protein intake, clinical outcomes and malnutrition in hospitalised patients? Nutr Diet 2013; 70: 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Young A, Mudge A, Banks M, Ross L, Daniels L . Encouraging, assisting and time to EAT: improved nutritional intake for older medical patients receiving Protected Mealtimes and/or additional nursing feeding assistance. Clin Nutr 2013; 32: 543–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huxtable S, Palmer M . The efficacy of protected mealtimes in reducing mealtime interruptions and improving mealtime assistance in adult inpatients in an Australian hospital. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013; 67: 904–910.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hickson M, Connolly A, Whelan K . Impact of protected mealtimes on ward mealtime environment, patient experience and nutrient intake in hospitalised patients. J Hum Nut Diet 2011; 24: 370–374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Das A, McDougall T, Smithson J, West R . Protecting mealtimes may similarly benefit elderly inpatients. Br Med J 2006; 332: 1334–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stuckey C, Bakewell L, Ford G . The effect of a protected mealtime policy on the energy intake and frequency of non-urgent interruptions during mealtimes at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital. Proc Nutr Soc 2010; 69: E526 (abstract OCE7).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weekes C . The effect of protected mealtimes on meal interruptions, feeding assistance, energy and protein intake and plate waste. Proc Nutr Soc 2008; 67: E119 (abstract).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bjornsdottir R, Oskarsdottir E, Thordardottir F, Ramel A, Thorsdottir I, Gunnarsdottir I . Validation of a plate diagram sheet for estimation of energy and protein intake in hospitalized patients. Clin Nutr 2013; 32: 746–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Forli L, Oppedal B, Skjelle K, Vatn M . Validation of a self-administered form for recording food intake in hospital patients. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998; 52: 929–933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Berrut G, Favreau AM, Dizo E, Tharreau B, Poupin C, Gueringuili M et al. Estimation of calorie and protein intake in aged patients: validation of a method based on meal portions consumed. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002; 57: M52–M56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bradley L, Rees C . Reducing nutritional risk in hospital: the red tray. Nurs Stand 2003; 17: 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Walton K, Williams P, Tapsell L, Hoyle M, Shen Z, Gladman L et al. Observations of mealtimes in hospital aged care rehabilitation wards. Appetite 2013; 67: 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rafferty J, Bailey J, Kostovski V, Armstrong R . Observation of lunch meal experience on an acute hospital ward. Nutr Diet 2012; 69: 43 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Green S, Martin J, Roberts H, Sayer A . A systematic review of the use of volunteers to improve mealtime care of adult patients or residents in institutional settings. J Clin Nurs 2011; 20: 1810–1823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mudge AM, Ross LJ, Young AM, Isenring EA, Banks MD . Helping understand nutritional gaps in the elderly (HUNGER): a prospective study of patient factors associated with inadequate nutritional intake in older medical inpatients. Clin Nutr 2011; 30: 320–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams P, Walton K . Plate waste in hospitals and strategies for change. Eur e-J Clin Nutr Metab 2011; 6: e235–e241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Queensland Health for the resources provided. No financial support was received. Thanks to Patricia Lee for her helpful statistical consultations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Palmer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palmer, M., Huxtable, S. Aspects of protected mealtimes are associated with improved mealtime energy and protein intakes in hospitalized adult patients on medical and surgical wards over 2 years. Eur J Clin Nutr 69, 961–965 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2015.87

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2015.87

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links