Introduction
Clinical background
Hearing impairment is the most common sensory disorder, affecting one in every 500–1000 newborns (http://hearing.screening.nhs.uk/nationalprog). It is estimated that about half of these have a genetic cause, whereas the other half are caused by environmental factors, such as rubella or CMV infection during pregnancy, factors associated with prematurity or ototoxic medication. In most genetic cases, the inheritance pattern is autosomal recessive (80%), but also autosomal dominant (17%), X-linked (2–3%) and mitochondrial (<1%) inheritance has been described. In about 30% of cases, additional clinical and/or physical features lead to a syndrome diagnosis, but in the remaining 70% the only finding is hearing impairment in otherwise healthy people. Non-syndromic hearing loss is genetically very heterogeneous, with over 150 associated loci and >60 identified causative genes (http://hereditaryhearingloss.org/). Remarkably, defects in one locus (DFNB1) account for up to 50% of cases in many populations, which makes this the most common cause of non-syndromic, prelingual hearing impairment and deafness. The locus was described for the first time in 19941 and the first mutations in 1997.2, 3 The DFNB1 locus (OMIM* 220290) contains two genes associated with hearing loss, GJB2 (OMIM*121011) and GJB6 (OMIM*604418), encoding connexin 26 (CX26) and connexin 30 (CX30), respectively. The reference sequences are given in Table 1. Connexins aggregate to form connexons, consisting of six connexin proteins in heteromeric or homomeric complexes located at gap junctions, and which are involved in the transport of ions and other low-molecular weight components between cells.
The severity of hearing impairment is graded as mild (20–40 dB), moderate (41–55 dB), moderately severe (56–70 dB), severe (71–95 dB), or profound (>95 dB) and may involve low (<500 Hz), middle (500–2000 Hz), or high (>2000 Hz) frequencies. Non-syndromic hearing impairment caused by mutations in the genes at the DFNB1 locus is associated with congenital, generally non-progressive, sensorineural hearing impairment that is moderate to profound by pure tone audiometry, or auditory brain stem response testing (ABR). It tends to affect all frequencies. The vast majority of cases therefore fail Newborn Hearing Screening, but a few rare cases of later-onset hearing impairment4, 5 and some progression of the hearing loss have been described.6, 7, 8 By definition, there are no related systemic findings identified on medical history and physical examination. Family history is consistent with autosomal recessive inheritance, but pseudodominant inheritance should not be overlooked, especially in marriages where both partners have hearing loss (deaf–deaf unions).9
Genetic background
The most common mutation in GJB2 associated with deafness varies around the world according to population. In Caucasians, the c.35delG is the most frequent mutation, comprising 70% of alleles in some populations, with a carrier rate of 1–3% in the general population.7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 The c.167delT mutation is the most common mutation in the Ashkenazi Jewish population,15, 16 c.235delC is found more frequently in the Japanese populations,17 and p.Trp24* in the Indian, Bangladeshi, Romany, and Slovak populations as well as others.18, 19, 20, 21, 22 The splice mutation c.−23+1G>A is found in several populations (including Caucasian, Bangladeshi, Egyptian, Algerian, Czech, Turkish, Mongolian, and Chinese).18, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 Snoeckx et al29 have compiled data from many centres in an effort to try to establish correlation between genotype and phenotype. They were able to distinguish between ‘severe’ alleles, which tended to be truncating, and ‘mild’ alleles, often non-truncating missense or splice mutations, but many could not be graded due to their relatively rare occurrence in the population.
Although many mutations have been described within the GJB2 gene, it became clear that there must be additional alleles. Several investigators described a common, partial deletion (342 kb, del(GJB6:D13S1830) in the GJB6 gene, which seemed to account for many of the missing alleles.30, 31, 32 Later, it was confirmed that this is in fact a 309-kb deletion.33 Rarer deletions have subsequently been identified, all involving a minimally deleted region between GJB6 and CRYL134, 35, 36 (Figure 1).
It should be noted that a few mutations in the GJB2 gene have been associated with autosomal dominant inheritance (DFNA3),37, 38, 39 which may be non-syndromic40 or with associated skin features41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 in syndromic forms of deafness such as Vohwinkel syndrome, Keratitis Ichthyosis Deafness, Bart Pumphrey syndrome, Palmo Plantar Keratoderma, and Hystrix-ichthyosis. These are particular mutations involving specific residues of the protein.
Indications for testing and information needed
Any person with bilateral non-syndromic sensorineural hearing impairment of prelingual onset with no known aetiology can be offered testing. Cascade testing (successive testing of relatives to follow the mutations) can be offered where an index case has been identified, with one or two mutations in the genes at the DFNB1 locus. In addition, partners of index cases as well as partners of known carriers can also be offered testing. Prenatal diagnosis can be offered where both parents are identified as carriers of definitely pathogenic mutations. In our experience, this request is extremely rare and is not a common practice in many countries.
It is useful to include the following details with a request for testing: family history and pedigree, imaging results (for example CT or MRI scan results), audiograms (or ABR for small children), ethnicity, and consanguinity.
Materials and methods
This article is the output from a Best Practice meeting on deafness caused by mutations at the DFNB1 locus, organised by the European Molecular Genetics Quality Network (EMQN; http://www.emqn.org.uk). The EMQN is an independent organisation based in the United Kingdom that promotes improvement in the quality of genetic testing by ensuring that diagnostic molecular genetic laboratory test results are accurate, reliable, and comparable wherever they are produced. The mechanism for doing this is the organisation of external quality assessment (EQA) schemes and the development of Best Practice guidelines. Annual participation in an EQA scheme is necessary for quality assurance, continuous validation, evaluation of reporting, and continuous education of laboratory staff. Testing should only be performed in laboratories that are accredited according to ISO15189 or the equivalent (see the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Guidelines (http://www.oecd.org/science/biotechnologypolicies/38839788.pdf).
Clinicians and Scientists involved in molecular diagnosis of deafness were invited to a workshop supported by EMQN in Nijmegen, Netherlands in October 2009 to discuss and formulate consensus-based Best Practice Guidelines for the molecular diagnosis of deafness caused by mutations at the DFNB1 locus. The meeting was advertised on the EMQN and EuroGentest websites (http://www.eurogentest.org); it was organised by the EMQN team responsible for the DFNB1 EQA scheme and attended by 15 clinical and scientific experts named in the Acknowledgements. Discussions were based upon a pilot EQA scheme for DFNB1 testing held in 2008–2009 by EMQN. After the meeting, draft guidelines were circulated for comment to the attendees and subjected to further revision.
Results and discussion
Molecular diagnostic testing at the DFNB1 locus/approaches and protocols
Laboratory analysis. Analysis of c.35delG alone, or specific combinations of point mutations, is no longer considered sufficient for diagnostic testing. In some laboratories, it may be desirable to screen for specific prevalent mutations first, but in the absence of biallelic mutations it is recommended that all possible mutations should be screened, for adequate diagnostic testing. This entails sequence analysis of the coding sequence (exon 2) and analysis of the splice sites (5′ and 3′ ends of intron 1), as well as detection of common deletions in the GJB6 gene associated with recessive non-syndromic hearing loss. The multiplex PCR assay designed by del Castillo et al36 is used to detect the del(GJB6-D13S1830) and del(GJB6-D13S1854). These deletions are relatively common in some populations,30, 49, 50, 51, 52 but appear to be very rare in others53, 54, 55, 56, 57 and should be sought at least in those in whom only a single mutation has been found on GJB2 screening. GeneClinics advises that very few individuals (<0.5%) will be homozygous for two GJB6 deletion alleles;58 however, as the assay is straightforward, consanguinity not uncommon and ethnic origin not always stated, we suggest that this is done in all cases. The MLPA kit made by MRC Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, (P163-D1 GJB-WFS1) allows the detection of large GJB6 deletions, but as it lacks the specific probes for del(GJB6-D13S1830) and del(GJB6-D13S1854) it cannot detect them explicitly; although there are added probes for specific point mutations such as c.35delG, c.−23+1G>A, c.167delT, c.235delC, and c.313_326del, these are insufficient for comprehensive diagnostic testing in our opinion. In addition, the P163-D1 kit includes probes for other genes that are not associated with deafness caused by mutations in the genes at the DFNB1 locus, including progressive syndromic forms of deafness, which has the inherent risk of overtesting.
As point mutations in the GJB6 gene have been associated with syndromic deafness, including skin abnormalities, rather than non-syndromic forms of deafness, sequencing of this gene is not recommended in DFNB1 analysis and is also considered to be overtesting. See Box 1 for an overview.
Reporting. Reports should contain concise background information, an outline of the techniques and strategy used for screening, and prominent display of results together with interpretation of the findings. Although most laboratories write reports to the referring clinical geneticists, it is very likely that in future, reports may be sent directly to general physicians and paediatricians. It is suggested that ideally reports should be on a single page. Guidelines already exist, for example, those of the OECD (http://www.oecd.org/science/biotechnologypolicies/38839788.pdf), the Swiss Society of Medical Genetics (http://www.sgmg.ch), and the UK Clinical Molecular Genetics Society (www.cmgs.org); however, the following relates specifically to deafness caused by mutations at the DFNB1 locus. See Box 1 for an overview.
(i) Nomenclature. Mutations should be annotated according to the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) guidelines. Although numerous publications over the years have reported mutations using different nomenclatures, it is important to name the ‘known’ mutations following HGVS. Furthermore, it is necessary to indicate the reference sequence and version number used for annotation. (http://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen/). Mutation nomenclature can be checked using programmes such as Mutalyzer and Alamut. For example, 30delG should be named c.35delG, 310del14 (also known as 312del14, 314del14) should be named c.313_326del, and -3172G>A (also known as −3172 or IVS1+1G>A) should be c.−23+1G>A. It is still acceptable to refer to old nomenclature as long as HGVS is also indicated. In addition, any new variant should be annotated according to HGVS guidelines. For reporting purposes, it is recommended to use annotation at both the nucleotide and the protein level, as different nucleotide changes can lead to the same change at the protein level due to the degenerate code at the third nucleotide of a codon.
Once mutations have been found, testing of parents is recommended to establish phase and recurrence risks (there is the possibility of de novo mutation, large deletion, uniparental disomy, or allelic dropout). When genotypes are reported, phase should be considered, for example, c.[35delG];[139G>T] indicates that the mutations are known to be on different alleles, whereas c.[35delG(;)139G>T] indicates that phase is unknown, and c.[35delG];[(35delG)] denotes a homozygous 35delG, not confirmed by analysis of both parents.
There is considerable difficulty, however, in using HGVS for the well-known deletions including those found in the GJB6 gene (http://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen/uncertain.html#exondel). We suggest that for reporting purposes, it is acceptable to use original deletion names that is, del(GJB6-D13S1830). The combination of a mutation in GJB2 and a deletion in GJB6 should be described as a compound heterozygote, instead of a double heterozygote, because the deletions likely involve a regulatory element of GJB2. Therefore, a common genotype might be described as [GJB2:c.35delG];[GJB6:del(GJB6-D13S1830)].
When an MLPA kit has been used to identify deletions, it is not possible to be sure of the exact breakpoint of the deletions detected, and therefore, we suggest that for reporting purposes deletions detected using MLPA should be validated using the multiplex PCR method described by del Castillo et al.36
(ii) Mutations and variants of unknown clinical significance. Alterations at the DFNB1 locus can be classified as truncating and non-truncating. New variants, if predicted to lead to premature stop codon, frameshift, or splicing alteration with abolition of the obligatory AG/GT sites, all presumed to interfere with proper protein production, should be labelled as pathogenic or truncating alterations.
More difficult are the novel missense or synonymous changes. In laboratory reports, an interpretation should be made as to the predicted functional effect of the variant, following the guidelines of the Clinical Molecular Genetics Society (http://cmgs.org/). See also Table 1.
(iii) Controversial known variants. A few variants are notoriously difficult to interpret, the most well-known example being the c.101T>C p.(Met34Thr) variant. This variant has been labelled as autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and a neutral variant, but current evidence suggests it is most likely to be a hypomorphic recessive allele3, 29, 59, 60 (not fully inactivating the protein). Indeed, Snoeckx et al29 have shown that 38 patients who were genotyped c.[35delG];[c.101T>C] had mild to moderate hearing loss. If the mutation had no specific influence on the phenotype, this would have resulted in a variety of degrees of hearing loss. Moreover, the high prevalence of this variant in the general Caucasian population (carrier rate of 1/37–1/43)11, 14, 52 and its under-representation in several cohorts with profound deafness, supports its role as a hypomorphic allele rather than a mutation responsible for severe to profound hearing loss. Therefore, if p.(Met34Thr) is present in homozygosity, or with another pathogenic mutation in a patient with mild hearing loss, it is likely to be causative; if the hearing loss is profound however, another cause should be considered.
For p.(Val37Ile), evidence now suggests that it is a common mutation causing mild–moderate hearing loss, especially, in subjects from Southeast Asia and North Africa61; the variant should be reported as such. The variants p.(Arg127His), p.(Val27Ile), p.(Lys224Gln), and p.(Val153Ile) appear to be non-pathogenic polymorphic variants.
(iv) Interpretation. This is the final step in reporting and is the professional role of the diagnostic laboratory. For diagnostic testing, the common situations include:
-
1)
Two mutations found (both pathogenic, or one pathogenic and one unknown); the results confirm (if mutations are shown to be in trans) or support the diagnosis (if phase is unknown). It is good practice to mention the effect of some of the milder mutations (see above, and Table 2). The report should recommend clinical genetic counselling when one or two mutations are detected. Carrier screening can be offered to other family members.
-
2)
No mutation is found; hearing impairment is genetically very heterogeneous, therefore, this result does not exclude other genetic or acquired causes of hearing impairment in this patient. The sensitivity of the test strategy should be given; sequencing GJB2 (noncoding and coding exons) and screening for del(GJB6-D13S1830) gives >98% mutation detection rate. For parents of a deaf child who does not have mutations at DFNB1, residual recurrence risk should be estimated. This is likely to be a minimum of 10% but up to 25% (as for any recessive disorder).
-
3)
One mutation found; the patient is a carrier, which supports the diagnosis, but for mutations with high frequencies this can be a coincidental finding. In familial cases (siblings) where one mutation is found, haplotype analysis (marker analysis) may be recommended. If haplotype analysis shows all affected siblings to have inherited the same alleles from their parents, the diagnosis of hearing loss caused by a gene at the DFNB1 locus is supported, but if not, carrier status is likely to be coincidental to the aetiology of hearing loss. Suggested markers for this analysis are D13S141-(GJB2-GJB6)-D13S175-D13S143-D13S1236, although other markers could be useful as well.
-
4)
New missense variation: audiometry of the parents may be recommended when they carry the variant in order to exclude dominant inheritance. In contrast, if a single new missense variant is shown to have arisen de novo, then it is possible that it may be a pathogenic autosomal dominant mutation.
Carrier testing is usually performed in the case of cascade testing (successive testing of family members to follow the mutation), and genetic counselling is part of the recommendation if the subject is found to have a mutation. Partners of carriers should be offered testing as well, because of the high incidence of carriers in the general population.
Conclusions
Diagnostic testing for DFNB1-associated hearing impairment is technically simple compared with many diagnostic tests and has a good diagnostic yield (up to 15–20% of singleton cases and 50% of recessively inherited cases of deafness). We have made recommendations for good practice for diagnostic testing of this locus, as well as reporting of the results, which includes sequence analysis of the coding region of the GJB2 gene, as well as of the splice sites and a search for common deletions involving GJB6. Nomenclature of mutations should follow HGVS guidelines, and mutations should be annotated at the protein and cDNA level. It is the role of the diagnostic laboratory to provide an interpretation of the results when reporting.
References
Guilford P, Ben Arab S, Blanchard S et al: A non-syndrome form of neurosensory, recessive deafness maps to the pericentromeric region of chromosome 13q. Nat Genet 1994; 6: 24–28.
Zelante L, Gasparini P, Estivill X et al: Connexin26 mutations associated with the most common form of non-syndromic neurosensory autosomal recessive deafness (DFNB1) in Mediterraneans. Hum Mol Genet 1997; 6: 1605–1609.
Kelsell DP, Dunlop J, Stevens HP et al: Connexin 26 mutations in hereditary non-syndromic sensorineural deafness. Nature 1997; 387: 80–83.
Pagarkar W, Bitner-Glindzicz M, Knight J, Sirimanna T : Late postnatal onset of hearing loss due to GJB2 mutations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70: 1119–1124.
Norris VW, Arnos KS, Hanks WD, Xia X, Nance WE, Pandya A : Does universal newborn hearing screening identify all children with GJB2 (Connexin 26) deafness? Penetrance of GJB2 deafness. Ear Hear 2006; 27: 732–741.
Kenna MA, Feldman HA, Neault MW et al: Audiologic phenotype and progression in GJB2 (Connexin 26) hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136: 81–87.
Bartsch O, Vatter A, Zechner U et al: GJB2 mutations and genotype-phenotype correlation in 335 patients from germany with nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss: evidence for additional recessive mutations not detected by current methods. Audiol Neurootol 2010; 15: 375–382.
Janecke AR, Hirst-Stadlmann A, Gunther B et al: Progressive hearing loss, and recurrent sudden sensorineural hearing loss associated with GJB2 mutations—phenotypic spectrum and frequencies of GJB2 mutations in Austria. Hum Genet 2002; 111: 145–153.
Pampanos A, Neou P, Iliades T et al: Pseudodominant inheritance of DFNB1 deafness due to the common 35delG mutation. Clin Genet 2000; 57: 232–234.
Gasparini P, Rabionet R, Barbujani G et al: High carrier frequency of the 35delG deafness mutation in European populations. Genetic Analysis Consortium of GJB2 35delG. Eur J Hum Genet 2000; 8: 19–23.
Green GE, Scott DA, McDonald JM, Woodworth GG, Sheffield VC, Smith RJ : Carrier rates in the midwestern United States for GJB2 mutations causing inherited deafness. JAMA 1999; 281: 2211–2216.
Lucotte G, Bathelier C, Champenois T : PCR test for diagnosis of the common GJB2 (connexin 26) 35delG mutation on dried blood spots and determination of the carrier frequency in France. Mol Cell Probes 2001; 15: 57–59.
Lucotte G, Mercier G : Meta-analysis of GJB2 mutation 35delG frequencies in Europe. Genet Test 2001; 5: 149–152.
Hall A, Pembrey M, Lutman M, Steer C, Bitner-Glindzicz M : Prevalence and audiological features in carriers of GJB2 mutations, c.35delG and c.101T>C (p.M34T), in a UK population study. BMJ Open 2012; 2: e001238.
Morell RJ, Kim HJ, Hood LJ et al: Mutations in the connexin 26 gene (GJB2) among Ashkenazi Jews with nonsyndromic recessive deafness. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1500–1505.
Lerer I, Sagi M, Malamud E, Levi H, Raas-Rothschild A, Abeliovich D : Contribution of connexin 26 mutations to nonsyndromic deafness in Ashkenazi patients and the variable phenotypic effect of the mutation 167delT. Am J Med Genet 2000; 95: 53–56.
Yan D, Park HJ, Ouyang XM et al: Evidence of a founder effect for the 235delC mutation of GJB2 (connexin 26) in east Asians. Hum Genet 2003; 114: 44–50.
Bajaj Y, Sirimanna T, Albert DM, Qadir P, Jenkins L, Bitner-Glindzicz M : Spectrum of GJB2 mutations causing deafness in the British Bangladeshi population. Clin Otolaryngol 2008; 33: 313–318.
Joseph AY, Rasool TJ : High frequency of connexin26 (GJB2) mutations associated with nonsyndromic hearing loss in the population of Kerala, India. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 73: 437–443.
Alvarez A, del Castillo I, Villamar M et al: High prevalence of the W24X mutation in the gene encoding connexin-26 (GJB2) in Spanish Romani (gypsies) with autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss. Am J Med Genet A 2005; 137A: 255–258.
Minarik G, Ferak V, Ferakova E, Ficek A, Polakova H, Kadasi L : High frequency of GJB2 mutation W24X among Slovak Romany (Gypsy) patients with non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL). Gen Physiol Biophys 2003; 22: 549–556.
Padma G, Ramchander PV, Nandur UV, Padma T : GJB2 and GJB6 gene mutations found in Indian probands with congenital hearing impairment. J Genet 2009; 88: 267–272.
Snoeckx RL, Hassan DM, Kamal NM, Van Den Bogaert K, Van Camp G : Mutation analysis of the GJB2 (connexin 26) gene in Egypt. Hum Mutat 2005; 26: 60–61.
Ammar-Khodja F, Faugere V, Baux D et al: Molecular screening of deafness in Algeria: high genetic heterogeneity involving DFNB1 and the Usher loci, DFNB2/USH1B, DFNB12/USH1D and DFNB23/USH1F. Eur J Med Genet 2009; 52: 174–179.
Seeman P, Sakmaryova I : High prevalence of the IVS 1+1G to A/GJB2 mutation among Czech hearing impaired patients with monoallelic mutation in the coding region of GJB2. Clin Genet 2006; 69: 410–413.
Sirmaci A, Akcayoz-Duman D, Tekin M : The c.IVS1+1G>A mutation in the GJB2 gene is prevalent and large deletions involving the GJB6 gene are not present in the Turkish population. J Genet 2006; 85: 213–216.
Yuan Y, Yu F, Wang G et al: Prevalence of the GJB2 IVS1+1G >A mutation in Chinese hearing loss patients with monoallelic pathogenic mutation in the coding region of GJB2. J Transl Med 2010; 8: 127.
Tekin M, Xia XJ, Erdenetungalag R et al: GJB2 mutations in Mongolia: complex alleles, low frequency, and reduced fitness of the deaf. Ann Hum Genet 2010; 74: 155–164.
Snoeckx RL, Huygen PL, Feldmann D et al: GJB2 mutations and degree of hearing loss: a multicenter study. Am J Hum Genet 2005; 77: 945–957.
Lerer I, Sagi M, Ben-Neriah Z, Wang T, Levi H, Abeliovich D : A deletion mutation in GJB6 cooperating with a GJB2 mutation in trans in non-syndromic deafness: a novel founder mutation in Ashkenazi Jews. Hum Mutat 2001; 18: 460.
del Castillo I, Villamar M, Moreno-Pelayo MA et al: A deletion involving the connexin 30 gene in nonsyndromic hearing impairment. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 243–249.
Pallares-Ruiz N, Blanchet P, Mondain M, Claustres M, Roux AF : A large deletion including most of GJB6 in recessive non syndromic deafness: a digenic effect? Eur J Hum Genet 2002; 10: 72–76.
Del Castillo I, Moreno-Pelayo MA, Del Castillo FJ et al: Prevalence and evolutionary origins of the del(GJB6-D13S1830) mutation in the DFNB1 locus in hearing-impaired subjects: a multicenter study. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 73: 1452–1458.
Wilch E, Azaiez H, Fisher RA et al: A novel DFNB1 deletion allele supports the existence of a distant cis-regulatory region that controls GJB2 and GJB6 expression. Clin Genet 2010; 78: 267–274.
Feldmann D, Le Marechal C, Jonard L et al: A new large deletion in the DFNB1 locus causes nonsyndromic hearing loss. Eur J Med Genet 2009; 52: 195–200.
del Castillo FJ, Rodriguez-Ballesteros M, Alvarez A et al: A novel deletion involving the connexin-30 gene, del(GJB6-d13s1854), found in trans with mutations in the GJB2 gene (connexin-26) in subjects with DFNB1 non-syndromic hearing impairment. J Med Genet 2005; 42: 588–594.
Bazazzadegan N, Sheffield AM, Sobhani M et al: Two Iranian families with a novel mutation in GJB2 causing autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss. Am J Med Genet A 2011; 155A: 1202–1211.
Denoyelle F, Lina-Granade G, Plauchu H et al: Connexin 26 gene linked to a dominant deafness. Nature 1998; 393: 319–320.
Weegerink NJ, Pennings RJ, Huygen PL, Hoefsloot LH, Cremers CW, Kunst HP : Phenotypes of two Dutch DFNA3 families with mutations in GJB2. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011; 120: 191–197.
Janecke AR, Nekahm D, Loffler J, Hirst-Stadlmann A, Muller T, Utermann G : De novo mutation of the connexin 26 gene associated with dominant non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss. Hum Genet 2001; 108: 269–270.
Lee JR, White TW : Connexin-26 mutations in deafness and skin disease. Expert Rev Mol Med 2009; 11: e35.
Bakirtzis G, Choudhry R, Aasen T et al: Targeted epidermal expression of mutant Connexin 26(D66H) mimics true Vohwinkel syndrome and provides a model for the pathogenesis of dominant connexin disorders. Hum Mol Genet 2003; 12: 1737–1744.
Birkenhager R, Lublinghoff N, Prera E, Schild C, Aschendorff A, Arndt S : Autosomal dominant prelingual hearing loss with palmoplantar keratoderma syndrome: variability in clinical expression from mutations of R75W and R75Q in the GJB2 gene. Am J Med Genet A 2010; 152A: 1798–1802.
de Zwart-Storm EA, van Geel M, Veysey E et al: A novel missense mutation in GJB2, p.Tyr65His, causes severe Vohwinkel syndrome. Br J Dermatol 2011; 164: 197–199.
de Zwart-Storm EA, Hamm H, Stoevesandt J et al: A novel missense mutation in GJB2 disturbs gap junction protein transport and causes focal palmoplantar keratoderma with deafness. J Med Genet 2008; 45: 161–166.
Mazereeuw-Hautier J, Bitoun E, Chevrant-Breton J et al: Keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome: disease expression and spectrum of connexin 26 (GJB2) mutations in 14 patients. Br J Dermatol 2007; 156: 1015–1019.
Richard G, Brown N, Ishida-Yamamoto A, Krol A : Expanding the phenotypic spectrum of Cx26 disorders: Bart-Pumphrey syndrome is caused by a novel missense mutation in GJB2. J Invest Dermatol 2004; 123: 856–863.
Iossa S, Marciano E, Franze A : GJB2 gene mutations in syndromic skin diseases with sensorineural hearing loss. Curr Genomics 2011; 12: 475–785.
Marlin S, Feldmann D, Blons H et al: GJB2 and GJB6 mutations: genotypic and phenotypic correlations in a large cohort of hearing-impaired patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 131: 481–487.
Gravina LP, Foncuberta ME, Estrada RC, Barreiro C, Chertkoff L : Carrier frequency of the 35delG and A1555G deafness mutations in the Argentinean population. Impact on the newborn hearing screening. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 71: 639–643.
Dalamon V, Beheran A, Diamante F, Pallares N, Diamante V, Elgoyhen AB : Prevalence of GJB2 mutations and the del(GJB6-D13S1830) in Argentinean non-syndromic deaf patients. Hear Res 2005; 207: 43–49.
Roux AF, Pallares-Ruiz N, Vielle A et al: Molecular epidemiology of DFNB1 deafness in France. BMC Med Genet 2004; 5: 5.
Dragomir C, Stan A, Stefanescu DT, Savu L, Severin E : Prenatal screening for the 35delG GJB2, del (GJB6-D13S1830), and del (GJB6-D13S1854) mutations in the Romanian population. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2011; 15: 749–753.
Primignani P, Trotta L, Castorina P et al: Analysis of the GJB2 and GJB6 genes in Italian patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss: frequencies, novel mutations, genotypes, and degree of hearing loss. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2009; 13: 209–217.
Tang HY, Basehore MJ, Blakey GL et al: Infrequency of two deletion mutations at the DFNB1 locus in patients and controls. Am J Med Genet A 2008; 146: 934–936.
Esmaeili M, Bonyadi M, Nejadkazem M : Common mutation analysis of GJB2 and GJB6 genes in affected families with autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss from Iran: simultaneous detection of two common mutations (35delG/del(GJB6-D13S1830)) in the DFNB1-related deafness. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 71: 869–873.
Gunther B, Steiner A, Nekahm-Heis D et al: The 342-kb deletion in GJB6 is not present in patients with non-syndromic hearing loss from Austria. Hum Mutat 2003; 22: 180.
Smith RJH, Van Camp G : Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss and Deafness, DFNB1, In: Pagon RA, Bird T, Dolan CR et al: (eds) Seattle, WA, USA: University of Washington, 1993.
Griffith AJ, Friedman TB : Auditory function and the M34T allele of connexin 26. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128: 94.
Griffith AJ : Genetic analysis of the connexin-26 M34T variant. J Med Genet 2001; 38: E24.
Wattanasirichaigoon D, Limwongse C, Jariengprasert C et al: High prevalence of V37I genetic variant in the connexin-26 (GJB2) gene among non-syndromic hearing-impaired and control Thai individuals. Clin Genet 2004; 66: 452–460.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the EMQN for their support in the preparation of these guidelines, particularly, Outi Kamarainen. We would also like to thank attendees of the Best Practice meeting: Carol Hardy, Birmingham, UK; Olga Strena, Riga Latvia; Vassos Neocleous, Nicosia, Cyprus; Tiina Kahre, Tartu, Estonia; Pavel Seeman, Prague, Czech Republic; Wim Wuyts, Antwerp, Belgium; Tracy Stockley, Toronto, Ontorio, Canada; Marie-Louise Bondeson, Uppsala, Sweden; Ignacio del Castillo, Madrid, Spain; Ronald Admiraal, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Hannie Kremer, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Hoefsloot, L., Roux, AF., Bitner-Glindzicz, M. et al. EMQN Best Practice guidelines for diagnostic testing of mutations causing non-syndromic hearing impairment at the DFNB1 locus. Eur J Hum Genet 21, 1325–1329 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2013.83
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2013.83
This article is cited by
-
Genetic etiology of non-syndromic hearing loss in Europe
Human Genetics (2022)
-
Characterization of GJB2 cis-regulatory elements in the DFNB1 locus
Human Genetics (2019)
-
Tinnitus in patients with hearing loss due to mitochondrial DNA pathogenic variants
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (2018)
-
Whole exome sequencing identifies TRIOBP pathogenic variants as a cause of post-lingual bilateral moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss
BMC Medical Genetics (2017)
-
Combined genetic approaches yield a 48% diagnostic rate in a large cohort of French hearing-impaired patients
Scientific Reports (2017)