Abstract
The US Fourth Report (2004) recommended that elevated blood pressure (BP) on at least three occasions should be used to define hypertension in children and adolescents. However, there is no sufficient evidence to support this decision. This study aimed to assess the change in the prevalence of elevated BP obtained on three separate visits in children and adolescents worldwide using a meta-analysis. The PubMed database was searched for eligible studies published in English until 20 April 2016. Included studies were population based and reported on the prevalence of elevated BP measured on two or three separate occasions in pediatric populations. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate a summary prevalence of elevated BP over three different visits. A total of 21 studies with 179 561 participants aged 3–20 years were included in the present meta-analysis. The summary prevalence of elevated BP decreased across visits, from 12.1% (95% confidence interval (CI)=10.1–14.0%) during the first visit to 5.6% (95% CI=4.3–7.0%) during the second visit and to 2.7% (95% CI=2.1–3.3%) during the third visit. These findings were independent of sex, age group, ethnicity/race and the definition of elevated BP. When compared with visit 1, the prevalence of elevated BP decreased by 53.7% during visit 2 and by 77.7% during visit 3. Our study suggested that the prevalence of elevated BP decreased substantially from the first visit to the subsequent visits. Worldwide, the true prevalence of hypertension in children and adolescents is ~3% over three different visits.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Elevated blood pressure (BP) in children and adolescents is a serious public health issue worldwide.1 Evidence suggests that elevated BP is associated with the risk of target organ damage.2, 3 In addition, modest tracking of elevated BP from childhood to adulthood4 increases the long-term risk of cardiovascular diseases and premature death in adulthood.5 Therefore, early accurate detection and effective control of high BP in children and adolescents are crucial to reduce the risk of target organ damage in children and the long-term risk of cardiovascular diseases in adults.
As recommended by several medical guidelines, the definition of hypertension in adults should be based on multiple BP measurements on each of at least two different visits owing to the significant variability of BP within and between days.6, 7, 8 Similarly, hypertension in children is defined as elevated BP (systolic BP/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP)⩾95th percentile by sex, age and height) on at least three separate occasions.9, 10, 11, 12 There are many factors that can influence the stability of BP values, including within-person variability (for example, accommodation, nervous status, stress and so on), the ‘white-coat’ effect13 and regression to the mean.14 The BP measurements on a single occasion can result in an overestimated prevalence of true hypertension.14, 15, 16 Therefore, repeated readings on several occasions may be necessary for the diagnosis of true hypertension.
However, in most epidemiological studies, the diagnosis of ‘hypertension’ mainly relies on one to three readings during a single screening visit for both adults17 and children,1 and true hypertension is undoubtedly overestimated. Accuracy when estimating the prevalence of hypertension is important for making decisions on intervention measures and evaluating the effect of these measures. In 2004, the US Fourth Report by the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group (NHBPEP) recommended that elevated BP on at least three occasions should be used to define hypertension in children and adolescents. However, to our knowledge, there is no sufficient evidence to support this decision. Fortunately, several publications thus far have investigated and reported the number of visits on BP measurements in children and adolescents.18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 This provides us with the opportunity to assess the accuracy of the hypertension definition according to the US Fourth Report by NHBPEP. In this study, we performed the first meta-analysis to assess the variability of elevated BP prevalence estimated from two or three separate visits and provided the scientific evidence for accurate measurements of BP in children and adolescents.
Methods
Search strategy
This review was performed based on the general principles recommended in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (http://www.prisma-statement.org/). The PubMed database was searched to retrieve eligible studies conducted until 20 April 2016. Search terms were as follows: (children OR adolescents OR pediatric OR school age OR puberty OR youths) and (blood pressure OR high blood pressure OR elevated blood pressure OR hypertension OR sustained elevated BP OR persistent elevated BP OR sustained hypertension OR persistent hypertension) and (three occasions OR three visits OR two occasions OR two visits OR multiple occasions OR multiple visits OR repeated measurements OR repeated visits OR multiple measurements). The search strategy is given in detail in Supplementary Table S1. The publication language was restricted to English only. In addition, related reference lists in the eligible papers were also searched. Two trained authors (Jiahong Sun and Chuanwei Ma) performed the search and extracted the data independently. If the opinions of the two authors were different, a third author (Bo Xi) was consulted to reach an agreement.
For all the included studies, children or adolescents with an ‘elevated BP’ based on measured BP readings during the first visit had a second set of BP readings taken during a separate visit several weeks later. Children or adolescents who still had an ‘elevated BP’ based on BP readings during that second visit had a third set of BP readings taken another several weeks later.
Inclusion criteria and data extraction
To be eligible for inclusion in this review, studies had to meet the following criteria: (1) provide the prevalence or incidence of elevated BP (definitions are presented in Table 1) or sufficient data for calculation during two or three visits; (2) population- or school-based studies; and (3) population included children and/or adolescents. The information extracted included: (1) name of authors; (2) year of publication; (3) origin of country; (4) sample size; (5) age of participants; (6) proportion of boys; (7) definition of elevated BP; (8) BP measurement device; (9) interval of each visit; and (10) survey year.
Data analysis
A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the summary prevalence of elevated BP during each of the three visits. Cochran’s Q test was used to test the between-study heterogeneity. A random-effect model was used to calculate pooled prevalence because of the strong heterogeneity between the studies (All I2>90%). Publication bias was assessed by Begg’s test and Egger’s test (P<0.05 was considered statistically significant). Meta-regression analysis was performed to examine the source of heterogeneity using potential variables, including sex, age, race, the definition of elevated BP and BP measurement devices. Data were analyzed using Stata version 11.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).
Results
Characteristics of included studies
A flowchart of study inclusion/exclusion is presented in Figure 1. A total of 21 studies (179 561 participants) that met the inclusion criteria were included in this review.18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 All included studies were population-based and cross-sectional in design. The sample size ranged from 552 to 85 780 participants. The definitions of elevated BP included the definitions from the US NHBPEP released in the years 1977, 1987, 1996 and 2004 as well as the established BP references from China (2010), Hong Kong (2008) and Hungary (2003). Detailed characteristics are displayed in Table 1.
Prevalence of elevated BP and the change over three separate visits
The prevalence of elevated BP and the change in the prevalence of elevated BP over two or three separate visits for each study are presented in Supplementary Table S2. For elevated BP, 14 studies had available data during three visits and 6 studies during two visits. For elevated SBP and DBP, there were four studies with available data during three visits and three studies with available data during two visits. The summary of the prevalence of elevated BP and 95% confidence interval (CI) was 12.1% (10.1–14.0%) during visit 1 (Figure 2), 5.6% (4.3–7.0%) during visit 2 (Figure 3) and 2.7% (2.1–3.3%) during visit 3 (Figure 4). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of elevated BP during each of the three visits between sexes, age groups, child BP definitions or ethnicity/races (Table 2). When compared with visit 1, the prevalence of elevated BP decreased by 53.7% during visit 2 and by 77.7% during visit 3.
The summary prevalence of elevated SBP over three separate occasions was 8.3% (4.6–12.0%), 3.5% (1.8–5.1%) and 1.7% (0.8–2.7%), respectively, and the summary prevalence of elevated DBP over three separate occasions was 5.9% (3.3–8.5%), 2.1% (0.8–3.3%) and 0.7% (0.4–1.1%), respectively (Table 2).
There was significant heterogeneity between studies for the prevalence of elevated BP in each of the three visits. Meta-regression analysis was performed to examine the source of the heterogeneity using potential variables, including sex, age, race, definition of elevated BP and BP measurement devices. However, these variables cannot explain the source of the heterogeneity. There was no publication bias according to Begg’s test (first visit prevalence: P=0.417; second visit prevalence: P=0.753; third visit prevalence: P=1.000) and Egger’s test (first visit prevalence: P=0.151; third visit prevalence: P=0.542). However, there was marginal publication bias according to Egger’s test for the prevalence during the second visit (P=0.037). We used the trim and fill method to address this publication bias, and the pooled prevalence was slightly changed to 5.0% (95% CI=3.6–6.9%). Additionally, we performed a sensitivity analysis using the studies where BP measurements were performed on three different occasions, and the results from the meta-analysis were similar with those when all studies were included.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first review to assess the changes in elevated BP prevalence across three separate visits. Our report illustrated that the prevalence of elevated BP decreased substantially (by 77.7%) from the first to the third screening. As expected, the prevalence of elevated SBP and DBP also showed significant decreasing trends from the first to the third visit (decreased by 79.5% for elevated SBP and decreased by 88.1% for elevated DBP). The true prevalence of hypertension in children and adolescents is ~3% over three different visits. The present meta-analysis underlines the necessity of measuring BP on at least three separate occasions to identify a hypertensive child in clinical practice or to accurately estimate the true prevalence of hypertension in a pediatric population.
One previous meta-analysis demonstrated that the prevalence of elevated BP in all children, in boys only and in girls only was 11.2, 13, and 9.6%, respectively.1 However, it should be noted that the prevalence in that meta-analysis was based on BP measurements during only one visit, and the true prevalence of hypertension most likely was overestimated. In the studies included in our meta-analysis, the prevalence of elevated BP during the first visit was 12.1%, but it decreased substantially to 5.6% during the second visit and then to 2.7% during the third visit. However, there was significant heterogeneity between the studies on the prevalence of elevated BP during each of the three visits. The between-study heterogeneity might be due to differences in the study year, race/ethnicity and age distribution of the target population, definitions for elevated BP or devices used to measure BP, but our meta-regression analysis did not indicate any of these differences. In epidemiological studies, BP is usually measured two or three times during only one visit because of cost and inconvenience. However, the present meta-analysis indicated that childhood BP should be measured on three different visits to avoid overestimating the prevalence of elevated BP during one or two screening occasions.
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI, 2011), based on the Fourth Report, recommended that, for children with BP readings between the 95th percentile and the 99th percentile plus 5 mm Hg on a single visit, additional BP measurements should be taken on two more occasions. If hypertension is confirmed, evaluations should be conducted, including the evaluation of lifestyle factors (diet habits, smoking, drinking alcohol, physical examination and so on), substance use and sleep disorders that might cause hypertension, metabolic abnormalities and target organ damage (for eample, left ventricular hypertrophy and microalbuminuria). However, for children with BP readings >the 99th percentile plus 5 mm Hg on a single visit, a prompt referral should be made for evaluation and treatment.39
As for the minimum number of BP measurements during each of the three visits, this is beyond the scope of our review. But three readings during each visit and the mean of the second and third readings would reduce the false positive cases of elevated BP when compared with one or two readings on each visit.15 However, a previous meta-analysis using one BP measurement on one visit as the reference group demonstrated that more than three measurements did not seem superior to two measurements for childhood BP tracking into adulthood.4 On the other hand, to reduce the white-coat effect, successive measurements of BP with the first office reading discarded may improve the possibility of knowing the actual BP.40
In our opinion, it is important to standardize the procedure to assess the actual BP and therefore the actual hypertensive status among children and adolescents in clinical or epidemiological practice. However, adverse effects of elevated BP in childhood on related morbidity and mortality are mainly based on one or two readings during a single visit.5, 41 Two studies, one from the Swedish Military Conscription Registry and the other from the Harvard Alumni Health Study, with a follow-up median duration of ~20 years, showed that hypertension in late adolescence or early adulthood defined using BP readings during a single visit predicted the risk of cardiovascular disease mortality.42, 43 It should be noted that BP measurements during a single visit may result in many false positive cases, and the findings on the risk of high BP in childhood may be inaccurate. Further, findings from the Fels Longitudinal Study suggested that several repeated body mass index values rather than repeated BP values were associated with adult left ventricular hypertrophy.44 In addition, data from the Bogalusa Heart Study indicated that both body mass index and BP values measured at least four times during childhood statistically as the area under the curve predicted a risk of left ventricular hypertrophy, with body mass index having a larger effect than BP.45 Although these two cohort studies used more than one BP value during different visits to predict adult health outcomes, it is still unclear whether or not persistent childhood elevated BP during three separate visits would be better for predicting target organ damage in childhood and the long-term cardiovascular disease burden in adulthood using a prospective study design before the appropriate recommendations can be made. Most recently, the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study showed that persistent elevated BP on two occasions is superior to elevated BP measured during a single visit for predicting adult hypertension.46
There are two strengths in our study. First, this is the first meta-analysis comprehensively assessing changes in the prevalence of elevated BP on three separate visits in children and adolescents. Second, the included studies included a total of 179 561 participants, which provides sufficient statistical power to draw creditable conclusions. However, several limitations should be noted. First, because there was significant between-study heterogeneity during each of the three visits, the results should be interpreted with caution. We performed a meta-regression analysis to examine the source of heterogeneity using potential variables, including sex, age, race, definition of elevated BP and BP measurement devices, but we failed to find the source of the heterogeneity. Second, several included studies did not consider loss to follow-up during the second or third visit, which may have potentially resulted in slight underestimation of the true hypertension prevalence. Third, within-person BP changes may be more important than repeated population measures; however, all the included studies treated the participants as a group, not as individuals. Fourth, the included studies were mainly conducted in Caucasian children; therefore, the generalizability of our results to other populations should be cautious.
In conclusion, the true prevalence of hypertension in children and adolescents is ~3% over three different visits. In addition, the present meta-analysis provides evidence-based results in support of the recommendation of the US Fourth Report by NHBPEP in 2004 that the definition of pediatric hypertension should be based on BP measurements on at least three occasions in clinical practice or epidemiological studies to avoid false positive cases. Further prospective studies should determine whether this procedure is better than BP measurements during only one visit in predicting future BP-related morbidity and mortality in both childhood and adulthood.
References
de Moraes AC, Lacerda MB, Moreno LA, Horta BL, Carvalho HB . Prevalence of high blood pressure in 122053 adolescents: a systematic review and meta-regression. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014; 93: e232.
Kollias A, Dafni M, Poulidakis E, Ntineri A, Stergiou GS . Out-of-office blood pressure and target organ damage in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens 2014; 32: 2315–2331 discussion 2331.
Karpettas N, Nasothimiou E, Kollias A, Vazeou A, Stergiou GS . Ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents: diagnosis of hypertension and assessment of target-organ damage. Hypertens Res 2013; 36: 285–292.
Chen X, Wang Y . Tracking of blood pressure from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Circulation 2008; 117: 3171–3180.
Franks PW, Hanson RL, Knowler WC, Sievers ML, Bennett PH, Looker HC . Childhood obesity, other cardiovascular risk factors, and premature death. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 485–493.
Daskalopoulou SS, Rabi DM, Zarnke KB, Dasgupta K, Nerenberg K, Cloutier L, Gelfer M, Lamarre-Cliche M, Milot A, Bolli P, McKay DW, Tremblay G, McLean D, Tobe SW, Ruzicka M, Burns KD, Vallee M, Ramesh Prasad GV, Lebel M, Feldman RD, Selby P, Pipe A, Schiffrin EL, McFarlane PA, Oh P, Hegele RA, Khara M, Wilson TW, Brian PS, Burgess E, Herman RJ, Bacon SL, Rabkin SW, Gilbert RE, Campbell TS, Grover S, Honos G, Lindsay P, Hill MD, Coutts SB, Gubitz G, Campbell NR, Moe GW, Howlett JG, Boulanger JM, Prebtani A, Larochelle P, Leiter LA, Jones C, Ogilvie RI, Woo V, Kaczorowski J, Trudeau L, Petrella RJ, Hiremath S, Stone JA, Drouin D, Lavoie KL, Hamet P, Fodor G, Gregoire JC, Fournier A, Lewanczuk R, Dresser GK, Sharma M, Reid D, Benoit G, Feber J, Harris KC, Poirier L, Padwal RS . The 2015 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension. Can J Cardiol 2015; 31: 549–568.
Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, Jones DW, Kurtz T, Sheps SG, Roccella EJ . Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: Blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation 2005; 111: 697–716.
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr, Roccella EJ, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–2572.
Lurbe E, Cifkova R, Cruickshank JK, Dillon MJ, Ferreira I, Invitti C, Kuznetsova T, Laurent S, Mancia G, Morales-Olivas F, Rascher W, Redon J, Schaefer F, Seeman T, Stergiou G, Wuhl E, Zanchetti A, European Society of Hypertension. Management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 2009; 27: 1719–1742.
National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children Adolescents. The Fourth Report on the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 555–576.
Cantinotti M, Giordano R, Scalese M, Molinaro S, Murzi B, Assanta N, Crocetti M, Marotta M, Ghione S, Iervasi G . Strengths and limitations of current pediatric blood pressure nomograms: a global overview with a special emphasis on regional differences in neonates and infants. Hypertens Res 2015; 38: 577–587.
Xi B, Zong XN, Kelishadi R, Hong YM, Khadilkar A, Steffen LM, Nawarycz T, Krzywinska-Wiewiorowska M, Aounallah-Skhiri H, Bovet P, Chiolero A, Pan H, Litwin M, Poh BK, Sung RYT, So HK, Schwandt P, Haas GM, Neuhauser HK, Marinov L, Galcheva SV, Motlagh ME, Kim HS, Khadilkar V, Krzyzaniak A, Ben Romdhane H, Heshmat R, Chiplonkar S, Stawinska-Witoszynska B, El Ati J, Qorbani M, Kajale N, Traissac P, Ostrowska-Nawarycz L, Ardalan G, Parthasarathy L, Zhao M, Zhang T, International Child Blood Pressure References Establishment Consortium. Establishing international blood pressure references among nonoverweight children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years. Circulation 2016; 133: 398–408.
Gorostidi M, Vinyoles E, Banegas JR, de la Sierra A . Prevalence of white-coat and masked hypertension in national and international registries. Hypertens Res 2015; 38: 1–7.
Figueiredo D, Azevedo A, Pereira M, de Barros H . Definition of hypertension: the impact of number of visits for blood pressure measurement. Rev Port Cardiol 2009; 28: 775–783.
Bovet P, Gervasoni JP, Ross AG, Mkamba M, Mtasiwa DM, Lengeler C, Burnier M, Paccaud F . Assessing the prevalence of hypertension in populations: are we doing it right? J Hypertens 2003; 21: 509–517.
Modesti PA, Rapi S, Bamoshmoosh M, Baldereschi M, Massetti L, Padeletti L, Gensini GF, Zhao D, Al-Hidabi D, Al Goshae H . Impact of one or two visits strategy on hypertension burden estimation in HYDY, a population-based cross-sectional study: implications for healthcare resource allocation decision making. BMJ Open 2012; 2: e001062.
Ibrahim MM, Damasceno A . Hypertension in developing countries. Lancet 2012; 380: 611–619.
Marcovecchio ML, Mohn A, Diddi G, Polidori N, Chiarelli F, Fuiano N . Longitudinal assessment of blood pressure in school-aged children: a 3-year follow-up study. Pediatr Cardiol 2015; 37: 255–261.
Patil RR, Garg BS . Prevalence of hypertension and variation in blood pressure among school children in rural area of Wardha. Indian J Public Health 2014; 58: 78–83.
Kidy F, Rutebarika D, Lule SA, Kizza M, Odiit A, Webb EL, Elliott AM . Blood pressure in primary school children in Uganda: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 1223.
Lu Q, Ma C, Yin F, Wang R, Lou D, Liu X . Blood pressure-to-height ratio as a screening measure for identifying children with hypertension. Eur J Pediatr 2013; 172: 99–105.
Lo JC, Sinaiko A, Chandra M, Daley MF, Greenspan LC, Parker ED, Kharbanda EO, Margolis KL, Adams K, Prineas R, Magid D, O'Connor PJ . Prehypertension and hypertension in community-based pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2013; 131: e415–e424.
Meng L, Liang Y, Liu J, Hu Y, Yan Y, Mi J . Prevalence and risk factors of hypertension based on repeated measurements in Chinese children and adolescents. Blood Press 2012; 22: 59–64.
Steinthorsdottir SD, Eliasdottir SB, Indridason OS, Agustsdottir IM, Palsson R, Edvardsson VO . Prevalence of hypertension in 9- to 10-year-old Icelandic school children. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011; 13: 774–779.
Leung LC, Sung RY, So HK, Wong SN, Lee KW, Lee KP, Yam MC, Li SP, Yuen SF, Chim S, Chan KK, Luk D . Prevalence and risk factors for hypertension in Hong Kong Chinese adolescents: waist circumference predicts hypertension, exercise decreases risk. Arch Dis Child 2011; 96: 804–809.
Katona E, Zrinyi M, Lengyel S, Komonyi E, Paragh G, Zatik J, Nagy G, Fulesdi B, Pall D . The prevalence of adolescent hypertension in Hungary - the Debrecen hypertension study. Blood Press 2011; 20: 134–139.
McNiece KL, Poffenbarger TS, Turner JL, Franco KD, Sorof JM, Portman RJ . Prevalence of hypertension and pre-hypertension among adolescents. J Pediatr 2007; 150: 640–644, 644 e641.
Chiolero A, Cachat F, Burnier M, Paccaud F, Bovet P . Prevalence of hypertension in schoolchildren based on repeated measurements and association with overweight. J Hypertens 2007; 25: 2209–2217.
Kardas P, Kufelnicka M, Herczynski D . Prevalence of arterial hypertension in children aged 9-14 years, residents of the city of Lodz. Kardiol Pol 2005; 62: 211–216.
Genovesi S, Giussani M, Pieruzzi F, Vigorita F, Arcovio C, Cavuto S, Stella A . Results of blood pressure screening in a population of school-aged children in the province of Milan: role of overweight. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 493–497.
Sorof JM, Lai D, Turner J, Poffenbarger T, Portman RJ . Overweight, ethnicity, and the prevalence of hypertension in school-aged children. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 475–482.
Antal M, Regoly-Merei A, Nagy K, Greiner E, Biro L, Domonkos A, Balajti A, Szorad I, Szabo C, Mozsary E . Representative study for the evaluation of age- and gender-specific anthropometric parameters and blood pressure in an adolescent Hungarian population. Ann Nutr Metab 2004; 48: 307–313.
Sorof JM, Poffenbarger T, Franco K, Bernard L, Portman RJ . Isolated systolic hypertension, obesity, and hyperkinetic hemodynamic states in children. J Pediatr 2002; 140: 660–666.
Sinaiko AR, Gomez-Marin O, Prineas RJ . Prevalence of ’significant’ hypertension in junior high school-aged children: the Children and Adolescent Blood Pressure Program. J Pediatr 1989; 114: 664–669.
Fixler DE, Laird WP, Fitzgerald V, Stead S, Adams R . Hypertension screening in schools: results of the Dallas study. Pediatrics 1979; 63: 32–36.
Rames LK, Clarke WR, Connor WE, Reiter MA, Lauer RM . Normal blood pressure and the evaluation of sustained blood pressure elevation in childhood: the Muscatine study. Pediatrics 1978; 61: 245–251.
Reichman LB, Cooper BM, Blumenthal S, Block G, O'Hare D, Chaves AD, Alderman MH, Deming QB, Farber SJ, Thomson GE . Hypertension testing among high school students. I. Surveillance procedures and results. J Chronic Dis 1975; 28: 161–171.
Kilcoyne MM, Richter RW, Alsup PA . Adolescent hypertension. I. Detection and prevalence. Circulation 1974; 50: 758–764.
Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health, Risk Reduction in Children, Adolescents, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Expert panel on integrated guidelines for cardiovascular health and risk reduction in children and adolescents: summary report. Pediatrics 2011; 128: S213–S256.
Parati G, Mancia G . Assessing the white-coat effect: which blood pressure measurement should be considered? J Hypertens 2006; 24: 29–31.
Juhola J, Magnussen CG, Berenson GS, Venn A, Burns TL, Sabin MA, Srinivasan SR, Daniels SR, Davis PH, Chen W, Kahonen M, Taittonen L, Urbina E, Viikari JS, Dwyer T, Raitakari OT, Juonala M . Combined effects of child and adult elevated blood pressure on subclinical atherosclerosis: the International Childhood Cardiovascular Cohort Consortium. Circulation 2013; 128: 217–224.
Gray L, Lee IM, Sesso HD, Batty GD . Blood pressure in early adulthood, hypertension in middle age, and future cardiovascular disease mortality: HAHS (Harvard Alumni Health Study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 2396–2403.
Sundstrom J, Neovius M, Tynelius P, Rasmussen F . Association of blood pressure in late adolescence with subsequent mortality: cohort study of Swedish male conscripts. BMJ 2011; 342: d643.
Sabo RT, Yen MS, Daniels S, Sun SS . Associations between childhood body size, composition, blood pressure and adult cardiac structure: the Fels Longitudinal Study. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e106333.
Lai CC, Sun D, Cen R, Wang J, Li S, Fernandez-Alonso C, Chen W, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS . Impact of long-term burden of excessive adiposity and elevated blood pressure from childhood on adulthood left ventricular remodeling patterns: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 1580–1587.
Oikonen M, Nuotio J, Magnussen CG, Viikari JSA, Taittonen L, Laitinen T, Hutri-Kahonen N, Jokinen E, Jula A, Cheung M, Sabin MA, Daniels SR, Raitakari OT, Juonala M . Repeated blood pressure measurements in childhood in prediction of hypertension in adulthood. Hypertension 2016; 67: 41–47.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (81302496), Shandong Natural Science Foundation (ZR2012HQ033) and the Young Scholars Program of Shandong University (2015WLJH51).
Author contributions
Dr BX conceptualized and designed the study, reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr JS and Dr BX drafted the initial manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr JS, Dr CM and Dr YL designed the data collection instruments, coordinated and supervised data collection and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr LMS reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on Hypertension Research website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, J., Steffen, L., Ma, C. et al. Definition of pediatric hypertension: are blood pressure measurements on three separate occasions necessary?. Hypertens Res 40, 496–503 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2016.179
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2016.179
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Environments affect blood pressure in toddlers: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study
Pediatric Research (2024)
-
High blood pressure in childhood and adolescence
Hypertension Research (2024)
-
Screening and Management of Pediatric High Blood Pressure—Challenges to Implementing the Clinical Practice Guideline
Current Hypertension Reports (2024)
-
Pediatric body mass index trajectories and the risk of hypertension among adolescents in China: a retrospective cohort study
World Journal of Pediatrics (2023)
-
Blood pressure levels among children in rural Uganda: results from 1913 children in a general population survey
Journal of Human Hypertension (2022)