Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Concurrent validity of a modified version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-A) in European adolescents: The HELENA Study

Abstract

Introduction:

The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed to measure health-enhancing physical activity in adult populations. This study explores the concurrent validity of a modified version of the long IPAQ (the IPAQ-A) for the assessment of physical activity among adolescents.

Participants and methods:

In total, 248 healthy adolescents, divided into one older and one younger age group (aged 15–17 years (N=188) and 12–14 years (N=60), respectively) from nine Healthy Lifestyle by Nutrition in Adolescence (HELENA) Study centres across Europe, voluntarily participated in the study. Data on total physical activity, as well as activities in different intensities derived from the IPAQ-A, were compared using Spearman's correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman analysis, with data from an accelerometer. Tertiles of total physical activity for the IPAQ-A and the accelerometer were compared using Kendall's tau-b.

Results:

For the older age group, significant correlations between the instruments were found for time spent walking, for moderate and vigorous activities as well as for total physical activity (Rs=0.17–0.30, P<0.05). No significant correlations were found for any of the variables studied in the younger age group. Kendall's tau-b showed low but significant correlations for tertiles of total physical activity (P<0.001).

Conclusions:

The IPAQ-A has reasonable validity properties for assessing activities in different intensities and for total physical activity in healthy European adolescents aged 15–17 years. For adolescents aged 14 years and younger, the correlations were unsatisfactorily low and objective methodology, such as accelerometry, may be the appropriate alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CDC. Physical Activity and Health. A Report from the Surgeon General. CDC: Pittsburg, 1996.

  2. Pedersen BK, Saltin B . Evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in chronic disease. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2006; 16 (Suppl 1): 3–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown W, Bauman A, Chey T, Trost S, Mummery K . Comparison of surveys used to measure physical activity. Aust N Z J Public Health 2004; 28: 128–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. WHA. World Health Assembly 57.17. Global Strategy on diet, physical activity and health, 2004, pp 1–4.

  5. Moreno LA, González-Gross M, Kersting M, Molnár D, de Henauw S, Beghin L et al. Assessing, understanding and modifying nutritional status, eating habits and physical activity in European adolescents. The HELENA study. Public Health Nutr 2008; 6: 288–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aarnio M, Winter T, Kujala U, Kaprio J . Associations of health related behaviour, social relationships, and health status with persistent physical activity and inactivity: a study of Finnish adolescent twins. Br J Sports Med 2002; 36: 360–364.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. IPAQ. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire, http://www.ipaq.ki.se/.

  8. Craig C, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1381–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnett J, Nigg CR, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Maglione C, Maddock J . The effect of item order on physical activity estimates using the IPAQ. Californian J Health Promot 2007; 5: 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ACSM. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 975–991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, Jacobs Jr DR, Montoye HJ, Sallis JF et al. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 71–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S498–S504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Computer Science Application. Activity Monitor Operator's Manual. In: Shallimar FL (ed). Model 7164 version AM7164;2-2, 1995, pp 3–24.

  14. Trost SG, Ward DS, Moorehead SM, Watson PD, Riner W, Burke JR . Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 629–633.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Trost SG, Pate RR, Freedson PS, Sallis JF, Taylor WC . Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 426–431.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Altman D . Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall: London, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Atkinson G, Nevill AM . Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 1998; 26: 217–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sirard JR, Pate RR . Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Sports Med 2001; 31: 439–454.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Welk G . Physical Assessment in Health-Related Research. Human Kinetics: Leeds, UK, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Washburn RA, Heath GW, Jackson AW . Reliability and validity issues concerning large-scale surveillance of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000; 71: S104–S113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bassett Jr DR . Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000; 71: S30–S36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sirard JR, Melanson EL, Li L, Freedson PS . Field evaluation of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. physical activity monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 695–700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P . Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S442–S449.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sjostrom M, Westerterp K . Field evaluation of the Computer Science and Application's Inc. Activity monitor during running and skating training in adolescent athletes. Int J Sports Med 2000; 21: 586–592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ainsworth BE, Bassett Jr DR, Strath SJ, Swartz AM, O’Brien WL, Thompson RW et al. Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S457–S464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nichols JF, Morgan CG, Chabot LE, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ . Assessment of physical activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer: laboratory versus field validation. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000; 71: 36–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yngve A, Nilsson A, Sjostrom M, Ekelund U . Effect of monitor placement and of activity setting on the MTI accelerometer output. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 320–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Caspersen CJ, Nixon PA, DuRant RH . Physical activity epidemiology applied to children and adolescents. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1998; 26: 341–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Crocker PR, Bailey DA, Faulkner RA, Kowalski KC, McGrath R . Measuring general levels of physical activity: preliminary evidence for the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29: 1344–1349.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wong SL, Leatherdale ST, Manske SR . Reliability and validity of a school-based physical activity questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006; 38: 1593–1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McMurray RG, Ring KB, Treuth MS, Welk GJ, Pate RR, Schmitz KH et al. Comparison of two approaches to structured physical activity surveys for adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 2135–2143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The HELENA Study was carried out with the financial support of the European Community Sixth RTD Framework Programme (Contract FOOD-CT-2005-007034) and of the Stockholm County Council. The content of this paper reflects only the authors’ views, and the European Community is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. FBO is supported by CSD (Ref: 109/UPB31/03 and 13/UPB20/04) and the FPU-Spanish Ministry of Education (Ref: AP-2004-2745) grants. J Pablo Rey Lopez is supported by Fundacion Cuenca Villoro. The researchers from the University of Zaragoza, Spain (JPRL) are complementarily supported by FUNDACIÓN MAPFRE (Spain). We thank the adolescents for their participation. A copy of the modified IPAQ questionnaire can be downloaded from the HELENA website.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Hagströmer.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors state no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hagströmer, M., Bergman, P., De Bourdeaudhuij, I. et al. Concurrent validity of a modified version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-A) in European adolescents: The HELENA Study. Int J Obes 32 (Suppl 5), S42–S48 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.182

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.182

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links