Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Antihypertensive treatment and control in a large primary care population of 21 167 patients

Results from the Swedish Primary Care Cardiovascular Database (SPCCD)

Abstract

The efficacy of antihypertensive drug therapy is undisputed, but observational studies show that few patients reach a target blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg. However, there is limited data on the drug prescribing patterns and their effectiveness in real practice. This retrospective observational survey of electronic patient records extracted data from 24 Swedish primary health-care centres, with a combined registered population of 330 000 subjects. We included all patients 30 years with a recorded diagnosis of hypertension who consulted the centres in 2005 or 2006 (n=21 167). Main outcome measures were systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and prescribed antihypertensive drug classes. Only 27% had a blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg. The number of prescribed drugs increased with age, except among the oldest (90 years). Only 29% of patients given monotherapy had a blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg. Women more often received diuretics (52 vs 42%), and less often angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (22 vs 33%) and calcium channel blockers (26 vs 31%) than men. β-Blockers and diuretics were the most common drug classes prescribed, independent of comorbidity. In conclusion, one out of four primary care patients with hypertension reach target blood pressure. More frequent use of drug combinations may improve blood pressure control.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lindholm LH, Agenäs I, Carlbeg B, Dahlgren H, de Faire U, Hedblad B et al. Moderately Elevated Blood Pressure. A Systematic Literature Review. The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care: Stockholm, 2004. Report 170/1, pp 1-248 & 170/2, pp 1-514.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR, Giampaoli S, Hense HW, Joffres M et al. Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA 2003; 289: 2363–2369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cutler JA, Sorlie PD, Wolz M, Thom T, Fields LE, Roccella EJ . Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control rates in United States adults between 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Hypertension 2008; 52: 818–827.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJ . Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet 2002; 360: 1347–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Psaty BM, Lumley T, Furberg CD, Schellenbaum G, Pahor M, Alderman MH et al. Health outcomes associated with various antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a network meta-analysis. JAMA 2003; 289: 2534–2544.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Staessen JA, Wang JG, Thijs L . Cardiovascular prevention and blood pressure reduction: a quantitative overview updated until 1 March 2003. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1055–1076.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weinehall L, Ohgren B, Persson M, Stegmayr B, Boman K, Hallmans G et al. High remaining risk in poorly treated hypertension: the ‘rule of halves’ still exists. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 2081–2088.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hedblad B, Nerbrand C, Ekesbo R, Johansson L, Midlöv P, Brunkstedt I et al. High blood pressure despite treatment: results from a cross-sectional primary healthcare-based study in southern Sweden. Scand J Prim Health Care 2006; 24: 224–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Journath G, Hellénius ML, Petersson U, Theobald H, Nilsson PM, Hyper-Q Study Group Sweden. Sex differences in risk factor control of treated hypertensives: a national primary healthcare-based study in Sweden. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2008; 15: 258–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McInnis NH, Fodor G, Lum-Kwong MM, Leenen FH . Antihypertensive medication use and blood pressure control: a community-based cross-sectional survey (ON-BP). Am J Hypertens 2008; 21: 1210–1215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abaci A, Kozan O, Oguz A, Sahin M, Deger N, Senocak H et al. Prescribing pattern of antihypertensive drugs in primary care units in Turkey: results from the TURKSAHA study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 63: 397–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Westheim A, Klemetsrud T, Tretli S, Stoikke HP, Olsen H . Blood pressure levels in treated hypertensive patients in general practice in Norway. Blood Press 2001; 10: 37–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beckett NS, Peters R, Fletcher AE, Staessen JA, Liu L, Dumitrascu D et al. Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1887–1898.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ljungman C, Mortensen L, Kahan T, Manhem K . Treatment of mild to moderate hypertension by gender perspective. J Women Health 2009; 18: 1049–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2007; 25: 1105–1187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosendorff C, Black HR, Cannon CP, Gersh BJ, Gore J, Izzo Jr JL et al. American Heart Association Council for High Blood Pressure Research; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Treatment of hypertension in the prevention and management of ischemic heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council for High Blood Pressure Research and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 2007; 115: 2761–2788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2009. Diabetes Care 2009; 32 (Suppl 1): 13–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabiti-Rosei E, Ambrosioni E, Burnier M, Caulfield MJ et al. Reappraisal of European guidelines of hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document. J Hypertens 2009; 27: 2121–2159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Engfeldt P, Popa C, Bergensand P, Bernsten C, Lindgren O, Navay I et al. Quality assurance of drug prescription in primary health care. A new database software makes the drug therapy surveillance easier. Läkartidningen 2001; 98: 5767–5771.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cederholm J, Nilsson PM, Anderberg C-P, Fröberg L, Petersson U, for the Q-Heart Study Group. Blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors among treated hypertensives in Swedish primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2002; 20: 224–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fagard RH, van den Enden M, Leeman M, Warling X . Survey on treatment of hypertension and implementation of World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension risk stratification in primary care in Belgium. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 1297–1302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Khan N, Chockalingam A, Campbell NR . Lack of control of high blood pressure and treatment recommendations in Canada. Can J Cardiol 2002; 18: 657–661.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Law MR, Morris JK, Wald NJ . Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies. Br Med J 2009; 338: 1245–1252.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lindholm LH, Carlberg B, Samuelsson O . Should beta blockers remain first choice in the treatment of primary hypertension? A meta-analysis. Lancet 2005; 366: 1545–1553.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Khan N, McAlister FA . Re-examining the efficacy of beta-blockers for the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2006; 174: 1737–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wettermark B, Godman B, Neovius M, Hedberg N, Mellgren T-O, Kahan T . Initial effects of a reimbursement restriction to improve the cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment. Health Policy 2010; 94: 221–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Borzecki AM, Glickman ME, Kader B, Berlowitz DR . The effect of age on hypertension control and management. Am J Hypertens 2006; 19: 520–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Klungel OH, de Boer A, Paes AH, Seidell JC, Bakker A . Sex differences in hypertensive drug use: determinants of the choice of medication for hypertension. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 1545–1553.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jochmann N, Stangl K, Garbe E, Baumann E, Stangl V . Female-specific aspects in the pharmacotherapy of chronic cardiovascular diseases. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1585–1595.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Eliasson B, Cederholm J, Nilsson P, Gudbjörnsdóttir S . The gap between guidelines and reality: type 2 diabetes in a National Diabetes Register 1996–2003. Diabet Med 2005; 22: 1420–1426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Buckley B, Shanahan E, Colwell N, Turgonyi E, Bramlage P, Perry IJ . Blood pressure control in hypertensive patients in Irish primary care practices. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2009; 11: 432–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 895–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jamerson K, Weber MA, Bakris GL, Dahlöf B, Pitt B, Shi V et al. Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2417–2428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nietert PJ, Wessell AM, Feifer C, Ornstein SM . Effect of terminal digit preference on blood pressure measurement and treatment in primary care. Am J Hypertens 2006; 19: 147–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Burnier M, Gasser UE . End-digit preference in general practice: a comparison of the conventional auscultatory and electronic oscillometric methods. Blood Press 2008; 17: 104–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cramer JA, Benedict A, Muszabek N, Keskinaslan A, Khan ZM . The significance of compliance and persistence in the treatment of diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: a review. Int J Clin Pract 2008; 62: 76–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all 24 primary health-care centres in Southwest Stockholm for their participation in data collection and quality improvement. This study was supported by Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T Kahan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qvarnström, M., Wettermark, B., Ljungman, C. et al. Antihypertensive treatment and control in a large primary care population of 21 167 patients. J Hum Hypertens 25, 484–491 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2010.86

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2010.86

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links