Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Validity and reliability of aortic pulse wave velocity and augmentation index determined by the new cuff-based SphygmoCor Xcel

Abstract

Aortic pulse wave velocity (AoPWV) and augmentation index (AIx) are commonly used measures of large elastic artery stiffness and wave reflection, respectively. Recently, a new cuff-based SphygmoCor device (Xcel) has been developed to measure both AoPWV and AIx. We sought to examine the following: (1) the validity of Xcel compared with the well-validated tonometry-based SphygmoCor device (MM3); (2) the intratest and day-to-day reliability of Xcel; (3) the influence of body side (right or left) on Xcel measurements; and (4) the relation of Xcel measurements to carotid artery compliance, distensibility and β-stiffness index. We found that measurements of AoPWV and AIx between Xcel and MM3 were not different (P=0.26 and P=0.43, N=22 and 26, respectively) and were strongly related (r=0.85 and 0.75, P<0.0001), and based on Bland–Altman plots there was good agreement between them. Intra-test (intraclass correlation=0.996 and 0.983, P<0.0001; AoPWV and AIx, N=24 and 26, respectively) and day-to-day reliability (intraclass correlation=0.979 and 0.939, P<0.0001) were high. Xcel AoPWV and AIx on the left versus right body side were not different (P=0.19 and P=0.58, N=14 and 15, respectively) and were highly correlated (r=0.99 and 0.94, P<0.0001). AoPWV and AIx measured with Xcel were positively related with β-stiffness index (r=0.62 and 0.51, P0.005, N=23 and 24, respectively) and negatively related with distensibility (r=−0.58 and −0.44, P0.02, N=23 and 24, respectively). In conclusion, Xcel measures of AIx and AoPWV are valid, highly reliable and not affected by body side. Xcel is a useful tool for use in research and the clinic.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, O'Rourke MF, Safar ME, Baou K, Stefanadis C . Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with central haemodynamics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2010; 31 (15): 1865–1871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C . Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55 (13): 1318–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pauca AL, O'Rourke MF, Kon ND . Prospective evaluation of a method for estimating ascending aortic pressure from the radial artery pressure waveform. Hypertension 2001; 38 (4): 932–937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adji A, Hirata K, Hoegler S, O'Rourke MF . Noninvasive pulse waveform analysis in clinical trials: similarity of two methods for calculating aortic systolic pressure. Am J Hypertens 2007; 20 (8): 917–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. O'Rourke MF, Hashimoto J . Pressure pulse waveform analysis in critical care. Crit Care Med 2006; 34 (5): 1569–1570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Casey DP, Beck DT, Nichols WW, Conti CR, Choi CY, Khuddus MA et al. Effects of enhanced external counterpulsation on arterial stiffness and myocardial oxygen demand in patients with chronic angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107 (10): 1466–1472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanaka H, Dinenno FA, Monahan KD, Clevenger CM, DeSouza CA, Seals DR . Aging, habitual exercise, and dynamic arterial compliance. Circulation 2000; 102 (11): 1270–1275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Armentano R, Megnien JL, Simon A, Bellenfant F, Barra J, Levenson J . Effects of hypertension on viscoelasticity of carotid and femoral arteries in humans. Hypertension 1995; 26 (1): 48–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. O'Rourke MF, Staessen JA, Vlachopoulos C, Duprez D, Plante GE . Clinical applications of arterial stiffness; definitions and reference values. Am J Hypertens 2002; 15 (5): 426–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hirai T, Sasayama S, Kawasaki T, Yagi S . Stiffness of systemic arteries in patients with myocardial infarction. A noninvasive method to predict severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation 1989; 80 (1): 78–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank AtCor Medical for kindly providing the SphygmoCor Xcel device for the duration of the study. We also thank the study participants for their time and efforts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D D Christou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Dr Nichols has previously served as a consultant for AtCor Medical. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hwang, MH., Yoo, JK., Kim, HK. et al. Validity and reliability of aortic pulse wave velocity and augmentation index determined by the new cuff-based SphygmoCor Xcel. J Hum Hypertens 28, 475–481 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2013.144

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2013.144

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links