Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Effect of magnesium sulfate exposure on term neonates

Abstract

Objective:

To compare neonatal intensive care unit and special care unit (NICU) admission rates between term neonates exposed to antenatal magnesium sulfate (MS) and those unexposed.

Study Design:

We performed a retrospective cohort study of all singleton neonates 37 weeks born to women with pre-eclampsia from August 2006 to July 2008. Cases were defined by antenatal exposure to MS and controls by absence of MS exposure. The primary outcome was NICU admission. Data were analyzed via univariable and multivariable regression analyses.

Result:

In all, 28 (14.7%) out of 190 MS-exposed neonates 37 weeks were admitted to the NICU, compared with 4 (5.4%) of 74 non-exposed neonates (P=0.04). This association persisted after controlling for potential confounding variables including severe pre-eclampsia and cesarean delivery (AOR 3.69, 1.13 to 11.99). NICU admission was associated in a dose-dependent relationship with total hours and mean dose of MS exposure. Number needed to harm with MS was 11 per NICU admission. Among neonates admitted to the NICU, MS-exposed were more likely to require fluid and nutritional support than unexposed neonates (60.7 vs 0%, P=0.04), and trended toward more frequent requirement for respiratory support and greater length of stay.

Conclusion:

In term neonates, MS exposure may be associated independently with NICU admission in a dose-dependent relationship. Requirements for fluid and nutritional support are common in this group, likely due to feeding difficulties in exposed neonates. Assessment of acute care needs among all neonates exposed to MS for maternal eclampsia prophylaxis should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pryde PG, Mittendorf R . Contemporary usage of obstetric magnesium sulfate. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 669–673.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morgan MA, Goldenberg RL, Schulkin J . Obstetrician-gynecologists’ screening and management of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fox NS, Gelber SE, Kalish RB, Chasen ST . Contemporary practice patterns and beliefs regarding tocolysis among U.S. maternal-fetal medicine specialists. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mercer BM, Merlino AA . Magnesium sulfate for preterm labor and preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 650–668.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Duley L, Gulmezoglu AM, Henderson-Smart DJ . Magnesium sulfate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (2): CD000025.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sibai BM . Magnesium sulfate prophylaxis in pre-eclampsia: evidence from randomized trials. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2005; 48: 478–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pryde PG, Besinger RE, Gianopoulos JG, Mittendorf R . Adverse and beneficial effects of tocolytic therapy. Semin Perinatol 2001; 25: 316–340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Doyle LW, Crowther CA, Middleton P, Marret S, Rouse D . Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (1): CD004661.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lyell DJ, Pullen K, Campbell L, Ching S, Druzin ML, Chitkara U et al. Magnesium sulfate compared with nifedipine for acute tocolysis of preterm labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 61–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lyell DJ, Penn A, Caughey A, Kogut E, McClellan L, Adams B et al. Neonatal outcomes following antenatal magnesium sulfate exposure: follow up from a magnesium vs nifedipine tocolysis RCT. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: S180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenberg MB, Penn AA, Thomas LJ, El-Sayed YY, Caughey AB, Lyell DJ . Neonatal medical admission in a term and late-preterm cohort exposed to magnesium sulfate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: 515.e1–515.e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 33. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 159–167.

  13. Lucas MJ, Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG . A comparison of magnesium sulfate with phenytoin for the prevention of eclampsia. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 201–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Coetzee EJ, Dommisse J, Anthony J . A randomised controlled trial of intravenous magnesium sulphate versus placebo in the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 300–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Altman D, Carroli G, Duley L, Farrell B, Moodley J, Neilson J et al. Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 1877–1890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Belfort MA, Anthony J, Saade GR, Allen JC Jr . A comparison of magnesium sulfate and nimodipine for the prevention of eclampsia. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 304–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lipsitz PJ, English IC . Hypermagnesemia in the newborn infant. Pediatrics 1967; 40: 856–862.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lipsitz PJ . The clinical and biochemical effects of excess magnesium in the newborn. Pediatrics 1971; 47: 501–509.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stone SR, Pritchard JA . Effect of maternally administered magnesium sulfate on the neonate. Obstet Gynecol 1970; 35: 574–577.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rasch DK, Huber PA, Richardson CJ, L’Hommedieu CS, Nelson TE, Reddi R . Neurobehavioral effects of neonatal hypermagnesemia. J Pediatr 1982; 100: 272–276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Green KW, Key TC, Coen R, Resnik R . The effects of maternally administered magnesium sulfate on the neonate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 29–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Riaz M, Porat R, Brodsky NL, Hurt H . The effects of maternal magnesium sulfate treatment on newborns: a prospective controlled study. J Perinatol 1998; 18: 449–454.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, Henriksen TB . Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: cohort study. BMJ 2008; 336: 85–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. De Luca R, Boulvain M, Irion O, Berner M, Pfister RE . Incidence of early neonatal mortality and morbidity after late-preterm and term cesarean delivery. Pediatrics 2009; 123: e1064–e1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sibai BM . Etiology and management of postpartum hypertension-preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 470–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Oscar G and Elsa S Mayer Family Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M B Greenberg.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Presented at the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine 31st Annual Meeting, 12 to 19 February 2011, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenberg, M., Penn, A., Whitaker, K. et al. Effect of magnesium sulfate exposure on term neonates. J Perinatol 33, 188–193 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2012.95

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2012.95

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links