Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Influence of patent ductus arteriosus and ventilators on electrical velocimetry for measuring cardiac output in very-low/low birth weight infants

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

We evaluated electrical velocimetry, a noninvasive method for continuous cardiac output measurement, in very-low and low birth weight infants and the influence of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and ventilators on this method.

Study design:

This prospective study compared 81 pairs of simultaneous cardiac output measurements by electrical velocimetry and transthoracic echocardiography in 28 patients. Data were compared by correlation, Bland–Altman analysis and two-way analysis of variance.

Results:

The two methods exhibited a high correlation (r=0.859, P<0.0001). The bias (mean difference of the methods) and percent error (100 × 1.96 × s.d./mean cardiac output) were −6 ml min−1 and 29.2%, respectively. PDA significantly affected the bias (P=0.0004), but ventilators did not (P=0.14). Hemodynamically significant PDA had a larger bias (−36 ml min−1) and higher percent error (38.6%).

Conclusions:

Although influenced by PDA, electrical velocimetry was generally interchangeable with transthoracic echocardiography even using ventilators.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lobo SM, Lobo FR, Polachini CA, Patini DS, Yamamoto AE, de Oliveira NE et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing fluids and dobutamine optimization of oxygen delivery in high-risk surgical patients [ISRCTN42445141]. Crit Care 2006; 10 (3): R72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345 (19): 1368–1377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, Bennett ED . Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care 2005; 9 (6): R687–R693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fakler U, Ch Pauli, Balling G, Lorenz HP, Eicken A, Hennig M et al. Cardiac index monitoring by pulse contour analysis and thermodilution after pediatric cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133 (1): 224–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Raue W, Swierzy M, Koplin G, Schwenk W . Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transthoracic thermodilution technique for cardiac output assessment in critically ill patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26 (12): 1067–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Osthaus WA, Huber D, Beck C, Winterhalter M, Boethig D, Wessel A et al. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transpulmonary thermodilution for measuring cardiac output in piglets. Paediatr Anaesth 2007; 17 (8): 749–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zoremba N, Bickenbach J, Krauss B, Rossaint R, Kuhlen R, Schälte G . Comparison of electrical velocimetry and thermodilution techniques for the measurement of cardiac output. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51 (10): 1314–1319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Norozi K, Beck C, Osthaus WA, Wille I, Wessel A, Bertram H . Electrical velocimetry for measuring cardiac output in children with congenital heart disease. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100 (1): 88–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidt C, Theilmeier G, Van Aken H, Korsmeier P, Wirtz SP, Berendes E et al. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography for measuring stroke volume and cardiac output. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95 (5): 603–610.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mertens L, Seri I, Marek J, Arlettaz R, Barker P, McNamara P et al. Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: practice guidelines and recommendations for training. Writing Group of the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) in collaboration with the European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) and the Association for European Pediatric Cardiologists (AEPC). J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24 (10): 1057–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Raaijmakers E, Faes TJ, Scholten RJ, Goovaerts HG, Heethaar RM . A meta-analysis of three decades of validating thoracic impedance cardiography. Crit Care Med 1999; 27 (6): 1203–1213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Critchley LA, Critchley JA . A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15 (2): 85–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bland JM, Altman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1 (8476): 307–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, Della Rocca G, Grounds RM . Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies -with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 2009; 13 (1): 201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mekis D, Kamenik M, Starc V, Jeretin S . Cardiac output measurements with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing CABG surgery: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25 (3): 237–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grollmuss O, Demontoux S, Capderou A, Serraf A, Belli E . Electrical velocimetry as a tool for measuring cardiac output in small infants after heart surgery. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38 (6): 1032–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Noori S, Drabu B, Soleymani S, Seri I . Continuous non-invasive cardiac output measurements in the neonate by electrical velocimetry: a comparison with echocardiography. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97 (5): F340–F343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tomaske M, Knirsch W, Kretschmar O, Woitzek K, Balmer C, Schmitz A et al. Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of Aesculon cardiac output monitor and thermodilution. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100 (4): 517–520.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Futier E, Robin E, Jabaudon M, Guerin R, Petit A, Bazin JE et al. Central venous O2 saturation and venous-to-arterial CO2 difference as complementary tools for goal-directed therapy during high-risk surgery. Crit Care 2010; 14 (5): R193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vijlbrief DC, Benders MJ, Kemperman H, van Bel F, de Vries WB . Cardiac biomarkers as indicators of hemodynamic adaptation during postasphyxial hypothermia treatment. Neonatology 2012; 102 (4): 243–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ehrenkranz RA, Younes N, Lemons JA, Fanaroff AA, Donovan EF, Wright LL et al. Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1999; 104 (2 Pt 1): 280–289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaffer SG, Quimiro CL, Anderson JV, Hall RT . Postnatal weight changes in low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1987; 79 (5): 702–705.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T Torigoe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torigoe, T., Sato, S., Nagayama, Y. et al. Influence of patent ductus arteriosus and ventilators on electrical velocimetry for measuring cardiac output in very-low/low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 35, 485–489 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.245

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.245

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links