Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Perforin pores in the endosomal membrane trigger the release of endocytosed granzyme B into the cytosol of target cells

Abstract

How the pore-forming protein perforin delivers apoptosis-inducing granzymes to the cytosol of target cells is uncertain. Perforin induces a transient Ca2+ flux in the target cell, which triggers a process to repair the damaged cell membrane. As a consequence, both perforin and granzymes are endocytosed into enlarged endosomes called 'gigantosomes'. Here we show that perforin formed pores in the gigantosome membrane, allowing endosomal cargo, including granzymes, to be gradually released. After about 15 min, gigantosomes ruptured, releasing their remaining content. Thus, perforin delivers granzymes by a two-step process that involves first transient pores in the cell membrane that trigger the endocytosis of granzyme and perforin and then pore formation in endosomes to trigger cytosolic release.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Inhibition of gigantosome formation does not impair granzyme B–induced apoptosis.
Figure 2: Perforin inhibits endosome acidification.
Figure 3: Perforin multimerizes in gigantosome membranes.
Figure 4: Endocytosed granzyme B is released into the cytosol beginning within 10 min of the loading of perforin.
Figure 5: Release of endocytosed cargo from gigantosomes into the cytosol.
Figure 6: Granzyme B and perforin localize in gigantosomes in target cells during lysis by NK cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Saint Basile, G., Menasche, G. & Fischer, A. Molecular mechanisms of biogenesis and exocytosis of cytotoxic granules. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 568–579 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grakoui, A. et al. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 285, 221–227 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stinchcombe, J.C., Bossi, G., Booth, S. & Griffiths, G.M. The immunological synapse of CTL contains a secretory domain and membrane bridges. Immunity 15, 751–761 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lieberman, J. The ABCs of granule-mediated cytotoxicity: new weapons in the arsenal. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 361–370 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dustin, M.L. & Long, E.O. Cytotoxic immunological synapses. Immunol. Rev. 235, 24–34 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Anthony, D.A., Andrews, D.M., Watt, S.V., Trapani, J.A. & Smyth, M.J. Functional dissection of the granzyme family: cell death and inflammation. Immunol. Rev. 235, 73–92 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bovenschen, N. & Kummer, J.A. Orphan granzymes find a home. Immunol. Rev. 235, 117–127 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lieberman, J. Granzyme A activates another way to die. Immunol. Rev. 235, 93–104 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pasternack, M.S. & Eisen, H.N. A novel serine esterase expressed by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Nature 314, 743–745 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Podack, E.R., Young, J.D. & Cohn, Z.A. Isolation and biochemical and functional characterization of perforin 1 from cytolytic T-cell granules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 8629–8633 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gershenfeld, H.K. & Weissman, I.L. Cloning of a cDNA for a T cell-specific serine protease from a cytotoxic T lymphocyte. Science 232, 854–858 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bleackley, R.C. et al. The isolation and characterization of a family of serine protease genes expressed in activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Immunol. Rev. 103, 5–19 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. van den Broek, M.E. et al. Decreased tumor surveillance in perforin-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 184, 1781–1790 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stepp, S.E. et al. Perforin gene defects in familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Science 286, 1957–1959 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Katano, H. & Cohen, J.I. Perforin and lymphohistiocytic proliferative disorders. Br. J. Haematol. 128, 739–750 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pipkin, M.E. & Lieberman, J. Delivering the kiss of death: progress on understanding how perforin works. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 19, 301–308 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Voskoboinik, I., Smyth, M.J. & Trapani, J.A. Perforin-mediated target-cell death and immune homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6, 940–952 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Baran, K. et al. The molecular basis for perforin oligomerization and transmembrane pore assembly. Immunity 30, 684–695 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Podack, E.R. & Dennert, G. Assembly of two types of tubules with putative cytolytic function by cloned natural killer cells. Nature 302, 442–445 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Podack, E.R., Konigsberg, P.J., Acha-Orbea, H., Pircher, H. & Hengartner, H. Cytolytic T-cell granules: biochemical properties and functional specificity. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 184, 99–119 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Trapani, J.A. et al. Genomic organization of the mouse pore-forming protein (perforin) gene and localization to chromosome 10. Similarities to and differences from C9. J. Exp. Med. 171, 545–557 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tschopp, J., Masson, D. & Stanley, K.K. Structural/functional similarity between proteins involved in complement- and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-mediated cytolysis. Nature 322, 831–834 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Keefe, D. et al. Perforin triggers a plasma membrane-repair response that facilitates CTL induction of apoptosis. Immunity 23, 249–262 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Thiery, J. et al. Perforin activates clathrin- and dynamin-dependent endocytosis, which is required for plasma membrane repair and delivery of granzyme B for granzyme-mediated apoptosis. Blood 115, 1582–1593 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Froelich, C.J. et al. New paradigm for lymphocyte granule-mediated cytotoxicity. Target cells bind and internalize granzyme B, but an endosomolytic agent is necessary for cytosolic delivery and subsequent apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 29073–29079 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Browne, K.A. et al. Cytosolic delivery of granzyme B by bacterial toxins: evidence that endosomal disruption, in addition to transmembrane pore formation, is an important function of perforin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8604–8615 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Reddy, A., Caler, E.V. & Andrews, N.W. Plasma membrane repair is mediated by Ca2+-regulated exocytosis of lysosomes. Cell 106, 157–169 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McNeil, P.L. & Steinhardt, R.A. Plasma membrane disruption: repair, prevention, adaptation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19, 697–731 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McNeil, P.L. & Kirchhausen, T. An emergency response team for membrane repair. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 499–505 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Idone, V. et al. Repair of injured plasma membrane by rapid Ca2+-dependent endocytosis. J. Cell Biol. 180, 905–914 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bucci, C. et al. The small GTPase rab5 functions as a regulatory factor in the early endocytic pathway. Cell 70, 715–728 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Olkkonen, V.M. & Stenmark, H. Role of Rab GTPases in membrane traffic. Int. Rev. Cytol. 176, 1–85 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Armstrong, J. How do Rab proteins function in membrane traffic? Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 32, 303–307 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Li, G., Barbieri, M.A., Colombo, M.I. & Stahl, P.D. Structural features of the GTP-binding defective Rab5 mutants required for their inhibitory activity on endocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 14631–14635 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Forgac, M. Vacuolar ATPases: rotary proton pumps in physiology and pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 917–929 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tschopp, J. & Masson, D. Inhibition of the lytic activity of perforin (cytolysin) and of late complement components by proteoglycans. Mol. Immunol. 24, 907–913 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Yoshimori, T., Yamamoto, A., Moriyama, Y., Futai, M. & Tashiro, Y. Bafilomycin A1, a specific inhibitor of vacuolar-type H+-ATPase, inhibits acidification and protein degradation in lysosomes of cultured cells. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 17707–17712 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Recchi, C. & Chavrier, P. V-ATPase: a potential pH sensor. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 107–109 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Galloway, C.J., Dean, G.E., Marsh, M., Rudnick, G. & Mellman, I. Acidification of macrophage and fibroblast endocytic vesicles in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 3334–3338 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Praper, T. et al. Human perforin permeabilizing activity, but not binding to lipid membranes, is affected by pH. Mol. Immunol. 47, 2492–2504 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Jans, D.A., Jans, P., Briggs, L.J., Sutton, V. & Trapani, J.A. Nuclear transport of granzyme B (fragmentin-2). Dependence of perforin in vivo and cytosolic factors in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 30781–30789 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. D'Arrigo, A., Bucci, C., Toh, B.H. & Stenmark, H. Microtubules are involved in bafilomycin A1-induced tubulation and Rab5-dependent vacuolation of early endosomes. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 72, 95–103 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Husmann, M. et al. Elimination of a bacterial pore-forming toxin by sequential endocytosis and exocytosis. FEBS Lett. 583, 337–344 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Pilzer, D., Gasser, O., Moskovich, O., Schifferli, J.A. & Fishelson, Z. Emission of membrane vesicles: roles in complement resistance, immunity and cancer. Springer Semin. Immunopathol. 27, 375–387 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Praper, T. et al. Human perforin employs different avenues to damage membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 2946–2955 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Thiery, J., Walch, M., Jensen, D.K., Martinvalet, D. & Lieberman, J. in Current Protocols in Cell Biology Vol. 47 (eds. Bonifacino, J.S., Dasso, M., Harford, J.B., Lippincott-Schwartz, J. & Yamada, K.M.) Unit 3.37, 1–29 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2010).

  47. Aricescu, A.R., Lu, W. & Jones, E.Y. A time- and cost-efficient system for high-level protein production in mammalian cells. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 1243–1250 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Martinvalet, D., Thiery, J. & Chowdhury, D. Granzymes and cell death. Methods Enzymol. 442, 213–230 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Barbieri, M.A., Li, G., Mayorga, L.S. & Stahl, P.D. Characterization of Rab5:Q79L-stimulated endosome fusion. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 326, 64–72 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Y. Jones (University of Oxford) for the mammalian expression vector pHLseq; G.M. Griffiths (Oxford University) for 2d4 mouse antibody to human perforin; and E. Marino for assistance with microscopy and image analysis. Supported by the US National Institutes of Health (AI063430 to J.L. and GM075252 to T.K.), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (R.C.B.), the Canadian Cancer Society (RCB), the Stiefel-Zangger Foundation (M.W.), the Human Frontier Science Program Organization (E.B.), the Harvard Digestive Diseases Center (S.B.) and the Immune Disease Institute and GlaxoSmithKline Alliance (S.B.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.T. designed and did experiments, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript; S.B., D.K. and E.B. did and helped analyze some experiments; M.W. and D.M. purified granzyme B and helped with perforin purification; I.S.G. and R.C.B. developed the NK cell line expressing eGFP–granzyme B; and T.K. and J.L. conceived of and supervised the project, helped design experiments and coordinated the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judy Lieberman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–7 and Supplementary Methods (PDF 941 kb)

Supplementary Video 1

PFN-mediated release of endocytosed dextran from a gigantosome. Representative EGFP-EEA-1+ (green) gigantosomes from transfected HeLa cells treated with TR-Dextran (red) and sublytic rat PFN. Live images were acquired by spinning disk confocal microscopy starting 10 min after addition of TR-Dextran and PFN (duration 5 min, 2.5 sec/frame). Selected static individual frames from these movies are shown in Figure 5c. (MOV 2009 kb)

Supplementary Video 2

PFN-mediated release of endocytosed dextran from a gigantosome. Representative EGFP-EEA-1+ (green) gigantosomes from transfected HeLa cells treated with TR-Dextran (red) and sublytic rat PFN. Live images were acquired by spinning disk confocal microscopy starting 10 min after addition of TR-Dextran and PFN (duration 6 min, 10 sec/frame). Selected static individual frames from these movies are shown in Supplementary Figure 6a. (MOV 113 kb)

Supplementary Video 3

PFN-mediated release of endocytosed dextran from a gigantosome. Representative EGFP-EEA-1+ (green) gigantosomes from transfected HeLa cells treated with TR-Dextran (red) and sublytic rat PFN. Live images were acquired by spinning disk confocal microscopy starting 10 min after addition of TR-Dextran and PFN (duration 13.5 min, 10 sec/frame). Selected static individual frames from these movies are shown in Supplementary Figure 6b. (MOV 461 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thiery, J., Keefe, D., Boulant, S. et al. Perforin pores in the endosomal membrane trigger the release of endocytosed granzyme B into the cytosol of target cells. Nat Immunol 12, 770–777 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2050

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2050

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing