Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Technical Report
  • Published:

Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness

Nature Neuroscience volume 10, pages 257–261 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

The lack of an accepted measure of awareness has made claims that accurate decisions can be made without awareness controversial. Here we introduce a new objective measure of awareness, post-decision wagering. We show that participants fail to maximize cash earnings by wagering high following correct decisions in blindsight, the Iowa gambling task and an artificial grammar task. This demonstrates, without the uncertainties associated with the conventional subjective measures of awareness (verbal reports and confidence ratings), that the participants were not aware that their decisions were correct. Post-decision wagering may be used to study the neural correlates of consciousness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Performance and wagering in the modified Iowa gambling task.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A. & Boyer, M. Implicit learning: news from the front. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 406–411 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shanks, D.R. & St. John, M.F. Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 17, 367–447 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dienes, Z. & Scott, R. Measuring unconscious knowledge: distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge. Psychol. Res. 69, 338–351 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crick, F. & Koch, C. A framework for consciousness. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 119–126 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cowey, A. The Ferrier Lecture 2004: what can transcranial magnetic stimulation tell us about how the brain works? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 360, 1185–1205 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stoerig, P., Zontanou, A. & Cowey, A. Aware or unaware: assessment of cortical blindness in four men and a monkey. Cereb. Cortex 12, 565–574 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tunney, R.J. & Shanks, D.R. Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition. Mem. Cognit. 31, 1060–1071 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Damasio, A.R. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain (Grosset/Putnam, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bechara, A., Damasio, A.R., Damasio, H. & Anderson, S.W. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 50, 7–15 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D. & Damasio, A.R. Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science 275, 1293–1295 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maia, T.V. & McClelland, J.L. A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: what participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16075–16080 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Barbur, J.L., Harlow, A.J. & Weiskrantz, L. Spatial and temporal response properties of residual vision in a case of hemianopia. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 343, 157–166 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Blythe, I.M., Bromley, J.M., Kennard, C. & Ruddock, K.H. Visual discrimination of target displacement remains after damage to the striate cortex in humans. Nature 320, 619–621 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Weiskrantz, L., Harlow, A. & Barbur, J.L. Factors affecting visual sensitivity in a hemianopic subject. Brain 114, 2269–2282 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barbur, J.L., Ruddock, K.H. & Waterfield, V.A. Human visual responses in the absence of the geniculo-calcarine projection. Brain 103, 905–928 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. King, S.M., Azzopardi, P., Cowey, A., Oxbury, J. & Oxbury, S. The role of light scatter in the residual visual sensitivity of patients with complete cerebral hemispherectomy. Vis. Neurosci. 13, 1–15 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dienes, Z., Altmann, G., Kwan, L. & Goode, A. Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 21, 1322–1338 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reber, A.S. Transfer of syntactic structures in synthetic languages. J. Exp. Psychol. 81, 115–119 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

N.P. was supported by a Rhodes Scholarship and A.C. by the UK Medical Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Experimental Psychology, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK

    Navindra Persaud, Peter McLeod & Alan Cowey

Authors
  1. Navindra Persaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter McLeod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alan Cowey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All three authors contributed to the execution of the experiments and the writing of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Navindra Persaud.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Wagering versus performance in aware and unaware conditions by GY. (PDF 77 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Wagering versus performance in aware and unaware conditions in the artificial grammar task. (PDF 192 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Wagering versus performance in the Iowa gambling task. (PDF 218 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Localization task with subthreshold stimuli in the scotoma (right hemifield). (PDF 39 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Pooled data for subthreshold stimuli presented in the scotoma (right hemifield) during yes-no and localization tasks. (PDF 52 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

Localization task with suprathreshold stimuli presented in the scotoma (right hemifield). (PDF 6 kb)

Supplementary Table 4

Localization task with suprathreshold stimuli presented in the normal (left) hemifield. (PDF 39 kb)

Supplementary Table 5

Localization task with a mix of suprathreshold and subthreshold stimuli presented in both hemifields. (PDF 40 kb)

Supplementary Table 6

d' values for blindsight and artificial grammar. (PDF 40 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 169 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Persaud, N., McLeod, P. & Cowey, A. Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness. Nat Neurosci 10, 257–261 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1840

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1840

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing