Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Synaptic basis for intense thalamocortical activation of feedforward inhibitory cells in neocortex

Nature Neuroscience volume 10, pages 462–468 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

The thalamus provides fundamental input to the neocortex. This input activates inhibitory interneurons more strongly than excitatory neurons, triggering powerful feedforward inhibition. We studied the mechanisms of this selective neuronal activation using a mouse somatosensory thalamocortical preparation. Notably, the greater responsiveness of inhibitory interneurons was not caused by their distinctive intrinsic properties but was instead produced by synaptic mechanisms. Axons from the thalamus made stronger and more frequent excitatory connections onto inhibitory interneurons than onto excitatory cells. Furthermore, circuit dynamics allowed feedforward inhibition to suppress responses in excitatory cells more effectively than in interneurons. Thalamocortical excitatory currents rose quickly in interneurons, allowing them to fire action potentials before significant feedforward inhibition emerged. In contrast, thalamocortical excitatory currents rose slowly in excitatory cells, overlapping with feedforward inhibitory currents that suppress action potentials. These results demonstrate the importance of selective synaptic targeting and precise timing in the initial stages of neocortical processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: In paired FS-RS cell recordings, thalamocortical responses were strongest in FS cells, but intrinsic excitability was greatest in RS cells.
Figure 2: Excitatory and inhibitory conductances evoked by thalamocortical stimulation were larger in FS than in RS cells.
Figure 3: Strengths of individual thalamic cell connections, and the number of thalamic cells making connections, were greater for FS than for RS cells.
Figure 4: A cell-type difference in Ge-Gi kinetics allowed inhibition to be most effective in RS cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mountcastle, V.M. Perceptual Neuroscience (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gibson, J.R., Beierlein, M. & Connors, B.W. Two networks of electrically coupled inhibitory neurons in neocortex. Nature 402, 75–79 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Porter, J.T., Johnson, C.K. & Agmon, A. Diverse types of interneurons generate thalamus-evoked feedforward inhibition in the mouse barrel cortex. J. Neurosci. 21, 2699–2710 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruno, R.M. & Simons, D.J. Feedforward mechanisms of excitatory and inhibitory cortical receptive fields. J. Neurosci. 22, 10966–10975 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Swadlow, H.A. Thalamocortical control of feedforward inhibition in awake somatosensory 'barrel' cortex. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357, 1717–1727 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Agmon, A. & Connors, B.W. Correlation between intrinsic firing patterns and thalamocortical synaptic responses of neurons in mouse barrel cortex. J. Neurosci. 12, 319–329 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gil, Z. & Amitai, Y. Properties of convergent thalamocortical and intracortical synaptic potentials in single neurons of neocortex. J. Neurosci. 16, 6567–6578 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beierlein, M., Gibson, J.R. & Connors, B.W. Two dynamically distinct inhibitory networks in layer 4 of the neocortex. J. Neurophysiol. 90, 2987–3000 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gabernet, L., Jadhav, S.P., Feldman, D.E., Carandini, M. & Scanziani, M. Somatosensory integration controlled by dynamic thalamocortical feedforward inhibition. Neuron 48, 315–327 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Inoue, T. & Imoto, K. Feedforward inhibitory connections from multiple thalamic cells to multiple regular-spiking cells in layer 4 of the somatosensory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 1746–1754 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, Q.Q., Huguenard, J.R. & Prince, D.A. Barrel cortex microcircuits: thalamocortical feedforward inhibition in spiny stellate cells is mediated by a small number of fast-spiking interneurons. J. Neurosci. 26, 1219–1230 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, K.D., Pinto, D.J. & Simons, D.J. Processing in layer 4 of the neocortical circuit: new insights from visual and somatosensory cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 488–497 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Douglas, R.J. & Martin, K.A. Neuronal circuits of the neocortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 419–451 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Alonso, J.M. & Swadlow, H.A. Thalamocortical specificity and the synthesis of sensory cortical receptive fields. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 26–32 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Agmon, A. & Connors, B.W. Thalamocortical responses of mouse somatosensory (barrel) cortex in vitro. Neuroscience 41, 365–379 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lawrence, J.J. & McBain, C.J. Interneuron diversity series: containing the detonation-feedforward inhibition in the CA3 hippocampus. Trends Neurosci. 26, 631–640 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jonas, P., Bischofberger, J., Fricker, D. & Miles, R. Interneuron diversity series: fast in, fast out—temporal and spatial signal processing in hippocampal interneurons. Trends Neurosci. 27, 30–40 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wehr, M. & Zador, A.M. Balanced inhibition underlies tuning and sharpens spike timing in auditory cortex. Nature 426, 442–446 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McNaughton, B.L., Barnes, C.A. & Andersen, P. Synaptic efficacy and EPSP summation in granule cells of rat fascia dentata studied in vitro. J. Neurophysiol. 46, 952–966 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Staiger, J.F., Zilles, K. & Freund, T.F. Distribution of GABAergic elements postsynaptic to ventroposteromedial thalamic projections in layer IV of rat barrel cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 8, 2273–2285 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Martina, M., Royer, S. & Pare, D. Cell type–specific GABA responses and chloride homeostasis in the cortex and amygdala. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 2887–2895 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Owens, D.F. & Kriegstein, A.R. Is there more to GABA than synaptic inhibition? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 715–727 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gulledge, A.T. & Stuart, G.J. Excitatory actions of GABA in the cortex. Neuron 37, 299–309 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jin, X., Huguenard, J.R. & Prince, D.A. Impaired Cl− extrusion in layer V pyramidal neurons of chronically injured epileptogenic neocortex. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 2117–2126 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Szabadics, J. et al. Excitatory effect of GABAergic axo-axonic cells in cortical microcircuits. Science 311, 233–235 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Steriade, M., Timofeev, I. & Grenier, F. Natural waking and sleep states: a view from inside neocortical neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 85, 1969–1985 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bruno, R.M. & Sakmann, B. Cortex is driven by weak but synchronously active thalamocortical synapses. Science 312, 1622–1627 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Higley, M.J. & Contreras, D. Balanced excitation and inhibition determine spike timing during frequency adaptation. J. Neurosci. 26, 448–457 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Galarreta, M. & Hestrin, S. Spike transmission and synchrony detection in networks of GABAergic interneurons. Science 292, 2295–2299 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Geiger, J.R. et al. Relative abundance of subunit mRNAs determines gating and Ca2+ permeability of AMPA receptors in principal neurons and interneurons in rat CNS. Neuron 15, 193–204 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lambolez, B., Ropert, N., Perrais, D., Rossier, J. & Hestrin, S. Correlation between kinetics and RNA splicing of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid receptors in neocortical neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 1797–1802 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou, F.M. & Hablitz, J.J. AMPA receptor–mediated EPSCs in rat neocortical layer II/III interneurons have rapid kinetics. Brain Res. 780, 166–169 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Geiger, J.R., Lubke, J., Roth, A., Frotscher, M. & Jonas, P. Submillisecond AMPA receptor–mediated signaling at a principal neuron-interneuron synapse. Neuron 18, 1009–1023 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Walker, H.C., Lawrence, J.J. & McBain, C.J. Activation of kinetically distinct synaptic conductances on inhibitory interneurons by electrotonically overlapping afferents. Neuron 35, 161–171 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Benshalom, G. & White, E.L. Quantification of thalamocortical synapses with spiny stellate neurons in layer IV of mouse somatosensory cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 253, 303–314 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Keller, A. & White, E.L. Synaptic organization of GABAergic neurons in the mouse SmI cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 262, 1–12 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ahmed, B., Anderson, J.C., Douglas, R.J., Martin, K.A. & Nelson, J.C. Polyneuronal innervation of spiny stellate neurons in cat visual cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 341, 39–49 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ahmed, B., Anderson, J.C., Martin, K.A. & Nelson, J.C. Map of the synapses onto layer 4 basket cells of the primary visual cortex of the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 380, 230–242 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wilent, W.B. & Contreras, D. Dynamics of excitation and inhibition underlying stimulus selectivity in rat somatosensory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1364–1370 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Moore, C.I., Nelson, S.B. & Sur, M. Dynamics of neuronal processing in rat somatosensory cortex. Trends Neurosci. 22, 513–520 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Chattopadhyaya, B. et al. Experience and activity-dependent maturation of perisomatic GABAergic innervation in primary visual cortex during a postnatal critical period. J. Neurosci. 24, 9598–9611 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our colleagues A. Agmon, O. Ahmed, C. Aizenman, J.-M. Edeline, E. Fanselow, A. Gray, S.-C. Lee, M. Long, R. Metherate, K. Pratt, K. Richardson, B. Rudy and H. Swadlow for their helpful comments about this work; S. Patrick for technical assistance; and Z. Huang for providing G42 mice. Our research was supported by grants from the US National Institutes of Health, the US National Science Foundation and the Brown University Brain Science Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience, Division of Biology & Medicine, Box G-LN, Brown University, Providence, 02912, Rhode Island, USA

    Scott J Cruikshank & Barry W Connors

  2. Department of Mathematics, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, Davis, 95616, California, USA

    Timothy J Lewis

Authors
  1. Scott J Cruikshank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Timothy J Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Barry W Connors
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barry W Connors.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

GFP expression in FS cells of the G42 mouse line. (PDF 856 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Mean intrinsic properties, reversal potentials and synaptic conductances recorded during the experiments and applied in the models. (PDF 127 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

The influence of Ge kinetics on functional inhibition depends on inhibitory driving force. (PDF 110 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4

Effects of input resistance (Rin) on time-course of PSPs. (PDF 127 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 88 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cruikshank, S., Lewis, T. & Connors, B. Synaptic basis for intense thalamocortical activation of feedforward inhibitory cells in neocortex. Nat Neurosci 10, 462–468 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1861

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1861

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing