Abstract
The publication of the fifth version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) in 2013 raises important questions for clinical trials and associated regulatory decisions on new drugs for psychiatric disorders.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Regier, D. A. Dimensional approaches to psychiatric classification: refining the research agenda for DSM-V: an introduction. Int. J. Meth. Psychiatr. Res. 16, S1–S5 (2007).
Kraemer, H. C., Kupfer, D. J., Clarke, D. E., Narrow, W. E. & Regier, D. A. DSM-5: how reliable is reliable enough? Am. J. Psychiatry 169, 13–15 (2012).
First, M. B. DSM-5 proposals for mood disorders: a cost–benefit analysis. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 24, 1–9 (2011).
Wakefield, J. C. DSM-5: proposed changes to depressive disorders. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 28, 335–343 (2012).
Insel, T. R. & Wang, P. S. Rethinking mental illness. JAMA 303, 1970–1971 (2010).
Acknowledgements
The views expressed in this article are the personal views of the authors and may not be understood or quoted as being made on behalf of or reflecting the position of the regulatory agencies or the committees or working parties of the regulatory agencies the authors work for.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
All authors work for drug regulatory agencies. The authors have declared that no other competing interests exist, and no specific funding was received for writing this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Butlen-Ducuing, F., Haas, M., Pani, L. et al. DSM-5 and clinical trials in psychiatry: challenges to come?. Nat Rev Drug Discov 11, 583–584 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3811
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3811
This article is cited by
-
Cluster analysis of cognitive deficits may mark heterogeneity in schizophrenia in terms of outcome and response to treatment
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (2014)