Key Points
-
Cell movement is essential for animal development, homeostasis and disease progression. Some cells move in groups, others as single cells.
-
Individual cell migration can be described by a series of reiterated steps: extension of protrusions towards a chemoattractant, adhesion to a substrate, contraction and detachment at the rear. However, cells migrating in complex environments and/or coordinating their movements with other cells require additional regulation.
-
The Drosophila melanogaster border cells have emerged as an excellent model for the study of the coordinated movement of cells in a cohort in vivo. Innovative genetic, live imaging and photomanipulation techniques are providing new insights into the signals governing collective cell migration.
-
Key molecules regulating border cell migration include: the JAK–STAT (Janus kinase–signal transducer and activator of transcription) pathway for selecting the motile cells; the steroid hormone ecdysone for coordinating the timing of movement; and receptor tyrosine kinases and their ligands for providing spatial cues.
-
Unlike individually migrating cells that only adopt a leading–lagging edge polarity, the border cells require two additional axes of polarity for coordinated movement: apical–basal and inside–outside. Because border cells remain in a cluster as they move, they must maintain high levels of adhesion complexes between cells, while dynamically regulating adhesions at the outer edges.
-
Regulators of actin dynamics, such as the Rho.family of GTPases and actin-binding proteins, control much of the mechanics of cell movement. However, the precise roles for specific actin regulators depend on their cellular contexts.
Abstract
Cell movements are essential for animal development and homeostasis but also contribute to disease. Moving cells typically extend protrusions towards a chemoattractant, adhere to the substrate, contract and detach at the rear. It is less clear how cells that migrate in interconnected groups in vivo coordinate their behaviour and navigate through natural environments. The border cells of the Drosophila melanogaster ovary have emerged as an excellent model for the study of collective cell movement, aided by innovative genetic, live imaging, and photomanipulation techniques. Here we provide an overview of the molecular choreography of border cells and its more general implications.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rorke, L. B. A perspective: the role of disordered genetic control of neurogenesis in the pathogenesis of migration disorders. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 53, 105–117 (1994).
Imai, K., Nonoyama, S. & Ochs, H. D. WASP (Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein) gene mutations and phenotype. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 3, 427–436 (2003).
Gertler, F. & Condeelis, J. Metastasis: tumor cells becoming MENAcing. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 81–90 (2011).
Roussos, E. T., Condeelis, J. S. & Patsialou, A. Chemotaxis in cancer. Nature Rev. Cancer 11, 573–587 (2011).
Yamaguchi, H. & Condeelis, J. Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell migration and invasion. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1773, 642–652 (2007).
Vicente-Manzanares, M., Webb, D. J. & Horwitz, A. R. Cell migration at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 118, 4917–4919 (2005).
Webb, D. J., Zhang, H. & Horwitz, A. F. Cell migration: an overview. Methods Mol. Biol. 294, 3–11 (2005).
Petrie, R. J., Doyle, A. D. & Yamada, K. M. Random versus directionally persistent cell migration. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 538–549 (2009).
Bretscher, M. S. On the shape of migrating cells — a 'front-to-back' model. J. Cell Sci. 121, 2625–2628 (2008).
Janetopoulos, C. & Firtel, R. A. Directional sensing during chemotaxis. FEBS Lett. 582, 2075–2085 (2008).
Swaney, K. F., Huang, C. H. & Devreotes, P. N. Eukaryotic chemotaxis: a network of signaling pathways controls motility, directional sensing, and polarity. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 39, 265–289 (2010).
Horwitz, R. & Webb, D. Cell migration. Curr. Biol. 13, R756–R759 (2003).
Doyle, A. D., Wang, F. W., Matsumoto, K. & Yamada, K. M. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 184, 481–490 (2009).
Gammill, L. S. & Roffers-Agarwal, J. Division of labor during trunk neural crest development. Dev. Biol. 344, 555–565 (2010).
Gomperts, M., Garcia-Castro, M., Wylie, C. & Heasman, J. Interactions between primordial germ cells play a role in their migration in mouse embryos. Development 120, 135–141 (1994).
Theveneau, E. et al. Collective chemotaxis requires contact-dependent cell polarity. Dev. Cell 19, 39–53 (2010). Introduced the concept of collective chemotaxis in which cells integrate chemoattractant signalling with cadherin-mediated adhesion to allow coordinated guidance of a group of cells.
Theveneau, E. & Mayor, R. Integrating chemotaxis and contact-inhibition during collective cell migration: small GTPases at work. Small GTPases 1, 113–117 (2010).
Ewald, A. J., Brenot, A., Duong, M., Chan, B. S. & Werb, Z. Collective epithelial migration and cell rearrangements drive mammary branching morphogenesis. Dev. Cell 14, 570–581 (2008).
Friedl, P. & Gilmour, D. Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 445–457 (2009).
Aman, A. & Piotrowski, T. Cell migration during morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 341, 20–33 (2010).
Montell, D. J. Morphogenetic cell movements: diversity from modular mechanical properties. Science 322, 1502–1505 (2008).
Ilina, O. & Friedl, P. Mechanisms of collective cell migration at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 122, 3203–3208 (2009).
Niewiadomska, P., Godt, D. & Tepass, U. DE-cadherin is required for intercellular motility during Drosophila oogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 144, 533–547 (1999). Key study demonstrating that DE-cadherin promotes rather than inhibits migration of border cells, in contrast to the prevailing EMT model. Reports the rosette organization of the border cell cluster with polar cells in the centre.
Montell, D. J. Rorth, P. & Spradling, A. C. Slow border cells, a locus required for a developmentally regulated cell migration during oogenesis, encodes Drosophila C/EBP. Cell 71, 51–62 (1992). Landmark study that establishes border cells as a genetically tractable model for the study of cell migration in vivo.
Prasad, M. & Montell, D. J. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of border cell migration analyzed using time-lapse live-cell imaging. Dev. Cell 12, 997–1005 (2007). Demonstrates live imaging of border cell migration and successful ex vivo culture of stage 9 egg chambers. Live imaging reveals differences in phenotypes of mutants that appear similar in fixed tissue and the discovery of dynamic phenomena not previously anticipated.
Han, D. D., Stein, D. & Stevens, L. M. Investigating the function of follicular subpopulations during Drosophila oogenesis through hormone-dependent enhancer-targeted cell ablation. Development 127, 573–583 (2000).
King, R. C. Ovarian Development in Drosophila Melanogaster (Academic Press;1970).
Tworoger, M., Larkin, M. K., Bryant, Z. & Ruohola-Baker, H. Mosaic analysis in the drosophila ovary reveals a common hedgehog- inducible precursor stage for stalk and polar cells. Genetics 151, 739–748 (1999).
Margolis, J. & Spradling, A. Identification and behavior of epithelial stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Development 121, 3797–3807 (1995).
Wu, X., Tanwar, P. S. & Raftery, L. A. Drosophila follicle cells: morphogenesis in an eggshell. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 19, 271–282 (2008).
Rorth, P. Initiating and guiding migration: lessons from border cells. Trends Cell Biol. 12, 325–331 (2002).
Montell, D. J. Border-cell migration: the race is on. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 13–24 (2003).
Bianco, A. et al. Two distinct modes of guidance signalling during collective migration of border cells. Nature 448, 362–365 (2007). Defines the differences in migration speed and molecular guidance pathways that are used in early and late phases of border cell migration.
Tekotte, H., Tollervey, D. & Davis, I. Imaging the migrating border cell cluster in living Drosophila egg chambers. Dev. Dyn. 236, 2818–2824 (2007).
Prasad, M., Jang, A. C., Starz-Gaiano, M., Melani, M. & Montell, D. J. A protocol for culturing Drosophila melanogaster stage 9 egg chambers for live imaging. Nature Protoc. 2, 2467–2473 (2007).
Savant-Bhonsale, S. & Montell, D. J. torso-like encodes the localized determinant of Drosophila terminal pattern formation. Genes Dev. 7, 2548–2555 (1993).
Denef, N. & Schupbach, T. Patterning: JAK–STAT signalling in the Drosophila follicular epithelium. Curr. Biol. 13, R388–R390 (2003).
Ghiglione, C. et al. The Drosophila cytokine receptor Domeless controls border cell migration and epithelial polarization during oogenesis. Development 129, 5437–5447 (2002).
Beccari, S., Teixeira, L. & Rorth, P. The JAK/STAT pathway is required for border cell migration during Drosophila oogenesis. Mech. Dev. 111, 115–123 (2002).
Silver, D. L. & Montell, D. J. Paracrine signaling through the JAK/STAT pathway activates invasive behavior of ovarian epithelial cells in Drosophila. Cell 107, 831–841 (2001). Shows the role of JAK–STAT signalling in cell migration. Demonstrated that JAK–STAT activity is necessary and sufficient to cause follicle cells to migrate and invade the nurse cell cluster.
Brown, S., Hu, N. & Castelli-Gair Hombria, J. Identification of the first invertebrate interleukin JAK/STAT receptor, the Drosophila gene domeless. Curr. Biol. 11, 1700–1705 (2001). Identifies the D. melanogaster receptor in the JAK–STAT pathway.
McGregor, J. R., Xi, R. & Harrison, D. A. JAK signaling is somatically required for follicle cell differentiation in Drosophila. Development 129, 705–717 (2002).
Arbouzova, N. I. & Zeidler, M. P. JAK/STAT signalling in Drosophila: insights into conserved regulatory and cellular functions. Development 133, 2605–2616 (2006).
Bromberg, J. & Darnell, J. E. Jr. The role of STATs in transcriptional control and their impact on cellular function. Oncogene 19, 2468–2473 (2000).
Borghese, L. et al. Systematic analysis of the transcriptional switch inducing migration of border cells. Dev. Cell 10, 497–508 (2006).
Wang, X. et al. Analysis of cell migration using whole-genome expression profiling of migratory cells in the Drosophila ovary. Dev. Cell 10, 483–495 (2006).
Rorth, P., Szabo, K. & Texido, G. The level of C/EBP protein is critical for cell migration during Drosophila oogenesis and is tightly controlled by regulated degradation. Mol. Cell 6, 23–30 (2000).
Silver, D. L., Geisbrecht, E. R. & Montell, D. J. Requirement for JAK/STAT signaling throughout border cell migration in Drosophila. Development 132, 3483–3492 (2005).
Cobreros-Reguera, L. et al. The Ste20 kinase misshapen is essential for the invasive behaviour of ovarian epithelial cells in Drosophila. EMBO Rep. 11, 943–949 (2010).
Harrison, D. A., McCoon, P. E., Binari, R., Gilman, M. & Perrimon, N. Drosophila unpaired encodes a secreted protein that activates the JAK signaling pathway. Genes Dev. 12, 3252–3263 (1998).
Van de Bor, V., Zimniak, G., Cerezo, D., Schaub, S. & Noselli, S. Asymmetric localisation of cytokine mRNA is essential for JAK/STAT activation during cell invasiveness. Development 138, 1383–1393 (2011). Demonstrates that apical localization of upd mRNA is important for generating a high enough local UPD concentration for signalling.
Ghiglione, C., Devergne, O., Cerezo, D. & Noselli, S. Drosophila RalA is essential for the maintenance of Jak/Stat signalling in ovarian follicles. EMBO Rep. 9, 676–682 (2008).
Yoon, W. H., Meinhardt, H. & Montell, D. miRNA-mediated feedback inhibition of JAK/STAT morphogen signalling establishes a cell fate threshold. Nature Cell Biol. 13, 1062–1069 (2011). Demonstrates that miR-279 is a key downstream target of APT that directly inhibits STAT in the regulatory circuit that converts initially graded STAT activity into on and off states.
Starz-Gaiano, M., Melani, M., Wang, X., Meinhardt, H. & Montell, D. J. Feedback inhibition of Jak/STAT signaling by apontic is required to limit an invasive cell population. Dev. Cell 14, 726–738 (2008). Reports the role of feedback inhibition of JAK–STAT signalling in follicle cells. Uses mathematical modelling to support genetic data defining the regulatory circuit consisting of STAT, APT and SLBO.
Nallamothu, G., Woolworth, J. A., Dammai, V. & Hsu, T. awd, the homolog of metastasis suppressor gene Nm23, regulates Drosophila epithelial cell invasion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 1964–1973 (2008).
Li, J., Xia, F. & Li, W. X. Coactivation of STAT and Ras is required for germ cell proliferation and invasive migration in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 5, 787–798 (2003).
Brown, S., Zeidler, M. P. & Hombria, J. E. JAK/STAT signalling in Drosophila controls cell motility during germ cell migration. Dev. Dyn. 235, 958–966 (2006).
Li, J. et al. Patterns and functions of STAT activation during Drosophila embryogenesis. Mech. Dev. 120, 1455–1468 (2003).
Naora, H. & Montell, D. J. Ovarian cancer metastasis: integrating insights from disparate model organisms. Nature Rev. Cancer 5, 355–366 (2005).
Dauer, D. J. et al. Stat3 regulates genes common to both wound healing and cancer. Oncogene 24, 3397–3408 (2005).
Haura, E. B., Turkson, J. & Jove, R. Mechanisms of disease: Insights into the emerging role of signal transducers and activators of transcription in cancer. Nature Clin. Pract. Oncol. 2, 315–324 (2005).
Devarajan, E. & Huang, S. STAT3 as a central regulator of tumor metastases. Curr. Mol. Med. 9, 626–633 (2009).
Xi, R., McGregor, J. R. & Harrison, D. A. A gradient of JAK pathway activity patterns the anterior–posterior axis of the follicular epithelium. Dev. Cell 4, 167–177 (2003).
Riddiford, L. M. in The Development of Drosophila Melanogaster (eds Bate, M. & Martinez Arias, A.) 899–940 (Cold spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1993).
Buszczak, M. et al. Ecdysone response genes govern egg chamber development during mid- oogenesis in Drosophila. Development 126, 4581–4589 (1999).
Yao, T. P. et al. Functional ecdysone receptor is the product of EcR and Ultraspiracle genes. Nature 366, 476–479 (1993).
Thomas, H. E., Stunnenberg, H. G. & Stewart, A. F. Heterodimerization of the Drosophila ecdysone receptor with retinoid X receptor and ultraspiracle. Nature 362, 471–475 (1993).
Cherbas, L., Hu, X., Zhimulev, I., Belyaeva, E. & Cherbas, P. EcR isoforms in Drosophila: testing tissue-specific requirements by targeted blockade and rescue. Development 130, 271–284 (2003).
Bai, J., Uehara, Y. & Montell, D. J. Regulation of invasive cell behavior by Taiman, a Drosophila protein related to AIB1, a steroid receptor coactivator amplified in breast cancer. Cell 103, 1047–1058 (2000). Demonstrates the role of ecdysone signalling in regulating the timing of border cell migration and identifies TAI as a co-activator of ecdysone signalling and as the functional orthologue of AIB1 (amplified in breast cancer 1).
Hackney, J. F., Pucci, C., Naes, E. & Dobens, L. Ras signaling modulates activity of the ecdysone receptor EcR during cell migration in the Drosophila ovary. Dev. Dyn. 236, 1213–1226 (2007).
Jang, A. C., Chang, Y. C., Bai, J. & Montell, D. Border-cell migration requires integration of spatial and temporal signals by the BTB protein Abrupt. Nature Cell Biol. 11, 569–579 (2009). Shows that Abrupt, a negative regulator of border cell migration, integrates ecdysone and JAK–STAT signalling inputs, thus coordinating spatial and temporal cues. Abrupt in turn inhibits ecdysone signalling by direct binding to TAI.
Romani, P. et al. Cell survival and polarity of Drosophila follicle cells require the activity of ecdysone receptor B1 isoform. Genetics 181, 165–175 (2009).
Liu, Y. & Montell, D. J. Jing: a downstream target of slbo required for developmental control of border cell migration. Development 128, 321–330 (2001).
Schober, M., Rebay, I. & Perrimon, N. Function of the ETS transcription factor Yan in border cell migration. Development 132, 3493–3504 (2005).
Doronkin, S., Djagaeva, I., Nagle, M. E., Reiter, L. T. & Seagroves, T. N. Dose-dependent modulation of HIF-1α/sima controls the rate of cell migration and invasion in Drosophila ovary border cells. Oncogene 29, 1123–1134 (2010).
Melani, M., Simpson, K. J., Brugge, J. S. & Montell, D. Regulation of cell adhesion and collective cell migration by hindsight and its human homolog RREB1. Curr. Biol. 18, 532–537 (2008).
Llense, F. & Martin-Blanco, E. JNK signaling controls border cell cluster integrity and collective cell migration. Curr. Biol. 18, 538–544 (2008). Demonstrates the role of CDC42 and JNK in border cell cluster cohesion.
Van Haastert, P. J. & Devreotes, P. N. Chemotaxis: signalling the way forward. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 626–634 (2004).
Iijima, M., Huang, Y. E. & Devreotes, P. Temporal and spatial regulation of chemotaxis. Dev. Cell 3, 469–478 (2002).
Iijima, M., Huang, Y. E., Luo, H. R., Vazquez, F. & Devreotes, P. N. Novel mechanism of PTEN regulation by its phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate binding motif is critical for chemotaxis. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 16606–16613 (2004).
Rahdar, M. et al. A phosphorylation-dependent intramolecular interaction regulates the membrane association and activity of the tumor suppressor PTEN. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 480–485 (2009).
Iglesias, P. A. & Devreotes, P. N. Biased excitable networks: how cells direct motion in response to gradients. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 245–253 (2012).
Thiery, J. P. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and pathologies. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 740–746 (2003).
Bladt, F., Riethmacher, D., Isenmann, S., Aguzzi, A. & Birchmeier, C. Essential role for the c-met receptor in the migration of myogenic precursor cells into the limb bud. Nature 376, 768–771 (1995).
Thiery, J. P., Acloque, H., Huang, R. Y. & Nieto, M. A. Epithelial–mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 139, 871–890 (2009).
Kerosuo, L. & Bronner-Fraser, M. What is bad in cancer is good in the embryo: importance of EMT in neural crest development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 23, 320–332 (2012).
Hynes, R. O. & Lander, A. D. Contact and adhesive specificities in the associations, migrations, and targeting of cells and axons. Cell 68, 303–322 (1992).
Yang, J. & Weinberg, R. A. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition: at the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis. Dev. Cell 14, 818–829 (2008).
Fulga, T. A. & Rorth, P. Invasive cell migration is initiated by guided growth of long cellular extensions. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 715–719 (2002).
Poukkula, M., Cliffe, A., Changede, R. & Rorth, P. Cell behaviors regulated by guidance cues in collective migration of border cells. J. Cell Biol. 192, 513–524 (2011).
McDonald, J. A., Pinheiro, E. M. & Montell, D. J. PVF1, a PDGF/VEGF homolog, is sufficient to guide border cells and interacts genetically with Taiman. Development 130, 3469–3478 (2003). Demonstrates that ectopic PVF1 is sufficient to redirect border cells.
McDonald, J. A., Pinheiro, E. M., Kadlec, L., Schupbach, T. & Montell, D. J. Multiple EGFR ligands participate in guiding migrating border cells. Dev. Biol. 296, 94–103 (2006). Reveals that Spitz and Keren are EGFR ligands that redundantly guide border cells to the oocyte.
Duchek, P. & Rorth, P. Guidance of cell migration by EGF receptor signaling during Drosophila oogenesis. Science 291, 131–133 (2001). Identifies EGFR as a guidance receptor for border cell migration by using a misexpression screen. Shows that EGFR signalling guides the dorsal migration of border cells and Gurken serves as the guidance cue.
Duchek, P., Somogyi, K., Jekely, G., Beccari, S. & Rorth, P. Guidance of cell migration by the Drosophila PDGF/VEGF receptor. Cell 107, 17–26 (2001). Identifies PVF1 and its receptor PVR by using a gain-of-function genetic screen.
Janssens, K., Sung, H. H. & Rorth, P. Direct detection of guidance receptor activity during border cell migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 7323–7328 (2010).
Chen, L. et al. PLA2 and PI3K/PTEN pathways act in parallel to mediate chemotaxis. Dev. Cell 12, 603–614 (2007).
Jekely, G., Sung, H. H., Luque, C. M. & Rorth, P. Regulators of endocytosis maintain localized receptor tyrosine kinase signaling in guided migration. Dev. Cell 9, 197–207 (2005). Presents the original hypothesis that recycling of Tyr phosphorylated proteins specifically to the leading edge of migrating border cells amplifies front–back asymmetry in shallow gradients of growth factors.
Quinones, G. A., Jin, J. & Oro, A. E. I-BAR protein antagonism of endocytosis mediates directional sensing during guided cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 189, 353–367 (2010).
Assaker, G., Ramel, D., Wculek, S. K., Gonzalez-Gaitan, M. & Emery, G. Spatial restriction of receptor tyrosine kinase activity through a polarized endocytic cycle controls border cell migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22558–22563 (2010).
Pinheiro, E. M. & Montell, D. J. Requirement for Par-6 and Bazooka in Drosophila border cell migration. Development 131, 5243–5251 (2004). Demonstrates that apical–basal polarity is required for cohesion of cells of the border cell cluster and efficient migration, in contrast to the prevailing EMT model.
Tanentzapf, G., Smith, C., McGlade, J. & Tepass, U. Apical, lateral, and basal polarization cues contribute to the development of the follicular epithelium during Drosophila oogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 151, 891–904 (2000).
Goode, S., Wei, J. & Kishore, S. Novel spatiotemporal patterns of epithelial tumor invasion in Drosophila discs large egg chambers. Dev. Dyn. 232, 855–864 (2005).
Szafranski, P. & Goode, S. Basolateral junctions are sufficient to suppress epithelial invasion during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev. Dyn. 236, 364–373 (2007).
Li, Q., Feng, S., Yu, L., Zhao, G. & Li, M. Requirements of Lgl in cell differentiation and motility during Drosophila ovarian follicular epithelium morphogenesis. Fly (Austin) 5, 81–87 (2011).
Szafranski, P. & Goode, S. A. Fasciclin 2 morphogenetic switch organizes epithelial cell cluster polarity and motility. Development 131, 2023–2036 (2004).
McDonald, J. A., Khodyakova, A., Aranjuez, G., Dudley, C. & Montell, D. J. PAR-1 kinase regulates epithelial detachment and directional protrusion of migrating border cells. Curr. Biol. 18, 1659–1667 (2008). Finds that PAR1 modulates apical–basal polarity between border cells and epithelial cells, and that this requires detachment of border cells and sensing of the chemoattractant gradient.
Majumder, P., Aranjuez, G., Amick, J. & McDonald, J. A. Par-1 controls Myosin-II activity through Myosin phosphatase to regulate border cell migration. Curr. Biol. 22, 363–372 (2012). Shows the molecular mechanism by which PAR1 regulates myosin activity.
Abercrombie, M. & Heaysman, J. E. Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. I. Speed of movement of chick heart fibroblasts in relation to their mutual contacts. Exp. Cell Res. 5, 111–131 (1953).
Peifer, M. The product of the Drosophila segment polarity gene armadillo is part of a multi-protein complex resembling the vertebrate adherens junction. J. Cell Sci. 105, 993–1000 (1993).
Sarpal, R. et al. Mutational analysis supports a core role for Drosophila α-catenin in adherens junction function. J. Cell Sci. 125, 233–245 (2012).
De Graeve, F. M. et al. Drosophila apc regulates delamination of invasive epithelial clusters. Dev. Biol. 368, 76–85 (2012).
Lilien, J. & Balsamo, J. The regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion by tyrosine phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of β-catenin. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17, 459–465 (2005).
Pacquelet, A., Lin, L. & Rorth, P. Binding site for p120/δ-catenin is not required for Drosophila E-cadherin function in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 160, 313–319 (2003).
Fernandez-Minan, A., Cobreros, L., Gonzalez-Reyes, A. & Martin-Bermudo, M. D. Integrins contribute to the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity in the follicular epithelium of the Drosophila ovary. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 52, 925–932 (2008).
Medioni, C. & Noselli, S. Dynamics of the basement membrane in invasive epithelial clusters in Drosophila. Development 132, 3069–3077 (2005).
Haigo, S. L. & Bilder, D. Global tissue revolutions in a morphogenetic movement controlling elongation. Science 331, 1071–1074 (2011).
Wang, X., Adam, J. C. & Montell, D. Spatially localized Kuzbanian required for specific activation of Notch during border cell migration. Dev. Biol. 301, 532–540 (2007).
Carroll, D. K. et al. p63 regulates an adhesion programme and cell survival in epithelial cells. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 551–561 (2006).
Horne-Badovinac, S. & Bilder, D. Mass transit: epithelial morphogenesis in the Drosophila egg chamber. Dev. Dyn. 232, 559–574 (2005).
Dinkins, M. B., Fratto, V. M. & Lemosy, E. K. Integrin α-chains exhibit distinct temporal and spatial localization patterns in epithelial cells of the Drosophila ovary. Dev. Dyn. 237, 3927–3939 (2008).
Bateman, J., Reddy, R. S., Saito, H. & Van Vactor, D. The receptor tyrosine phosphatase Dlar and integrins organize actin filaments in the Drosophila follicular epithelium. Curr. Biol. 11, 1317–1327 (2001).
Insall, R. H. & Machesky, L. M. Actin dynamics at the leading edge: from simple machinery to complex networks. Dev. Cell 17, 310–322 (2009).
Raftopoulou, M. & Hall, A. Cell migration: Rho GTPases lead the way. Dev. Biol. 265, 23–32 (2004).
Burridge, K. & Wennerberg, K. Rho and Rac take center stage. Cell 116, 167–179 (2004).
Heasman, S. J. & Ridley, A. J. Mammalian Rho GTPases: new insights into their functions from in vivo studies. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 690–701 (2008).
Friedl, P. Prespecification and plasticity: shifting mechanisms of cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 14–23 (2004).
Verkhusha, V. V., Tsukita, S. & Oda, H. Actin dynamics in lamellipodia of migrating border cells in the Drosophila ovary revealed by a GFP-actin fusion protein. FEBS Lett. 445, 395–401 (1999).
Murphy, A. M. & Montell, D. J. Cell type-specific roles for Cdc42, Rac, and RhoL in Drosophila oogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 133, 617–630 (1996). First demonstration of the role of the small GTPase RAC in cell migration in vivo.
Wang, X., He, L., Wu, Y. I., Hahn, K. M. & Montell, D. J. Light-mediated activation reveals a key role for Rac in collective guidance of cell movement in vivo. Nature Cell Biol. 12, 591–597 (2010). Shows by using photo-activatable analogues of RAC that local RAC activation leads to local membrane protrusion. Demonstrates that local activation in one cell guides collective behaviour of the whole cluster.
Luo, L., Liao, Y. J., Jan, L. Y. & Jan, Y. N. Distinct morphogenetic functions of similar small GTPases: Drosophila Drac1 is involved in axonal outgrowth and myoblast fusion. Genes Dev. 8, 1787–1802 (1994).
Harden, N., Loh, H. Y., Chia, W. & Lim, L. A dominant inhibitory version of the small GTP-binding protein Rac disrupts cytoskeletal structures and inhibits developmental cell shape changes in Drosophila. Development 121, 903–914 (1995).
Hornstein, I., Mortin, M. A. & Katzav, S. DroVav, the Drosophila melanogaster homologue of the mammalian Vav proteins, serves as a signal transducer protein in the Rac and DER pathways. Oncogene 22, 6774–6784 (2003).
Malartre, M., Ayaz, D., Amador, F. F. & Martin-Bermudo, M. D. The guanine exchange factor vav controls axon growth and guidance during Drosophila development. J. Neurosci. 30, 2257–2267 (2010).
Ridley, A. J., Paterson, H. F., Johnston, C. L., Diekmann, D. & Hall, A. The small GTP-binding protein Rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling. Cell 70, 401–410 (1992).
Wu, Y. I., Wang, X., He, L., Montell, D. & Hahn, K. M. Spatiotemporal control of small GTPases with light using the LOV domain. Methods Enzymol. 497, 393–407 (2011).
Yoo, S. K. et al. Differential regulation of protrusion and polarity by PI3K during neutrophil motility in live zebrafish. Dev. Cell 18, 226–236 (2010).
Houk, A. R. et al. Membrane tension maintains cell polarity by confining signals to the leading edge during neutrophil migration. Cell 148, 175–188 (2012).
Bastock, R. & Strutt, D. The planar polarity pathway promotes coordinated cell migration during Drosophila oogenesis. Development 134, 3055–3064 (2007).
Sokol, N. S. & Cooley, L. Drosophila filamin is required for follicle cell motility during oogenesis. Dev. Biol. 260, 260–272 (2003).
Verheyen, E. M. & Cooley, L. Profilin mutations disrupt multiple actin-dependent processes during Drosophila development. Development 120, 717–728 (1994).
Miralles, F., Posern, G., Zaromytidou, A. I. & Treisman, R. Actin dynamics control SRF activity by regulation of its coactivator MAL. Cell 113, 329–342 (2003).
Copeland, J. W. & Treisman, R. The diaphanous-related formin mDia1 controls serum response factor activity through its effects on actin polymerization. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 4088–4099 (2002).
Somogyi, K. & Rorth, P. Evidence for tension-based regulation of Drosophila MAL and SRF during invasive cell migration. Dev. Cell 7, 85–93 (2004).
Oser, M. & Condeelis, J. The cofilin activity cycle in lamellipodia and invadopodia. J. Cell Biochem. 108, 1252–1262 (2009).
Chen, J. et al. Cofilin/ADF is required for cell motility during Drosophila ovary development and oogenesis. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 204–209 (2001).
Zhang, L. et al. Regulation of cofilin phosphorylation and asymmetry in collective cell migration during morphogenesis. Development 138, 455–464 (2011).
Wahlstrom, G. et al. Twinfilin is required for actin-dependent developmental processes in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 155, 787–796 (2001).
Bear, J. E. et al. Negative regulation of fibroblast motility by Ena/VASP proteins. Cell 101, 717–728 (2000).
Bear, J. E. & Gertler, F. B. Ena/VASP: towards resolving a pointed controversy at the barbed end. J. Cell Sci. 122, 1947–1953 (2009).
Gates, J. et al. Enabled and Capping protein play important roles in shaping cell behavior during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev. Biol. 333, 90–107 (2009).
Bear, J. E. et al. Antagonism between Ena/VASP proteins and actin filament capping regulates fibroblast motility. Cell 109, 509–521 (2002).
Somogyi, K. & Rorth, P. Cortactin modulates cell migration and ring canal morphogenesis during Drosophila oogenesis. Mech. Dev. 121, 57–64 (2004).
Cant, K., Knowles, B. A., Mooseker, M. S. & Cooley, L. Drosophila singed, a fascin homolog is required for actin bundle formation during oogenesis and bristle extension. J. Cell Biol. 125, 369–380 (1994).
Edwards, K. A. & Kiehart, D. P. Drosophila nonmuscle myosin II has multiple essential roles in imaginal disc and egg chamber morphogenesis. Development 122, 1499–1511 (1996).
Karess, R. E. et al. The regulatory light chain of nonmuscle myosin is encoded by spaghetti-squash, a gene required for cytokinesis in Drosophila. Cell 65, 1177–1189 (1991).
Dobens, L. L. & Raftery, L. A. Integration of epithelial patterning and morphogenesis in Drosophila ovarian follicle cells. Dev. Dyn. 218, 80–93 (2000).
Geisbrecht, E. R. & Montell, D. J. Myosin VI is required for E-cadherin-mediated border cell migration. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 616–620 (2002).
Geisbrecht, E. R. & Montell, D. J. A role for Drosophila IAP1-mediated caspase inhibition in Rac-dependent cell migration. Cell 118, 111–125 (2004). Identifies an unexpected role of DIAP1 in cell migration. DIAP1 overexpression suppresses migration defects due to inhibition of RAC.
Mathieu, J., Sung, H. H., Pugieux, C., Soetaert, J. & Rorth, P. A. Sensitized PiggyBac-based screen for regulators of border cell migration in Drosophila. Genetics 176, 1579–1590 (2007).
Kim, J. H. et al. Psidin, a conserved protein that regulates protrusion dynamics and cell migration. Genes Dev. 25, 730–741 (2011).
Heisenberg, C. P. & Solnica-Krezel, L. Back and forth between cell fate specification and movement during vertebrate gastrulation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 18, 311–316 (2008).
Pollack, R., Goldman, R. D., Conlon, S. & Chang, C. Properties of enucleated cells. II. Characteristic overlapping of transformed cells is reestablished by enucleates. Cell 3, 51–54 (1974).
Goldman, R. D., Pollack, R. & Hopkins, N. H. Preservation of normal behavior by enucleated cells in culture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 70, 750–754 (1973).
Ridley, A. J. & Hall, A. The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell 70, 389–399 (1992).
Bai, J. & Montell, D. Eyes Absent, a key repressor of polar cell fate during Drosophila oogenesis. Development 129, 5377–5388 (2002).
Liu, Y. & Montell, D. J. Identification of mutations that cause cell migration defects in mosaic clones. Development 126, 1869–1878 (1999).
Dietzl, G. et al. A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature 448, 151–156 (2007).
Brand, A. H. & Perrimon, N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118, 401–415 (1993).
Rorth, P. et al. Systematic gain-of-function genetics in Drosophila. Development 125, 1049–1057 (1998). Reports the development of widely used methods for random overexpression screens and identifies 60 genes that disrupt border cell migration when overexpressed.
Rorth, P. Gal4 in the Drosophila female germline. Mech. Dev. 78, 113–118 (1998).
Xiong, Y., Huang, C. H., Iglesias, P. A. & Devreotes, P. N. Cells navigate with a local-excitation, global-inhibition-biased excitable network. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17079–17086 (2010).
Starz-Gaiano, M., Melani, M., Meinhardt, H. & Montell, D. Interpretation of the UPD/JAK/STAT morphogen gradient in Drosophila follicle cells. Cell Cycle 8, 2917–2925 (2009).
Lin, X. et al. Identification, chromosomal assignment, and expression analysis of the human homeodomain-containing gene Orthopedia (OTP). Genomics 60, 96–104 (1999).
Deng, W., Leaper, K. & Bownes, M. A targeted gene silencing technique shows that Drosophila myosin VI is required for egg chamber and imaginal disc morphogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 112, 3677–3690 (1999).
Zarnescu, D. C. & Thomas, G. H. Apical spectrin is essential for epithelial morphogenesis but not apicobasal polarity in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 146, 1075–1086 (1999).
Pacquelet, A. & Rorth, P. Regulatory mechanisms required for DE-cadherin function in cell migration and other types of adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 170, 803–812 (2005). Demonstrates that regulation of ARM is not necessary during border cell migration because a fusion protein of DE-cadherin and α-catenin can functionally substitute for ARM.
Szabo, K., Jekely, G. & Rorth, P. Cloning and expression of sprint, a Drosophila homologue of RIN1. Mech. Dev. 101, 259–262 (2001).
Wang, D. et al. Drosophila twinfilin is required for cell migration and synaptic endocytosis. J. Cell Sci. 123, 1546–1556 (2010).
Acknowledgements
M. S. G. is funded by a Basil O'Connor Starter Scholar Award from the March of Dimes and a CAREER Award (1054422) from the National Science Foundation. D. J. M. is supported by R01GM46425 and R01GM73164 from the National Institutes of General Medical Sciences. The authors would like to thank current and previous members of the Montell laboratory for providing the images in Figure 1 (Image in figure 1b is courtesy of Ho Lam Tang, image in part b is courtesy of Yu Chiuan Chang, image in part d is courtesy of Mohit Prasad and image in part f is courtesy of Anna Jang).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information S1 | Time lapse imaging of normal border cell migration.
Nuclear DsRed and cytoplasmic GFP are expressed in the outer, migratory border cells as well as a few anterior (left) and posterior (right) follicle cells that remain in the epithelium. Border cells migrate about 150 micrometres to the oocyte (which contains autofluorescent speckles) and then turn and migrate a few micrometres towards the dorsal side (top). (MOV 4418 kb)
Supplementary information S2 | Polar cell behavior during normal border cell migration
GFP is expressed in a pair of cells at the anterior (left) and posterior (right) poles of the egg chamber. The oocyte is also brightly autofluorescent. Anterior polar cells are carried passively by the migrating border cells. During the movie, polar cells roll as the cluster migrates. (MOV 6860 kb)
Related links
Glossary
- Border cells
-
Six to eight somatic ovarian cells that originate in the follicle epithelium, then coalesce around the polar cells, detach and migrate collectively between germline cells to the border of the oocyte, where they are required for patterning and egg fertilization.
- Polar cells
-
Two somatic follicle cells that are specified at each end of the developing egg chamber. Anterior polar cells secrete signals that specify neighbouring cells to become border cells.
- Nurse cells
-
Auxiliary germline cells that supply the oocyte with synthesized mRNAs, proteins and organelles during insect oogenesis.
- Basal lamina
-
A thin sheet of laminin, collagen IV and proteoglycans that underlies the basal surface of an epithelium.
- Ecdysone
-
The single Drosophila melanogaster steroid hormone, which activates a nuclear hormone receptor complex and initiates transcriptional regulation.
- RAC
-
A 21 kDa GTPase of the RHO-family that is activated by chemoattractants and in turn stimulates polymerization of branched actin networks, resulting in lamellipodial protrusion.
- Epithelial to mesenchymal transition
-
(EMT). A morphological change that is characteristic of some developing tissues and certain forms of cancer. During EMT, cells lose intercellular junctions and apical–basal polarity, become migratory and, in the case of cancer, become invasive.
- Filopodia
-
Thin, dynamic, cellular extensions that contain actin filaments. They are aligned in parallel with their barbed ends pointing towards the tip and are often found in growth cones and at the leading edge of migrating cells.
- Lamellipodia
-
Broad, flat protrusions at the leading edge of a moving cell that are enriched with a branched network of elongating actin filaments, which generate the force to push the cell membrane forward.
- Stress fibres
-
Consist of contractile actin filament bundles that are typically anchored at one or both ends to the extracellular matrix via focal adhesions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Montell, D., Yoon, W. & Starz-Gaiano, M. Group choreography: mechanisms orchestrating the collective movement of border cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13, 631–645 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3433
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3433
This article is cited by
-
Transcriptome analysis reveals temporally regulated genetic networks during Drosophila border cell collective migration
BMC Genomics (2023)
-
Two Rac1 pools integrate the direction and coordination of collective cell migration
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Endocytosis in the context-dependent regulation of individual and collective cell properties
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2021)
-
Identifying conserved molecular targets required for cell migration of glioblastoma cancer stem cells
Cell Death & Disease (2020)
-
The Function of NM23-H1/NME1 and Its Homologs in Major Processes Linked to Metastasis
Pathology & Oncology Research (2020)