Main

In humans and higher primates, uric acid (UA) is the final oxidation product of purine metabolism and is excreted in urine. Elevated serum UA levels can result either exogenously from increased intake of purine-rich foods, or endogenously from increased production as seen in certain malignancies and inborn errors of metabolism; elevated serum UA levels can also result from decreased renal clearance. It is becoming apparent that UA homeostasis and its relationship with health and disease is complex. Elevated serum UA is associated with hypertension (HTN), as well as with diabetes, cardiovascular disease, endothelial dysfunction, obesity, metabolic syndrome, nephrolithiasis, intellectual disabilities, and all-cause mortality (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8). On the other hand, some recent investigations provide evidence that UA may be beneficial as an antioxidant/free-radical scavenger in certain patient groups (9,10,11).

The association between elevated serum UA and HTN in both adults and children is well-described (1,12). HTN is one of the most prevalent diseases in the Western world and tracking studies suggest that children and adolescents with elevated blood pressure (BP) are more likely to be hypertensive adults and develop metabolic syndrome (13,14). Despite multiple investigations into the relationship between UA and HTN in children, little is known about the normal range of serum UA levels in children and adolescents. Previous studies on UA levels in children were either based on small sample size or presented only mean UA values (15,16,17,18). Further, given that previous studies were not representative of the US population, it is possible that they do not broadly represent recent trends and changes in diet and demographics.

Similarly, associations between serum UA levels and socioeconomic status, diet, and other demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters have not been established in adolescents. Therefore, the aims of this study were to (i) examine serum UA distributions in a large, nationally representative cohort of US adolescents; (ii) examine the relationships between UA values and dietary and demographic variables; (iii) examine the relationships between UA values and BP and other cardiovascular risk factors; and (iv) examine the determinants of elevated UA levels in a multivariate regression model.

Results

Relationship Between Serum UA and Demographics

A total of 1,912 adolescents in NHANES 2005–2008, 13–18 y of age and representing 19,888,299 adolescents, were included in these analyses ( Figure 1 ). The mean (± SD) UA level was 5.14 ± 1.45 mg/dl, and the levels were higher with increasing age and for the male gender as compared with the female gender. Participants categorized as belonging to the non-Hispanic white race had significantly higher mean UA levels (5.22 ± 0.99 mg/dl) as compared with non-Hispanic blacks (4.89 ± 1.98 mg/ dl) and Mexican Americans (5.03 ± 2.33 mg/dl), P = 0.002 and 0.0164, respectively ( Table 1 ).

Figure 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study cohort.

Table 1 Nationally representative percentiles of uric acid distribution in 13–18-y-old persons, NHANES 2005–2008

The relationships between weighted UA quartiles (estimated by quantile regression) and demographic and biochemical characteristics are shown in Table 2 . An increase in UA quartile was significantly associated with older age, higher BMI, greater height, greater weight, male gender, and black race, and was inversely associated with higher urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) per weighted least squares analyses. Significantly more non-Hispanic white, male, and older adolescents with higher BMI z-scores were in the higher UA quartiles (i.e., higher UA levels). There was no significant trend in the relationship between UA quartile and either cholesterol or estimated glomerular filtration rate. The lowest C-reactive protein levels were observed in the second quartile (UA 4.3–5.1 mg/dl) (1 mg/dl = 59.48 µmol/l SI units), but this trend was not statistically significant (P = 0.365).

Table 2 Characteristics of persons aged 13–18 y by quartile of uric acid, NHANES 2005–2008

Relationship of UA Levels With Diet and With Poverty

The association between the results of the dietary recall interviews (averaged over 2 d) and UA quartiles is shown in Table 3 . The relationships between dietary data and increasing UA quartile were “J” shaped for all dietary components, with the exception of fiber. The second quartile of UA (4.3–5.1 mg/dl) was associated with the lowest percentage of poverty ( Table 2 ).

Table 3 Dietary characteristics of persons aged 13–18 y, NHANES 2005–2008

Relationship of UA With BP

A total of 273 participants (15.8 %) had elevated BP, defined as ≥90th percentile for age, sex, and height. Of these, 50 (2.9%) had HTN and 223 (12.9%) had pre-HTN. UA levels were not significantly different between the prehypertensive and the hypertensive groups. Systolic BP value, and classification as HTN/pre-HTN were significantly associated with higher UA quartiles (P = 0.019 and <0.001, respectively, Table 4 ).

Table 4 Characteristics of blood pressure in persons aged 13–18 y by quartile of uric acid, NHANES 2005–2008

Determinants of UA Levels

In a weighted linear regression model, sex, older age, non-Hispanic white race, and having a higher BMI z-score were significantly associated with higher UA levels. None of the variables relating to nutritional intake were significantly associated with UA per analysis of data from a smaller, fully adjusted model using 2005–2006 data only (data not shown).

Discussion

In this study, we defined percentiles of UA distribution in a nationally representative sample of adolescents 13–18 y of age. Furthermore, we examined the relationship of UA with dietary factors as well as with multiple demographic and clinical characteristics. We also examined independent determinants of UA levels.

There are no reference ranges of values for plasma UA in children and adolescents based on large population studies. Earlier studies reported a mean of 3.6 mg/dl (range 2.0–6.7) in 204 children aged 0–13 y hospitalized for a variety of illnesses (18). In a more recent single-center study using a different assay, UA levels were found to vary with age and sex, the ranges being 2.3–6.0 mg/dl and 3.5–8.0 mg/dl for ≥13-y-old female and male participants, respectively (19). In the same study, the authors used adult values as reference intervals for female participants ≥13 y of age and male participants ≥17 y old.

In our cohort, UA levels followed a normal distribution. The mean UA level was 5.14 ± 1.45 mg/ dl (range 1st–99th percentile, 2.8–8.7 mg/dl). UA levels were higher in male participants than in female participants; also, the levels increased with BMI in a linear fashion, consistent with recently published data by Lee et al. (20).

Age-related and race-related differences in serum UA levels have not been well described. In our cohort, white adolescents had significantly higher UA levels as compared with both black and Hispanic adolescents.

There is a relationship between socioeconomic status and obesity in both adults and children in the United States (21). In developing nations, children living in poverty generally experience true protein–energy malnutrition, whereas in developed nations poverty predisposes to obesity and micronutrient malnourishment (22). Although poverty and protein–energy malnutrition have been shown to lead to lower serum UA levels (23), no relationship between socioeconomic status and UA has previously been described in developed nations.

Our data show the highest UA levels to be associated with the highest percentage of children living in poverty, whereas UA levels in the range 4.3–5.1 mg/dl was associated with the lowest percentage of poverty. Also, our data reveal a J-shaped relationship between UA and the intake of all dietary components except fiber. Previous investigations regarding the association between dietary intake and UA showed increased serum UA levels with higher intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (24), calories (25), and protein (25,26), and lower intake of vitamin C (27). A study using NHANES data in adults revealed that a higher intake of fiber correlated with lower serum UA levels (28), which is consistent with our findings. However, a small, prospective study in Norway showed no effect of increased fiber intake on serum UA levels in adults (29). The observed relationships suggest that dietary factors do relate to UA levels but do not solely explain higher or lower UA levels. Dietary factors did not remain as an independent determinant of UA levels in the final regression model ( Table 5 ).

Table 5 Predictive model 3: Continuous UA.

The prevalence of HTN in our cohort was 2.9%, which is close to the value of 3.7% previously reported from older NHANES data by Din-Dzietham et al. (30,31), but lower than the value of 4.5% reported by Sorof et al. in a population of children in a major metropolitan city (31). These differences are probably related to data from differing time periods as regards the former study, and differences in study population (including higher BMI) as regards the latter study.

Results of recent studies support the possible role of UA as a mediator of high BP (1,2). In this study, we classified the cohort’s BP values on the basis of age, height, and gender as normotensive, prehypertensive, and hypertensive. A total of 269 adolescents had an abnormal BP classification, which was significantly associated with the UA quartile trend, P < 0.001. Our findings are consistent with those of Gruskin and colleagues, who compared adolescents having essential HTN to age-matched, healthy controls with normal BP and found that those with HTN higher serum UA levels (32). Feig and Johnson observed that the mean serum UA level in children with “white-coat HTN” was 3.6 ± 0.7 mg/dl; in those with secondary HTN it was higher (4.3 ± 1.4 mg/dl, P = 0.008), and in children with primary HTN UA was significantly elevated (6.7 ± 1.3 mg/dl, P = 0.001) (2).

To our knowledge, there have been no previous large pediatric studies examining the relationship between UA and microalbuminuria. The inverse relationship observed in this cohort is possibly influenced by the inclusion of a poorly nourished group with lower UA levels (reflected by dietary intake data and higher C-reactive protein). Also, it is important to stress that the albuminuria levels in this cohort were below those that are considered to be clinically relevant in adult populations; the significance of microalbuminuria in children has not yet been elucidated.

Our finding that the highest C-reactive protein levels are in the lowest UA quartile group is intriguing and may reflect the presence of a possibly poorly nourished group in the lowest quartile. Of note, few previous studies demonstrated a “U-shaped” or a J-shaped relationship between various cardiovascular outcomes and UA levels (33,34).

Given the lack of universally accepted upper normal limits for UA in adolescents, we built three statistical models to examine two different cutoff points considered as representing elevated UA (95%, and UA levels in the upper weighted quartile of UA (data not shown)), and a third model to examine predictors of UA level considered as a continuous variable. The determinants of UA were similar in the three models, with gender, race, BMI z-score, and age representing independent determinants of UA level. Systolic BP, diastolic BP, BP classification, urinary ACR, dietary factors, and poverty–income ratio did not remain as independent determinants in the final model. It is possible that BP did not remain in the final model because of the relatively small number of adolescents with elevated BP in the cohort. An alternative possibility is that it did not remain in the final model because of its significant but weak correlation with BMI z-score.

Our study had some limitations. Although we were able to examine the relationship between UA levels and other variables, the nature of the study design did not allow for examination of causality. Another limitation of the study was the limited volume of dietary data collected from the NHANES 2005–2006 participants. In addition, the retrospective nature of our study, along with the reliance on dietary recall, instills inherent limitations as compared with a prospective study involving strict dietary control. Despite these limitations, our study, which used data from the largest nationally representative sample of adolescents for the purpose of defining reference ranges for serum UA, was also the first to examine the relationship between UA levels and dietary factors, poverty, and BP classification. It is also worth noting that the NHANES database involves the use of the same assay to measure UA levels, thereby eliminating differences in measurement methods frequently encountered in multicenter studies. It also used a standardized BP classification based on the fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high BP in children and adolescents (35). Also, conducting the study in a healthy, young cohort minimized confounding by comorbidities, which is a major weakness of existing smaller studies.

Conclusions

This work defines the frequency distribution of serum UA levels in a sample that is representative of the US adolescent population, and examines the relationship between UA levels and multiple demographic and biochemical characteristics as well as known cardiovascular risk determinants such as BP and diet. Sex, age, race, and BMI z-score were found to be independent determinants of higher UA levels. Further prospective studies are needed to address the relationship between UA levels and cardiovascular morbidities in pediatric patients.

Methods

Study Population

Data from the NHANES for the years 2005–2008 were analyzed. NHANES is an ongoing nationally representative cross-sectional survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized US population and uses a complex, stratified, multistage probability design. The survey is performed by the National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, and the results are released in 2-y increments. Survey participants underwent standardized interviews, physical examinations, and laboratory testing in their homes and at a mobile examination center (MEC).

Serum UA measurements were obtained for all individuals ≥12 y of age in NHANES 2005–2008. Of the 2,125 children and adolescents 12–19 y of age, valid measures for serum UA were available for n = 1,912. In our study, analysis was limited to data relating to adolescents 13–19 y of age for whom serum UA measurements and complete data on other variables of interest were available (n = 1,725). Because dietary intake information is not reported in the public-access NHANES 2007–2008 data, the analysis of the association between UA and dietary intake was limited to adolescents from NHANES 2005–2006 (n = 925).

NHANES 2005–2008 was approved by the National Center for Health Statistics Institutional Review Board. All participants ≥18 y of age provided informed consent; for those <18 y of age, parents/guardians provided informed consent.

Study Variables

The demographic variables included in our study were age, gender, and self-reported race/ethnicity (categorized as non-Hispanic black, non-Hispanic white, Mexican American, and other). Poverty–income ratio is the ratio of a family’s income to the poverty threshold as defined by the US Census Bureau. In NHANES, a poverty–income ratio ≤1 was defined as being below the poverty threshold.

Detailed information on dietary intake was collected from the 2005–2006 NHANES participants during the MEC. Food intake histories were used to estimate the types and amounts of foods and beverages consumed during the 24-h period before the interview and to estimate intake of energy, nutrients, and other food components from those foods and beverages. All NHANES participants were eligible for two 24-h dietary recall interviews. The first dietary recall interview was collected in person during the MEC. The second interview was by telephone 3–10 d after the MEC. Average dietary intake was used in the analysis.

Physical measures were obtained in the MEC in accordance with standardized protocol (36). Using a mercury sphygmomanometer, three measurements of systolic and diastolic BP were obtained for each participant. The participants were classified as having HTN if this mean value was ≥ the 95th percentile for age, sex, and height, and as having pre-HTN if the mean BP was ≥ the 90th percentile but < the 95th percentile (35). The BP index (mean BP divided by the 95th percentile of BP for age, gender, and height) was calculated for each participant. Each participant’s height and weight were measured. BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. BMI z-scores were calculated based on 2000 Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention growth charts (37). Laboratory procedures are described in detail in the NHANES Laboratory/Medical Technologists Procedures Manual (38) Serum UA levels were measured using a colorimetric method. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein was measured using latex-enhanced nephelometry. Serum cholesterol levels were measured on the Beckman Synchron LX20 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA). Urinary albumin levels were measured using a solid-phase fluorescent immunoassay. Urinary creatinine levels were measured using the Jaffe rate reaction with a CX3 analyzer (Beckman ASTRA, Brea, CA). The urinary ACR was calculated as urinary albumin value divided by urinary creatinine value. An ACR ≥30 was used to define albuminuria. Serum creatinine was measured by means of the modified kinetic Jaffe reaction. Because differences were noted in serum creatinine values from the 1999–2000 survey when compared with a “gold standard,” a correction factor was applied to adjust for errors in measurement. Glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the Schwartz formula (39).

Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using Stata (SE 10.1; Stata, College Station, TX). Standard errors for all estimates were obtained using the Taylor-linearized variance estimation. Four-y sample weights were used to account for the complex sampling design of NHANES, including unequal probabilities of selection, oversampling, and nonresponse. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Mean values for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables were estimated on the basis of weighted UA quartiles. Statistical significance of linear trends across patient characteristics was determined by linear and logistic regression for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Weighted percentiles of the distribution of UA were estimated using quantile regression, utilizing analytical weights. Weighted linear regression models (least squares) were utilized to examine the associations between UA and demographic, socioeconomic, and dietary risk factors.

The relationship between BP and UA was first examined using the frequency distribution of UA levels based on BP classification. Next, the relationship between BP and weighted UA quartiles and the relationship between BP index and UA levels were examined.

Statement of Financial Support

No financial assistance was received to support this study.