Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Food and health

Impact of delay in early swallow screening on pneumonia, length of stay in hospital, disability and mortality in acute stroke patients

Abstract

Background/Objectives

Early swallow screening, within 4 h of admission, is required for all acute stroke patients to commence nutritional support, as recommended. We evaluated the impact of delay in early swallow screening on outcomes in patients admitted with acute stroke.

Subjects/Methods

Prospective cohort study of 1656 men (mean ± SD age = 73.1y ± 13.2) and 1653 women (79.3y ± 13.0) admitted with stroke to hyperacute stroke units (HASUs) in Surrey. Logistic regression was used to assess the risk (adjusted for age, stroke severity and co-morbidities) of delay in swallow screening on pneumonia, length of stay (LOS) > 3 weeks in HASU or hospital, moderately severe to severe disability on discharge (modified Rankin scale score = 4–5) and mortality during admission.

Results

Compared with those who received swallow screening within 4 h of admission, a delay between 4 and 72 h was associated with greater risks of pneumonia: OR = 1.4 (95%CI:1.1–1.9, P = 0.022), moderately severe to severe disability on discharge: OR = 1.4 (1.1–1.7, P = 0.007) and a delay beyond 72 h was associated with even greater risks of pneumonia: OR = 2.3 (1.4–3.6, P < 0.001), prolonged LOS in HASU: OR = 1.7 (1.0–3.0, P = 0.047, median LOS = 6.2 vs. 14.7 days) and hospital: OR = 2.1-fold (1.3–3.4, P = 0.007, median LOS = 6.8 vs. 14.9 days), moderately severe to severe disability on discharge: OR = 2.5 (1.7–3.7, P < 0.001) and mortality: OR = 3.8 (2.5–5.6, P < 0.001). These risks persisted after excluding 103 patients who died within 72 h.

Conclusions

Delay in early screening for swallow capacity in acute stroke patients is detrimental to outcomes, possibly due to delaying nutritional provision or through inappropriate feeding leading to aspiration. Routine early screening needs greater attention in HASUs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smithard DG, O’Neill PA, England RE, Park CL, Wyatt R, Martin DF, et al. The natural history of dysphagia following a stroke. Dysphagia. 1997;12:188–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Daniels SK, Brailey K, Priestly DH, Herrington LR, Weisberg LA, Foundas AL. Aspiration in patients with acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:14–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Perry L, Love CP. Screening for Dysphagia and aspiration in acute stroke: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2001;16:7–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, Diamant N, Speechley M, Teasell R. Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke. 2005;36:2756–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D. Swallowing disorders following acute stroke: prevalence and diagnostic accuracy. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;10:380–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smithard DG, O’Neill PA, Parks C, Morris J. Complications and outcome after acute stroke. Does dysphagia matter? Stroke. 1996;27:1200–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Odderson IR, Keaton JC, McKenna BS. Swallow management in patients on an acute stroke pathway: quality is cost effective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:1130–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baijens LW, Clavé P, Cras P, Ekberg O, Forster A, Kolb GF, et al. European society for swallowing disorders - European Union Geriatric Medicine Society white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1403–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Royal College of Physicians. National clinical guideline for stroke. 5th ed. Prepared by the Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. 2015.

  10. Royal College of Physicians. Clinical effectiveness and evaluation unit on behalf of the Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP). Clinical audit January–March 2016 Public Report National results. 2016.

  11. Han TS, Fry CH, Fluck D, Affley B, Gulli G, Barrett C. et al. Evaluation of anticoagulation status for atrial fibrillation on early ischaemic stroke outcomes: a registry-based, prospective cohort study of acute stroke care in Surrey, UK. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e019122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Stroke and transient ischaemic attack in over 16s: diagnosis and initial management. Clinical guideline. 2008. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg68. (Accessed 15/06/2017).

  13. Donovan NJ, Daniels SK, Edmiaston J, Weinhardt J, Summers D, Mitchell PH. Dysphagia screening: State of the art. Stroke. 2013;44:e24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boaden E, Doran D, Burnell J, Clegg A, Dey P, Hurley M, et al. Screening for aspiration risk associated with dysphagia in acute stroke. The Cochrane Library 2017.

  15. Perry L. Eating and dietary intake in communication-impaired stroke survivors: a cohort study from acute-stage hospital admission to 6 months post-stroke. Clin Nutr. 2004;23:1333–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jönsson AC, Lindgren I, Norrving B, Lindgren A. Weight loss after stroke: a population-based study from the Lund. Stroke Regist Stroke. 2008;39:918–23.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davis JP, Wong AA, Schluter PJ, Henderson RD, O’Sullivan JD, Read SJ. Impact of premorbid undernutrition on outcome in stroke patients. Stroke. 2004;35:1930–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dávalos A, Ricart W, Gonzalez-Huix F, Soler S, Marrugat J, Molins A, et al. Effect of malnutrition after acute stroke on clinical outcome. Stroke. 1996;27:1028–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoo SH, Kim JS, Kwon SU, Yun SC, Koh JY, Kang DW. Undernutrition as a predictor of poor clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:39–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Foley NC, Martin RE, Salter KL, Teasell RW. A review of the relationship between dysphagia and malnutrition following stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:707–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nyswonger GD, Helmchen RH. Early enteral nutrition and length of stay in stroke patients. J Neurosci Nurs. 1992;24:220–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dennis M. Nutrition after stroke. Br Med Bull. 2000;56:466–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Martineau J, Bauer JD, Isenring E, Cohen S. Malnutrition determined by the patient-generated subjective global assessment is associated with poor outcomes in acute stroke patients. Clin Nutr. 2005;24:1073–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Foley N, Teasell R, Salter K, Kruger E, Martino R. Dysphagia treatment post stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Age Ageing. 2008;37:258–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rowat A, Graham C, Dennis M. Dehydration in hospital-admitted stroke patients: detection, frequency, and association. Stroke. 2012;43:857–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, Gramlich L, Dodek P, Canadian Critical Care Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2003;27:355–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Doig GS, Heighes PT, Simpson F, Sweetman EA, Davies AR. Early enteral nutrition, provided within 24 h of injury or intensive care unit admission, significantly reduces mortality in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:2018–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Koretz RL, Lipman TO. The presence and effect of bias in trials of early enteral nutrition in critical care. Clin Nutr. 2014;33:240–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Healthcare for London. Stroke acute commissioning and tariff guidance. 2011. http://www.londonhp.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Stroke-Commissioning-and-Tariff-Guidance.pdf. (Accessed 15/06/2017)..

  30. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Costing statement: implementing the NICE guideline on transition between inpatient hospital settings and community or care home settings for adults with social care needs (NG27). 2015. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng27/resources/costing-statement-2187244909. (Accessed 15/06/2017).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all patients who participated in this SSNAP audit and to Dr Adrian Blight (currently at Department of Stroke, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust) for his help with contribution of data from Royal Surrey County Hospital.

Author contributions

TSH and PS designed research (project conception, development of overall research plan and study oversight). BA, GG, TP, CB, PK and AB conducted data collection. TSH analysed the data and wrote the first draft of the paper and MEJL and PS edited subsequent versions of the paper. TSH had primary responsibility for final content. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thang S Han.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, T.S., Lean, M.E., Fluck, D. et al. Impact of delay in early swallow screening on pneumonia, length of stay in hospital, disability and mortality in acute stroke patients. Eur J Clin Nutr 72, 1548–1554 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0148-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0148-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links