Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Transplant center characteristics and clinical outcomes after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: what do we know

Summary:

Center effects are differences in outcome among treatment centers that cannot be explained by identifiable differences in patients treated or specific treatments applied and are presumed to result from differences in the ways health care is delivered. This paper will briefly review studies of association between treatment center factors and clinical outcomes in general medicine and surgery and look more closely at studies involving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We will also attempt to identify conceptual domains to study further the processes and mechanisms that may be associated with better outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bortin MM, Horowitz MM, Rimm AA . Increasing utilization of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Results of the 1988–1990 survey. Ann Intern Med 1992; 116: 505–512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Passweg JR, Rowlings PA, Armitage JO et al. Report from the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry and Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry – North America. In: Cecka JM, Terasaki PI (eds). Clinical Transplants 1995. UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory: Los Angeles, CA, 1996, pp 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gratwohl A, Hermans J . Bone marrow transplantation activity in Europe 1992: report from the European Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1994; 13: 5–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Appelbaum FR . The use of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in the treatment of cancer. CA J Clin 1996; 46: 142–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Horowitz MM, Rowlings PA . An update from the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry and the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry on current activity in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In: Stossel TP, Goldman JM, Sander SG (eds). Current Opinion in Hematology. Rapid Science Publishers: Philadelphia, PA, 1997, pp 395–400.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amos RA, Gordon MY . Sources of human hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation – a review. Cell Transplant 1995; 4: 547–569.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JH, Klein HG . Collection and use of circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells. Hem Onc Clin North Am 1995; 9: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gratwohl A, Hermans J, Apperley J et al. Acute graft-versus-host disease: grade and outcome in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Working Party on Chronic Leukemia of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood 1995; 86: 813–818.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bensinger WI . Supportive care in marrow transplantation. Curr Opin Oncol 1992; 4: 614–623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rowlings PA, Passweg JR, Armitage JO et al. Current status of allogeneic and autologous blood and marrow transplantation: report from the IBMTR and ABMTR – North America. In: Lanza RP, Chick WL (eds). Yearbook of Cell and Tissue Transplantation. Kluwer Academic Publishers: the Netherlands, 1996, pp 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reece RL (ed). Volume–outcome link is strong indicator of quality. The Quality Indicator Physician Resource. April 2001.

  12. Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE . Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 2327–2340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tarnow-Mordi W, Hau C, Warden A, Shearer A . Hospital mortality in relation to staff workload: a 4-year study in an adult intensive-care unit. Lancet 2000; 356: 185–189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Provonost PJ, Jenckes MW, Dorman T et al. Organizational characteristics of intensive care units related to outcomes of abdominal aortic surgery. JAMA 1999; 281: 1310–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M, Zelevinsky K . Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1715–1722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sainsbury R, Haward B, Rider L, Johnston C, Round C . Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer. Lancet 1995; 345: 1265–1270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meagher AP . Colorectal cancer: is the surgeon a prognostic factor? Med J Aust 1999; 171: 308–310.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, Weissman NW et al. Relationship of hospital teaching status with quality of care and mortality for Medicare patients with acute MI. JAMA 2000; 284: 1256–1262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Horowitz MM, Przepiorka D, Champlin RE et al. Should HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplants for leukemia be restricted to large centers. Blood 1992; 79: 2771–2774.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hows J, Bradley BA, Gore S et al. Prospective evaluation of unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation. The International Marrow Unrelated Search and Transplant (IMUST) Study. Bone Marrow Transplant 1993; 4: 371–380.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Matsuo K, Hamajima N, Morishima Y, Harada M . Hospital capacity and post-transplant survival after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: analysis of data from the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26: 1061–1067.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Frassoni F, Labopin M, Powles R et al. Effect of center on outcome of bone marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukaemia. Lancet 2000; 355: 1393–1398.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Apperley J, Brand R, Gratwohl A et al. Is center size an accurate surrogate marker of quality of patient care in stem cell transplant units? Blood 2000; 96: A3654.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Luft HS . The relation between surgical volume and mortality: an exploration of causal factors and alternative models. Med Care 1980; 18: 940.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC . Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 1979; 301: 1364–1369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Morrow M, Stewart A, Sylvester J et al. Hospital volume predicts outcomes in breast cancer: a national cancer database study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2000; 19. p 309.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is funded in part by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ-5R03 HS 13046-02), the Medical College of Wisconsin Research Affairs Committee, and National Institutes of Health (NIH 5K23 (A82350-04)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loberiza, F., Serna, D., Horowitz, M. et al. Transplant center characteristics and clinical outcomes after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: what do we know. Bone Marrow Transplant 31, 417–421 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703873

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703873

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links