Introduction

Glaucoma in aphakia and pseudophakia is one of the most common complications of congenital cataract surgery.1 The incidence of such glaucoma as reported in the early literature ranges from 0.9 to 14%.2 The incidence in more recent literature ranges from 6 to 24%, depending on the series.3,4,5,6,7,8 While medical treatment should be tried first to lower the intraocular pressure (IOP), surgical procedure is often required to adequately control it.1,3

Standard glaucoma filtering surgery (trabeculectomy) has its own limitations with a poor success rate in the younger age group.9,10,11 The barriers to success of filtering surgery in children and younger individuals include a thick and active Tenon's capsule and rapid wound healing response.12 Recently, intraoperative mitomycin-C (MMC) has been shown to be an effective adjunct chemotherapy with trabeculectomy including glaucoma following congenital cataract surgery.13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22 However, with the exception of the study by Walton,22 other reports have presented results of different procedures in all childhood glaucomas grouped together.17,18,19,20,21 Azuara-Blanco et al18 had limited success in aphakic childhood glaucoma. In their study, the probability of having IOP <21 mmHg with no antiglaucoma medication and with clinically stable glaucoma 1 year after trabeculectomy with MMC was 0% in the aphakic eyes (n=8).18 They commented that an alternative therapeutic approach to aphakic childhood glaucoma might be needed. In contrast, aphakic glaucoma patients did well after congenital cataract surgery with MMC trabeculectomy with success rates ranging from 62 to 82%, depending on the other reported series.17,19,20,21,22 However, most of the series included only few patients with short or unknown follow-up.

The purpose of the present study is to provide additional information regarding the outcome of trabeculectomy with or without MMC in a homogenous series of patients with glaucoma in aphakia or pseudophakia following congenital cataract surgery and to identify the risk factors for failure of this procedure.

Patients and methods

A retrospective review of medical records identified all patients of glaucoma in aphakia and pseudophakia following congenital cataract surgery who subsequently underwent trabeculectomy with or without MMC (19 consecutive patients, 23 eyes) between January 1989 and April 2000 at LV Prasad Eye Institute. Patients were identified by searching our database for diagnostic codes and by reviewing the old charts. In four patients who underwent glaucoma surgery in both eyes, only the first operated eye was included in this study.

All patients underwent a complete ocular examination before and after surgery. The information obtained by a retrospective chart review included (1) patient demographics, (2) diagnosis of glaucoma, (3) age at cataract surgery, (4) preexisting ocular abnormalities, (5) type of cataract, (6) type of procedure or instrumentation, (7) interval between cataract surgery and development of glaucoma, (8) pre- and postoperative data including visual acuities, disc findings, IOPs, visual field changes and antiglaucoma medications, (9) exposure time and dose of MMC, (10) surgical procedure, and (11) significant complications. Informed consent was obtained from all patients/parents and Institutional Review Board approval for this study was obtained.

Surgical technique

All trabeculectomies were performed by one surgeon (AKM) and have been detailed previously.13,14 A limbus-based flap of conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule was created. After haemostasis of the episcleral blood vessels with wet-field cautery, a one-half thickness triangular scleral flap (4 mm base at the limbus) was outlined and dissected anteriorly without entry into the anterior chamber. A surgical sponge measuring 4×4 mm2 was soaked in a solution of 0.4 mg/ml MMC (mitomycin-C powder was reconstituted in sterile water to give the final concentration). The sponge was placed over the dissected bed; a superficial scleral flap and the conjunctiva-Tenon layer were then draped over the MMC-soaked sponge so that only those ocular tissues in contact with the sponge were directly exposed to MMC. After 3 min, the sponge was removed and MMC was irrigated thoroughly with 20 ml balanced salt solution (BSS). A 2 mm×1 mm deep trabecular block was removed, and a peripheral iridectomy was performed.

The scleral flap was closed with three interrupted (one at the apex and one on each side of the triangular scleral flap) 10-0 nylon sutures. The conjunctivo-Tenon layer was closed with 8-0 polyglactin (Vicryl) suture on a tapered needle (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA). After the closure, the conjunctiva was shown to be watertight. A drop of antibiotic–corticosteroid preparation and cyclopentolate was instilled in the conjunctival sac, and a patch and shield were applied on the eye. In cases where MMC was not used, standard trabeculectomy was performed with a few modifications in the form of three loose sutures or a single apical suture for scleral flap closure, partial Tenonectomy and cautery around the margins of the internal osteum. There were no definite criteria for applying or not applying MMC; however, the surgeon (AKM) stopped using MMC more recently.

The postoperative medical regimen initially included 0.1% betamethasone eye drops administered every 2 h and then tapered over a period of 6 weeks, depending on the degree of inflammation. Cyclopentolate 1% eye drops were given 3 times a day for the first 4 postoperative weeks. A topical antibiotic (0.3% gentamycin) was also administered 4 times daily for 1 week after surgery.

All patients were seen on the first postoperative day and then at 1, 3, 6 weeks and at every 3 months thereafter. At each visit, slit-lamp biomicroscopy for chamber depth, corneal appearance, IOP, bleb appearance and fundus examination was carried out wherever possible. IOP was measured while the patient was awake and in the seated position using a Goldmann applanation tonometer whenever patient cooperation permitted. For patients who were unable to cooperate with an office exam, a Perkins hand-held applanation tonometer was used during examination under anaesthesia using 1% halothane. Age-appropriate methods of visual acuity testing were used.

Surgical success and failure were defined before data analysis. A ‘complete’ success was defined as an IOP at the most recent follow-up visit that was in the range 6–21 mmHg without any glaucoma medications, without evidence of glaucoma progression, without requirement for further glaucoma surgery, and in the absence of visually devastating complications. A ‘qualified’ success was defined when the previous condition was achieved with single topical antiglaucoma medication. Failure was defined if any of the following were present: (1) IOP>21 mmHg with two or more medications, (2) additional antiglaucoma surgery required, (3) hypotony maculopathy, or (4) any other sight-threatening complications like bleb-related infection (BRI) and endophthalmitis. For the purpose of this study, ocular hypotony was documented to be present when IOP was <6 mmHGg on two consecutive postoperative visits employed to indicate statistical significance. Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the mean IOP between trabeculectomy with MMC and trabeculectomy without MMC groups. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to determine the success probabilities at various postoperative intervals. Log-rank test was applied to test the equality of survival distribution between the two groups.

Results

In total, 23 eyes of 19 patients were included in this study. Patient demographics are summarized in Table 1. There were 10 males and 9 females in the group. All patients were of Asian origin. The mean age at the time of initial cataract surgery was 2.9±3.5 years (range: 0.2–12 years; median: 1 year). The information regarding the instrumentation or the type of surgical procedure for cataract extraction was not available to our patients. The man time interval between cataract surgery and diagnosis of glaucoma was 7.2±7.8 years (range: 0–27 years; median: 5.8 years). The mean age of the patients at the time of trabeculectomy without MMC was 11.0±12.4 years (range: 0.3–37 years) and was 8.8±5.5 years (range: 2–18 years) in the group with MMC (P=0.649, Mann–Whitney U test). Nine eyes (eight patients) underwent trabeculectomy with MMC while 14 eyes (11 patients) underwent trabeculectomy without MMC. The mean follow-up was 24.2±17.9 months.

Table 1 Patient demographics (23 eyes of 19 patients of glaucoma following congenital cataract surgery)

Four patients underwent bilateral trabeculectomy with MMC, but in separate operative sessions; only the first eye operated upon was included for statistical analysis in this study. In all, 21 eyes were aphakic and two eyes were pseudophakic. The mean horizontal corneal diameter was 11.0±1.6 mm. However, the corneal diameter was less than 10 mm in three eyes. Two eyes had Peter's anomaly. The mean number of prior surgical procedures was two. The mean number of antiglaucoma medications used before trabeculectomy was beta-blockers in 94.7%, pilocarpine in 36.5%, and tablet acetazolamide in 42.1%.

The IOP was reduced from a preoperative level of 34.2±8.9 mmHg (range: 20–52) to a postoperative level of 18.4+12.2 mmHg (range: 2–60) with a mean follow-up of 24.2±17.9 months. The mean reduction in IOP in the MMC group was 15.4±17.3 and 16.3±13.8 mmHg in the other group (P=0.967, Mann–Whitney U test).

Complete success was achieved in 36.8% patients with a mean follow-up of 24.2±17.9 months (range: 1.6–54 months). The IOP was controlled with one antiglaucoma medication in 21.1% patients, which was considered as a qualified success. Surgical failure occurred in 42.1% of patients at a mean postoperative interval of 18.3±16.0 months (range: 0.9–40.2 months). The success probabilities (±standard error) were 78±1%, 57±13% and 33±13% at 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively. Figure 1 shows the Kaplan–Meier survival curve of overall success rate. Figure 2 shows the Kaplan–Meier survival curve of successful IOP control in trabeculectomy with and without MMC. There was no significant difference (P=0.5135, log-rank test) in the survival distributions of the two groups.

Figure 1
figure 1

Kaplan–Meier survival plot showing overall success rate of modified trabeculectomy and trabeculectomy with MMC.

Figure 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier life table estimation of successful intraocular pressure control following surgery. The outcome of modified trabeculectomy and trabeculectomy with MMC is compared.

Preoperative visual acuities are listed in Table 2. The final postoperative visual acuity was the same as, or better than, the preoperative level in 76.5% of the eyes that were categorized as a success. Four eyes (23.5%), which were categorized as failures, had a decrease in visual acuity. Of these, two eyes belonged to a single patient who developed bleb-related endophthalmitis. This was successfully treated but the patient subsequently developed chronic hypotony and choroidal detachment, which was not amenable to treatment, and the final visual acuity dropped from 20/50 to 20/400 in the left eye.

Table 2 Preoperative visual acuities in 19 patients

The blebs were characterized by their large, elevated, avascular and transparent appearance in patients who underwent trabeculectomy with MMC. In contrast, the blebs were diffuse and relatively thick-walled in patients who underwent trabeculectomy without MMC as seen in Figure 3.

Figure 3
figure 3

Diffuse and relatively thick-walled blebs with modified trabeculectomy.

There were no intraoperative complications. The postoperative complications in the two groups are listed in Table 3. Two patients developed dellen formation 6 weeks postoperatively, which was successfully treated with lubricant drops. Complete healing of the dellen occurred after treatment with topical lubricants. Figure 4 documents the anterior segment appearance in the right eye of the patient who developed bleb-related endophthalmitis. Figure 5 documents the appearance of the same eye after successful treatment of endophthalmitis. Similarly, Figures 6 and 7 document the appearance of the anterior segment when endophthalmitis developed in the left eye and outcome following treatment, respectively. Figures 8 and 9 document the 1 year and 14 months, respectively, of the postoperative appearance of the blebs of the right and left eye of the same patient who developed bleb-related endophthalmitis. Subsequently, the patient was seen with the diagnosis of chronic hypotony with thick choroidals that did not respond to any therapy and visual acuity reduced from 20/50 to 20/400 in the left eye.

Table 3 Comparison of complications in trabeculectomy with MMC and modified trabeculectomy in glaucoma following congenital cataract surgery
Figure 4
figure 4

Anterior segment and bleb appearance of the right eye of the patient who developed bleb-related endophthalmitis 13 months following trabeculectomy with MMC.

Figure 5
figure 5

Appearance of the same eye after successful treatment of endophthalmitis.

Figure 6
figure 6

Anterior segment and bleb appearance of the left eye of the same patient who developed bleb-related endophthalmitis 1 year and 9 months following trabeculectomy with MMC.

Figure 7
figure 7

Appearance of the left eye of the patient who developed bleb-related endophthalmitis following treatment.

Figure 8
figure 8

Appearance of the bleb of the right eye 1 year following treatment of endophthalmitis.

Figure 9
figure 9

Appearance of the bleb of the left eye 14 months following treatment of endophthalmitis.

Discussion

Glaucoma in aphakia and pseudophakia is a well-recognized sequelae of congenital cataract surgery, but there is still a lack of adequate information regarding its presentation, risk factors and management. Glaucoma may occur in either an acute form or chronic form. Acute glaucoma is typically of the angle closure type and usually presents in the early postoperative period. In contrast, open angle glaucoma (OAG) following congenital cataract surgery is not usually diagnosed until many years have passed. In our series, all the patients had open angles and the average time interval for the onset of glaucoma following congenital cataract surgery was 7.2±7.8 years. This is in accordance with the existing knowledge in the literature. Simon et al6 reported a mean time interval of 6.8 years. The average time interval between congenital cataract surgery and diagnosis of glaucoma was 12.2 years as reported by Asrani and Wilensky;3 while Phelps and Arafat; 23 reported an interval ranging from 2 to 45 years. Asrani et al24 observed a decreased incidence of open angle glaucoma among eyes rendered primarily pseudophakic compared with those that remained aphakic after congenital cataract surgery. They reported a single case of open-angle glaucoma found among 377 eyes with primary pseudophakia (mean age of patients: 5.1±4.7 years; mean follow-up: 3.9±2.7 years) following congenital cataract surgery. Extensive literature search has not revealed any reported case of OAG after primary IOL implantation of a congenital or developmental cataract in the absence of any other anterior segment anomalies.24 Interestingly, our series included two such cases and both eyes had pseudophakia with open angle gonioscopically. However, multiple surgeons were involved and various techniques of cataract surgery were employed, details of which were not known to us.

Glaucoma following congenital cataract surgery is refractory to surgical intervention for several reasons, including young age, history of prior surgery, associated subconjunctival scarring, aphakia and pseudophakia itself. Aphakia is also a known risk factor for failure in adult trabeculectomy surgery.25,26 Previous reports of outcome of filtering surgery without the use of any adjunctive antifibrotic agents in the management of a paediatric glaucoma have been disappointing.9,10,11 The use of antifibroproliferative agents such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)27,28 and MMC,29,30 which may improve the surgical prognosis, has been studied extensively in adults. Several prospective randomized studies in adults with high-risk glaucoma filtering surgery have shown that intraoperative MMC may be a better alternative to the use of postoperative 5-FU because MMC-augmented trabeculectomy is shown to have resulted in lower overall IOP, decreased dependence on postoperative antiglaucoma medication, and decreased corneal toxicity.31,32,33 Khaw et al,34 in an elegant study of cell culture analysis, demonstrated the greater effect of MMC as compared to 5-FU on both fibroblast proliferation and morphologic characteristics. Encouraging reports of intraoperative use of MMC in adults,31,32,33 coupled with the difficulties encountered by repeated injections of 5-FU in children, prompted us to use MMC intraoperatively during glaucoma filtering surgery in these patients.

Mitomycin-C has emerged as an effective antimetabolite for topical use during trabeculectomy. It is an antineoplastic antibiotic isolated from the fermentation filtrate of Streptomyces caespitosus, which has the ability to suppress significantly fibrosis and vascular ingrowth after exposure to the filtration site. The time of application of MMC in our study was 2–3 min. After a mean follow-up of 24.2±17.9 months, 36.8% of the eyes demonstrated successful control of IOP (IOP less than or equal to 21 mmHg). This suggests that glaucoma following congenital cataract surgery is refractory to filtering surgery even with the intraoperative use of MMC.

The probability of having IOP<21 mmHg with no antiglaucoma medication and with clinically stable glaucoma 1 year after surgery was 0% in the eight aphakic eyes in the study by Azuara-Blanco et al.18 The mean age at the time of surgery was 5.7 years in that study, while the mean age at surgery was 11.0±12.4 years in trabeculectomy without MMC group and 8.5±5.5 in the MMC group in our study. The relatively better success rate in our series could be related to the application time of MMC, which was 3 min compared to 2.2 min (0.9 min lower) in the study by Azaura-Blanco et al.

Table 4 summarizes the reports evaluating the outcome of glaucoma filtering surgery with adjunctive MMC in glaucoma following congenital cataract surgery. With the exception of the study reported by Azuara-Blanco et al18 the success rate varied from 50% to 85%.3,17,18,19,20,21,22 The success rate of the present series is comparable to that reported by Walton,22 Asrani and Wilensky,3 Wallace et al21 and Beck et al.17 According to Wallace et al21 trabeculectomy with MMC is the most effective treatment in aphakic glaucoma following congenital cataract surgery. In sharp contrast, Azuara-Blanco et al18 had a poorer outcome and they were forced to comment that an alternative approach to aphakic childhood glaucoma may be necessary. Sidoti et al20 also suggested that other therapeutic approaches should be explored such as aqueous drainage implants because of the lack of effectiveness of trabeculecotmy with MMC in many cases and the potential for complications even when the successful control of IOP is achieved.

Table 4 Reported series on trabeculectomy with or without mitomycin-C in paediatric aphakic glaucoma

The role of glaucoma drainage implant surgery as the alternative management of refractory glaucoma following congenital cataract surgery deserves mention. The long-term bleb-related complications and the potential risk of chemotherapeutic exposure are avoided with the use of drainage implants.35 Encouraging reports obtained with the Molteno implants in young adults have led several investigators to the application of various other glaucoma drainage devices in children and young adults with various refractory glaucomas.36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43 Molteno et al36 and Billson et al37 reported success rates of 87 and 95%, respectively. Recently, Baervelat and Ahmed glaucoma implants have been used to treat refractory glaucoma in young adults and paediatric patients, achieving success rates of 86 and 85%, respectively.41,42 Molteno et al36 reported success (IOP<20 mmHg without any antiglaucoma medication, with a Molteno implant in 19 of 21 eyes with congenital cataracts). Billson et al37 achieved IOP control (<21 mmHg without medication) in 8 of 11 eyes with childhood aphakic glaucoma after a two-stage Molteno implant with a follow-up of 1–7 years. Contradictory reports have also been published in the recent literature. Wallace et al21 implanted nine Molteno implants in patients with aphakia. Although six of the nine procedures resulted in IOP control at 6 months, only three maintained IOP control for 12 months after surgery. Coleman et al43 reported cumulative probability of success as 80 and 60% at 12 and 24 months, respectively, while Nesher et al39 reported a success rate of 59%.

In general, the success rates of glaucoma drainage devices in refractory paediatric glaucoma are variable and also have a variable rate of complications.36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43 The comparison of the results of these studies with the present study is invalid in view of the differences in age groups included and racial variations. However, glaucoma drainage implant seems to be an interesting alternative in this refractory glaucoma. Only a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the two treatment modalities will identify convincingly the superior surgical option for these challenging patients. Drainage implants may be a better alternative to trabeculectomy with MMC for aphakic patients who are contact lens dependants, and who may be at greater risk for late-onset bleb-related infection and endophthalmitis after surgery.44

Bleb-related infection is a serious complication of trabeculectomy with adjunctive chemotherapy and its incidence appears to have increased in recent years.15,17,20,21,45,46,47,48 Susanna et al15 reported one case in 79 cases (1.26%) and Wallace et al21 noted one case in 16 eyes (6%). Beck et al17 noted late-onset endophthalmitis in five eyes of five patients (8%) at 18–48 months postoperatively; however, four of the five eyes had excellent outcome with continued IOP control. In the recent report by Sidoti et al20 five patients (17%) had BRI at a mean follow-up of 27.9 months. Of these, two (7%) experienced endophthalmitis with one eye becoming phthisical and the other three patients (10%) experienced blebitis. In our own series, two eyes of a patient had BRI on separate occasions, which was successfully treated but ultimately developed choroidal detachment and hypotony that was refractory to treatment and led to severe diminution of vision. The long life expectancy in these patients as well as huge thin-walled avascular bleb coupled with difficulty in maintaining proper hygiene in children are responsible for the high rate of intraocular infection. Several studies46,49 have reported a higher frequency of endophthalmitis with the use of antimetabolites with trabeculectomy in the inferior hemisphere, so it is advisable to avoid such locations.

Considering the higher incidence of BRI in their series over an extended follow-up interval, Sidoti et al20 have suggested caution in using MMC as an adjunct chemotherapy in paediatric trabeculectomy. They suggested that when MMC is used as adjunct chemotherapy to trabeculectomy in children, a lower dosage (concentration, time of exposure, or both) should be considered. Agarwal et al16 reported that 0.2 mg/ml of mitomycin for 4 min is as effective as 0.4 mg/ml concentration in high-risk cases of congenital glaucoma, but with a lower incidence of complications and thin-walled blebs.

It is of interest that there were more surgical failures with a higher dosage of MMC in uncomplicated congenital glaucoma as reported by Mullaney et al.50 The reason for this is not clear. Megevand et al51 found no difference in the final IOP while using MMC with exposure time 2 min vs 5 min. Stone et al52 found similar results and the exposure time of MMC (0.3 mg/ml) ranged from 1 to 5 min. Jampel53 suggested that the largest effect of MMC took place during the first minute of drug exposure. Based on the available reports in the literature, it is advisable to use lower concentration and shorter exposure time when adjunctive MMC with trabeculectomy is planned in paediatric patients.

A less potent chemotherapeutic agent such as 5-FU may be used in refractory paediatric glaucoma. There is a little doubt that MMC carries greater risk than does postoperative 5-FU. Zalish et al54 reported good success with postoperative 5-FU in congenital and infantile glaucoma. The primary disadvantage of conventional 5-FU treatment is the need for multiple postoperative visits to receive the subconjunctival injections. Good outcomes with intraoperative sponge 5-FU in adults have been reported by several investigators.55,56,57,58 To our knowledge, there is no published report on the results of intraoperative use of sponge 5-FU in refractory glaucoma following congenital cataract surgery. We think that trabeculectomy with intraoperative sponge 5-FU with a short course of postoperative subconjunctival supplementation (if required) may be a safer alternative in this type of refractory glaucoma. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing intraoperative MMC vs 5-FU in the carefully selected comparable group of patient population seems warranted; however, it is probably not feasible, as the patient numbers are small.

To avoid MMC-related complications, and adjunctive chemotherapy in paediatric glaucoma patients, we performed trabeculectomy with tenonectomy in nine patients with application of loose 10-0 nylon sutures or a single apical suture for closure of the superficial scleral flap. This approach was followed in view of the thin-walled avascular blebs following adjunctive antifibrotic therapy, which are prone to infections as documented in the present study as well as several other published studies. Although, the success rate of trabeculectomy with or without MMC is the same, a large number of cases and longer duration of follow-up is required to identify the superior surgical option in this situation. The bleb appearance of the patients who did not receive MMC was satisfactory and not prone to blebitis or endophthalmitis compared with the patients who received MMC intraoperatively.

The results of the present study need to be interpreted with caution. The limitations of this study include its nonrandomized, retrospective design, the wide variation in the age groups included, and arbitrary criteria for use of MMC. In addition, our series is relatively small to be able to have the power to detect differences in the outcome of trabeculectomy with or without MMC.

In conclusion, the management of glaucoma following congenital cataract surgery is challenging. Young age, subconjunctival scarring, prior surgery and aphakia or pseudophakia are significant risk factors for failure. The present study achieved a poor success rate of trabeculectomy in a small series of aphakic Asian Indian patients, even with the use of MMC. The possibility of bleb-related sequelae and complications should be discussed with the patients or parents, and children with filtering blebs who develop red eyes should be promptly evaluated. Periodic follow-up is mandatory for life.