Introduction

Hypotony can result from many aetiologies, with several mechanisms working in concert to reduce intraocular pressure.1, 2 It is commonly seen in patients with a history of ocular trauma, previous vitreoretinal surgery, particularly if complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy, and in cases of long-standing uveitis. While mild hypotony is often transient and is of little consequence, a pressure below 4–6 mmHg can have deleterious effects on ocular function and if sustained can lead to phthisis.1, 3, 4, 5, 6

Anterior vitreous traction on the ciliary processes is considered to be one of the mechanisms by which hypotony is induced in post-traumatic or postvitrectomy cases.7, 8, 9, 10 In these cases, removing antero-posterior traction, and epiciliary membranes can lead to a moderate increase in intraocular pressure.7, 11, 12 Either gas or silicone oil can be used to provide postoperative tamponade. With the use of gas, the pressure increase was sustained in 2/3 of patients, while with oil, a modest increase was noted in above 90% of patients. Visual acuity results were similar in both groups, with the majority of patients having only a limited gain in acuity.

Hypotony resulting from ocular inflammation is observed in both the acute and chronic phase of disease. Hyperacute ocular inflammation can induce a significant drop in intraocular pressure, which usually resolves once the inflammatory episode is brought under control.1, 4 This form of hypotony is likely mediated by the secretion of prostaglandins such as PGF2-α, which increase uveoscleral outflow.13, 14, 15 Chronic uveitis can lead to the development of cyclitic membranes, which both increase outflow by placing traction on the ciliary processes, and decrease secretion by directly damaging the ciliary epithelium.5 With time, the hypotonous process can itself lead to further damage, including sclerosis and atrophy of ciliary processes.4, 16 Medical treatment may be sufficient in early forms of inflammatory hypotony, but in the presence of a tractional detachment, surgical release of the tractional forces has been advocated. It was shown to improve intraocular pressure in a case of sarcoid uveitis, as well as in a case of juvenile chronic arthritis.17

In the current study, we investigated the value of surgical management of inflammatory hypotony in a larger group of patients.

Methods

Through a retrospective chart review, patients who had undergone surgery to treat hypotony in the Ophthalmology department of the Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam from January 1997 to September 2001 were identified. Patient demographics and characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Only patients who were operated upon with an intraocular pressure of 5 mmHg or less for at least a month's duration, and documented on at least two separate visits were included in the study. The last recorded intraocular pressure prior to surgery is reported. Visual acuity was measured at each visit. The best-corrected visions are reported in this series.

Table 1 Patient demographics

During the initial evaluation period, patients with a diagnosis of intraocular inflammation were more intensively treated with either 1 to 2 subtenon's injection of triamcinolone, or by raising the level of systemic steroids by at least 0.5 mg/kg/day. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, cell, and flare were carefully monitored for signs of improvement over the following month. As a pre-requisite for surgery, eyes were required not to show sustained improvement with medical treatment. In particular, the intraocular pressure on two occasions while under treatment remained below or equal to 5 mmHg. Several patients were sent for ultrasound biomicroscopy of their ciliary body for any evidence of epiciliary tissue, ciliary body detachment with supraciliary effusion, traction on the ciliary processes, and, in particular for the absence of complete atrophy of the ciliary body. In the perioperative period, intense anti-inflammatory therapy was maintained. At the time of surgery, a periocular or intraocular injection of triamcinolone was given. Anti-inflammatory medications were slowly tapered in the postoperative period based upon the observed level of intraocular inflammation.

All patients were carefully examined at the time of surgery to determine the state of the ciliary processes. This was judged in terms of the severity and extent of epiciliary proliferations, the presence of anterior PVR (defined as the presence of adherent vitreous strands and/or sheet-like membranes extending from the region of the vitreous base anteriorly to attach to the ciliary body, posterior surface of the iris, or pupillary margin), and the extent and severity of ciliary process atrophy (seen as total absence, sclerotic processes (crest alone, or including the base of the ciliary process), or processes of normal appearance).

A conventional three-port pars plana technique was performed in all cases, with the sclerotomies placed 3 mm posterior to the limbus, and the superior two sclerotomies positioned in the 3 and 9 o'clock meridians to allow for better visualization and manipulation of the superior peripheral retina, and ciliary body region. Lens capsule, pupillary membranes, and residual lens material were removed first. Any remaining vitreous present adjacent to the vitreous base was shaved using low suction, and a high cut rate. The ciliary processes were assessed as indicated above. In several cases, membranes were first dissected away, before the ciliary processes could be assessed. Epiciliary tissue was incised using an MVR blade under direct visualization through the pupil. If visualization was deemed to be insufficient, the endo-illuminator probe was held externally by the assistant at the edge of the limbus, directing the light beam from an angle situated 180° opposite to the tissue being manipulated. Extensive external indentation of the pars plana region allowed adequate visualization of the peripheral retina, and ciliary body region.

Once the ciliary processes were exposed, the epiciliary tissue was carefully stripped from the surface of the processes using microscissors, a bent MVR blade, or dissector combined with a microforceps. This approach minimized traction on the ciliary processes themselves. If the underlying processes appeared to be of normal size with minimal fibrosis in roughly 1/4 of the eye's circumference, no oil was injected in the eye at the completion of the procedure.

Results

Six uveitis patients were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria defined in the methods section (Table 1). Two patients were male, and four female, with a mean age of 35 years (range 10–69 years). Hypotony was present from 1 month to several years. In both patients whose hypotony was present for more than 1 year, a symptomatic visual drop was noted in the previous 2 to 3 months. The patient with intermediate uveitis had a limited peripheral retinal detachment and hypotony. The detachment extended over 3 clock hours peripherally and reached the arcade posteriorly. Prominent anterior vitreous traction was seen to the posterior lens surface over 1/2 of the circumference. This was removed under endoscopic visualization, allowing the intraocular lens to remain in situ. As shown in Table 1, some patients had had prior surgery consisting of either cataract extraction, and/or pars plana vitrectomy with IOL insertion or removal. None of these patients had cyclodestructive procedures, nor extensive vitreo-retinal surgery. None had undergone a retinotomy, nor had silicone oil been injected in their eye before developing hypotony.

Preoperative assessment using the UBM showed the presence of a supraciliary effusion in two patients, and traction on the ciliary processes in one (Figure 1). Thick epiciliary tissue prevented visualization of the ciliary processes in two patients. In one, the membranes extended onto the posterior surface of the iris. UBM was not performed in two uveitis patients. Standard ultrasound did not show any abnormality.

Figure 1
figure 1

UBM showing ciliary body detachment in case number 5. There is also evidence of vitreous condensation on the posterior iris surface.

At the time of surgery, the condition of the ciliary processes was carefully assessed (Table 2). Some degree of epiciliary tissue extending onto the iris surface was observed in one uveitis patient with long-standing hypotony. Some degree of ciliary sclerosis was noted in two patients. In one the process was severe, involving most processes (patient 6). Silicone oil was injected in her eye at the end of the procedure.

Table 2 Surgical findings and procedure

The postoperative course was highly variable. A moderate degree of inflammation with increased flare was noted in all eyes. Two uveitis patients developed a vitreous haemorrhage that required 2–3 months to clear. The postoperative rise in intraocular pressure occurred at a variable rate. It was often not present in the immediate postoperative period, but appeared within the first postoperative month. In one patient with sarcoidosis, a significant pressure rise developed after tapering antisuppressive medication (Table 3). Visual acuity results are reported in Table 4. Significant visual acuity gains were achieved in four of the six uveitis patients. In one, the visual gain was limited due to on-going inflammation and the development of band keratopathy.

Table 3 Intraocular pressure results (mmHg)
Table 4 Visual acuity results

Discussion

Within the realm of inflammatory ocular diseases, a prolonged lowered pressure can occur on the basis of ciliary body inflammation or as a consequence of tractional forces on the ciliary processes, both leading to decreased aqueous production.4 Ocular signs can be of some utility in differentiating the two, as acute hypotony is often associated with inflammation (cell and flare) in the anterior chamber and/or the peripheral vitreous, while the latter is often present in a relatively quiet eye (although hypotony can itself cause increased flare in the absence of cells in the anterior chamber).4 To ensure timely management, a stepwise approach to inflammatory hypotony can be of use in guiding care for these patients.

First, one has to be certain that ocular inflammation is brought under control. Whatever the anti-inflammatory cocktail being used by an individual patient, it should be raised sufficiently to allow resolution of inflammatory hypotony if present. This is more likely to be present in hypotony of recent onset and when there is a prominent inflammatory response. If effective, the anti-inflammatory cocktail can be slowly tapered based on the patient's response. With adequate anti-inflammatory therapy, some degree of response should be visible within 2–3 months. This was not observed in any of the patients we treated.

If no response is observed with anti-inflammatory agents, the further course will be dependent on the state of the ciliary body. The presence of a detached ciliary body and the absence of ciliary process atrophy suggest a better surgical prognosis. A careful preoperative assessment of the ciliary body should be carried out preferably with the use of a UBM or similar device. This evaluation can also help to identify the location and thickness of epiciliary membranes, and thus help in surgical planning. In patients where ciliary processes are absent, and it is clear that they are not hidden by epiciliary membranes, surgery alone is unlikely to lead to a significant rise in pressure or vision. Some authors have advocated the use of periocular, or systemic steroids, but the efficacy of these modalities is limited.18 Recently, intraocular triamcinolone or the use of topical ibopamine have been proposed as an alternative, both are dependent on residual ciliary body function.19, 20 Both also require continuous treatment, or repeated injection.

If surgery is chosen, or atrophy is noted at the time of surgery, silicone oil may prevent the development of phthisis. It can lead to a moderate increase in pressure.21

At the time of surgery, it is necessary to remove carefully all peripheral vitreous gel, and all epiciliary tissue over 360°. Removal of any residual lens or capsular support is also performed if it is contributing to the traction on the ciliary processes. The epiciliary tissue is removed using a bimanual technique to minimize traction on the ciliary body epithelium, as this procedure can lead to the unnecessary removal of ciliary epithelium as we and others have noted in surgical specimens.7

The ciliary body is then carefully examined by deep indentation or using an endoscopic viewing system. Normal processes will have well-defined crypts, a slightly corrugated appearance, and have a deep brown colour. In a dysfunctional ciliary body, processes can be completely absent, in which case a white fibrotic plaque with a variable degree of pigmentation is left behind. Partial ciliary body dysfunction can be identified as fibrosis (whitening) most often beginning on the top of the processes, extending only later to the crypts. We have attempted to classify the appearance of the ciliary processes in our patients based on the above description. As noted in Table 3, the appearance can vary in different parts of the eye. In the presence of normal-appearing ciliary processes, or with fibrosis limited to the crests of the processes, no further surgery is required. In the presence of significant ciliary process atrophy, silicone oil is advisable.

Perioperative anti-inflammatory control is also important and should be carefully monitored. Intraocular inflammation and fibrin formation is frequently observed following surgery in hypotonous eyes.7 Reducing preoperative inflammation as suggested in step one, topped by giving additional periocular or intraocular steroids at the time of surgery, can help to reduce postoperative fibrin formation. Reducing postoperative fibrin will reduce the risk of recurrent epiretinal and epiciliary membrane formation, and thus reduces the risk of a recurrent hypotony.11, 22 Our uveitis patients did particularly well with regard to intraocular pressure and vision. Our own results in PVR or ocular infection patients have led to only limited improvement in keeping with previously published series.7, 8, 11

In an experimental hypotony model, the development of an epiciliary membrane was associated with a progressive loss of nonpigmented and pigmented epithelium over a period of several weeks.16 Hypotony developed in parallel with this tissue loss. With long-standing hypotony, progressive atrophy of the ciliary processes can occur, reducing the likelihood of a functional recovery. This was probably the case in our sixth patient, who only experienced a transient increase in pressure following surgery, and in whom the processes were noted to be atrophic at the time of surgery. She had uveitis for several years prior to her arrival in our clinic. Young patients appear to carry a particularly favourable prognosis. Following surgery, they recovered normal intraocular pressure and significant vision. However, compliance with postoperative anti-inflammatory therapy may be a problem in this patient population, as was the case in patient 2.

In conclusion, certain cases of hypotony due to uveitis are amenable to surgical therapy, but should be carried out prior to the development of irreversible ciliary process damage. When operated upon in a timely fashion, sustained gains in pressure and vision are possible. However, for patients with ciliary process atrophy, or hypotony from other causes, the currently available surgical approaches do not appear to present much benefit, except for the avoidance of phthisis bulbi. Other approaches will be required in these patients.