Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Recognition and management of overweight and obesity in primary care in Germany

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In contrast to the well-documented high prevalence of overweight and obesity in the general population, the prevalence, recognition rates and management by primary care physicians—as the core gatekeeper in the health care system—remains poorly studied.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To examine (1) the point prevalence of overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) in primary care patients, (2) prevalence patterns in patients with high-risk constellations (diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, etc.), (3) doctors' recognition and interventions, as well as patients' use and perceived effectiveness of weight-loss interventions and (4) factors associated with non-treatment.

METHODS: Cross-sectional point prevalence study of 45 125 unselected consecutive primary care attendees recruited from a representative nationwide sample of 1912 primary care practices. Measures: (1) standardized clinical appraisal of each patient by the physician (diagnostic status and recognition, severity, comorbidity, current and past interventions). (2) Patient self-report questionnaire: height and weight, illness history, past and current treatments and their perceived effectiveness, health attitudes and behaviors.

RESULTS: (1) In all, 37.9% of all primary care attendees were overweight, 19.4% obese. (2) Rates for overweight and obesity were highest in patients with diabetes (43.6 and 36.7%) and hypertension (46.1 and 31.3%), followed by patients with cardiovascular disorders. Rates of overweight/obesity increased steadily by the number of comorbid conditions. (3) Doctors' recognition of overweight (20–30%) and obesity (50–65%) was low, patients' actual use of weight control interventions even lower (past 12 months: 8–11%, lifetime: 32–39%). Patient success rates were quite limited. (4) Co- and multimorbidity in particular as well as other patient and illness variables were identified as predictors for recognition, but prediction of patients' actual use of weight loss interventions was limited.

CONCLUSIONS: Primary care management of overweight and obesity is largely deficient, predominantly due to four interrelated factors: doctors' poor recognition of patients' weight status, doctors' inefficient efforts at intervention, patients' poor acceptance of such interventions and dissatisfaction with existing life-style modification strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kuczmarski RJ, Johnson CL . Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960–1994. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998; 22: 39–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL . Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000. JAMA 2002; 288: 1723–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caccamese SM, Kolodner K, Wright SM . Comparing patient and physician perception of weight status with body mass index. Am J Med 2002; 112: 662–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin PD, Rhode PC, Howe JT, Brantley PJ . Primary care weight management counseling: physician and patient perspectives. J La State Med Soc 2003; 155: 52–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee IM, Rexrode KM, Cook NR, Manson JE, Buring JE . Physical activity and coronary heart disease in women: is ‘no pain, no gain’ passe? JAMA 2001; 285: 1447–1454.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kenchaiah S, Evans JC, Levy D, Wilson PW, Benjamin EJ, Larson MG, Kannel WB, Vasan RS . Obesity and the risk of heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma AM, Wittchen HU, Kirch W, Pittrow D, Ritz E, Göke B, Lehnert H, Tschöpe D, Krause P, Höfler M, Pfister H, Bramlage P, Unger T . High prevalence and poor control of hypertension in primary care: cross-sectional study. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 479–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bray GA, Ryan DH, Harsha DW . Diet, weight loss, and cardiovascular disease prevention. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2003; 5: 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fontaine KR, Redden DT, Wang C, Westfall AO, Allison DB . Years of life lost due to obesity. JAMA 2003; 289: 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wittchen HU, Krause P, Hofler M, Pfister H, Küpper B, Pittrow D, Bramlage P, Unger T, Sharma AM, Ritz E, Göke B, Lehnert H, Tschöpe D, Kirch W . Objective, design and methodology of the ‘Hypertension and Diabetes Risk Screening and Awareness’ (HYDRA) study. MMW Fortschr Med 2003; 121: 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. National Institute of Mental Health Clinical Global Impressions. In: Guy W (ed). ECDEU assessment for psychopharmacology. US Department of Health and Human Service, Alcohol Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration, NIMH: Rockville; 1976. pp 221–227.

  12. Jacobi F, Wittchen HU, Holting C, Sommer S, Lieb R, Höfler M, Pfister H . Estimating the prevalence of mental and somatic disorders in the community: aims and methods of the German National Health Interview and Examination Survey. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2002; 11: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thefeld W, Stolzenberg H, Bellach BM . The Federal Health Survey: response, composition of participants and non-responder analysis. Gesundheitswesen 1999; 61: S57–S61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McCullagh P, Nelder JA . Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. London: Chapman & Hall; 1989.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Royall RM . Model robust confidence intervals using maximum likelihood estimators. Int Statist Rev 1986; 54: 221–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fahrmeier L, Tutz G, Hennevogl W . Multivariate statistical modeling based on generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Heidelberg: Springer; 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffmeister H, Mensink GB, Stolzenberg H . National trends in risk factors for cardiovascular disease in Germany. Prev Med 1994; 23: 197–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Troschke Jv et al. (eds). Die Deutsche Herz-Kreislauf-Präventionsstudie (DHP). Bern: Hans Huber; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, Campbell SM, Johnson CL . Increasing prevalence of overweight among US adults. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991. JAMA 1994; 272: 205–211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Assmann G, Schulte H, Cullen P . New and classical risk factors—the Munster heart study (PROCAM). Eur J Med Res 1997; 2: 237–242.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Field AE, Coakley EH, Must A, Spadano JL, Laird N, Dietz WH, Rimm E, Colditz GA . Impact of overweight on the risk of developing common chronic diseases during a 10-year period. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 1581–1586.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Hennekens CH, Arky RA, Speizer FE . Weight as a risk factor for clinical diabetes in women. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132: 501–513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Rotnitzky A, Manson JE . Weight gain as a risk factor for clinical diabetes mellitus in women. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 481–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mokdad AH, Bowman BA, Ford ES, Vinicor F, Marks JS, Koplan JP . The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States. JAMA 2001; 286: 1195–1200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Galuska DA, Will JC, Serdula MK, Ford ES . Are health care professionals advising obese patients to lose weight? JAMA 1999; 282: 1576–1578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fontanarosa PB . Patients, physicians, and weight control. JAMA 1999; 282: 1581–1582.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Glaesmer H, Brahler E . Prevalence estimation of overweight and obesity based on subjective data of body-mass-index (BMI). Gesundheitswesen 2002; 64: 133–138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by an unrestricted educational grant by Sanofi-Synthelabo, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P Bramlage.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bramlage, P., Wittchen, HU., Pittrow, D. et al. Recognition and management of overweight and obesity in primary care in Germany. Int J Obes 28, 1299–1308 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802752

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802752

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links