Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Fully automated large-scale assessment of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue by magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

Objective:

To describe and evaluate a fully automated method for characterizing abdominal adipose tissue from magnetic resonance (MR) transverse body scans.

Methods:

Four MR pulse sequences were applied: SE, FLAIR, STIR, and FRFSE. On 39 subjects, each abdomen was traversed by 15 contiguous transaxial images. The total abdominal adipose tissue (TAAT) was calculated from thresholds obtained by slice histogram analysis. The same thresholds were also used in the manual volume calculation of TAAT, subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SAAT) and visceral abdominal adipose tissue (VAAT). Image segmentation methods, including edge detection, mathematical morphology, and knowledge-based curve fitting, were used to automatically separate SAAT from VAAT in various ‘nonstandard’ cases such as those with heterogeneous magnetic fields and movement artefacts.

Results:

The percentage root mean squared errors of the method for SAAT and VAAT ranged from 1.0 to 2.7% for the four sequences. It took approximately 7 and 15 min to complete the 15-slice volume estimation of the three adipose tissue classes using automated and manual methods, respectively.

Conclusion:

The results demonstrate that the proposed method is robust and accurate. Although the separation of SAAT and VAAT is not always perfect, this method could be especially helpful in dealing with large amounts of data such as in epidemiological studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caprio S . Relationship between abdominal visceral fat and metabolic risk factors in obese adolescents. Am J Hum Biol 1999; 11: 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gastaldelli A, Miyazaki Y, Pettiti M, Matsuda M, Mahankali S, Santini E et al. Metabolic effects of visceral fat accumulation in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 5098–5103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith S, Lovejoy J, Greenway F, Ryan D, deJonge L, de la Bretonne J et al. Contributions of total body fat, abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments, and visceral adipose tissue to the metabolic complications of obesity. Metabolism 2001; 50: 425–435.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wajchenberg BL . Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Endocrine Rev 2000; 21: 697–738.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Miyazaki Y, Glass L, Triplitt C, Wajcberg E, Mandarino LJ, DeFronzo RA . Abdominal fat distribution and peripheral and hepatic insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2002; 283: E1135–E1143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas E, Bell J . Influence of undersampling on magnetic resonance imaging measurements of intra-abdominal adipose tissue. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003; 27: 211–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Armellini F, Zamboni M, Rigo L, Todesco T, Bergamo-Andreis IA, Procacci C et al. The contribution of sonography to the measurement of intra-abdominal fat. J Clin Ultrasound 1990; 18: 563–567.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu K, Chan Y, Chan W, Kong W, Kong M, Chan J . Sonographic measurement of mesenteric fat thickness is a good correlate with cardiovascular risk factors: comparison with subcutaneous and preperitoneal fat thickness, magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometric indexes. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003; 27: 1267–1273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell LV, Carey DG, Chisholm DJ . Measurement of central adiposity. A bet each way? Diabetes Care 1996; 19: 1033–1034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamel E, McNeill G, Han T, Smith FW, Avenell A, Davidson L et al. Measurement of abdominal fat by magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry in non-obese men and women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999; 23: 686–692.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Snijder M, Visser M, Dekker J, Seidell JC, Fuerst T, Tylavsky F et al. The prediction of visceral fat by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the elderly: a comparison with computed tomography and anthropometry. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 984–993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenfield JR, Samaras K, Chisholm DJ, Campbell LV . Regional intra-subject variability in abdominal adiposity limits usefulness of computed tomography. Obes Res 2002; 10: 260–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kobayashi J, Tadokoro N, Watanabe M, Shinomiya M . A novel method of measuring intra-abdominal fat volume using helical computed tomography. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 398–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Seidell JC, Bakker CJ, van der Kooy K . Imaging techniques for measuring adipose-tissue distribution – a comparison between computed tomography and 1.5-T magnetic resonance. Am J Clin Nutr 1990; 51: 953–957.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Elbers J, Haumann G, Asscheman H, Seidell J, Gooren L . Reproducibility of fat area measurements in young, non-obese subjects by computerized analysis of magnetic resonance images. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1997; 21: 1121–1129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Han T, Kelly I, Walsh K, Greene R, Lean M . Relationship between volumes and areas from single transverse scans of intra-abdominal fat measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1997; 21: 1161–1166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gronemeyer S, Steen R, Kauffman W, Reddick W, Glass J . Fast adipose tissue (FAT) assessment by MRI. Magn Reson Imag 2000; 18: 815–818.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang GZ, Myerson S, Chabat F, Pennell DJ, Firmin EN . Automatic MRI adipose tissue mapping using overlapping mosaics. Magn Reson Materials Phys Biol Med 2002; 14: 39–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Poll LW, Wittsack HJ, Koch JA, Willers R, Scherer A, Kapitza C et al. Quantification of total abdominal fat volumes using magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Med Res 2002; 7: 347–352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Donnelly LF, O'Brien KJ, Dardzinski BJ, Poe SA, Bean JA, Holland SK et al. Using a phantom to compare MR techniques for determining the ratio of intraabdominal to subcutaneous adipose tissue. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 993–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ross R, Shaw KD, Martel Y, Guise JD, Avruch L . Adipose tissue distribution measured by magnetic resonance imaging in obese women. Am J Clin Nutr 1993; 57: 470–475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ross R, Shaw KD, Rissanen J, Martel Y, Guise JD, Avruch L . Sex differences in lean and adipose tissue distribution by magnetic resonance imaging: anthropometric relationships. Am J Clin Nutr 1994; 59: 1277–1285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ross R, Goodpaster B, Kelley D, Boada F . Magnetic resonance imaging in human body composition research. From quantitative to qualitative tissue measurement. Ann NY Acad Sci 2000; 904: 12–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lancaster JL, Ghiatas AA, Alyassin A, Kilcoyne RF, Bonora E, DeFronzo RA . Measurement of abdominal fat with T1-weighted MR images. JMRI 1991; 1: 363–369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pichiecchio A, Uggetti C, Egitto MG, Berardinelli A, Orcesi S, Gorni KO et al. Quantitative MR evaluation of body composition in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Eur Radiol. 2002; 12 (11): 2704–2709.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shen W, Wang Z, Punyanita M, Lei J, Sinav A, Kral JG et al. Adipose tissue quantification by imaging methods: a proposed classification. Obes Res 2003; 11: 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Johannes B, Jurgen R, Thomas T . Differentiation of normal and pathologic brain structures in MRI using exact T1 and T2 values followed by a multidimensional cluster analysis. In: Greenes R, Peterson H, Protti D (eds). Medinfo 95 – Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Medical Informatics. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1995. pp 395–399.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mathematical morphology. In: Haralick RM, Shapiro LG (eds). Computer and robot vision vol. I. Addison-Wesley: New York, 1992. pp 157–261.

  29. Ridler TW, Calvard S . Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1978; (SMC-8): 630–632.

  30. Bland JM, Altman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Multiple hypotheses: The analysis of variance. In: Zar JH (ed). Biostatistical Analysis 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984. pp 162–184.

  32. Multiple comparisons. In: Zar JH (ed). Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984. pp. 185–205.

  33. Positano V, Gastaldelli A, Sironi A, Santarelli M, Lombardi M, Landini L . An accurate and robust method for unsupervised assessment of abdominal fat by MRI. J Magn Reson Imag 2004; 20: 684–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J-R Liao and the staff in Department of Radiology, Taipei Medical University-Wan Fang Hospital, for their work on MR image acquisition. We also thank Y-F Tsai, Y-W Sun, and L-M Chen for their assistance in performing manual image analysis. This research is partly supported by Grant NSC 93-2213-E-038-005 from the National Science Council, Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C-H Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liou, TH., Chan, W., Pan, LC. et al. Fully automated large-scale assessment of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue by magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Obes 30, 844–852 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803216

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803216

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links