Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Implicit anti-fat bias in physical educators: physical attributes, ideology and socialization

International Journal of Obesity volume 31, pages 308–314 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the implicit and explicit prejudice of physical education (PE) students before, and following extensive professional training, and to examine the relationship of anti-fat prejudice to relevant psychosocial predictors.

Design:

Implicit and explicit anti-fat prejudice of year one and three PE students (cross-sectional sample) were assessed and compared to a similarly matched (age, body mass index (BMI), education) sample of psychology students.

Subjects:

Three hundred and forty-four university students, 180 PE students, 164 psychology students (67% female, mean age 20 years, BMI: mean 23.18 kg/m2).

Measurements:

Measures of implicit and explicit anti-fat prejudice were administered to PE and psychology students in either their second week, or near completion of their third year, of university study. Physical identity, body esteem and social dominance orientation (SDO) were assessed in order to establish their relationship with anti-fat bias.

Results:

PE students displayed higher levels of implicit anti-fat bias than psychology students, and other health professionals. Additionally, year three PE students displayed higher levels of implicit anti-fat attitudes than year one PE students. The higher implicit anti-fat biases exhibited by year three PE students were associated with SDO, and lower body esteem.

Conclusion:

Physical educators, and particularly those more socialized in the PE environment, display strong negative prejudice toward obese individuals that is greater than that displayed by other groups. These prejudices appear to be supported by an over-investment in physical attributes, and ideological beliefs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Puhl R, Brownell KD . Bias, discrimination and obesity. Obes Res 2001; 9: 788–805.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Harris T . Beliefs and attitudes about obesity among teachers and school health care providers working with adolescents. J Nutr Edu 1999; 31: 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crandall CS . Do heavy-weight students have more difficulty paying for college? Pers Soc Psych Bull 1991; 17: 606–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roehling MV . Weight-based discrimination in employment: psychological and legal aspects. Personnel Psychol 1999; 52: 969–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bagley CR, Conklin DN, Isherwood RT, Pechiulis DR, Watson LA . Attitudes of nurses toward obesity and obese patients. Percept Motor Skills 1989; 68: 954.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rand CW, MacGregor AM . Morbidly obese patients' perceptions of social discrimination before and after surgery for obesity. South Med J 1990; 83: 1390–1395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maroney D, Golub S . Nurses' attitudes toward obese persons and certain ethnic groups. Percept Motor Skills 1992; 75: 387–391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Paulhus DL . Measurement and control of response bias. In: Robinson JP, Shaver PR, Wrightsman LS (eds). Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. Academic Press: New York, 1991, pp 17–59.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JL . Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 74: 1464–1480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McConnell AR, Leibold JM . Relations among the implicit association test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. J Exp Soc Psychol 2001; 37: 435–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Teachman BA, Brownell KD . Implicit anti-fat bias among health professionals: is anyone immune? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25: 1525–1531.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwartz MB, Chambliss HO, Brownell KD, Blair SN, Billington C . Weight bias among health professionals specializing in obesity. Obes Res 2003; 11: 1033–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chambliss HO, Finley CE, Blair SN . Attitudes toward obese individuals among exercise science students. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 468–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Foster GD, Wadden TA, Makris AP, Davidson D, Sanderson RS, Allison DB et al. Primary care physicians' attitudes about obesity and its treatment. Obes Res 2003; 11: 1168–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Blair SN . Cardiorespiratory fitness attenuates the effects of the metabolic syndrome on all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 1092–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tajfel H, Turner JC . The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin LW (eds). Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Nelson-Hall: Chicago, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guimond S . Group socialization and prejudice: the social transmission of intergroup attitudes and beliefs. Euro J Soc Psychol 2000; 30: 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sechrist GB, Stangor C . Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001; 80: 645–654.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dambrun M, Guimond S, Duarte S . The impact of hierarchy-enhancing vs attenuating academic major on stereotyping: the mediating role of perceived social norm. CRISP 2002; 7: 114–136.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guimond S, Palmer DL . The political socialization of commerce and social science students: Epistemic authority and attitude change. J Appl Soc Psychol 1996; 26: 1985–2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crandall CS . Prejudice against fat people: ideology and self-interest. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994; 66: 882–894.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pratto F, Shih M . Social dominance orientation and group context in implicit group prejudice. Psych Sci 2000; 11: 515–518.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bessenoff GR, Sherman JW . Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: evaluation versus stereotype activation. Soc Cogn 2000; 18: 329–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Luhtanen R, Crocker J . A collective self-esteem scale: self-evaluation of one's social identity. Pers Soc Psych Bull 1992; 18: 302–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Franzoi SL, Shields SA . The body-esteem scale: multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population. J Pers Assess 1984; 48: 173–178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sidanius J, Pratto F . Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Heirachy and Opression. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Sidanius J, Pratto F, Martin M, Stallworth L . Consensual racism and career track: some implications of social dominance theory. Polit Psychol 1991; 12: 691–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Guimond S . Attitude change during college: normative or informational social influence? Soc Psychol Edu 1999; 2: 237–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Greenleaf C, Weiller-Abels K . Perceptions of youth obesity among physical educators. Conference presentation AAHPERD National Convention, Chicago, IL, USA, April 2005.

  30. Blair SN, Church TS . The fitness, obesity, and health equation: is physical activity the common denominator? JAMA 2004; 292: 1232–1234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    K S O'Brien, J A Hunter & M Banks

  2. Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    K S O'Brien

Authors
  1. K S O'Brien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J A Hunter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M Banks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K S O'Brien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Brien, K., Hunter, J. & Banks, M. Implicit anti-fat bias in physical educators: physical attributes, ideology and socialization. Int J Obes 31, 308–314 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803398

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803398

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links