Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Pediatric Highlight
  • Published:

Comparison of ultrasonographic and anthropometric methods to assess body fat in childhood obesity

International Journal of Obesity volume 31, pages 53–58 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Background:

Pattern of fat distribution rather than obesity is of importance for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The accurate measurement of total and regional fat mass requires sophisticated and often expensive methods that have limited applicability in the clinical setting.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to evaluate body fat distributions by ultrasound (US) as a gold standard method for measuring visceral, preperitoneal and subcutaneous fat layers and comparing with anthropometric results, and then to find the most reliable anthropometric measurement in childhood obesity.

Materials and methods:

Study group of 51 obese children (21 F, 30 M) (mean age±s.d.: 11.5±2.6 years) and control group of 33 non-obese children (17 F, 16 M) (mean age±s.d.: 12.2±2.7 years) were recruited for this study. Anthropometric measurements as body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist/hip ratio (WHR), triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses were taken from all the participants. Abdominal preperitoneal (P), subcutaneous (S) fat at their maximum (max) and minimum (min) thickness sites, visceral (V), triceps (TrUS) and subscapular (SsUS) fat thicknesses were also measured ultrasonographically.

Results:

In the obese group, BMI was significantly correlated with US measurements of fat thicknesses, except Pmin and SsUS, whereas in the control group, BMI was significantly correlated with all US fat measurements. The relation of US measurements with skinfold thickness and WC was more significant in the control than in the obese group. No relation between WHR and US fat thickness measurements was found in both groups. Multiple regression analysis, using V as the dependent variable and anthropometric parameters, gender and the group as the independent variables, revealed BMI was the best single predictor of V (R2: 0.53).

Conclusion:

This study suggests that the validity of the anthropometric skinfold thickness in the obese children is low. Despite the limitations reported in the literature, in our study, BMI provides the best estimate of body fat. WHR in children and adolescents is not a good index to show intra-abdominal fat deposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  1. Gidding SS, Bao W, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS . Effects of secular trends in obesity on coronary risk factors in children: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Pediatr 1995; 127: 868–874.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Flegal KM, Troiano RP . Changes in the distribution of body mass index of adults and children in the US population. Int J Obes 2000; 24: 807–818.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chinn S, Rona RJ . Prevalence and trends in overweight and obesity in three cross sectional studies of British Children. 1974–1994. BMJ 2001; 322: 24–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Daniels SR, Khoury PR, Morrison JA . The utility of body mass index as a measure of body fatness in children and adolescents: difference by race and gender. Pediatrics 1997; 99: 804–807.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Onis M, Habicht JP . Anthropometric reference data for international use: recommendations from a World Health Organization Expert Committee. Am J Clin Nutr 1996; 64: 650–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Prentice AM . Body mass index standards for children. BMJ 1998; 354: 1874–1875.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barlow SE, Dietz WH . Obesity evaluation and treatment: expert committee recommendations. Pediatrics 1998; 102: 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maynard LM, Wisemandle W, Roche AF, Chumlea WC, Guo SS, Siervogel RM . Childhood body composition in relation to body mass index. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 344–350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller J, Rosenbloom A, Silverstein J . Childhood obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89: 4211–4218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Borkan GA, Hults DE, Cardarelli J, Burrows BA . Comparison of ultrasound and skin fold measurements in assessment of subcutaneous and total fatness. Am J Phys Anthropol 1982; 58: 307–313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fanelli MT, Kurczmarski RJ . Ultrasound as an approach to assessing body composition. Am J Clin Nutr 1984; 39: 703–709.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dixon AK . Abdominal fat assessed by computed tomography: sex difference in distribution. Clin Radiol 1983; 34: 189–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee MMC, Ng CK . Postmortem studies of skinfold caliper measurement and actual thickness of skin and subcutaneous tissue. Hum Biol 1965; 37: 91–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haymes EM, Lundergren HM, Loomis JL, Buskirk ER . Validity of the ultrasonic technique as a method of measuring subcutaneous adipose tissue. Ann Hum Biol 1976; 3: 245–251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Himes JH, Roche AF, Siervogel RM . Compressibility of skinfolds and the measurement of subcutaneous fatness. Am J Clin Nutr 1979; 32: 1734–1740.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wells JCK . A critique of the expression of paediatric body composition data. Arch Dis Child 2001; 85: 67–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pouliot MC, Despres JP, Lemieux S . Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 460–468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Treuth MS, Hunter GR, Kekes ST . Estimating intraabdominal adipose tissue in women by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Am J Clin Nutr 1995; 62: 527–532.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Goran MI, Kaskoun MC, Shuman WP . Intraabdominal adipose tissue in young children. Int J Obes 1995; 19: 279–283.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fox K, Peters D, Armstrong N, Sharpe P, Bell M . Abdominal fat deposition in 11-year-old children. Int J Obes 1993; 17: 11–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. De Ridder CM, De Boer RW, Seidell JC . Body fat distribution in pubertal girls quantified by magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Obes 1992; 16: 443–449.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Goran M . Visseral fat in Children: influence of obesity, anthropometry, ethnicity, gender, diet, and growth. Am J Hum Biol 1999; 11: 201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Armellini F, Zamboni M, Rigo L, Todexco T, Andreis IAB, Poracacci C et al. The contribution of sonography to the measurement of intra-abdominal fat. J Clin Ultrasound 1990; 18: 563–567.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Suzuki R, Watanabe S, Hirai Y, Akıyama K, Nıshıde T, Matsushıma Y et al. Abdominal wall fat index, estimated by ultrasonography, for assessment of the ratio of visceral fat to subcutaneous fat in the abdomen. Am J Med 1993; 95: 309–314.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Armellini F, Zamboni M, Robbi R, Todesco T, Rigo L, Bergamo AIA et al. Total and intra-abdominal fat measurements by ultrasound and computerized tomography. Int J Obes 1993; 17: 209–214.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tornaghi G, Raiteri R, Pozzato C, Rispoili A, Bramani M, Cipolat M et al. Anthropometric or ultrasonic measurements in assessment of visceral fat? A comparative study. Int J Obes 1994; 18: 771–775.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Caucchi E, Piatti PM, Orena C, Pontiroli AE, Martine E, Paesano PL et al. Is echography an adequate method for assessing the thickness of intra-abdominal fat? A comparison with computed tomography. Radiol Med 1997; 94: 329–334.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sabir N, Pakdemirli E, Sermez Y, Zencir M, Kazil S . Sonographic assessment of changes in thickness of different abdominal fat layers in response to diet in obese women. J Clin Ultrasound 2003; 31: 26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marshall WA, Tanner JM . Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in boys. Arch Dis Childhood 1970; 45: 13–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Marshall WA, Tanner JM . Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Arch Dis Childhood 1969; 44: 291–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cole TJ, Bellini MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH . Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. BMJ 2000; 320: 1240–1243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Armellini F, Zamboni M, Rigo L, Bergamo AIA, Robbi R, Marchi M et al. Sonography detection of small intra-abdominal fat variations. Int J Obes 1991; 15: 847–852.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gidding SS, Leibel RL, Daniels S, Rosenbaum M, Van HL, Marx GR . Understanding obesity in youth: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on atherosclerosis and hypertension in the Young and Nutrition Committee American Heart Association Writing Group. Circulation 1996; 94: 3383–3387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zonderland ML, Erich WB, Erkelens DW, Kortlandt W, Wit JM, Huisveld IA et al. Plasma lipids and apoproteins, body fat distribution and body fatness in early pubertal children. Int J Obese 1990; 14: 1036–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Caprio S, Hyman LD, Limb C, McCarthy S, Lange R, Sherwin RS et al. Central adiposity and its metabolic correlates in obese adolescent girls. Am J Physiol 1995; 269: 118–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tamura A, Mori T, Hara Y, Komıyama A . Preperitoneal fat thickness in childhood obesity: Association with serum insulin concentration. Pediatr Int 2000; 42: 155–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nishina M, Kıkuchi T, Yamazaki H, Kamede K, Hıura M, Uchiyama M . Relationship among systolic blood pressure, serum insulin and leptin, and visceral fat accumulation in obese children. Hypertens Res 2003; 26: 281–288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tershakovec AM, Kuppler KM, Zemel BS, Katz L, Weinzimer S, Harty MP et al. Body composition and metabolic factors in obese children and adolescents. Int J Obes 2003; 27: 19–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Asayama K, Dobashi K, Hayashibe H, Kodera K, Uchida N, Nkane T et al. Threshold values of visceral fat measures and their anthropometric alternatives for metabolic derangement in Japanese obese boys. Int J Obes 2002; 26: 208–213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Borkan GA, Gerzof SG, Robbins AH . Assessment of abdominal fat content by computed tomography. Am J Nutr 1982; 36: 172–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rössner S, Bo WJ, Hiltbrandt E, Hinson W, Karstaedt N, Santiago P et al. Adipose tissue determinations in cadavers: a comparison between cross-sectional planimetry and computed tomography. Int J Obes 1990; 14: 893–902.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Slyper AH . Childhood obesity, adipose tissue distribution, and the pediatric practioner. Pediatrics 1998; 102: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yamaguchi J, Oguni T, Konishi K, Mino M . Abdominal adiposity with respect to the proportion of intra-abdominal visceral fat to extra-abdominal fat (V/S ratio) in Japanese childhood obesity. Pathophysiol 1996; 3: 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Must A, Dallal GE, Dietz WH . Reference data for obesity: 85th and 95th percentiles of body mass index (Wt/ht2) and triceps skinfold thickness. Am J Clin Nutr 1991; 53: 839–846.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Himes JH, Dietz WH . Guidelines for owerweight in adolescent preventive services: recommendations from an expert committee. Am J Clin Nutr 1994; 59: 307–316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Bandini LG, Dietz WH . Assessment of body fatness in childhood obesity: evaluation of laboratory and anthropometric techniques. J Am Diet Assoc 1987; 87: 1344–1348.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kannel WB, Cupples LA, Ramaswami R, Stokes J, Kreger BE, Higgins M . Regional obesity and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study. K Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 183–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Masuda T, Imai K, Komiya S . Relationship of anthropometric indices of body cardiovascular risk in Japanese women. Ann Physiol Anthropol 1993; 12: 135–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Taylor RW, Jones IE, Williams SM, Goulding A . Evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and the conicity index as screening tools for high trunk fat mass, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorbtiometry, in children aged 3-19 years. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 72: 490–495.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Forbes G . The abdomen: Hip ratio normative data and observations on selected patients. Int J Obes 1990; 14: 149–157.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey

    S Semiz

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey

    E özgören

  3. Department of Radiology, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey

    N Sabir

Authors
  1. S Semiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E özgören
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N Sabir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Semiz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Semiz, S., özgören, E. & Sabir, N. Comparison of ultrasonographic and anthropometric methods to assess body fat in childhood obesity. Int J Obes 31, 53–58 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803414

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803414

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links