Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Exposure apportionment: Ranking food items by their contribution to dietary exposure

Abstract

This paper identifies and ranks food items by estimating their contribution to the dietary exposure of the US population and 19 subpopulation groups. Contributions to dietary exposures to arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, nickel, benzene, chlorpyrifos, and diazinon are estimated using either the Dietary Exposure Potential Model (DEPM) approach, the National Human Exposure Assessment Survey Arizona (NHEXAS-AZ) approach or the combination of the two. The DEPM is a computer model that uses several national databases of food consumption and residue concentrations for estimating dietary. The DEPM approach ranks the contribution of food items to the total dietary exposure using two methods, the direct method that ranks contributions by population exposure magnitude and the weighted method that ranks by subpopulation exposure magnitude. The DEPM approach identifies highly exposed subpopulations and a relatively small number of food items contributing the most to dietary exposure. The NHEXAS-AZ approach uses the NHEXAS-AZ database containing food consumption data for each subject and chemical residues of a composite of food items consumed by each subject in 1 day during the sampling week. These data are then modeled to obtain estimates of dietary exposure to chemical residues. The third approach uses the NHEXAS-AZ consumption data with residue values from the national residue database. This approach also estimates percent contributions to exposure of each ranked food item for the Arizona population. Dietary exposures estimated using the three approaches are compared. The DEPM results indicate groups with highest dietary exposures include Nonnursing Infants, Children 1–6, Hispanic, Non-Hispanic White, Western, Northeast and Poverty 0–130%. The use of the Combined National Residue Database (CNRD) identifies 43 food items as primary contributors to total dietary exposure; they contribute a minimum of 68% of the total dietary exposure to each of the eight chemical residues. The percent contribution of ranked food items estimated using the NHEXAS samples is smaller than those obtained from the western US population via the DEPM. This indicates differences in consumption characteristics of the two groups with respect to the ranked food items. Six of 15 food items consumed by the NHEXAS-AZ subjects per day are ranked food items contributing between 56% and 70% of the estimated NHEXAS-AZ dietary exposure to each of the eight chemical residues. The difference between total dietary exposure estimates from the DEPM and NHEXAS-AZ approaches varies by chemical residue and is attributable to differences in sampling and analytical methods, and geographic areas represented by the data. Most metal exposures estimated using the NHEXAS consumption data with the CNRD have lower values than those estimated via the other approaches, possibly because the NHEXAS-AZ residue values are higher than the CNRD values. In addition, exposure estimates are seemingly affected by the difference in demographic characteristics and factors that affect types and amounts of food consumed. Efficient control strategies for reducing dietary exposure to chemical residues may be designed by focusing on the relatively small number of food items having similar ingredients that contribute substantively to the total ingestion exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NHEXAS:

National Human Exposure Assessment Survey

DEPM:

Dietary Exposure Potential Model

CSFII:

Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individual

CNRD:

Combined National Residue Database

TDS:

Total Diet Study

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

USDA:

US Department of Agriculture

ECF:

exposure core food

References

  • Berry MR Strategy for a dietary exposure research program, J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol (1992) Suppl. 1: 97–110

  • Berry MR Tomerlin JR A Dietary Exposure Potential Model using extant databases to estimate exposure to chemical residues In Proceedings of the EPA/AWMA International Specialty Conference, “Measurement of Toxic and Related, Air Pollutants (VIP-64)”. Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996 pp 819–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietary Exposure Potential Model (DEPM) Version 3.3.2A software available for evaluation on the internet at http://www.epa.gov/nerlcwww/depm.htm2000

  • Helsel DR Less than obvious: statistical treatment of data below the detection limit, Environ Sci Technol (1990) 24(12): 1766–1774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lebowitz MD O'Rourke MK Gordon S Moschandreas DJ Buckley T Nishioka M Population-based exposure measurements in Arizona: a phase I field study in support of the national human exposure assessment survey, J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol (1995) 5(3): 297–325

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk LJ Berry MR Sheldon LS Freeman NCG Pellizzari ED Kinman RN Dietary exposure of children living in lead-laden environments, J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol (2000) 10 6; Part 2 723–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohri T Hisanaga A Ishinishi N Arsenic intake and excretion by Japanese adults: a 7-day duplicate diet study, Food Chem Toxicol (1990) 28(7): 521–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington JAT Gunderson EL History of the food and drug administration's Total Diet Study — 1961 to 1987, J Assoc Off Anal Chem Int (1987) 70: 772–782

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly C Metal Contamination of Food 2nd edElsevier, New York, NY, USA 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomerlin JR Berry MR Tran NL Chew S-B Petersen BJ Tucker KD Fleming KH Development of a Dietary Exposure Potential Model for evaluating dietary exposure to chemical residue in food, J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol (1993) 7 No. 1 82–102

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Health and Human Service Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Toxicological Profile for Arsenic (1993a)

  • US Department of Health and Human Service Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Toxicological Profile for Cadmium (1993b)

  • US Department of Health and Human Service Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Toxicological Profile for Chromium (1993c)

  • US Department of Health and Human Service Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Toxicological Profile for Lead (1993d)

  • US Department of Health and Human Service Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Toxicological Profile for Nickel (1995)

  • US Department of Health and Human Service Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Toxicological Profile for Benzene (1997)

  • World Health Organization (WHO). Environmental Health Criteria 150, Benzene (1993)

  • World Health Organization (WHO) Environmental Health Criteria 198, Diazinon (1998)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D J MOSCHANDREAS.

Additional information

Although this work was funded by the US Environmental Protection Agency (Coop agreement no. CR821560-01-0), it does not necessarily reflect the views of the agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MOSCHANDREAS, D., KARUCHIT, S., BERRY, M. et al. Exposure apportionment: Ranking food items by their contribution to dietary exposure. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 12, 233–243 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500230

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500230

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links