Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Relationship between left ventricular mass and blood pressure in treated hypertension

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 16, pages 61–66 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

This study evaluated prospectively whether there is still a relationship between left ventricular mass and blood pressure once hypertension is treated and determined the relative importance of daytime vs night-time blood pressure, systolic vs diastolic blood pressure and office vs ambulatory blood pressure. A total of 649 patients (305 or 47% female) with essential hypertension, treated with antihypertensive drugs for at least 3 months, underwent office blood pressure measurement and both daytime and night-time ambulatory blood pressure measurement, electrocardiography and echocardiography. Correlations were made between blood pressure values and parameters of left ventricular mass. Electrocardiographic voltage criteria and even more so echocardiographic parameters correlate significantly albeit weakly (r ⩽ 0.28) with blood pressure in treated hypertension. Correlations are consistently higher when systolic blood pressure is considered. Overall, the best correlations are found between 24-h ambulatory systolic or night-time blood pressure and the Sokolow–Lyon voltage as well as the echocardiographic age and body mass index adjusted left ventricular mass. In conclusion, once hypertension is treated, the relationship between blood pressure and left ventricular mass is low. Nevertheless, in this the largest single centre study of its kind, echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular mass in treated hypertensive subjects correlate better with blood pressure than electrocardiographic parameters. Parameters of hypertrophy are more closely related to systolic blood pressure than to diastolic blood pressure. In accordance with the finding that dippers have a better prognosis than non-dippers, night-time blood pressure consistently correlates better with left ventricular mass than daytime blood pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levy D et al. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study N Engl J Med 1990 332: 1561–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Verdecchia P et al. Prognostic significance of serial changes in left ventricular mass in essential hypertension Circulation 1998 97: 48–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Levy D et al. Echocardiographically detected left ventricular hypertrophy, prevalence and risk factors. The Framingham Heart Study Ann Intern Med 1988 108: 2–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fagard R, Staessen JA, Thijs L . The relationships between left ventricular mass and daytime and night-time blood pressures: a meta-analysis of comparative studies J Hypertens 1995 13: 823–829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dählof B, Pennert K, Hansson L . Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensionpatients: a meta-analysis of 109 treatment studies Am J Hypertens 1992 5: 95–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jennings G, Wong J . Reversibility of left ventricular hypertrophy and malfunction by antihypertensive treatment. In: Hansson L, Birkenhäger W (eds) Handbook of Hypertension, Vol 18: Assessment of Hypertensive Organ Damage Elsevier Science BV: Amsterdam 1997 184–223

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cruickshank JM, Lewis JN, Moore V, Dodd C . Reversibility of left ventricular hypertrophy by differing types of anti-hypertensive therapy J Hum Hypertens 1992 6: 85–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmieder RE, Martus M, Klingbeil A . Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension: meta-analysis of studies with high scientific quality JAMA 1996 275: 1507–1513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sokolow M, Werdegar S, Kain H, Hinman AT . Relationship between level of blood pressure measured casually and by portable recorders and severity of complications in essential hypertension Circulation 1966 34: 279–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kannel WB . Importance of hypertension as a major risk factor in cardiovascular disease. In: Genest G, Koiw E, Kuchel D (eds) Hypertension McGraw Hill: New York 1977 888–910

    Google Scholar 

  11. Giaconi S et al. Microalbuminuria and casual and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in normotensives and inpatients with borderline and mild essential hypertension Am J Hypertens 1989 2: 259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Omboni S et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring J Hypertens 1991 9 (Suppl 3): S25–S28

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stanton A et al. Fundal blood vessel alterations are associated with mild-to-moderate hypertension J Hypertens 1991 9 (Suppl 6): S488

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shimada K et al. Diurnal blood pressure variations and silent cerebrovascular damage in elderlypatients with hypertension J Hypertens 1992 10: 875–878

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mancia G, Di Rienzo M, Parati G . Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertension research and clinical practice Hypertension 1993 21: 510–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mancia G et al. 24-hour blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy. In: FH Messerli (ed) Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Its Regression Science Press: London 1996 6.1–6.16

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clement D, De Buyzere M, Duprez D . Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring J Hypertens 1994 12: 857–864

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Devereux RB, Pickering TG . Ambulatory blood pressure in assessing the cardiac impact and prognosis of hypertension. In: O'Brien E, O'Malley K (eds) Handbook of Hypertension, Vol. 14, Blood Pressure Measurement Elsevier: Amsterdam 1991 pp 261–286

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fagher B, Valind S, Thulin T . End-organ damage in treated severe hypertension: close relation to nocturnal blood pressure J Hum Hypertens 1995 9: 605–610

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gubner R, Ungerleider HE . Electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy Arch Int Med 1943 72: 196–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sokolow M, Lyon TP . The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads Am Heart J 1949 37: 161–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Okin PM, Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kligfield P . Electrocardiographic identification of left ventricular hypertrophy: test performance in relation to definition of hypertrophy and presence of obesity JACC 1996 27: 124–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A . The committee on M-mode standardization of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements Circulation 1978 58: 1072–1083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Devereux RB et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings Am J Cardiol 1986 57: 450–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Devereux RB et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy inpatients with hypertension: importance of blood pressure response to regularly recurring stress Circulation 1983 68: 470–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Verdecchia P et al. Circadian blood pressure changes and left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension Circulation 1990 81: 528–536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schulte KL et al. Relationship between ambulatory blood pressure, forearm vascular resistance, and left ventricular mass in hypertensive and normotensive subjects Am J Hypertens 1993 6: 786–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Armario P et al. Determinants of left ventricular mass in untreated mildly hypertensive subjects. Hospitalet study in mild hypertension Am J Hypertens 1999 12: 1084–1090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fagard R, Staessen JA, Thijs L . Prediction of cardiac structure and function by repeated clinic and ambulatory blood pressure Hypertension 1997 29: 22–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mancia G, Parati G, Albini F, Villani A . Circadian blood pressure variations and their impact on disease J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1988 12 (Suppl 7): S11–S17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Galderisi M et al. Influence of night-time blood pressure on left atrial size in uncomplicated arterial systemic hypertension Am J Hypertens 1997 10: 836–842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Norman JE, Levy D . Improved electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy: results of a correlated data base approach JACC 1995 26: 1022–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmieder RE et al. Gender-specific cardiovascular adaptation due to circadian blood pressure variations in essential hypertension Am J Hypertens 1995 8: 1160–1166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mosterd A et al. Trends in the prevalence of hypertension, antihypertensive therapy, and left ventricular hypertrophy from 1950 to 1989 N Engl J Med 1999 340: 1221–1227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lewis JF, Maron BJ . Diversity of patterns of hypertrophy inpatients with systemic hypertension and marked left ventricular wall thickening Am J Cardiol 1990 65: 874–881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, Hypertension Unit, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium

    L H Missault, M L De Buyzere, D D De Bacquer, D D Duprez & D L Clement

Authors
  1. L H Missault
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M L De Buyzere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D D De Bacquer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D D Duprez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D L Clement
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L H Missault.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Missault, L., De Buyzere, M., De Bacquer, D. et al. Relationship between left ventricular mass and blood pressure in treated hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 16, 61–66 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001295

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001295

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links