Abstract
The improved Finapres apparatus, known as the Fino-meter, measures finger blood pressure noninvasively on a beat-to-beat basis and gives waveform measurements similar to intra-arterial recordings. The Finometer measures brachial pressure and corrects for finger pressure accordingly. It also corrects for the hydrostatic height of the finger with respect to the heart level. The objective was to validate the Finometer according to the revised British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol and the criteria of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). We carried out a main validation test using a subject group of 102 black women, which was also divided into smaller groups, namely 24 hypertensives, 25 obese normotensive and 35 lean normotensive women. Finometer and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure (BP) measurements were taken early in the morning before breakfast, after the subjects stayed overnight in a research unit. Within the whole subject group, the Finometer satisfied the AAMI criteria for accuracy and achieved an overall A/B grading according to the BHS criteria. The sphygmomanometer measurements were 128±20/78±12 mmHg compared to 130±20/78±11 mmHg for the Finometer. The average differences between the mercury sphygmomanometer and Finometer readings for systolic and diastolic BP were, respectively, −1.83±6.8 and 0.88±7.5. Systolic readings of the Finometer device differed by less than 5 mmHg for 64%, by less than 10 mmHg for 86% and differed by less than 15 mmHg for 96% of all readings. A total of 63% of all diastolic readings of the Finometer by less than 5 mmHg, 85% by less than 10 mmHg and 94% of all readings differed by less than 15 mmHg. On the basis of these results, the Finometer device satisfied the validation criteria of AAMI and received an A/B grading according to the BHS protocol. It can therefore be recommended for measurements in the clinical set-up and for research purposes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sleight P . Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension 1985; 7: 163–164.
In't Veld AJ et al. Measurement of heart rate and blood pressure variability in man. Proceedings of the Two Satellite Symposia to the Seventh Meeting of the European Society of Hypertension. Van Zuiden Communications, 1995.
Huisman HW et al. Prolactin, testosterone and cortisol as possible markers of changes in cardiovascular function associated with urbanization. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16: 829–835.
Schutte AE et al. Dietary risk markers that contribute to the aetiology of hypertension in black South African children: the THUSA BANA study. J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17: 29–35.
Imholz BPM, Wieling W, Van Montfrans GA, Wesseling KH . Fifteen years experience with finger arterial pressure monitoring: assessment of the technology. Cardiovasc Res 1998; 38: 605–616.
McAuley D, Silke B, Farrel S . Reliability of blood pressure determination with the Finapres with altered physiological states or pharmacodynamic conditions. Clin Auton Res 1997; 7: 179–184.
Silke B, McAuley D . Accuracy and precision of blood pressure determination with the Finapres: an overview using re-sampling statistics. J Hum Hypertens 1998; 12: 403–409.
Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American national standard. Electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. ANSI/AAMI SP 10-1992. AAMI: Arlington, VA, 1993, p 40.
Bos WJ et al. The reliability of noninvasive continuous finger blood pressure measurement in patients with both hypertension and vascular disease. Am J Hypertens 1992; 5: 529–535.
Dorlas JC et al. Effects of peripheral vasoconstriction on the blood pressure in the finger, measured continuously by a new non-invasive method (the Finapres). Anaesthesiology 1985; 62: 342–345.
Guelen I et al. Finometer, finger pressure measurements with the possibility to reconstruct brachial pressure. Blood Press Monit 2003; 8: 27–30.
Gizdulich P et al. Finapres tracking of systolic pressure and baroreflex sensitivity improved by waveform filtering. J Hypertens 1996; 14: 243–250.
O'Brien E et al. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens 1993; 11(Suppl 2): S43–S63.
Wesseling KH, Settels JJ, De Wit B . The measurement of continuous finger arterial pressure noninvasively in stationary subjects. In: Schmidt TH, Dembroski TM, Blümchen G (eds). Biological Factors in Cardiovascular Disease. Springer: Berlin, 1986, pp 355–375.
Imholz BPM . The brachial to finger pressure difference: are effects of modifiers of pulse wave distortion detectable among subjects? In: Man in't Veld AJ, van Montfrans GA, Langewouters GJ, Lie KI, Mancia G (ed). Measurement of Heart Rate and Blood Pressures Variability in Man. Proceedings of the Two Satellite Symposia to the Seventh Meeting of the European Society of Hypertension, 7 June 1995. Van Zuiden Communications: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995.
World Health Organization. International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 151–183.
Norton K, Olds T . Anthropometrica: a Textbook of Body Measurement for Sports and Health Courses. UNSW Press: Sydney, 1996.
Livi R, Teghini L, Cagnoni S, Scarpelli PT . Simultaneous and sequential same-arm measurements in the validation studies of automated blood pressure measuring devices. Am J Hypertens 1996; 9: 1228–1231.
Pesola GR, Pesola HR, Nelson MJ, Westfal RE . The normal difference in bilateral indirect blood pressure recordings in normotensive individuals. Am J Emerg Med 2001; 19: 43–45.
StatSoft, Inc. STATISTICA for Windows (Computer program manual). StatSoft, Inc.: Tulsa, OK, 2000.
Bland JM, Altman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.
O'Brien E et al. Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. BMJ 2001; 322: 531–536.
Langewouters GJ, Settels JJ, Roelandt R, Wesseling KH . Why use Finapres or Portapres rather than intra-arterial or intermittent non-invasive techniques of blood pressure measurement? J Med Eng Technol 1998; 22: 37–43.
Acknowledgements
We thank the participants of the POWIRS-study, as well as Sr C Lessing and Mrs CF Scholtz. We are also grateful for the funding of this project, provided by the South African National Research Foundation, Medical Research Council and Research Focus Area 9.1 of the PU for CHE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schutte, A., Huisman, H., van Rooyen, J. et al. Validation of the Finometer device for measurement of blood pressure in black women. J Hum Hypertens 18, 79–84 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001639
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001639
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Inorganic nitrate supplementation may improve diastolic function and the O2 cost of exercise in cancer survivors: a pilot study
Supportive Care in Cancer (2023)
-
Impact of age, sex and heart rate variability on the acute cardiovascular response to isometric handgrip exercise
Journal of Human Hypertension (2021)
-
Area of the pressure-strain loop during ejection as non-invasive index of left ventricular performance: a population study
Cardiovascular Ultrasound (2019)
-
Social Context and Sex Moderate the Association Between Type D Personality and Cardiovascular Reactivity
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback (2019)
-
Prediction of autonomic dysreflexia during urodynamics: a prospective cohort study
BMC Medicine (2018)