Introduction

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is thought to drive structural changes–both degeneration and repair–across the entire neuroaxis (brain and spinal cord)1,2. Neuroimaging studies have demonstrated a relationship between the extent of the plasticity and the recovery of sensorimotor impairments, proposing a functional rationale for “reorganization” after SCI3,4,5. A major limiting factor of the recovery is the development of below-level neuropathic pain (NP) of which the majority of the individuals with SCI suffer from6,7,8,9. Commonly, the development of below-level NP in SCI has been attributed to maladaptive plasticity in brain areas encoding sensory stimuli (i.e., noxious and innocuous sensation) including primary and sensory cortices (S1 and S2), thalamus and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)10,11. Cortical reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex (S1) was shown to be associated with the intensity and duration of ongoing NP following SCI11,12. These findings prompt the assumption that persistent NP is related to alterations in neuronal activity that translate into long-term structural changes in the brain12,13. Gray and white matter volume changes were detected in SCI individuals suffering from NP when compared to pain-free counterparts10. Trauma-induced cord atrophy rostral to the injury is frequently reported5,14, however less is known about the pathological relationship between cord atrophy and below-level NP.

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the impact of traumatic SCI on central nervous system (CNS) structure and the extent by any which changes in structure were related to the presence of below-level neuropathic pain. Building on previous studies that focused exclusively on the brain, we aimed to address the hypothesis that below-level neuropathic pain is indicative of structural changes in the spinal cord compared to pain-free individuals and healthy control subjects. Among individuals with neuropathic pain, we further aimed to examine the direction of the relationship between changes in CNS structure and the intensity of patient reported symptoms. Thus, we used cross-sectional cord area measurement to assess cord atrophy and voxel-based morphometry/thickness to assess gray and white matter volumes changes5. We specifically addressed the hypothesis that structural changes across the neuroaxis are associated with the presence and intensity of below-level NP. To this end, we investigated healthy subjects, individuals with SCI with NP and pain-free individuals with SCI.

Material and Methods

Data collection

Participants

We enrolled 30 individuals with a chronic traumatic SCI (mean (SD) 46.3 (11.9) years; gender: 3 female, 27 male) including lesions at cervical (N = 15), thoracic (N = 13) and lumbar levels (N = 2). Time since injury spanned from 2 to 27 years (mean 10.5 yrs) and 2 to 26 years (mean 13 yrs) for the individuals with tetraplegia and paraplegia, respectively. We also recruited 31 neurologically healthy subjects (mean (SD) 42.1 (9.9) years; gender: 8 female, 23 male). All participants provided written informed consent and all procedures described below were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local Ethics committee of Zurich the ‘Kantonale Ethikkommission Zurich, KEK’ (ref. number: EK-04/2006).

Clinical Assessment

The neurological examination was performed according to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI)15,16. Briefly, sensory, motor and neurological levels of injury were identified allowing characterization of sensory/ motor functioning as well as determination of the completeness of injury by means of the ISNCSCI Impairment Scale (AIS)16. Sensory levels are assessed by testing two aspects of sensation, light touch and pin prick (sharp-dull discrimination), of a keypoint in each dermatome (C4-S4-5, bilateral). Motor function assessment comprised testing key muscle functions corresponding to 10 paired myotomes (C5-T1 and L2-S1). A ‘Touch-test Sensory Evaluator’ (North Coast Medical Inc, California, USA) was used for the evaluation of the cutaneous sensation level (Von Frey Filament testing) of the participants’ left and right C6 dermatomes. Beginning with the smallest filament size (2.83), the stimulus was applied three times, whereas a single response indicated a positive response. In cases in which the participant did not respond to the stimulus, the next largest monofilament was chosen and the process repeated. At maximum, a set of five of monofilaments was used (2.83, 3.61, 4.31, 4.56 and 6.65). Moreover, warm perception and pain thresholds of left and right C6 dermatomes were recorded using the method of levels starting at a baseline temperature of 32 °C17. Briefly, single stimuli with increasing temperature (1 °C/ stimulus) were sequentially presented by a contact heat stimulator (Pathway, Medoc, Ramat Yishai, Israel) until the subject reported to perceive a thermal sensation (i.e., perception threshold) or rated the thermal sensation as painful (i.e., pain perception). All participants were interviewed to determine the existence of pain using the EMSCI pain questionnaire (V4.2, http://www.emsci.org/). The pain questionnaire examines various aspects of pain (e.g., duration (years), maximal and average pain intensity). The pain intensity was rated using an 11-point numeric rating scale with “0” indicating no pain to “10” indicating worst pain imaginable. Accordingly, pain can be grouped into nociceptive (e.g., musculoskeletal or visceral) or neuropathic pain (e.g., at or below the lesion). To be classified as below-level NP, ongoing pain had to be located three of more segments below the level of lesion.

Image acquisition

MRI data was collected on a Philips 3 T Ingenia system (Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) using a 15-channel Philips Sense head coil. A 3D-GRE T1-weighted (T1w) sequence was used to acquire a structural scan optimized for simultaneous assessment of the brain and spinal cord4. The imaging parameters were: isotropic 1 mm3 resolution, field of view 256 × 256 × 180, repetition time = 6.88 ms, echo time = 3.1 ms, flip angle 8°, fat saturation, scan resolution 256 × 256 voxels and a scan time of 6:31 min. Prior to analysis the MRI data were screened for movement artefacts.

Data Analysis

Statistics

All statistical procedures were performed using SPSS (version 19.0, Armonk, New York, U.S.). Mann-Whitney-U tests were applied and P < 0.05 was considered significant after Bonferroni correction.

MRI Analysis

Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was performed in SPM8 in order to perform voxel-wise comparisons of gray (GM) and white matter (WM) volume between the three groups of subjects18. The preprocessing included four steps. Firstly, all 3D-GRE T1-weighted images were reoriented to set the image origin (0/0/0) to the anterior commissure. Then, a unified model inversion (unified segmentation) was used for bias correction and segmentation of 3D-GRE T1-weighted (T1w) images into GM, WM and CSF. In the next step, through iterative nonlinear registration (DARTEL) the GM and WM segments were warped into an optimal (average) space. The resulting GM and WM images were modulated and affine transformed to MNI space. Lastly, the modulated normalized GM and WM segments were smoothed using an isotropic Gaussian kernel with 6 mm full width at half-maximum prior to between-group analyses at the 2nd level.

Voxel-based cortical thickness

A voxel-based cortical thickness (VBCT) map was created for each participant using the GM, WM and CSF segments created in the preprocessing step of the VBM analysis19. The input tissue segments were sub-sampled from 1 mm to 0.5 mm using trilinear interpolation to increase resolution for narrow CSF spaces. In order to compute VBCT maps, cortical GM boundaries were extracted and the distance between the inner and outer GM boundaries were estimated for each voxel in the cortex19. The VBCT maps comprised of a value for cortical thickness at each voxel in GM and zeros elsewhere. Afterwards, the VBCT maps were warped into the same reference space as the GM probability maps. Subsequently, smoothing was performed by using an isotropic 6 mm full width at half-maximum Gaussian kernel including a correction in order to maintain local cortical thickness19.

Region of interest (ROI) Analysis

Based on previous neuroimaging evidence10,11,14,20,21,22, we chose an ROI approach incorporating the bilateral primary motor cortex (M1), somatosensory cortices (S1 and S2), premotor cortex (PMC), insulae, thalamus and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). ROIs and the white matter mask were created using the Pick Atlas in SPM823,24. The John Hopkins University (JHU) White-Matter Tractography Atlas was used to identify the location of significant peak voxels in the white matter25. The ROIs were included as a mask in order to restrict the voxel-by-voxel analysis to these distinct regions. Group comparisons were performed between healthy controls and individuals with SCI, as well as between individuals with SCI suffering from NP and pain-free individuals with SCI. All results reported are family-wise error (FWE) corrected for multiple comparisons within regions of interest. For all group (i.e., healthy controls and individuals with SCI) and subgroup (i.e., pain-free individuals with SCI and individuals with SCI suffering from below-level NP) analyses, we accounted for the variability between individuals with SCI and healthy volunteers by explicitly modeling the linear variance of age, sex, level of lesion and total intracranial volume (TIV) in all GLM analyses26. Then we extracted the contrast estimates of all ROIs from the individuals with SCI in order to perform Spearman correlations to identify associations between structural changes and clinical characteristics (i.e., SCA, ISNCSCI motor and sensory scores, disease duration, neurological level of lesion, pinprick and light touch scores, pain intensity and duration)27.

Spinal Cord Area (SCA), anterior-posterior width (APW) and left-right width (LRW)

The 3D-GRE T1-weighted images were used to identify the cross-sectional cord area based on a well-established semi-automated segmentation method5,20,28. User intervention was required to define the cervical vertebra C2 as an anatomic landmark and to define the center of C2 on the axial slice containing the anatomic landmark voxel. This landmark definition was performed by an expert in spinal cord imaging, CRJ. The remaining analysis was carried out automatically to minimize the risk of user-induced bias. The boundary of the cord was determined via nearest-neighbor region growing. The stopping criterion was a 25% drop in signal intensity relative to the mean of the region. This was taken to signify that the white matter-cerebrospinal fluid boundary had been reached. The boundary voxels of this region were then used to fit an ellipse from which the anterior-posterior width (APW, long axis of the ellipse), left-right width (LRW, short axis of the ellipse) and cord area were extracted. The quality of the fit was ensured by visual inspection (also performed by CRJ). The center of the region of interest (ROI) was used to initialize region growing in the adjacent superior slice. A total of 15 slices were included in the analysis giving a total caudal-rostral coverage of 1.5 cm. The average of APW, LRW and cord area over this 1.5 cm extent was used for statistical analysis. The Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance was used to identify differences in cord area, APW and LRW between controls and subjects with SCI. In individuals with SCI, regression analyses were performed to test for an association between impairment and spinal cord area, APW and LRW. The behavioral measure was set as the dependent variable, while spinal cord area, APW and LRW were included as independent variables. Age and gender are reported to have a significant effect on the spinal cord area29, both variables were included as covariates in the analysis in addition to the lesion level.

Results

Clinical measurements

According to the ISNCSCI Impairment classification, 12 of 30 SCI subjects had complete (2 tetraplegic, 10 paraplegic) and 18 incomplete (13 tetraplegic, 5 paraplegic) injury of the spinal cord. Two SCI subjects (1 individual with tetraplegia, 1 with paraplegia) were excluded due to incomplete datasets (i.e., measurement errors). All individuals with SCI had reduced ISNCSCI motor and sensory scores of upper and lower limbs. From the remaining 28 individuals with SCI, 13 (8 with paraplegia, 5 with tetraplegia) suffered from below-level NP. Only one individual with SCI suffered from both at- and below-level pain (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical data for the spinal cord injured individuals.

The average and maximal pain intensities were 4.0 ± 2.1 and 5.5 ± 3.0, respectively and the duration of ongoing pain ranged from 4 to 33 years (mean 19.8 ± 12.3). All other individuals were pain-free at the time-points of measurements. Individuals with SCI showed elevation of thermal perception thresholds (paraplegic SCI: F = 13.4, df:56, p = 0.010, tetraplegic SCI: F = 13.4, df:56, p < 0.001) and pain thresholds (paraplegic SCI: F = 14.39, df:56, p < 0.001; tetraplegic SCI: F = 15.1, df: 56 , p = 0.003) compared to healthy controls (Table 2).

Table 2 Main clinical and demographic findings from the cohorts studied.

Structural changes at spinal cord and brain

Overall, cross-sectional SCA was reduced by 25.4% (mean (SD) 79.2 ± 9.1; F = 33.231, df: 56, p < 0.001) in the SCI cohort compared to healthy controls (i.e., 17.2% (6 ± 5.1; F = 50.64, df:42, p < 0.001) paraplegic SCI; 27.2% (56.0 ± 10.2; F = 22.81, df:42, p < 0.001) tetraplegic SCI). The degree of cord atrophy in SCI individuals with tetraplegia was greater than in individuals with paraplegia −14.0%; F = 9.0, df:26, p = 0.015) (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Differences in anterior-posterior width (APW) were only observed in individuals with tetraplegia (−18.2%; F = 23.3, df:42, p = 0.001) when compared to healthy controls. No differences between groups were detected regarding left-right width (LRW) (p > 0.05). Lastly, no difference between individuals with incomplete and complete SCI were found (p > 0.05).

Figure 1
figure 1

Spinal cord area reduction as a consequence of SCI.

(a) A significant reduction in SCA was found in individuals with paraplegia (pSCI) and tetraplegia (tSCI). The degree of reduction was more pronounced in individuals with tetraplegia. (b) In individuals with tetraplegia, a significant decrease of the anterior-posterior width is observed compared to healthy controls, while (c) the left-right width is indifferent between the groups.

At the whole brain level analysis, no group differences of GM and WM cortical volumes were found (all p > 0.05). However, employing the ROI approach revealed decreased GM and WM cortical volumes in individuals with SCI compared to healthy controls (Table 3). Specifically, lower GM volumes were found in ACC (Z score = 3.73, p = 0.047), left insula (Z score = 4.25, p = 0.002), left secondary somatosensory cortex (Z score = 4.83, p = 0.002 and Z score = 3.96, p = 0.009) and bilateral thalamus (Z score = 3.71, p = 0.031 (left) and Z score = 3.94, p = 0.045 (right)). White matter volumes were decreased in the pyramids (Z score = 3.98, p = 0.009, (left) and Z score = 3.83, p = 0.015 (right)) and the left internal capsule (Z score = 4.12, p = 0.021) in individuals with SCI. Similar to and beyond the area identified by VBM, VBCT analysis revealed decreased cortical thickness in left secondary somatosensory cortex (Z score = 4.01, p = 0.024) in subjects with SCI compared with controls. The cluster, containing the significant peak voxel extended in a rostral–caudal direction from y = −49.5 to −64.5, in the ventral–dorsal direction from z = 9 to 31.5 and left-right direction x = −9 to −21, thus additionally encompassing left M1 and right S1. Employing the whole brain analysis and ROI approach, no differences between individuals with complete and incomplete SCI were identified.

Table 3 Regions of reduced gray and white matter as well as thinner cortical thickness in individuals with SCI compared to healthy controls.

Relationship between below-level neuropathic pain and structural changes across the neuroaxis

Individuals with paraplegia suffering from NP, but not the individuals with tetraplegia (p > 0.05), exhibited a more decreased cord area compared to their pain-free counterparts (p = 0.002, greater mean reduction of −11.6%) (Fig. 2). At the spinal level, cord area was associated with neurological level of lesion (r = 0.558, p = 0.020) and pathologically increased warm perception threshold (r = −0.486, p = 0.049) – that is, warm perception thresholds were increased with smaller SCA. Cord area changes were independent of severity of injury (ISNSCI Score) (r = −0.108, p = 0.583), time since injury (r = −0.103, p = 0.600) and age (r = −0.091, p = 0.644). At the brain level, a decrease in GM volumes in the left ACC (Z = 3.85, p = 0.034) and right M1 (Z = 4.33, p = 0.005) was detected in NP-free individuals with SCI when compared to individuals suffering from below-level NP. On the other hand, NP-free individuals with SCI show greater GM volumes in the right S1 (Z = 3.79, p = 0.046) and thalamus (Z = 4.16, p = 0.010) (Table 4) as well as Fig. 3 and 4). In addition, greater GM volume in M1 is associated with higher on-going pain intensity in individuals with SCI suffering from NP (r = 0.637; p = 0.001)(Fig. 5). No further correlations between anatomical changes and clinical outcomes were detected.

Table 4 Differences in gray matter volume between individuals with SCI suffering from neuropathic pain (npSCI) compared to pain-free individuals with SCI (nnpSCI).
Figure 2
figure 2

The relationship between the presence of below-level neuropathic pain (np) and spinal cord atrophy.

Subjects with paraplegia (pSCI) suffering from neuropathic pain (np) exhibit lower cord area compared to their pain-free counterparts (nnp). Such a difference was not observed in subjects with tetraplegia (tSCI).

Figure 3
figure 3

Trauma-induced and pain-related changes of the cerebral structure.

(a) Volumetric changes between healthy subjects (HC) and individuals with SCI. Individuals with SCI exhibit decreased gray matter volume (red) in the left anterior cingulate cortex, left insula, left secondary sensory cortex, as well as bilateral thalamus compared to healthy controls. Further, decreased white matter volumes (green) were detected in bilateral pyramids and left internal capsule. (b) Bidirectional pain-related morphological changes in individuals with SCI experiencing neuropathic pain. In comparison to their pain-free counterparts, spinally injured individuals with neuropathic pain exhibit decreased gray matter volumes (blue) in the right primary sensory cortex (S1) and in the thalamus. In pain-free individuals with SCI, smaller gray matter volumes (yellow) were observed in the right primary motor cortex and the left anterior cingulate cortex compared to the individuals with SCI suffering from neuropathic pain. All volumetric changes displayed are derived from ROI analyses.

Figure 4
figure 4

Mean tissue volumes in SCI Individuals with (npSCI) and without neuropathic pain (nnpSCI) compared with healthy control individuals.

Averaged ROI volumes extracted for the supra-threshold clusters identified from whole brain contrasts (p < 0.001 uncorrected) in Table 4. (A) Decreased volumes were found in pain-free individuals with SCI in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and primary motor cortex (M1) compared to the pain-free SCI group. Surprisingly, the SCI-NP group exhibited even greater volumes in the ACC compared to healthy individuals. (B) Pain-free individuals with SCI displayed lager gray matter volumes in the primary sensory cortex (S1) as well in the thalamus. All extracted volumes were corrected for age and gender prior to extraction. npSCI: Individuals with SCI suffering from neuropathic pain. nnpSCI: Pain-free individuals with SCI.

Figure 5
figure 5

Positive correlation between preserved local gray matter volume and ongoing pain intensity.

Greater gray matter volume in primary motor cortex (M1) is associated with higher on-going pain intensity in individuals with SCI suffering from below-level neuropathic pain.

Discussion

This study shows distinct association of below-level NP with structural changes of the spinal cord and brain after SCI. In individuals with paraplegia, the reduction in SCA was associated with below-level NP independent of the level or completeness of lesion. At the brain level, pain-related changes were of bi-directional nature (i.e., increased and decreased volumes) and located in areas relevant to nociceptive processing (i.e., including S2, insula, ACC, thalamus) as well as in brain areas not associated with the sensation of NP (i.e., S1, M1, pyramids, internal capsule). These findings provide further insights into the complex pattern of neuro-adaptive processes due to below-level NP following SCI.

Below-level neuropathic pain and structural changes of the spinal cord

While several studies provided evidence of trauma-induced atrophy of the spinal cord5,14,30 and its relation to clinical recovery and impairment, this is the first study to demonstrate an association between spinal cord atrophy and the presence of neuropathic pain. The magnitude of cord atrophy above the neurological level of lesion (all measures performed at C2) was associated with the presence of below-level NP in individuals with paraplegia. That is, individuals with greater cord atrophy were more likely to exhibit below-level NP independent of the neurological level of lesion. Due to the cross-sectional nature of this study, the question of whether below-level NP is causal or consequential cannot be addressed. Based on recent findings, cord atrophy is considered to be due to anterograde and retrograde axonal degeneration of spinal pathway31.

However, pain might arise from both the abolishment of specific fiber tracts reflected by atrophic changes, but also changes through aberrant sprouting of spinal circuits may cause disinhibition or imbalance between sensory and motor pathways32. On the contrary, degeneration of myelinated efferent fibers is sufficient to elicit spontaneous activity in uninjured C-fiber afferents and has been associated with hyperalgesia and allodynia33. Another key factor in individuals with SCI might result from reduced neuro-muscular activity evident in individuals with chronic pain34. Typically, individuals suffering from pain tend to be less active due to the ongoing pain and its concomitants (e.g., depression, lack of motivation) or side-effects of pain medication. Increased activity promotes plasticity at multiple levels of the neuroaxis including spinal cord circuitry rostral and caudal to injury35. Thus, pain-related neuro-muscular inactivity leading to lower brain-derived neutrophic factor (BDNF) and tyrosine kinase B (TrkB) levels might inhibit these plastic processes resulting in atrophic structures as seen in the present study36. Up-regulated BDNF levels following intense exercise were associated with neuronal plasticity in skeletal muscles but also in the innervating level of the spinal cord37,38.

No such difference in the magnitude of cord atrophy related to pain was observed in individuals with tetraplegia. A potential reason might be a ‘flooring effect’ of atrophic progression towards a ‘stable’ SCA3,5. Cord atrophy rostral to the injury (i.e., C2 vertebrae) is dependent on the neurological level of lesion, as shown in the present study, – with more pronounced changes at higher levels of lesion5. Notably, given the anatomical properties of the spinal cord, a lesion to the cervical cord impacts the structural integrity of a higher number of fibers and neurons than a comparable thoracic lesion. The level-dependent degree of atrophy suggests axonal degeneration inducing cord atrophy as the morphometric changes were predominantly in the anterior-posterior axis of the cord. Changes in the anterior-posterior axis might represent Wallerian degeneration of afferents running in the dorsal columns5.

Below-level neuropathic pain and structural changes of the brain

In individuals with SCI, below-level NP was accompanied with reduced GM volume in S1 and the thalamus, but increased GM in the M1 and ACC. Thus far, several VBM studies have reported morphological alterations in areas related to pain processing in patients with neuropathic pain10,39, phantom pain20,22,40, fibromyalgia41,42 and migraine43,44,45 (findings summarized in Table 5). Volumetric bi-directional alterations of GM in areas involved in processing afferent input (e.g., thalamus, insula, cingulate cortex) have been reported46. While, decreased GM volume in pain-regulating areas is often put in context with maladaptive structural plasticity46,47, increased GM is rather linked with preserved structure as the underlying source of chronic pain22. ‘Maladaptive plasticity’ predicts that following loss of efferent output and afferent input deprived central areas undergo structural alterations of synaptic connections thereby triggering NP. The neuronal substrates underlying injury-induced alterations remain incompletely understood. VBM is sensitive to structural volume changes (i.e., alterations in WM and GM), but it cannot disclose the neuronal substrates underlying the structural differences that are revealed in the present study and thus assumptions regarding the underlying neuronal substrates remain speculative. Alterations in GM could result from varying numbers of neurons, interneurons, or glia cells, but also by differently sized cells. Based on animal studies, proposed mechanisms for the volume alterations include axonal sprouting, neuronal death, synaptic pruning and activity-dependent plasticity48. Moore and colleagues proposed in their pre-clinical study that a decline in GM, potentially due to persistent nociceptive input to the brain, could result in neural hyperexcitability along the neuroaxis49. Albeit incomplete understanding of the exact genesis of these morphological changes, it is yet generally accepted that chronic pain conditions are associated with alterations of gray matter volume localized in pain processing and modulatory areas, such as thalamus, insula and anterior cingulate cortex. As such, morphometric alteration in the thalamus, as seen in the present study, is a robust and consistent observation across various pain conditions42,47,50. The thalamus, a major relay station of sensory information, has been implicated in pain modulation and its dysfunction is suspected to drive the pathogenesis of various pain disorders (e.g., NP, fibromyalgia, migraine)46. In fact, human and animal studies provide evidence for an involvement of the thalamus in the emergence of neuropathic pain51,52,53,54,55,56 manifested as reorganization of the thalamus and abnormal thalamic rhythmicity. Anatomical deafferentation is likely the underlying mechanism resulting in a general thalamic hypoactivity (e.g., deficit in thalamic metabolism, decreased thalamic blood flow, functional thalamic depression, ‘thalamocortical dysrhythmia’) which eventually might become autonomous and contribute to the pathophysiology of NP20,57,58,59. Furthermore, the observed decreased GM volumes in primary somatosensory cortex is in line with previous studies associating structural and functional alterations with the presence of chronic pain following deafferentation60,61. Similar to the thalamus, S1 belongs to the so-called ‘lateral’ pain system and possesses a pivotal role in encoding sensory-discriminative aspects of pain62,63. Ongoing nociception was hypothesized to be associated with structural reorganization of areas involved in pain processing (e.g., thalamus and S1), which in turn may play a role in the process of the chronification of pain64. Thus, the decrease in GM volume in the thalamus and primary somatosensory cortex that we observed in individuals with SCI suffering from pain might reflect a chronic nociceptive transmission and may represent cortical plasticity.

Table 5 Summary of VBM studies in chronic pain syndromes.

In contrast to the maladaptive plasticity model, Mole and colleagues recently provided evidence that the presence of below-level neuropathic pain is associated with ‘preserved’ GM (i.e., GM volume comparable to healthy controls) in primary somatosensory and motor cortices10. This is in agreement with our findings, individuals without neuropathic pain demonstrate greater differences from healthy subjects than do individuals with neuropathic pain10. Similar to Makin22, we show not only the relationship of below-level NP and maintained local GM in M1, but also the correlation between pain intensity and preserved GM volume. Maintained local structure with disturbed long-range connectivity and diminished inhibition by surrounding representational areas may lead to ‘autonomous-acting’ areas responsible for the experience of pain22. The positive correlation with the intensity of ongoing below-level NP strengthens the assumption that pain is the consequence of structural preservation. We also found decreased GM volume in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in pain-free individuals with SCI when compared to individuals suffering from neuropathic pain. This finding is somewhat surprising and challenges explanation, since numerous studies contrast our findings by reporting pain-related volume decrease in the ACC20,43,46. One possibility could be that the ongoing pain prevents deafferentation-related structural alteration. This would be in accordance with training studies revealing a positive correlation between intensity of activity and increase of gray matter in areas ascribable to the task1,65,66,67. Furthermore, the anatomical connections between ACC and M1 suggest that these regions might be interactive in encoding different aspects of pain68 and thus, the similarity of the regional volumetric changes (i.e., relative increase) in the presence of chronic pain are in line with this possibility.

Finally, in this cohort, structural alterations of the WM and cortical thickness were not related with pain, but with the trauma-induced deafferentation. Based on animal studies, retrograde axonal degeneration is also suspected to induce volumetric changes of WM tissue at multiple levels of the corticospinal tract69 – as in the present study in the pyramids and internal capsule. Lastly, cortical thinning of the secondary somatosensory cortex was detected in the SCI group compared to healthy controls indicating atrophy of neurons, glial cells, and/or extracellular space70,71,72. Again, no link with the ongoing below-level NP and degree of cortical thinning was found.

Limitations

A major limiting factor constitutes that individuals with SCI and healthy volunteers are not matched with respect to gender. This can confound the group comparison, given possible differences in structure according to gender. DARTEL was used to improve the equalization between the groups through normalization processes. Furthermore, the cross-sectional nature of the study restricts conclusions to a single time point only and thus, temporal information of the above-described structural changes remain speculative. Outside the scope of this study, the assessment of depression and anxiety indices would be interesting to show that observed effects cannot be attributed to prevalent psychiatric comorbidity in this clinical group.

Conclusion

We provide further evidence of extensive changes in sensory function (i.e., pain) and micro-structural morphology of the CNS rostral to the neurological level of lesion (spinal cord and brain). Besides the trauma-dependent changes also volumetric changes become discerned that are related to below-level NP with both decreases and increases. The CNS shows extensive and complex changes (multi-directional with decrease – increase) in response to an injury. These complex interactions need to be considered in interventional studies that often simultaneously may affect many modalities like sensor-motor function and pain syndromes11,73. Future investigations are required to better understand the role of below-level NP in the process of dynamic structural changes after spinal cord injury14. It is conceivable that neuro-imaging biomarkers are sensitive in detecting these complex pain related neuro-adaptive changes.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Jutzeler, C. R. et al. Association of pain and CNS structural changes after spinal cord injury. Sci. Rep. 6, 18534; doi: 10.1038/srep18534 (2016).