Six3 regulates optic nerve development via multiple mechanisms

Samuel, Anat; Rubinstein, Ariel M.; Azar, Tehila T.; Ben-Moshe Livne, Zohar; Kim, Seok-Hyung; Inbal, Adi

doi:10.1038/srep20267

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 29 January 2016

Six3 regulates optic nerve development via multiple mechanisms

Anat Samuel¹,
Ariel M. Rubinstein¹,
Tehila T. Azar¹,
Zohar Ben-Moshe Livne²,
Seok-Hyung Kim³^nAff4 &
…
Adi Inbal¹

Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 20267 (2016) Cite this article

3712 Accesses
14 Citations
2 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Malformations of the optic nerve lead to reduced vision or even blindness. During optic nerve development, retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons navigate across the retina, exit the eye to the optic stalk (OS) and cross the diencephalon midline at the optic chiasm en route to their brain targets. Many signalling molecules have been implicated in guiding various steps of optic nerve pathfinding, however much less is known about transcription factors regulating this process. Here we show that in zebrafish, reduced function of transcription factor Six3 results in optic nerve hypoplasia and a wide repertoire of RGC axon pathfinding errors. These abnormalities are caused by multiple mechanisms, including abnormal eye and OS patterning and morphogenesis, abnormal expression of signalling molecules both in RGCs and in their environment and anatomical deficiency in the diencephalic preoptic area, where the optic chiasm normally forms. Our findings reveal new roles for Six3 in eye development and are consistent with known phenotypes of reduced SIX3 function in humans. Hence, the new zebrafish model for Six3 loss of function furthers our understanding of the mechanisms governing optic nerve development and Six3-mediated eye and forebrain malformations.

Notch signaling coordinates ommatidial rotation in the Drosophila eye via transcriptional regulation of the EGF-Receptor ligand Argos

Article Open access 09 December 2019

Yildiz Koca, Benjamin E. Housden, … Marek Mlodzik

Her9/Hes4 is required for retinal photoreceptor development, maintenance, and survival

Article Open access 09 July 2020

Cagney E. Coomer, Stephen G. Wilson, … Ann C. Morris

Disruption in murine Eml1 perturbs retinal lamination during early development

Article Open access 27 March 2020

G. B. Collin, J. Won, … P. M. Nishina

Introduction

The retina comprises five neuronal cell types that are organized in three layers of cell bodies. Of these, only retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), whose cell bodies are located in the ganglion cell layer (GCL), send axons via the optic nerve that relay information outside of the retina, to the optic tectum in non-mammalian vertebrates and to the superior colliculus (SC) in mammals.

The journey of RGC axons is complex. As RGCs differentiate, their axons navigate to the optic disc (optic nerve head), fasciculate and exit the eye as the optic nerve^1,2. After leaving the eye, axons navigate to the ventral diencephalon midline where they form the optic chiasm in the preoptic area (POA) with axons from the contralateral eye by crossing to the contralateral optic tract on their way to the tectum/SC. In animals with monocular vision such as zebrafish, all RGC axons cross the midline³. Innervation of the tectum/SC forms a retinotopic map, such that axons from cells located adjacently in the GCL project to adjacent locations in the tectum/SC^1,4.

In zebrafish, forward genetic screens have identified several types of RGC axon misrouting phenotypes. Pathfinding errors include abnormal navigation within the eye, failure to cross the midline coupled with innervation of the ipsilateral tectum and ectopic innervation of forebrain structures^5,6,7,8. Many mechanisms, both cell-autonomous and non cell-autonomous, underlie the various RGC pathfinding errors and include abnormal eye and optic stalk (OS) patterning, reduced expression of receptors such as robo2 and cxcr4b in RGCs or their ligands in the environment where axons navigate^9,10, failure to develop RGC pioneers¹¹ and abnormal patterning of the ventral diencephalon midline¹². However, little is known about how expression of the signalling pathway components is regulated and relatively few transcription factors have been implicated in regulation of optic nerve pathfinding.

Six3 is a transcription factor essential for normal forebrain and eye development. In humans, SIX3 haploinsufficiency can cause holoprosencephaly (HPE), the most common forebrain malformation characterized by midline deficiencies of brain and facial structures as well as a wide spectrum of eye malformations such as cyclopia, anophthalmia, microphthalmia and coloboma^13,14,15. In current models of Six3 loss of function, eye formation is severely abrogated from early stages. Mice homozygous for Six3 null mutation lack all forebrain structures including eyes¹⁶ and conditional removal of Six3 from the mouse eye field resulted in arrested neural retina specification¹⁷. In medaka, reduced Six3 function resulted in reduced eye tissues and cyclopia was also observed¹⁸. In zebrafish there are three six3-related genes, six3a, six3b and six7^19,20. The combined loss of zebrafish six3b and six7 function resulted in anophthalmia or microphthalmia²¹. Hence, to date it has been difficult to study the roles of Six3 in later stages of eye development, when Six3 is expected to function based on its expression, which is initially observed throughout the developing eye at optic vesicle stage, becomes largely limited to the OS and ventral eye at optic cup stage^{19,20,22,23,24} and is limited to the retina inner nuclear layer and RGCs after neurogenesis^25,26,27.

Here we describe a new zebrafish model for Six3 loss of function that reveals new roles for Six3 affecting later eye development. We show that zebrafish embryos with reduced Six3a and no Six3b functions have malformed eyes with large optic disc colobomas. The optic nerve in these embryos is hypoplastic and severely defasciculated and RGC axons make multiple pathfinding errors, both in eye and in forebrain. These errors appear to result from multiple mechanisms, including abnormal eye patterning, failure of OS differentiation, abnormal differentiation of RGCs and deficiencies in the diencephalic midline. Altogether, our findings show that Six3 is required for normal RGC and optic nerve development and identify six3a;six3b double mutants as a useful model for revealing new roles for Six3 in eye development.

Results

six3a;six3b-deficient embryos

To identify new roles for Six3 in embryonic development we screened for mutations in six3a by TILLING^28,29. From all identified mutations, only the vu129 allele, in which a T to C transition changes a highly conserved Leucine in position 183 in the homeodomain to Serine (L183S) (Fig. 1A,B), caused a severe reduction in Six3a activity, as tested by six3a misexpression (Supplementary Fig. S1). These results identify six3a^vu129 as a strong hypomorphic allele.

As both six3a^vu129 and six3b^vu87 homozygous mutants appear normal during embryonic and early larval stages²¹, we examined whether there was redundancy between these genes by generating double mutant embryos. We intercrossed double heterozygotes for six3a^vu129 and six3b^vu87 and examined their progeny, which appeared normal until 2 days post-fertilization (dpf). However, at 2 dpf and more prominently at 3 dpf, light could be seen passing through the lenses in some embryos, whose eyes also appeared slightly smaller (Fig. 1D). The passage of light suggested a defect in the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) layer, which covers the neural retina and indeed, the medial region of the RPE appeared incomplete (Fig. 1F). These embryos died around 2 weeks post-fertilization. Genotyping revealed that affected embryos were almost strictly double mutants, carrying four mutant six3 alleles (n = 22/25) and few (n = 3/25) carried three mutant alleles. We hereafter refer to double mutants as six3a;six3b double mutants or Six3-deficient embryos.

To better understand the eye phenotype we performed histological sections at 5 dpf, which revealed large colobomas in the optic disc region with ectopic retinal tissue protruding towards the brain (Fig. 1H). Additionally, optic nerve axons, which normally form a single bundle that exits the eye at the optic disc region (Fig. 1G,I), appeared severely defasciculated (Fig. 1H,J) and the optic chiasm could not be detected (Fig. 1I,J).

Together, these results show that reduced Six3 function through partial loss of Six3a and complete loss of Six3b activities causes abnormal eye and optic nerve morphogenesis.

Multiple optic nerve abnormalities in Six3-deficient embryos

We analyzed more closely the effects of Six3 loss of function on development of the optic nerve. In zebrafish, RGCs begin to differentiate around 28 hours post-fertilization (hpf)^30,31, axons exit the eye around 32 hpf, cross the chiasm at 34–36 hpf and fully innervate the tectum at 72 hpf^32,33. We began by examining the optic nerve at 40 hpf, when axons should have crossed the diencephalic midline. To visualize optic nerve axons we used antibodies against DM-GRASP (zn-5)^34,35 or against acetylated α-tubulin (Ac-T). Compared to normal (Fig. 2A), Six3-deficient embryos had hypoplastic optic nerves, axons failed to reach the midline and fewer RGCs were detected, especially in the ventral retina (Fig. 2B). By 48 hpf, optic nerve axons of Six3-deficient embryos reached the midline but the optic nerve remained hypoplastic and there was no clear structure of an optic chiasm (Fig. 2D). Moreover, some axons appeared to project abnormally inside the eye and many axons appeared to stray from the optic nerve before and in the midline region (Fig. 2D).

To better visualize pathfinding of the optic nerve we used lipophilic dyes for anterograde labelling of RGC axons from one eye, at 3 and 5 dpf. Whereas in WT embryos axons from one eye were always traced only to the contralateral tectum (n = 22) (Fig. 2E), in Six3-deficient embryos axons were found both in the contralateral and ipsilateral tecta (n = 31/35) and also in the telencephalon (n = 34/35) (Fig. 2F, S3).

As the ventral retina appeared to be more strongly affected by Six3 loss of function, we asked whether RGC axons from both dorsal and ventral regions exhibited similar pathfinding defects. We labelled dorsonasal (DN) and ventrotemporal (VT) eye quadrants with DiI and DiO, respectively and examined RGC axons. In WT embryos (n = 15), all axons from VT and DN retina invariably projected contralaterally (Fig. 2G). In Six3-deficient embryos, axons of VT RGCs made many more pathfinding errors than DN axons. In all examined embryos (n = 17), many VT axons projected to the ipsilateral tectum and/or forebrain, whereas DN axons projected mostly to the contralateral tectum. However, some DN axons also showed aberrant pathfinding and axons projecting to the contralateral tectum were defasciculated (Fig. 2H).

Despite the multiple pathfinding errors, many axons reached either the contralateral or ipsilateral tectum; however, it was unclear whether they formed functional connections. To address this question we performed the visual motor response (VMR) test, which monitors locomotion of larvae that is normally triggered by transitions between light and dark conditions³⁶ (see Methods sections for details). We found that although Six3-deficient larvae had a lower baseline activity than WT, they responded to transition from light to dark by a sharp increase of locomotor activity, similarly to WT (Supplementary Fig. S2). When lights were turned on, both WT and Six3-deficient larvae increased their activity, however the response of Six3-deficient larvae was delayed and somewhat slower compared to WT (Supplementary Fig. S2). These results suggest that Six3-deficient larvae can see, indicating functional connections are formed in the tectum. The mechanisms responsible for differences in locomotor behavior compared to WT larvae remain to be determined.

Six3 is required for normal eye patterning

Next, we addressed potential mechanisms that could cause optic nerve misrouting in Six3-deficient embryos. Optic nerve pathfinding errors and coloboma have been associated with abnormal eye patterning and reduced function of genes required for ventral retina and OS development. In Medaka, reduced Six3 function resulted in abnormal eye patterning with reduced expression of ventral eye genes¹⁸. Interestingly, the coloboma phenotype of six3a;six3b double mutant embryos is highly reminiscent of combined loss of function of transcription factors Vax1 and Vax2^37,38. We therefore examined vax1 and vax2 expression at 30 hpf, after initial eye patterning has been completed. At this stage, both vax1 and vax2 are normally expressed in the POA, weakly expressed in the OS and in the ventral retina vax2 is prominently expressed whereas vax1 expression is limited to the region of the choroid fissure (Fig. 3A,C,E). In double mutant embryos, vax1 expression (n = 6) was clearly present in the OS region and appeared upregulated. Additionally, the OS appeared abnormally large. In the POA, vax1 expression was reduced and retinal expression appeared comparable to normal (Fig. 3B). vax2 expression (n = 3) was reduced in the ventral retina, more prominently in the nasal region, almost absent from the OS and reduced in the POA (Fig. 3D,F). These results show that vax gene expression is differentially affected by Six3 loss of function, with vax2 being generally reduced and vax1 reduced in the POA and upregulated in the OS.

Another transcription factor important for eye and optic nerve morphogenesis is Pax2, whose loss of function results in optic fissure coloboma and similar RGC axon pathfinding defects to Six3-deficient embryos^39,40. At 30 hpf, pax2a was expressed in the optic fissure and OS of normal embryos, whereas in double mutants (n = 6) expression in the optic fissure was reduced and was absent from the OS (Fig. 3G,H) (also see below).

In contrast to the reduced expression of ventral genes in double mutants, expression of dorsal eye genes tbx5 (n = 2) (Fig. 3I,J) and raldh2 (n = 3) (Fig. 3K,L) was expanded. These results suggest that Six3-deficient eyes are partially dorsalized, an abnormality that can contribute to RGC axon pathfinding defects.

Optic stalk is induced but fails to differentiate when Six3 function is reduced

The OS plays a critical role in guiding growing RGC axons and its cells differentiate into astrocytes of the optic nerve. As the OS of Six3-deficient embryos failed to express pax2a and appeared abnormal at 30 hpf, we examined whether it was specified in the mutants by labelling for pax2a expression during optic cup formation. At 18 hpf (18-somite stage), pax2a was expressed in the developing OS of double mutants (n = 3) although in a slightly reduced domain, but this expression disappeared by 24 hpf (n = 6) (Fig. 4A–D). Hence, the OS was specified and the reduction of Six3 activity resulted in failure to maintain pax2a OS expression.

Next we examined OS morphogenesis in live embryos in which all cell membranes were labelled by membrane-tethered EGFP. Normally, the OS narrows significantly from 23 hpf to 30 hpf (n = 3–5 embryos for each time point) (Fig. 4E,G). In double mutant embryos, the OS failed to narrow and remained wider than normal (n = 2) (Fig. 4F,H). Hence, reduced Six3 activity also interfered with OS morphogenesis.

To find whether OS cells of double mutants differentiated into glia of the optic nerve we generated an rx3:Kaede transgenic line, in which cells derived from the eye field, including OS and eye cells, express the photoconvertible protein Kaede⁴¹. When OS cells are photoconverted at 24–27 hpf in otherwise WT embryos and are imaged again at 48 hpf or later, photoconverted glial cells are clearly seen at the periphery of the optic nerve (n = 4) (Fig. 4I,K). By contrast, when the same experiment is performed in double mutants, only few or no photoconverted glial cells can be identified in the optic nerve (n = 3) (Fig. 4J,L), suggesting that when Six3 activity is reduced, OS fails to differentiate normally.

Together, the data show that OS morphogenesis and differentiation are abrogated in Six3-deficient embryos. The absence of a normal OS likely contributes to the observed RGC axon pathfinding errors.

Reduced cxcl12a signalling from the optic stalk

OS cells normally express the chemokine ligand cxcl12a, which was shown to function in intra-retinal guidance of RGC axons by attracting them towards the OS^10,42. The failure of OS differentiation in Six3-deficient embryos prompted us to examine cxcl12a expression at 30 hpf, when axons navigate within the retina. Indeed, cxcl12a expression in the OS was strongly reduced (Fig. 4M,N), providing a possible mechanism underlying intra-retinal pathfinding defects in six3a;six3b double mutants.

Abnormal diencephalic midline formation in Six3-deficient embryos

After exiting the eye and OS, all RGC axons in zebrafish cross the anterior diencephalic midline, where they form the optic chiasm in close proximity to the diencephalic post-optic commissure (POC) and ventral to the telencephalic anterior commissure (AC)^43,44,45. The region flanked by the AC and POC is the POA, in which expression of semaphorin 3D (sema3d) is required for midline crossing of RGC axons⁴⁶. Additionally, correct expression of Slit family ligands slit1a, slit2 and slit3 in this region is required for normal commissure formation⁴⁵. The failure to form a normal optic chiasm and the close proximity of the chiasm and commissures prompted us to examine expression of these signalling molecules in Six3-deficient embryos at 32 hpf, shortly before RGC axons normally approach the midline. We found that POA expression of sema3d and the three Slit-family genes was strongly reduced or missing (Fig. 5A–H). Moreover, where the AC and POC could be detected, they appeared much closer to each other than normal (Fig. 5B’).

The abnormally close apposition of commissures raised the possibility that the POA was under-developed, providing an anatomic rather than regulatory explanation for the lack of signalling molecule expression. To test this hypothesis we examined expression of netrin1a (ntn1a), which is normally expressed at 32 hpf in the telencephalon and hypothalamus, leaving a gap in the POA (Fig. 6A). By contrast, in Six3-deficient embryos (n = 4) we observed a continuous expression domain throughout the anterior diencephlic midline and the telencephalic and hypothalamic domains appeared fused (Fig. 6B), supporting the idea that the POA was strongly reduced. Further confirmation for the reduction in POA was obtained by labelling the AC and POC at 28 hpf. In double mutant embryos (n = 3), the distance between the POC and AC was strongly reduced and commissures appeared fused together (Fig. 6C,D). We next labelled embryos for islet1 (isl1), which is normally expressed in the POA at 24 hpf. In Six3-deficient embryos (n = 5), isl1 POA expression could not be detected and importantly, the region ventral to the telencephalon appeared reduced at its dorsoventral dimension, suggesting that the POA was already under developed at 24 hpf (Fig. 6E,F).

These results demonstrate that in Six3-deficient embryos the diencephalic region where optic nerve axons form the chiasm is severely reduced, leading to diminished expression of signalling molecules and likely contributing to abnormalities in midline crossing of RGC axons.

Delayed and abnormal differentiation of Six3-deficient RGCs

The abnormalities described so far in retinal, OS and POA development likely contribute non cell-autonomously to pathfinding errors of RGC axons. However, reduced Six3 levels might also cause abnormalities in RGCs themselves that would lead to abnormal optic nerve development. For example, intra-retinal navigation errors could arise from lack of RGC pioneers¹¹ or loss of cxcr4b function in RGCs¹⁰ and navigation errors outside the retina are found when function of the Slit receptor Robo2 in RGCs is abrogated^6,9.

One line of evidence that RGC development is affected by Six3 loss of function comes from our earlier observation that ventroanterior RGCs, which are the first to differentiate, were not detected or appeared reduced in number in double mutants, at a time point when later-differentiating RGCs already sent axons (Figs 2B and 7B). As ventroanterior RGCs are part of the population of RGC pioneers whose axons guide later born RGC axons in the retina¹¹, it is possible that their reduction/absence contributes to the phenotype of intra-retinal guidance errors.

We also examined retinal expression of chemokine receptor cxcr4b, which is required in RGCs for navigating towards the OS where its ligand, cxcl12a is expressed¹⁰. cxcr4b expression begins in a ventral patch at 24 hpf, before RGCs differentiate and continues in differentiated RGCs⁴⁷. At 30 hpf, strong cxcr4b expression was present in RGCs of WT embryos, but was strongly reduced in Six3-deficient retinas (n = 4) (Fig. 7C,D). We considered two possible explanations for the lack of cxcr4b expression, namely specific downregulation in mutant RGCs or delayed differentiation of RGCs. To distinguish between these possibilities we labelled embryos for cxcr4b at 48 hpf and found that at this time point, Six3-deficient RGCs indeed expressed cxcr4b throughout the circumference of the eye, albeit at lower levels than normal (n = 3) (Fig. 7E,F), suggesting that reduced Six3 function caused delayed RGC differentiation. To verify this conclusion we labelled Six3-deficient embryos for isl1, which is normally expressed in differentiated RGCs⁴⁸. Consistent with the idea of delayed differentiation, isl1 expression was present in normal eyes and missing from eyes of double mutants at 34 hpf (n = 5) (Fig. 7G,H), but was present in double mutant eyes at 48 hpf (n = 6)(Fig. 7J). As cxcr4b is expressed in Six3-deficient RGCs, it is unlikely to play a significant role as a cell-autonomous factor in intra-retinal pathfinding in the double mutants. However, the results uncover a role for Six3 in regulating timely differentiation of RGCs.

Next, we asked if a cell-autonomous mechanism contributes to abnormal pathfinding errors outside the eyes of Six3-deficient embryos. As the pathfinding errors exhibited by Six3-deficient RGC axons are reminiscent of those seen in astray mutants^6,9, we focused on robo2 expression. robo2 is expressed in RGCs soon after their differentiation, beginning at 31 hpf and more robustly by 36 hpf⁹. However, in Six3-deficient embryos robo2 levels were strongly reduced even at 48 hpf, when many RGC axons have already reached the midline (Fig. 7K,L). Hence, Six3-deficient RGCs fail to activate expression of robo2 on time and have reduced ability to respond to specific guidance cues in their environment.

Together, the results suggest that both cell-autonomous and non cell-autonomous mechanisms likely contribute to the pathfinding errors of Six3-deficient RGC axons.

Discussion

In this work we present a new model of Six3 loss of function, in which reduction in total Six3 activity through inactivation of six3a and six3b, two out of three zebrafish six3-related genes (six3a, six3b, six7), results in malformed eyes and optic nerves. Because the eye malformations are relatively mild compared to previously described models of Six3 loss of function^16,18,21, six3a;six3b double mutants provide an opportunity to study in vivo how Six3 functions during optic cup and neurogenesis stages, thus affording identification of previously unknown functions of Six3 in eye and optic nerve development.

The different combinations of double loss-of-function reveal the division of work between zebrafish six3-related genes. Although all three genes are expressed from early stages in similar patterns^20,49, loss of six3b with downregulation of six7 causes severe microphthalmia or anophthalmia through failure to form optic vesicles²¹ (our unpublished observations), whereas strong reduction of six3a function with loss of six3b function results in only mild microphthalmia and in eye abnormalities that are apparent at later stages. Labelling six3a;six3b double mutant embryos at early segmentation stages for eye field and anterior neural plate markers suggests that early patterning of the anterior neural plate is normal (Supplementary Fig. S4). Interestingly, combined loss of six3a and six7 does not lead to overt eye phenotypes (A.S. and A.I., unpublished observations). Hence, six3a appears not to have a significant requirement during the transition from eye field to optic vesicle stage and to act redundantly with six3b only in specific aspects of eye and optic nerve development. This division of work between six3-related genes makes zebrafish a convenient system in which to dissect the roles of Six3 during different stages of eye formation. Interestingly, a previous study described the combined loss of six3a and six3b through the use of antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (MOs) against both genes⁵⁰. This approach led to more significant microphthalmia than what we found, a difference that might stem from differences between the levels of loss of function achieved by mutation versus the use of MOs.

six3a;six3b mutants also uncover a specific role for Six3 in promoting development of the POA. The POA was recently shown to develop as a distinct morphogenetic entity, the optic recess region (ORR), which is organized around the optic recess of the third ventricle⁵¹. Our results suggest that development of this region is particularly sensitive to Six3 levels and further studies will elucidate the mechanisms through which Six3 promotes POA development.

Importantly, the ventral forebrain deficiencies and optic nerve hypoplasia found in six3a;six3b mutants place Six3 as a potential causative gene in additional congenital diseases involving the forebrain and eyes such as septo-optic dysplasia (SOD) and Kallman syndrome. Indeed, a mutation in SIX3 was reported in a patient with Kallman syndrome⁵² and a connection to SOD is supported by the fact that Six3 expression is regulated by Sox2, a causative gene in SOD^53,54,55.

We find that reduced levels of Six3 lead to a wide repertoire of RGC axon pathfinding errors. Intra-retinal pathfinding defects are relatively mild and are more prominent in the ventral retina. One possible mechanism is the failure of some ventroanterior pioneers to differentiate on time (Figs 2B and 7B)¹¹. Another likely cause for the intra-retinal errors is the strongly reduced level of cxcl12a expression in the OS. However, the phenotype in Six3-deficient embryos is surprisingly mild when compared to reports on reduced Cxcl12a levels by morpholino or mutation^10,42. One possible explanation is that residual cxcl12a, at levels undetected by ISH, is present in the OS, providing attraction for RGC axons.

Innervation of the ipsilateral tectum in the mutants appears to be mediated by several factors. Non-autonomous mechanisms include abnormal development of the OS and diencephalic midline, the latter resulting in reduced levels of sema3d. Interestingly, similar abnormalities in OS morphogenesis and differentiation were found when Pax2 function was lost^39,40, suggesting Pax2 is a major mediator of Six3 function in OS development. A reduced POA was also reported in Pax2 mouse knockout but not in zebrafish pax2a mutants^39,40. Hence, this aspect of the phenotype is likely not mediated by reduced Pax2 function.

The possibility of a cell-autonomous mechanism that contributes to pathfinding errors outside of the eye is raised by the reduced level of robo2 in Six3-deficient RGCs. Nevertheless, some phenotypes reported for robo2 loss of function were not observed in six3a;six3b double mutants; this could be explained by low levels of robo2 still present in Six3-deficient RGCs.

six3a;six3b double mutants uncover novel roles for Six3 in RGC differentiation. Firstly, there is delayed differentiation of RGCs and possibly other retinal cell types (A.I., T.A. and A.M.R., unpublished). This is likely mediated by regulation of cell cycle progression and/or exit. Indeed, Six3 has been shown to influence the cell cycle in other contexts, mostly during earlier stages of eye and anterior neural plate development^56,57,58,59. Future analyses will determine the mechanisms by which Six3 influences timing of retinal differentiation.

A second effect of Six3 on RGC differentiation is abnormal gene expression in RGCs. In this work, for example, we found strongly reduced levels of robo2 in RGCs at 48 hpf, which cannot be attributed solely to delayed differentiation as at this stage many mutant RGCs have axons that have reached the midline (Fig. 2D) and express the differentiation marker isl1 (Fig. 7J). Hence, Six3 appears to influence RGC development through affecting specific gene expression. Additional roles for Six3 in differentiated RGCs are also likely, based on its expression in these cells after neurogenesis^25,27 and it will be important to identify these functions and their contribution to RGC biology.

Many of the RGC axon pathfinding defects in Six3-deficient embryos are also seen in mutants in which Hh pathway activity is compromised^6,7,8. A connection between Six3 and Hh signalling is of particular interest given that both have been implicated in HPE. In mice, Six3 was shown to be required for expression of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) in the anterior ventral diencephalic midline^60,61, suggesting Six3 acts upstream of Hh signalling in patterning the anterior diencephalon. However, work in zebrafish showed that Six3 does not function upstream of Hh but rather in parallel in patterning the telencephalon⁶². In the current study, several observations are consistent with Six3 functioning upstream of Hh signalling, namely reduced levels of known Hh downstream targets such as pax2a, cxcl12a and vax2^38,42,63. However, other findings argue against reduced Hh activity in six3a;six3b double mutants and include lack of reduction in ptch2 and gli1 levels in the midline (A.S., A.M.R. and A.I., unpublished observations), no reduction in vax1 levels in the OS (Fig. 3A,B) and no cyclopia, which would be expected if the deficiencies in midline development were mediated by reduced Hh signalling^38,45. Interestingly, the enlarged optic stalk, coloboma and ectopic retinal tissue in the brain are more reminiscent of patched2 mutants, in which Hh pathway activity is upregulated⁶⁴. However, molecular changes found in ptch2 mutants such as expanded pax2 expression and increased Hh signalling are also inconsistent with our findings in Six3-deficient embryos. Hence, based on current findings we propose that Six3’s function in optic nerve development is not mediated by regulation of Hh pathway activity.

Interesting similarities also exist between phenotypes observed in Six3–deficient embryos and lhx2b (belladonna) mutant embryos. For example, in lhx2b mutants RGC axons typically fail to cross the midline and POA development appears reduced^6,12. These similarities are particularly interesting given that lhx2b has been proposed to function as a mediator of Six3 function during early eye and forebrain growth⁵⁰. However, in lhx2b mutants AC and POC fail to form unlike in Six3-deficient embryos and we did not observe significant reduction in lhx2b levels in Six3-deficient embryos (A.M.R. and A. I., unpublished). Hence, while it is still possible that lhx2b functions downstream of Six3 in forebrain patterning and RGC axon guidance, it does not appear to be a significant mediator of Six3 activity in this context.

Methods

Fish lines and genotyping

six3a^vu129 mutation was identified by TILLING (Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes) as previously described^28,29. six3b^vu87mutation has been described²¹. six3b^vu87 and six3a^vu129 fish were maintained in AB and TL backgrounds. Genotyping of six3a^vu129: a 176 bp fragment was amplified from six3a gene using forward primer 5′- AGTTTCCCCTGCCTAGAACC-3′ and reverse primer 5′- AAACCAATTTCCGACCTGTG-3′. After digestion with AleI, the mutant allele is cut into 80 bp and 96 bp fragments whereas the wild-type (WT) allele remains uncut. six3b^vu87 was genotyped by amplifying a 168 bp fragment using forward primer 5′-TCAACAAGCACGAGTCCATC-3′ and reverse primer 5′-GCAGCTTCTCTGCTTCTTGG. After digestion with MseI, the mutant allele is cut into 65 bp and 103 bp fragments whereas the WT allele remains uncut. Generation of Tg(rx3:Kaede)huj8 line: Kaede coding sequence from pKaede-S1 (Amalgaam) was cloned into pENTR1A (Invitrogen) to generate pME-Kaede, which was used for inserting Kaede sequence by Gateway LR recombination downstream of rx3 promoter sequence in rx3-destination plasmid⁶⁵. Tg(rx3:Kaede) fish were generated by co-injection of rx3:Kaede DNA and Tol2 transposase synthetic RNA as described (Kawakami et al. 2004). Founder fish were identified by transgene expression in their progeny.

All experiments were approved by the Hebrew University Authority for Biological and Biomedical Models. The methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

RNA injection

pCS2-six3a: six3a coding sequence was PCR-amplified and cloned into BamHI and XbaI sites of pCS2+ vector. pCS2-six3a-L183S: L183S mutation was introduced by site directed mutagenesis into pCS2-six3a. Sequence was confirmed for both constructs and synthetic capped RNA was prepared by NotI digestion and transcription with SP6 polymerase (mMESSAGE mMACHINE, Ambion).

Visual motor response (VMR) assay

Automatic quantification of larval movement was performed as previously described³⁶. Briefly, at 6 dpf, six3a;six3b double-mutant and WT larvae were placed, individually, in 48-well plates in an observation chamber of DanioVision Tracking System (Noldus Information Technology, Waningen, Netherland). After 3 hours of light adaptation, larvae were subjected to 4 intervals of 30 min light/30 min darkness. In all experiments, larvae were subjected to locomotion analyses between 12:00 to 4:00 PM in a sound- and temperature-controlled (26 °C) behavioral testing room. Locomotor activity was tracked and analyzed using Ethovision 8.0 software (Noldus Information Technology). Described results are combined from two independent experiments.

In situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry and histology

Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) using riboprobes was performed according to standard protocols⁶⁶. BM Purple (Roche) was used as color substrate.

Whole-mount immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed as previously described⁶⁵. The following antibodies and dilution were used: mouse anti-acetylated α-tubulin (1:1,000; clone 6-11B-1, Sigma-Aldrich), mouse anti-zn-5 (1:100; ZIRC), Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated [F(ab’)₂ fragment] donkey anti-mouse (1:500; Jackson ImmunoResearch).

For histology, embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) overnight at 4 °C, washed with PBT, dehydrated in EtOH series and embedded in JB4 resin (Polysciences, Inc.) according to manufacturer’s instructions. 4 μm sections were cut with LKB8800 Ultratome III microtome and stained with methylene blue—azure II.

Lipophilic dye labelling

For anterograde labelling of retinotectal projections, embryos were fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4 °C, washed with PBS, bleached in 3% H₂O₂, 1% KOH (1M) in PBS for 2 hrs or more to remove eye pigmentation and rinsed several times with PBS. Embryos were mounted in 1.2% low-melting-point agarose gel and DiI (1, 1′-dioctadecyl-3, 3, 3′, 3,-tetramethyl indocarbocyanine perchlorate, Sigma-Aldrich #468495) or DiO (3,3′-dioctadecyl oxacarbocyanine perchlorate; Sigma-Aldrich #D4292) was applied either by injection of dissolved dye in 1% chloroform between lens and GCL or by direct application using a dye-coated insect micro pin (Ø 0.1 mm, FST #26002-10). In both methodologies, specimens were kept overnight at 28 °C to allow dyes to diffuse along the axons before imaging.

Photoconversion and imaging

To block pigmentation when imaging embryos older than 24 hpf, embryos were raised from 22 hpf in the presence of 0.003% N-Phenylthiourea (PTU; Sigma-Aldrich #P7629). Live embryos were anaesthetized using tricaine and mounted in 0.5% low-melting-point agarose (SeaPlaque, Lonza). For photoconversion, images of eye and OS region were acquired by minimal exposure using a 488 nm laser. A selected region of interest (ROI) was exposed to 405 nm laser scanning until all green fluorescence was converted to red, as determined by imaging with 488 nm and 555 nm lasers. The embryos were released from agarose and incubated at 28.5 °C in the dark until imaged again.

Images were acquired using Zeiss LSM700 confocal microscope and Axio Imager.M2 compound microscope or with Discovery.V8 stereoscope and AxioCam MRc digital camera (Zeiss). Microscope objective used were 40 × 1.0 NA water objective or 25 × 0.8 NA or 10 × 0.3 NA. Images were exported as JPEG or TIFF files using ZEN 2009 LE software (Zeiss) and figures were assembled using Adobe Photoshop CS4 software.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Samuel, A. et al. Six3 regulates optic nerve development via multiple mechanisms. Sci. Rep. 6, 20267; doi: 10.1038/srep20267 (2016).

References

Oster, S. F., Deiner, M., Birgbauer, E. & Sretavan, D. W. Ganglion cell axon pathfinding in the retina and optic nerve. Semin Cell Dev Biol 15, 125–136 (2004).
CAS Google Scholar
Bao, Z. Z. Intraretinal projection of retinal ganglion cell axons as a model system for studying axon navigation. Brain Res 1192, 165–177 (2008).
CAS Google Scholar
Petros, T. J., Rebsam, A. & Mason, C. A. Retinal axon growth at the optic chiasm: to cross or not to cross. Annu Rev Neurosci 31, 295–315 (2008).
CAS Google Scholar
Reese, B. E. Development of the retina and optic pathway. Vision Res 51, 613–632 (2011).
Google Scholar
Baier, H. et al. Genetic dissection of the retinotectal projection. Development 123, 415–425 (1996).
CAS Google Scholar
Karlstrom, R. O. et al. Zebrafish mutations affecting retinotectal axon pathfinding. Development 123, 427–438 (1996).
CAS Google Scholar
Culverwell, J. & Karlstrom, R. O. Making the connection: retinal axon guidance in the zebrafish. Semin Cell Dev Biol 13, 497–506 (2002).
Google Scholar
Hutson, L. D. & Chien, C. B. Wiring the zebrafish: axon guidance and synaptogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12, 87–92 (2002).
CAS Google Scholar
Fricke, C., Lee, J. S., Geiger-Rudolph, S., Bonhoeffer, F. & Chien, C. B. astray, a zebrafish roundabout homolog required for retinal axon guidance. Science 292, 507–510 (2001).
CAS ADS Google Scholar
Li, Q. et al. Chemokine signaling guides axons within the retina in zebrafish. J Neurosci 25, 1711–1717 (2005).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pittman, A. J., Law, M. Y. & Chien, C. B. Pathfinding in a large vertebrate axon tract: isotypic interactions guide retinotectal axons at multiple choice points. Development 135, 2865–2871 (2008).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Seth, A. et al. belladonna/(Ihx2) is required for neural patterning and midline axon guidance in the zebrafish forebrain. Development 133, 725–735 (2006).
CAS Google Scholar
Cohen, M. M. Jr. Holoprosencephaly: clinical, anatomic and molecular dimensions. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 76, 658–673 (2006).
CAS Google Scholar
Wallis, D. E. & Muenke, M. Molecular mechanisms of holoprosencephaly. Mol Genet Metab 68, 126–138 (1999).
CAS Google Scholar
Pineda-Alvarez, D. E. et al. A broad range of ophthalmologic anomalies is part of the holoprosencephaly spectrum. Am J Med Genet A 155A, 2713–2720 (2011).
Google Scholar
Lagutin, O. V. et al. Six3 repression of Wnt signaling in the anterior neuroectoderm is essential for vertebrate forebrain development. Genes Dev 17, 368–379 (2003).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, W., Lagutin, O., Swindell, E., Jamrich, M. & Oliver, G. Neuroretina specification in mouse embryos requires Six3-mediated suppression of Wnt8b in the anterior neural plate. J Clin Invest 120, 3568–3577 (2010).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Carl, M., Loosli, F. & Wittbrodt, J. Six3 inactivation reveals its essential role for the formation and patterning of the vertebrate eye. Development 129, 4057–4063 (2002).
CAS Google Scholar
Kobayashi, M., Toyama, R., Takeda, H., Dawid, I. B. & Kawakami, K. Overexpression of the forebrain-specific homeobox gene six3 induces rostral forebrain enlargement in zebrafish. Development 125, 2973–2982 (1998).
CAS Google Scholar
Seo, H. C., Drivenes, Ellingsen, S. & Fjose, A. Expression of two zebrafish homologues of the murine Six3 gene demarcates the initial eye primordia. Mech Dev 73, 45–57 (1998).
CAS Google Scholar
Inbal, A., Kim, S. H., Shin, J. & Solnica-Krezel, L. Six3 represses nodal activity to establish early brain asymmetry in zebrafish. Neuron 55, 407–415 (2007).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Loosli, F., Koster, R. W., Carl, M., Krone, A. & Wittbrodt, J. Six3, a medaka homologue of the Drosophila homeobox gene sine oculis is expressed in the anterior embryonic shield and the developing eye. Mech Dev 74, 159–164 (1998).
CAS Google Scholar
Bovolenta, P., Mallamaci, A., Puelles, L. & Boncinelli, E. Expression pattern of cSix3, a member of the Six/sine oculis family of transcription factors. Mech Dev 70, 201–203 (1998).
CAS Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Hollemann, T., Pieler, T. & Gruss, P. Cloning and expression of xSix3, the Xenopus homologue of murine Six3. Mech Dev 91, 327–330 (2000).
CAS Google Scholar
Oliver, G. et al. Six3, a murine homologue of the sine oculis gene, demarcates the most anterior border of the developing neural plate and is expressed during eye development. Development 121, 4045–4055 (1995).
CAS Google Scholar
Kawakami, K., Ohto, H., Takizawa, T. & Saito, T. Identification and expression of six family genes in mouse retina. FEBS Lett 393, 259–263 (1996).
CAS Google Scholar
Wargelius, A., Seo, H. C., Austbo, L. & Fjose, A. Retinal expression of zebrafish six3.1 and its regulation by Pax6. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 309, 475–481 (2003).
CAS Google Scholar
Wienholds, E. & Plasterk, R. H. Target-selected gene inactivation in zebrafish. Methods Cell Biol 77, 69–90 (2004).
CAS Google Scholar
Draper, B. W., McCallum, C. M., Stout, J. L., Slade, A. J. & Moens, C. B. A high-throughput method for identifying N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-induced point mutations in zebrafish. Methods Cell Biol 77, 91–112 (2004).
CAS Google Scholar
Laessing, U. & Stuermer, C. A. Spatiotemporal pattern of retinal ganglion cell differentiation revealed by the expression of neurolin in embryonic zebrafish. J Neurobiol 29, 65–74 (1996).
CAS Google Scholar
Burrill, J. D. & Easter, S. S., Jr. The first retinal axons and their microenvironment in zebrafish: cryptic pioneers and the pretract. J Neurosci 15, 2935–2947 (1995).
CAS Google Scholar
Burrill, J. D. & Easter, S. S., Jr. Development of the retinofugal projections in the embryonic and larval zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio). J Comp Neurol 346, 583–600 (1994).
CAS Google Scholar
Stuermer, C. A. Retinotopic organization of the developing retinotectal projection in the zebrafish embryo. J Neurosci 8, 4513–4530 (1988).
CAS Google Scholar
Trevarrow, B., Marks, D. L. & Kimmel, C. B. Organization of hindbrain segments in the zebrafish embryo. Neuron 4, 669–679 (1990).
CAS Google Scholar
Fashena, D. & Westerfield, M. Secondary motoneuron axons localize DM-GRASP on their fasciculated segments. J Comp Neurol 406, 415–424 (1999).
CAS Google Scholar
Emran, F. et al. OFF ganglion cells cannot drive the optokinetic reflex in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 19126–19131 (2007).
CAS ADS Google Scholar
Mui, S. H., Kim, J. W., Lemke, G. & Bertuzzi, S. Vax genes ventralize the embryonic eye. Genes Dev 19, 1249–1259 (2005).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Take-uchi, M., Clarke, J. D. & Wilson, S. W. Hedgehog signalling maintains the optic stalk-retinal interface through the regulation of Vax gene activity. Development 130, 955–968 (2003).
CAS Google Scholar
Torres, M., Gomez-Pardo, E. & Gruss, P. Pax2 contributes to inner ear patterning and optic nerve trajectory. Development 122, 3381–3391 (1996).
CAS Google Scholar
Macdonald, R. et al. The Pax protein Noi is required for commissural axon pathway formation in the rostral forebrain. Development 124, 2397–2408 (1997).
CAS Google Scholar
Ando, R., Hama, H., Yamamoto-Hino, M., Mizuno, H. & Miyawaki, A. An optical marker based on the UV-induced green-to-red photoconversion of a fluorescent protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 12651–12656 (2002).
CAS ADS Google Scholar
Stacher Horndli, C. & Chien, C. B. Sonic hedgehog is indirectly required for intraretinal axon pathfinding by regulating chemokine expression in the optic stalk. Development 139, 2604–2613 (2012).
Google Scholar
Chitnis, A. B. & Kuwada, J. Y. Axonogenesis in the brain of zebrafish embryos. J Neurosci 10, 1892–1905 (1990).
CAS Google Scholar
Wilson, S. W., Ross, L. S., Parrett, T. & Easter, S. S. Jr. The development of a simple scaffold of axon tracts in the brain of the embryonic zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. Development 108, 121–145 (1990).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Barresi, M. J., Hutson, L. D., Chien, C. B. & Karlstrom, R. O. Hedgehog regulated Slit expression determines commissure and glial cell position in the zebrafish forebrain. Development 132, 3643–3656 (2005).
CAS Google Scholar
Sakai, J. A. & Halloran, M. C. Semaphorin 3d guides laterality of retinal ganglion cell projections in zebrafish. Development 133, 1035–1044 (2006).
CAS Google Scholar
Chong, S. W., Emelyanov, A., Gong, Z. & Korzh, V. Expression pattern of two zebrafish genes, cxcr4a and cxcr4b. Mech Dev 109, 347–354 (2001).
CAS Google Scholar
Masai, I., Stemple, D. L., Okamoto, H. & Wilson, S. W. Midline signals regulate retinal neurogenesis in zebrafish. Neuron 27, 251–263 (2000).
CAS Google Scholar
Seo, H. C., Drivenes, O., Ellingsen, S. & Fjose, A. Transient expression of a novel Six3-related zebrafish gene during gastrulation and eye formation. Gene 216, 39–46 (1998).
CAS Google Scholar
Ando, H. et al. Lhx2 mediates the activity of Six3 in zebrafish forebrain growth. Dev Biol 287, 456–468 (2005).
CAS Google Scholar
Affaticati, P. et al. Identification of the optic recess region as a morphogenetic entity in the zebrafish forebrain. Sci Rep 5, 8738 (2015).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vaaralahti, K. et al. Genetic Overlap between Holoprosencephaly and Kallmann Syndrome. Mol Syndromol 3, 1–5 (2012).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Beccari, L., Conte, I., Cisneros, E. & Bovolenta, P. Sox2-mediated differential activation of Six3.2 contributes to forebrain patterning. Development 139, 151–164 (2012).
CAS Google Scholar
Lee, B. et al. Genomic code for Sox2 binding uncovers its regulatory role in Six3 activation in the forebrain. Dev Biol 381, 491–501 (2013).
CAS Google Scholar
Kelberman, D. & Dattani, M. T. Genetics of septo-optic dysplasia. Pituitary 10, 393–407 (2007).
CAS Google Scholar
Del Bene, F., Tessmar-Raible, K. & Wittbrodt, J. Direct interaction of geminin and Six3 in eye development. Nature 427, 745–749 (2004).
CAS ADS PubMed Google Scholar
Gestri, G. et al. Six3 functions in anterior neural plate specification by promoting cell proliferation and inhibiting Bmp4 expression. Development 132, 2401–2413 (2005).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dyer, M. A. Regulation of proliferation, cell fate specification and differentiation by the homeodomain proteins Prox1, Six3 and Chx10 in the developing retina. Cell Cycle 2, 350–357 (2003).
CAS Google Scholar
Appolloni, I., Calzolari, F., Corte, G., Perris, R. & Malatesta, P. Six3 controls the neural progenitor status in the murine CNS. Cereb Cortex 18, 553–562 (2008).
Google Scholar
Geng, X. et al. Haploinsufficiency of Six3 fails to activate Sonic hedgehog expression in the ventral forebrain and causes holoprosencephaly. Dev Cell 15, 236–247 (2008).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jeong, Y. et al. Regulation of a remote Shh forebrain enhancer by the Six3 homeoprotein. Nat Genet 40, 1348–1353 (2008).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Carlin, D. et al. Six3 cooperates with Hedgehog signaling to specify ventral telencephalon by promoting early expression of Foxg1a and repressing Wnt signaling. Development 139, 2614–2624 (2012).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Macdonald, R. et al. Midline signalling is required for Pax gene regulation and patterning of the eyes. Development 121, 3267–3278 (1995).
CAS Google Scholar
Lee, J. et al. Zebrafish blowout provides genetic evidence for Patched1-mediated negative regulation of Hedgehog signaling within the proximal optic vesicle of the vertebrate eye. Dev Biol 319, 10–22 (2008).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Weiss, O., Kaufman, R., Michaeli, N. & Inbal, A. Abnormal vasculature interferes with optic fissure closure in lmo2 mutant zebrafish embryos. Dev Biol 369, 191–198 (2012).
CAS Google Scholar
Thisse, C. & Thisse, B. High-resolution in situ hybridization to whole-mount zebrafish embryos. Nat Protoc 3, 59–69 (2008).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Lila Solnica-Krezel in whose laboratory the six3a mutant was identified and to Yoav Gothilf in whose laboratory we conducted the VMR assay. We thank colleagues from the zebrafish research community for reagents, Omri Weiss-Lavi for help with histological sections and Inbal lab members for discussions. This work was supported by grant no. 239347 (FP7-MC-IRG) from the European Commission, grant no. 3-9215 from the Chief Scientist Office of the Israel Ministry of Health and by the Israel Science Foundation (grant no. 791/09) to A.I.

Author information

Seok-Hyung Kim
Present address: Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Medical Neurobiology, Institute for Medical Research - Israel-Canada, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel
Anat Samuel, Ariel M. Rubinstein, Tehila T. Azar & Adi Inbal
Department of Neurobiology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Zohar Ben-Moshe Livne
Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Seok-Hyung Kim

Authors

Anat Samuel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ariel M. Rubinstein
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tehila T. Azar
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zohar Ben-Moshe Livne
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Seok-Hyung Kim
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Adi Inbal
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.S., A.M.R. and A.I. designed experiments, A.S., A.M.R., T.T.A., Z.B.-M. and A.I. performed experiments and/or analyzed data, S.-H.K. performed TILLING, A.S., A.M.R. and A.I. wrote the manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samuel, A., Rubinstein, A., Azar, T. et al. Six3 regulates optic nerve development via multiple mechanisms. Sci Rep 6, 20267 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20267

Download citation

Received: 20 August 2015
Accepted: 30 December 2015
Published: 29 January 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20267

This article is cited by

New alcohol-related genes suggest shared genetic mechanisms with neuropsychiatric disorders
- Evangelos Evangelou
- He Gao
- Paul Elliott
Nature Human Behaviour (2019)
Magnetic nanoparticles: a strategy to target the choroidal layer in the posterior segment of the eye
- Martina Giannaccini
- Lucia Pedicini
- Vittoria Raffa
Scientific Reports (2017)
VEP analysis methods in children with optic nerve hypoplasia: relationship to visual acuity and optic disc diameter
- John P. Kelly
- James O. Phillips
- Avery H. Weiss
Documenta Ophthalmologica (2016)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.