Original Article
The role of surgery in lung metastases

https://doi.org/10.1053/ejso.1999.0667Get rights and content

Abstract

Aims:To evaluate the efficacy of pulmonary metastasectomy in 93 patients with lung metastases (LM) operated on from 1983 to 1997.Methods:We assessed: location and histological diagnosis of the primary tumour (PT); the extent of pulmonary resection; and disease-free interval (DFI). Survival analysis was undertaken using the Kaplan–Meier method.Results:Surgical complications occurred in eight (9%) patients; two (3%) died in hospital; seven (8%) were operated again because of further LM. In the whole patient group the average survival after metastasectomy was 40 months (median 22 months). The actuarial survival was 44% at 3 years and 35% at 5 years. With metastasectomy we achieved an overall survival after treatment of PT of 87 months (median 58 months). The actuarial survival was 58% at 5 years and 38% at 10 years. The average time between the treatment of PT and metastasectomy DFI was 4 years (median 41 months). Patients with a DFI of more than 2 years tended to live longer (P=0.086). There were 23 patients with non-epithelial and 70 patients with epithelial tumours. Their DFIs were similar (mean 47, median 34 months for non-epithelial and mean 51, median 29 months for epithelial tumours). Of patients with non-epithelial tumours, 38% survived for 5 years and their survival curves were similar. In the group of tumours with the most frequent location, the results of metastasectomy did not differ considerably: 5 year survival rates of 20% for patients with kidney tumours, 28% for colorectal cancer, 30% for soft-tissue sarcoma, 28% for skin melanoma and 18% for breast cancer.Conclusions:Lung metastasectomy seems to be a safe and efficient method of treatment even for patients who show further metastases. According to our study it seems that, except for LM of breast carcinoma (which has a slightly worse prognosis), the results of surgical resection are not dependent on either the location or the histological pattern of the PT. For this reason patients indicated for operation can be selected according to similar criteria.

References (0)

Cited by (20)

  • Prolonged overall survival after pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with breast cancer

    2013, Annals of Thoracic Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Nevertheless, resection of isolated pulmonary metastases may be beneficial and increase OS in highly selected patients. This is supported by our results with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 59.6% and 43.0%, respectively, and by results reported by others [10, 12–15, 19–25]. Pulmonary metastasectomy was associated with low perioperative morbidity (7.6%) and lethality (0%), which has also been reported by others [14, 17, 23].

  • Surgical and nonresectional therapies for pulmonary metastasis

    2010, Surgical Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    The overall operative mortality in the International Registry of Lung Metastases study was 1.3% and the median survival of patients with complete resections of tumor was 35 months.2 The prognostic factors determined by this study have been supported by several other studies, which have also demonstrated 5-year survivals within the range listed by the Registry.8,9 One particular report by Girard and colleagues10 of 456 adult patients corroborated that the completeness of resection is prognostically significant to survival.

  • Surgical and Nonsurgical Therapy for Lung Metastasis: Indications and Outcomes

    2007, Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Head and neck cancers and testicular and germ cell tumors tend to have better prognoses [78,83,90]. Tumor types with consistently lower survival rates after pulmonary metastasectomy are breast cancer and melanoma [90,91]. The benefit of repeated resections for recurrent pulmonary metastases remains controversial.

  • Surgical treatment of stage IV melanoma

    2004, Clinics in Dermatology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text