Gastroenterology

Gastroenterology

Volume 119, Issue 3, September 2000, Pages 631-638
Gastroenterology

Alimentary Tract
Endoscopic comparison of esophageal and gastroduodenal effects of risedronate and alendronate in postmenopausal women,☆☆,

https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2000.16517Get rights and content

Abstract

Background & Aims: Bisphosphonates are effective treatment for osteoporosis, but upper gastrointestinal injury associated with some compounds has caused concern. This study compared the incidence of gastric ulcers after treatment with risedronate, a pyridinyl bisphosphonate, and alendronate, a primary amino bisphosphonate. Esophageal and gastroduodenal injury assessed by endoscopy scores was a secondary endpoint. Methods: Healthy, postmenopausal women (n = 515) received 5 mg risedronate (n = 255) or 10 mg alendronate (n = 260) for 2 weeks. At baseline and on days 8 and 15, subjects underwent endoscopy and evaluator-blinded assessment of the esophageal, gastric, and duodenal mucosa. Results: Gastric ulcers were observed during the treatment period in 9 of 221 (4.1%) evaluable subjects in the risedronate group compared with 30 of 227 (13.2%) in the alendronate group (P < 0.001). Mean gastric endoscopy scores for the risedronate group were lower than those for the alendronate group at days 8 and 15 (P ≤ 0.001). Mean esophageal and duodenal endoscopy scores were similar in the 2 groups at days 8 and 15. Esophageal ulcers were noted in 3 evaluable subjects in the alendronate group, compared with none in the risedronate group, and duodenal ulcers were noted in 1 evaluable subject in the alendronate group and 2 in the risedronate group. Conclusions At doses used for the treatment of osteoporosis, risedronate was associated with a significantly lower incidence of gastric ulcers than alendronate. These findings confirm that bisphosphonates differ in their potential to damage the gastroesophageal mucosa.

GASTROENTEROLOGY 2000;119:631-638

Section snippets

Study design

The study was a randomized, evaluator-blinded study conducted at 10 sites in the United States and Canada. The protocol was approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee. The study was conducted in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation Guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments, as applicable.

Subjects

The study subjects were postmenopausal women at least 40 years of age. The women were required to be in good health and

Subject disposition, demographics, and exposure to treatment

A total of 515 healthy postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to receive 5 mg risedronate (n = 255) or 10 mg alendronate (n = 260). The treatment groups were similar at baseline with respect to demographic characteristics, tobacco use, and alcohol consumption (Table 2).

. Demographics and tobacco and alcohol use for all subjects

ParameterRisedronate 5 mg (N = 255)Alendronate 10 mg (N = 260)P valuea
Age (yr)
 Mean ± SD53 ± 7.454 ± 7.20.285
 Range40–7540–78
Race (no. [%] of subjects)
 White212 (83.1)230

Discussion

This large study is the first head-to-head comparison of risedronate and alendronate and provides important new information about the differences in their potential to cause gastrointestinal damage in postmenopausal women. We now show that there are differences between risedronate and alendronate in the potential to damage the upper gastrointestinal mucosa. Gastric ulcers were observed in 9 (4.1%) subjects in the risedronate group compared with 30 (13.2%) subjects in the alendronate group (P <

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mary G. Royer for assistance in preparing the manuscript.

References (39)

  • R Pounder

    Silent peptic ulceration: deadly silence or golden silence

    Gastroenterology

    (1989)
  • AD Geddes et al.

    Bisphosphonates: structure-activity relationships and therapeutic implications

  • ST Harris et al.

    Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. A randomized controlled trial

    JAMA

    (1999)
  • M Hooper et al.

    Risedronate prevents bone loss in early postmenopausal women (abstr)

    Calcif Tissue Int

    (1999)
  • DM Reid et al.

    Efficacy and safety of daily risedronate in the treatment of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis in men and women: a randomized trial

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2000)
  • S Cohen et al.

    Risedronate therapy prevents corticosteroid-induced bone loss

    Arthritis Rheum

    (1999)
  • KG Saag et al.

    Alendronate for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

    N Engl J Med

    (1998)
  • National Osteoporosis Foundation

    Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Introduction

    Osteoporos Int

    (1998)
  • IR Reid et al.

    Continuous therapy with pamidronate, a potent bisphosphonate, in postmenopausal osteoporosis

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (1994)
  • Cited by (193)

    • Efficient lung-targeted delivery of risedronate sodium/vitamin D3 conjugated PAMAM-G5 dendrimers for managing osteoporosis: Pharmacodynamics, molecular pathways and metabolomics considerations

      2022, Life Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      RIS mainly acts by inhibiting osteoclast formation and bone resorption. The current oral dosage form has not risen to its true therapeutic potential owing to RIS's poor oral bioavailability (≤1 %) due to the hepatic first-pass effect [4] Moreover, the patient must remain in an upright position for at least 30 min after dosing to decrease the gastrointestinal (GIT) mucosal adhesion, and to accelerate oesophageal passage to overcome GIT side effects [5]. Combined therapy of Vitamin D (VITD) analogues such as VITD3 with RIS is always recommended [6,7] as it synergizes RIS therapeutic efficacy by inhibiting prothrombin-mediated osteoclasts recruitment and preventing oestrogen deficiency-induced loss of cancellous and cortical bone [8].

    • Sloughing Esophagitis: A Rare Cause of Dysphagia

      2015, GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Address request for reprint to: Frank L. Lanza, M.D., Houston Institute for Clinical Research, 7777 Southwest Freeway, Suite 720, Houston, Texas 77074. e-mail: [email protected]; fax: (713) 270-9658.

    ☆☆

    Supported by Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Cincinnati, Ohio, and Aventis Pharma, Bridgewater, New Jersey.

    The following institutions and primary investigators participated in the Risedronate Endoscopy Study: J. Breiter, M.D., P. Thibado, Center for Medical Research, Manchester, Connecticut; R. Dabaghi, M.D., Austin Gastroenterology Associates, Austin, Texas; D. Gremillion, M.D., K. Stouton, P. Herrell, C. Glass, Nashville Medical Research, Nashville, Tennessee; J. Marshall, M.D., C. James, McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; M. Kimmey, M.D., B. Tung, M.D., T. Brentnell, M.D., R. Kuver, M.D., University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; F. Sutton, M.D., M.F. Rack, Houston Institute for Clinical Research, Houston, Texas; M. Brannon, M.D., A. Poch, M.D., D. Philips, M.D., R. Barnett, M.D., D. Hatfield, Gastrointestinal Specialists AMC, Shreveport, Louisiana; E. Spiotta, M.D., J. Hawkins K. Hawkins, Southern Medical Research, Memphis, Tennessee; S. Appelman, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; S. Veldhuyzen van Zanten, M.D., Ph.D., J. Love, M.D., QEII Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

    View full text