Special Section: GFR Decline as an End Point for Clinical Trials in CKD
Special Report
GFR Decline as an End Point for Clinical Trials in CKD: A Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and the US Food and Drug Administration

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.07.030Get rights and content

The US Food and Drug Administration currently accepts halving of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), assessed as doubling of serum creatinine level, as a surrogate end point for the development of kidney failure in clinical trials of kidney disease progression. A doubling of serum creatinine level generally is a late event in chronic kidney disease (CKD); thus, there is great interest in considering alternative end points for clinical trials to shorten their duration, reduce sample size, and extend their conduct to patients with earlier stages of CKD. However, the relationship between lesser declines in GFR and the subsequent development of kidney failure has not been well characterized. The National Kidney Foundation and Food and Drug Administration sponsored a scientific workshop to critically examine available data to determine whether alternative GFR-based end points have sufficiently strong relationships with important clinical outcomes of CKD to be used in clinical trials. Based on a series of meta-analyses of cohorts and clinical trials and simulations of trial designs and analytic methods, the workshop concluded that a confirmed decline in estimated GFR of 30% over 2 to 3 years may be an acceptable surrogate end point in some circumstances, but the pattern of treatment effects on GFR must be examined, specifically acute effects on estimated GFR. An estimated GFR decline of 40% may be more broadly acceptable than a 30% decline across a wider range of baseline GFRs and patterns of treatment effects on GFR. However, there are other circumstances in which these end points could lead to a reduction in statistical power or erroneous conclusions regarding benefits or harms of interventions. We encourage careful consideration of these alternative end points in the design of future clinical trials.

Section snippets

Kidney Disease Outcomes and Measures

The prevalence of CKD is increasing in the United States and worldwide, with high cost and poor outcomes, especially for patients with kidney failure.6 There are few proven therapies to slow the progression of CKD. However, despite the availability of simple laboratory tests to identify people with earlier stages of CKD, fewer clinical trials have been performed for kidney disease than for other common diseases.7, 8 It is widely acknowledged that the lack of specific symptoms prior to the stage

Methods, Results, and Interpretation

In this section, we summarize methods, results, and interpretation of analyses reported elsewhere in more detail.2, 3, 4, 5 We begin with a definition of established and alternative surrogate end points, then discuss the general framework for analysis of observational studies (cohorts), clinical trials, and simulations, including strengths and limitations of each source of data. Next, we discuss the sources of data, then the main results and interpretation for each analysis.

The Proposal

Based on these results, the planning committee and analytic group proposed and the workshop participants agreed that under some circumstances, a GFR decline of 30% could be a valid and useful surrogate end point for progression to kidney failure in clinical trials of CKD (Table 4). Evidence was stronger for a GFR decline of 40% as the end point, which represents a more cautious approach and is likely to be more widely applicable (Fig 4). Using the CKD-EPI 2009 creatinine equation, a 30% and 40%

Conclusion

In summary, our results support the use of alternative eGFR-based end points as a surrogate for kidney failure in clinical trials. We have analyzed a large number of cohorts and clinical trials and developed a tool to simulate outcomes for alternative eGFR-based end points based on participant clinical characteristics and trial design. We have proposed eGFR decline of 30% as an alternative surrogate end point in trials of CKD, with stronger evidence for a 40% eGFR decline. We have considered

Acknowledgements

The workshop planning committee comprised Andrew S. Levey, MD (chair), Aliza M. Thompson, MD (FDA; co-chair), Josef Coresh, MD, PhD, Kerry Willis, PhD (NKF), Norman Stockbridge, MD, PhD (FDA), Edmund Lewis, MD, Dick de Zeeuw, MD, PhD, and Alfred K. Cheung, MD. The analytical group was chaired by Josef Coresh, MD, PhD, and comprised the observational studies subgroup (Kunihiro Matsushita, MD, PhD [lead], Josef Coresh, MD, PhD, Mark Woodward, PhD, Morgan Grams, MD, MS, Yingying Sang, MS, and

References (41)

Cited by (426)

View all citing articles on Scopus

Because an author of this article is an editor for AJKD, the peer-review and decision-making processes were handled entirely by an Associate Editor (Mark M. Mitsnefes, MD) who served as Acting Editor-in-Chief. Details of the journal’s procedures for potential editor conflicts are given in the Information for Authors & Editorial Policies.

View full text