Gastroenterology

Gastroenterology

Volume 153, Issue 5, November 2017, Pages 1205-1211
Gastroenterology

AGA Clinical Practice Update: Expert Review
Clinical Practice Update: The Use of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Achalasia: Expert Review and Best Practice Advice From the AGA Institute

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.001Get rights and content

The purpose of this review is to describe a place for per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) among the currently available robust treatments for achalasia.

The recommendations outlined in this review are based on expert opinion and on relevant publications from PubMed and EMbase. The Clinical Practice Updates Committee of the American Gastroenterological Association proposes the following recommendations: 1) in determining the need for achalasia therapy, patient-specific parameters (Chicago Classification subtype, comorbidities, early vs late disease, primary or secondary causes) should be considered along with published efficacy data; 2) given the complexity of this procedure, POEM should be performed by experienced physicians in high-volume centers because an estimated 20−40 procedures are needed to achieve competence; 3) if the expertise is available, POEM should be considered as primary therapy for type III achalasia; 4) if the expertise is available, POEM should be considered as treatment option comparable with laparoscopic Heller myotomy for any of the achalasia syndromes; and 5) post-POEM patients should be considered high risk to develop reflux esophagitis and advised of the management considerations (potential indefinite proton pump inhibitor therapy and/or surveillance endoscopy) of this before undergoing the procedure.

Keywords

Achalasia
Esophageal Motility Disorders
High-Resolution Manometry
Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy

Abbreviations used in this paper

EGJ
esophagogastric junction
HRM
high-resolution manometry
IRP
integrated relaxation pressure
LHM
laparoscopic Heller myotomy
LES
lower esophageal sphincter
POEM
per-oral endoscopic myotomy
PD
pneumatic dilation

Cited by (0)

Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.

Funding Peter J. Kahrilas was supported by R01 DK079902 and R01DK56033 from the US Public Health Service.

View Abstract