Elsevier

Seminars in Oncology

Volume 42, Issue 4, August 2015, Pages 640-655
Seminars in Oncology

Agonists of Co-stimulation in Cancer Immunotherapy Directed Against CD137, OX40, GITR, CD27, CD28, and ICOS

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2015.05.014Get rights and content

T and natural killer (NK) lymphocytes are considered the main effector players in the immune response against tumors. Full activation of T and NK lymphocytes requires the coordinated participation of several surface receptors that meet their cognate ligands through structured transient cell-to-cell interactions known as immune synapses. In the case of T cells, the main route of stimulation is driven by antigens as recognized in the form of short polypeptides associated with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigen-presenting molecules. However, the functional outcome of T-cell stimulation towards clonal expansion and effector function acquisition is contingent on the contact of additional surface receptor-ligand pairs and on the actions of cytokines in the milieu. While some of those interactions are inhibitory, others are activating and are collectively termed co-stimulatory receptors. The best studied belong to either the immunoglobulin superfamily or the tumor necrosis factor-receptor (TNFR) family. Co-stimulatory receptors include surface moieties that are constitutively expressed on resting lymphocytes such as CD28 or CD27 and others whose expression is induced upon recent previous antigen priming, ie, CD137, GITR, OX40, and ICOS. Ligation of these glycoproteins with agonist antibodies actively conveys activating signals to the lymphocyte. Those signals, acting through a potentiation of the cellular immune response, give rise to anti-tumor effects in mouse models. Anti-CD137 antibodies are undergoing clinical trials with evidence of clinical activity and anti-OX40 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) induce interesting immunomodulation effects in humans. Antibodies anti-CD27 and GITR have recently entered clinical trials. The inherent dangers of these immunomodulation strategies are the precipitation of excessive systemic inflammation or/and invigorating silent autoimmunity. Agonist antibodies, recombinant forms of the natural ligands, and polynucleotide-based aptamers constitute the pharmacologic tools to manipulate such receptors. Preclinical data suggest that the greatest potential of these agents is achieved in combined treatment strategies.

Section snippets

CD28 and ICOS

CD28 is the canonical and best studied co-stimulatory glycoprotein.18 Its function is critical for costimulation of naïve T lymphocytes.19 Activation through CD28 results in protection from cell death,20 stronger cytokine secretion and much enhanced proliferation. Indeed agonist anti-CD28 antibodies are routinely used in the laboratory to culture T-cell lines and clones.21 CD28 ligation results in the activation of various transcription factors and in the persistence of various pro-immune mRNAs,

Rna Aptamers as Novel Therapeutic for Costimulation of 41bb, Ox40, Or Cd28

The most frequently used therapeutic platform for agonist molecules triggering co-stimulatory receptors has been conventional mAbs. This topic has been extensively reviewed elsewhere.153, 154 Therefore, in this last part of the review, we will discuss as an alternative platform in the form of polynucleotides able to bind to proteins. In this regard, three important co-stimulatory RNA aptamers have been recently described against 4-1BB, OX40, and CD28.155, 156, 157 We will also review the use of

The Road Ahead

The clinical success of ipilimumab,174, anti–PD-1,175, 176 and anti–PD-L1177, 178, 179 mAbs has validated the principle that modulation of the immune response can overcome immune evasion mechanisms of tumors and produce objective anti-tumor responses. However, different mechanisms to evade immune attack can be developed by each patient׳s tumor and now the challenge is to determine which mechanism is dominant and which is the most suitable immunotherapy. Clinical experience has revealed that

References (181)

  • R.A. Shilling et al.

    CD28 and ICOS play complementary non-overlapping roles in the development of Th2 immunity in vivo

    Cell Immunol

    (2009)
  • R.I. Nurieva

    Regulation of immune and autoimmune responses by ICOS-B7h interaction

    Clin Immunol

    (2005)
  • M. Croft et al.

    TNF superfamily in inflammatory disease: translating basic insights

    Trends Immunol

    (2012)
  • I. Melero et al.

    Multi-layered action mechanisms of CD137 (4-1BB)-targeted immunotherapies

    Trends Pharmacol Sci

    (2008)
  • I. Melero et al.

    NK1.1 cells express 4-1BB (CDw137) co-stimulatory molecule and are required for tumor immunity elicited by anti-4-1BB monoclonal antibodies

    Cell Immunol

    (1998)
  • J.I. Quetglas et al.

    Immunotherapeutic synergy between anti-CD137 mAb and intratumoral administration of a cytopathic Semliki Forest virus encoding IL-12

    Mol Ther

    (2012)
  • L.M. Myers et al.

    Interfacing T-cell effector and regulatory function through CD137 (4-1BB) co-stimulation

    Trends Immunol

    (2005)
  • H.E. Kohrt et al.

    CD137 stimulation enhances the antilymphoma activity of anti-CD20 antibodies

    Blood

    (2011)
  • P.A. Ascierto et al.

    Clinical experiences with anti-CD137 and anti-PD1 therapeutic antibodies

    Semin Oncol

    (2010)
  • D.J. Paterson et al.

    Antigens of activated rat T lymphocytes including a molecule of 50,000 Mr detected only on CD4 positive T blasts

    Mol Immunol

    (1987)
  • B. Valzasina et al.

    Triggering of OX40 (CD134) on CD4(+)CD25+T cells blocks their inhibitory activity: a novel regulatory role for OX40 and its comparison with GITR

    Blood

    (2005)
  • P.R. Rogers et al.

    OX40 promotes Bcl-xL and Bcl-2 expression and is essential for long-term survival of CD4 T cells

    Immunity

    (2001)
  • J. Song et al.

    Sustained survivin expression from OX40 co-stimulatory signals drives T cell clonal expansion

    Immunity

    (2005)
  • M.K. Jenkins et al.

    On the composition of the preimmune repertoire of T cells specific for peptide-major histocompatibility complex ligands

    Ann Rev Immunol

    (2010)
  • P. Matzinger

    The danger model: a renewed sense of self

    Science

    (2002)
  • R. Medzhitov et al.

    Decoding the patterns of self and nonself by the innate immune system

    Science

    (2002)
  • L. Chen et al.

    Molecular mechanisms of T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition

    Nat Rev Immunol

    (2013)
  • M.L. Dustin

    The immunological synapse

    Cancer Immunol Res

    (2014)
  • D.R. Fooksman et al.

    Functional anatomy of T cell activation and synapse formation

    Ann Rev Immunol

    (2010)
  • K. Choudhuri et al.

    Polarized release of T-cell-receptor-enriched microvesicles at the immunological synapse

    Nature

    (2014)
  • P. Penaloza-MacMaster et al.

    Interplay between regulatory T cells and PD-1 in modulating T cell exhaustion and viral control during chronic LCMV infection

    J Ex p Med

    (2014)
  • T. Yokosuka et al.

    Programmed cell death 1 forms negative co-stimulatory microclusters that directly inhibit T cell receptor signaling by recruiting phosphatase SHP2

    J Exp Med

    (2012)
  • O. Acuto et al.

    CD28-mediated co-stimulation: a quantitative support for TCR signalling

    Nat Rev Immunol

    (2003)
  • L.F. Dodson et al.

    Targeted knock-in mice expressing mutations of CD28 reveal an essential pathway for costimulation

    Mol Cell Biol

    (2009)
  • I. Martinez-Forero et al.

    Lysine 63 polyubiquitination in immunotherapy and in cancer-promoting inflammation

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2009)
  • V.G. Bhoj et al.

    Ubiquitylation in innate and adaptive immunity

    Nature

    (2009)
  • P. Riha et al.

    CD28 co-signaling in the adaptive immune response

    Self Nonself

    (2010)
  • H. Bour-Jordan et al.

    Intrinsic and extrinsic control of peripheral T-cell tolerance by co-stimulatory molecules of the CD28/ B7 family

    Immunol Rev

    (2011)
  • T.H. Watts

    Staying alive: T cell costimulation, CD28, and Bcl-xL

    J Immunol

    (2010)
  • M.V. Maus et al.

    Ex vivo expansion of polyclonal and antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes by artificial APCs expressing ligands for the T-cell receptor, CD28 and 4-1BB

    Nat Biotechnol

    (2002)
  • J.A. Ragheb et al.

    CD28-Mediated regulation of mRNA stability requires sequences within the coding region of the IL-2 mRNA

    J Immunol

    (1999)
  • P. Waterhouse et al.

    Lymphoproliferative disorders with early lethality in mice deficient in Ctla-4

    Science

    (1995)
  • X. Tai et al.

    Induction of autoimmune disease in CTLA-4-/- mice depends on a specific CD28 motif that is required for in vivo costimulation

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2007)
  • R. Zhang et al.

    An obligate cell-intrinsic function for CD28 in Tregs

    J Clin Invest

    (2013)
  • S.E. Townsend et al.

    Tumor rejection after direct costimulation of CD8+T cells by B7-transfected melanoma cells

    Science

    (1993)
  • G. Winberg et al.

    Surface expression of CD28 single chain Fv for costimulation by tumor cells

    Immunol Rev

    (1996)
  • R.J. Brentjens et al.

    Genetically targeted T cells eradicate systemic acute lymphoblastic leukemia xenografts

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2007)
  • S. Tammana et al.

    4-1BB and CD28 signaling plays a synergistic role in redirecting umbilical cord blood T cells against B-cell malignancies

    Hum Gene Ther

    (2010)
  • T. Hunig

    The storm has cleared: lessons from the CD28 superagonist TGN1412 trial

    Nat Rev Immunol

    (2012)
  • G. Suntharalingam et al.

    Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • Cited by (169)

    • CAR-T cells for cancer immunotherapy

      2023, Chinese Chemical Letters
    • Monoclonal antibodies in breast cancer: A critical appraisal

      2023, Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflicts of interest: M.J.K. is full time employee at Bristol Myers Squibb and owns stock. I.M. is a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Miltenyi-biotec, Merck and Roche-Genentech.

    View full text