The Road to Three-Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2010.08.004Get rights and content

This paper examines the origins of 3-dimensional craniofacial measurement. It briefly tracks the development of measurement methods from the plaster casts and facial moulages of the early 20th century to the cone beam computed tomographic scanners of today. The fundamental difference in design between cone beam scanners and conventional computed tomography scanners is described in their difference in primary function; cone beam scanners are optimized for the location of hard tissue structures, such as teeth and bone, whereas computed tomography scanners were originally optimized for the detection of subtle distinctions in the radiopacity of different bodily soft tissues under different conditions of health and disease. The advantages and limitations of several attempts at quantitative measurement of the skull and face in 3 dimensions are noted.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (6)

  • Assessment of image quality in maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography imaging

    2015, Seminars in Orthodontics
    Citation Excerpt :

    One of the biggest controversies with the use of CBCT in dental imaging is the amount of generated radiation. Although there is a lack of definitive data, largely due to the fact that there are almost 60 CBCT scanners available on the market,5 recent reviews signify the importance of generated radiation by CBCT scanning as a cause for concern.6,7 CBCT scanning is often used for investigation of external root resorption because of its ability to produce accurate, anatomically correct images of the root structure.8

  • 3D Visualisation of the Spine

    2023, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
  • Evolving trends in orthodontic imaging for advance patient care

    2019, Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology
View full text