Original Articles
Thermometric determination of cartilage matrix temperatures during thermal chondroplasty: Comparison of bipolar and monopolar radiofrequency devices*,**

https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2002.29893Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose: To compare cartilage matrix temperatures between monopolar radiofrequency energy (mRFE) and bipolar RFE (bRFE) at 3 depths under the articular surface during thermal chondroplasty. We hypothesized that cartilage temperatures would be higher at all cartilage depths for the bRFE device than for the mRFE device. Type of Study: Randomized trial using bovine cartilage. Methods: Sixty osteochondral sections from the femoropatellar joint of 15 adult cattle were used for this study. Using a custom jig, fluoroptic thermometry probes were placed at one of the following depths under the articular surface: 200 μm, 500 μm, or 2,000 μm. RF treatment was performed either with fluid flow (F) (120 mL/min) or without fluid flow (NF) (n = 5/depth/RFE device/flow; total specimens, 60). Irrigation fluid temperature was room temperature (22°C). Thermometry data were acquired at 4 Hz for 5 seconds with the RF probe off, for 20 seconds with the RF probe on, and then for 15 seconds with the RF probe off. During RF treatment, a 0.79-cm2 area (1.0-cm diameter) of the articular surface centered over the thermometry probe was treated in a paintbrush manner in noncontact (bRFE) or light contact (mRFE). Results: Thermal chondroplasty with bRFE resulted in higher cartilage matrix temperatures compared with mRFE for all depths and regardless of fluid flow. Bipolar RFE resulted in temperatures of 95°C to 100°C at 200 μm and 500 μm under the surface, with temperatures of 75°C to 78°C at 2,000 μm. Fluid flow during bRFE application had no effect at 200 μm. Monopolar RFE resulted in temperatures of 61°C to 68°C at 200 μm, 54°C to 70°C at 500 μm under the surface, and 28°C to 30°C at 2,000 μm below the surface. A significant effect of fluid flow during mRFE application occurred at 200 μm (NF, 61°C; F, 63°C) and 500 μm (NF, 53°C; F, 68°C). Conclusions: In this study, we found significant differences between bRFE and a temperature-controlled mRFE device with regard to depth of thermal heating of cartilage in vitro. Bipolar RFE resulted in matrix temperatures high enough (>70°C) to kill cells as deep as 2,000 μm under the articular surface. Fluid flow during thermal chondroplasty had the effect of significantly increasing cartilage matrix temperatures at 200 and 500 μm with the mRFE device. During thermal chondroplasty, bRFE creates greater matrix temperature elevations at equivalent depths and treatment duration than does mRFE. Excessive temperatures generated deep within the cartilage matrix could cause full-thickness chondrocyte death, in vivo.

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 18, No 4 (April), 2002: pp 339–346

Section snippets

Methods

Sixty osteochondral sections (height, 2.0 cm; diameter, 2.54 cm) harvested from the femoropatellar joint space of 15 healthy, adult cattle were divided into 2 equal groups. Section location (patella and femoral trochlear groove) and animal number were recorded to allow randomization across treatment groups (n = 5/depth/RF device/flow).

Sections were placed in a jig that allowed tip sensing fluoroptic thermocouples (SFF-2; Luxtron Corp, Santa Clara, CA) to be placed tangentially, parallel to the

Results

At each depth, cartilage temperatures were higher in the bRFE group than the mRFE group (P <.05), and at all depths, bRFE resulted in temperatures exceeding 75°C (Table 1, Figs 3 and 4).

. Mean cartilage matrix temperatures of (A) bRFE and (B) mRFE during thermal chondroplasty with irrigation fluid flow (120 mL/min). Temperature measurements were performed with fluoroptic thermometers placed at 200, 500, and 2,000 μm below the articular surface. Data points were recorded at 4 Hz but reported at 1

Discussion

Bipolar RFE caused significantly greater and deeper temperature rises within the cartilage matrix than mRFE during thermal chondroplasty. Importantly, bRFE resulted in sufficiently high temperatures at the deepest depth measured (2,000 μm) to cause chondrocyte death up to and including this depth. Numerous reports have evaluated the effects of heat on osteoblasts, endothelial cells, murine lymphoma cells, neuronal cells, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and chondrocytes, and have shown that the

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgment: The authors thank John Bogdanske, Jennifer Devitt, David Choi, and Susan Heath for their assistance in this project. In addition, the authors thank Bill Hagquist, a senior instrument specialist in the College of Engineering, and his staff for the construction of the thermometry jig used to complete this work.

References (32)

  • Y Lu et al.

    Thermal chondroplasty with radiofrequency energy: An in vitro comparison of bipolar and monopolar radiofrequency devices

    Am J Sports Med

    (2001)
  • RB Edwards et al.

    Thermal chondroplasty of chondromalacic human cartilage: An ex vivo comparison of bipolar and monopolar radiofrequency devices

    Am J Sports Med

    (2002)
  • HP Benton et al.

    Use of adverse conditions to stimulate a cellular stress response by equine articular chondrocytes

    Am J Vet Res

    (1996)
  • S Li et al.

    Heat Shock-induced necrosis and apoptosis in osteoblasts

    J Orthop Res

    (1999)
  • J Utoh et al.

    Effects of temperature on phagocytosis of human and calf polymorphonuclear leukocytes

    Artif Organs

    (1992)
  • J Utoh et al.

    Effects of heat on fragility and morphology of human and calf erythrocytes

    J Invest Surg

    (1992)
  • Cited by (64)

    • Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

      2018, Equine Surgery, Fifth Edition
    • Temperature profile of radiofrequency probe application in wrist arthroscopy: Monopolar versus bipolar

      2013, Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      In our study the mean tissue temperature increased with the duration of the RFE application, and there was a significant difference between the bipolar and monopolar RFE systems concerning the heat expansion, which could be explained by the different functions of bipolar and monopolar systems. Similar results concerning the difference in the monopolar and bipolar systems had been achieved by former studies, whereas Edwards et al.5 found a significantly lower temperature for the monopolar system compared with the bipolar system. On the other hand, we had a higher peak temperature for the monopolar system than that for the bipolar system without irrigation, but it was not statistically significant.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Supported by Oratec Interventions, Inc., Menlo Park, California.

    **

    Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mark D. Markel, D.V.M., Ph.D., Comparative Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, 2015 Linden Dr West, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706-1102, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected]

    View full text