Regular Article
Need for intensive care after operations for head and neck cancer surgery

https://doi.org/10.1054/bjom.1999.0194Get rights and content

Abstract

We compared the postoperative morbidity of 44 patients who had had major head and neck oncological resections and who were nursed postoperatively on a general ward with that of 33 who were nursed on an intensive care unit at North Manchester General Hospital and Withington Hospital, South Manchester, respectively. There was no difference in the general morbidity (9/44, 20% compared with 9/33, 27%, 95% CI of difference – 0.26 to 0.13) We conclude that it is safe to nurse the patients on a general ward provided that certain conditions are fulfilled.

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (48)

  • Weaning outcome of solid cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit

    2019, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
    Citation Excerpt :

    These findings suggest that patients with HNC and HCC requiring MV should not be deferred from intensive care, while those with LC should be informed of the risks of prolonged MV before initiating MV. Critically ill HNC patients have mainly been studied in the post-surgical setting, and the MV outcome of those admitted to the ICU for medical reasons are unclear.10,16,35 In our study, HNC patients had weaning outcomes similar to non-cancer patients, including the probability of successful weaning at day 90 and median MV-free days to day 28 and day 90.

  • Head and neck free flap reconstruction: What is the appropriate post-operative level of care?

    2017, Oral Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Downey et al. reported two cases of flap ischemia and one flap hematoma, however, the flap salvage rate was not described [1]. Godden et al. reported a flap survival rate of 87% (13/15) in the ward setting, compared to 97% (31/32) in the ICU setting [53]. Strauss and Bellian reported 1/16 patients that experienced thrombosis of free flap vessels for patients receiving non-ICU level care, however, salvage of the flap was not described and the ICU flap survival rate was not reported [2].

  • Outcome of microvascular free flaps in a high-volume training centre

    2014, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    The operation time needed is within the scope of the data already published covering this topic (Eckardt et al., 2007; Mucke et al., 2013). Although in most publications the IMC stay was not studied in a separate manner, the over-all mean IMC time per patient (3.1 days) and the mean ICU time (1.6 days) were within the range of the published data (Godden et al., 1999; Haddock et al., 2010; Arshad et al., 2013). The rate of flap loss (4.85%) is also in the scope of the published data (Wei et al., 2002; Eckardt et al., 2007; Pohlenz et al., 2007a,b; Kessler et al., 2013; Mucke et al., 2013), however, there is no consensus about what is considered a complication.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text