Clinical Investigations
Prognosis of congestive heart failure in patients with normal versus reduced ejection fractions: Results from a cohort of 2,258 hospitalized patients*,**

https://doi.org/10.1054/jcaf.2003.13Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Patients with congestive heart failure have an annual mortality of 10% to 20% depending on disease severity. Though one third of these patients have normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), their natural history is poorly defined. Small population-based studies have suggested a more benign prognosis for patients with preserved LVEF. However, prognosis in hospitalized patients, who form a higher risk group, is not known. Methods: We investigated the survival patterns of 2,258 patients with a primary hospital discharge diagnosis of congestive heart failure between 1990 and 1999. Survival was analyzed and patients with normal and reduced LVEF were compared. Results: Their age was 71 ± 11 years, and 97% were men. There were 1,535 deaths over a mean follow up of 786 days. Of these, 963 (43%) patients had a normal LVEF (≥55%). Patients with normal LVEF were of the same age as those with reduced LVEF, but had a lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation (20 versus 26%, P =.03), left bundle branch block (2 versus 12%, P <.0001), significant mitral regurgitation (5 versus 31%, P <.0001) and electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial infarction (38 versus 60%, P <.0001). Despite lesser comorbidities, they had a higher mortality hazard, with a 5-year survival of 22% compared with 28% for those with systolic heart failure (P =.007). Proportional hazards model showed presence of normal EF as a categoric variable to be an independent predictor of mortality in those with heart failure after correcting for age and rhythm. Conclusions: Prognosis of hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure and normal LVEF is worse than those with reduced EF despite lesser comorbidities. Studies addressing optimal management of these patients are warranted.

Section snippets

Patient population

The hospital medical record discharge diagnosis database was electronically searched for a primary discharge diagnosis (on both alive and dead patients) of CHF between 1990 and 1999. This yielded a list of 2,678 patients. The diagnosis was made by or approved by a cardiology attending physician or an internist based on clinical, radiologic, and echocardiographic data. Of these patients, 2,258 patients had an echocardiogram during the index hospital admission or within a month of admission. For

Patient characteristics

Of the 2,258 patients with CHF, 963 (43%) had preserved LV systolic function defined as an LVEF ≥55%. The mean (± standard deviation) age was 71 ± 11 years; 97% were men. The LV ejection fraction was 45 ± 18%. Over a mean follow up of 786 days, there were 1,535 deaths.

Discussion

This study, which perhaps is the largest addressing the prognosis of patients with presumed diastolic heart failure, indicates that patients with diastolic CHF have a worse prognosis compared with those with systolic CHF, despite the fact that patients with diastolic heart failure had lesser cardiac comorbidities. Correcting for comorbidities amplified the difference in survival. Our CHF patients probably formed a higher risk group compared with population and outpatient-based studies because

Conclusions

We conclude that presence of CHF increases mortality in those with normal LVEF. Prognosis of hospitalized patients with CHF and normal LVEF is worse than of those with reduced EF, despite lesser comorbidities. Studies addressing optimal management of these patients are warranted.

Cited by (77)

  • Comparison of Risk of Re-hospitalization, All-Cause Mortality, and Medical Care Resource Utilization in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction

    2015, American Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Most previous studies of mortality comparing HFrEF with HFpEF have reported greater mortality in patients with HFrEF,2,3,15 with relative differences as high as twofold.4,5 However, 1 study found equal mortality,1 whereas another reported lower mortality among patients with HFrEF compared with those with HFpEF.6 Interestingly, a recent European study found that for a given level of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), mortality of patients with HFrEF did not differ from that of HFpEF.16

View all citing articles on Scopus
*

Reprint requests: Ramdas G. Pai, MD, FRCP (Edin), FACC, Professor of Medicine, Director of Cardiovascular Research and Fellowship Programs, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA 92354.

**

1071-9164/03/0902-0006$30.00/0

View full text