Gonadal Vein Embolization: Treatment of Varicocele and Pelvic Congestion Syndrome

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Therapeutic embolization of the gonadal veins is performed on male and female patients for different clinical situations using similar techniques. The testicular varicocele is a common clinical problem associated with pain and reduced fertility rates. In women, chronic pelvic pain can be attributed to pelvic congestion syndrome, which is said to result from retrograde flow in incompetent ovarian veins. Both of these clinical problems respond well to gonadal vein embolization. In this article, we review the clinical evaluation, diagnostic workup, and technical aspects of percutaneous intervention of gonadal vein embolization. The supporting literature is also reviewed.

REFERENCES

• 1 Pierik F H, Dohle G R, van Muiswinkel J M, Vreeburg J T, Weber R F. Is routine scrotal ultrasound advantageous in infertile men?.  J Urol. 1999;  162(5) 1618-1620
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Golzarian J, Sun S, Sharafuddin M J. Vascular Embolotherapy: A Comprehensive Approach. Berlin, New York; Springer 2006
  Google Scholar
• 3 Pinto K J, Kroovand R L, Jarow J P. Varicocele related testicular atrophy and its predictive effect upon fertility.  J Urol. 1994;  152(2 Pt 2) 788-790
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Wishahi M M. Detailed anatomy of the internal spermatic vein and the ovarian vein. Human cadaver study and operative spermatic venography: clinical aspects.  J Urol. 1991;  145(4) 780-784
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Porst H, Bähren W, Lenz M, Altwein J. Percutaneous sclerotherapy of varicoceles–an alternative to conventional surgical methods.  Br J Urol. 1984;  56(1) 73-78
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Shlansky-Goldberg R D, VanArsdalen K N, Rutter C M et al.. Percutaneous varicocele embolization versus surgical ligation for the treatment of infertility: changes in seminal parameters and pregnancy outcomes.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;  8(5) 759-767
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Gat Y, Bachar G, Zukerman Z, Belenky A, Gornish M. Varicocele: a bilateral disease.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  81(2) 424-429
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Cooper A, Cooper B B. Observations on the Structure and Diseases of the Testis. 2nd ed. London; Churchill 1841
  Google Scholar
• 9 Sakamoto H, Ogawa Y, Yoshida H. Relationship between testicular volume and varicocele in patients with infertility.  Urology. 2008;  71(1) 104-109
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Mori M, Bertolla R, Fraietta R, Ortiz V, Cedenho A. Does varicocele grade determine extent of alteration to spermatogenesis in adolescents?.  Fertil Steril. 2007;  , December 29 (Epub ahead of print)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Chehval M J, Purcell M H. Deterioration of semen parameters over time in men with untreated varicocele: evidence of progressive testicular damage.  Fertil Steril. 1992;  57(1) 174-177
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine . Report on varicocele and infertility.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  86(5, Suppl) S93-S95
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Skoog S J, Roberts K P, Goldstein M, Pryor J L. The adolescent varicocele: what's new with an old problem in young patients?.  Pediatrics. 1997;  100(1) 112-121
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Cayan S, Woodhouse C. The treatment of adolescents presenting with a varicocele.  BJU Int. 2007;  100(4) 744-747
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Dubin L, Amelar R. Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele.  Fertil Steril. 1970;  21(8) 606-609
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Comparison among different methods for the diagnosis of varicocele.  World Health Organization . Fertil Steril. 1985;  43(4) 575-582
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Petros J A, Andriole G L, Middleton W D, Picus D A. Correlation of testicular color Doppler ultrasonography, physical examination and venography in the detection of left varicoceles in men with infertility.  J Urol. 1991;  145(4) 785-788
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Trum J W, Gubler F M, Laan R, van der Veen F. The value of palpation, varicoscreen contact thermography and colour Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of varicocele.  Hum Reprod. 1996;  11(6) 1232-1235
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Hamm B, Fobbe F, Sörensen R, Felsenberg D. Varicoceles: combined sonography and thermography in diagnosis and posttherapeutic evaluation.  Radiology. 1986;  160(2) 419-424
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Cornud F, Belin X, Amar E et al.. Varicocele: strategies in diagnosis and treatment.  Eur Radiol. 1999;  9(3) 536-545
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Sigmund G, Bähren W, Gall H, Lenz M, Thon W. Idiopathic varicoceles: feasibility of percutaneous sclerotherapy.  Radiology. 1987;  164(1) 161-168
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Marsman J W. The aberrantly fed varicocele: frequency, venographic appearance, and results of transcatheter embolization.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;  164(3) 649-657
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Sigmund G, Gall H, Bähren W. Stop-type and shunt-type varicoceles: venographic findings.  Radiology. 1987;  163(1) 105-110
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Lima S S, Castro M P, Costa O F. A new method for the treatment of varicocele.  Andrologia. 1978;  10(2) 103-106
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 White R I, Kaufman S L, Barth K H et al.. Occlusion of varicoceles with detachable balloons.  Radiology. 1981;  139(2) 327-334
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Smith T P, Hunter D W, Cragg A H et al.. Spermatic vein embolization with hot contrast material: fertility results.  Radiology. 1988;  168(1) 137-139
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Gazzera C, Rampado O, Savio L et al.. Radiological treatment of male varicocele: technical, clinical, seminal and dosimetric aspects.  Radiol Med (Torino). 2006;  111(3) 449-458
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Lopez C, Serres-Cousine O, Averous M. Varicocele in adolescents. Treatment by sclerotherapy and percutaneous embolization: reflections on the method. Apropos of 23 cases.  Prog Urol. 1998;  8(3) 382-387
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Pollak J S, White R I. The use of cyanoacrylate adhesives in peripheral embolization.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;  12(8) 907-913
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Barrett J, Wells I, Riordan R, Roobottom C. Endovascular embolization of varicoceles: resorption of tungsten coils in the spermatic vein.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000;  23(6) 457-459
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Kampmann C, Brzezinska R, Abidini M et al.. Biodegradation of tungsten embolisation coils used in children.  Pediatr Radiol. 2002;  32(12) 839-843
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Wells I P. Biodegradation of tungsten embolisation coils used in children.  Pediatr Radiol. 2003;  33(4) 288
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Gandini R, Konda D, Reale C et al.. Male varicocele: transcatheter foam sclerotherapy with sodium tetradecyl sulfate–outcome in 244 patients.  Radiology. 2008;  246(2) 612-618
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Wunsch R, Efinger K. The interventional therapy of varicoceles amongst children, adolescents and young men.  Eur J Radiol. 2005;  53(1) 46-56
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Trombetta C, Liguori G, Bucci S, Ciciliato S, Belgrano E. Percutaneous treatment of varicocele.  Urol Int. 2003;  70(2) 113-118
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Kim H S, Malhotra A D, Rowe P C, Lee J M, Venbrux A C. Embolotherapy for pelvic congestion syndrome: long-term results.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;  17(2 Pt 1) 289-297
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Fobbe F, Hamm B, Sörensen R, Felsenberg D. Percutaneous transluminal treatment of varicoceles: where to occlude the internal spermatic vein.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;  149(5) 983-987
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Abdulmaaboud M R, Shokeir A A, Farage Y, Abd El-Rahman A, El-Rakhawy M M, Mutabagani H. Treatment of varicocele: a comparative study of conventional open surgery, percutaneous retrograde sclerotherapy, and laparoscopy.  Urology. 1998;  52(2) 294-300
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Beutner S, May M, Hoschke B et al.. Treatment of varicocele with reference to age: a retrospective comparison of three minimally invasive procedures.  Surg Endosc. 2007;  21(1) 61-65
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Lord D J, Burrows P E. Pediatric varicocele embolization.  Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;  6(4) 169-175
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Hargreave T B. Varicocele–a clinical enigma.  Br J Urol. 1993;  72(4) 401-408
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Drooz A T, Lewis C A, Allen T E et al.. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transcatheter embolization. SCVIR Standards of Practice Committee. Society of Cardiovascular & Interventional Radiology.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;  8(5) 889-895
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Nieschlag E, Behre H, Schlingheider A et al.. Surgical ligation vs. angiographic embolization of the vena spermatica: a prospective randomized study for the treatment of varicocele-related infertility.  Andrologia. 1993;  25(5) 233-237
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Barbalias G A, Liatsikos E N, Nikiforidis G, Siablis D. Treatment of varicocele for male infertility: a comparative study evaluating currently used approaches.  Eur Urol. 1998;  34(5) 393-398
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Parsch E M, Schill W B, Erlinger C, Tauber R, Pfeifer K J. Semen parameters and conception rates after surgical treatment and sclerotherapy of varicocele.  Andrologia. 1990;  22(3) 275-278
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Gat Y, Bachar G, Everaert K, Levinger U, Gornish M. Induction of spermatogenesis in azoospermic men after internal spermatic vein embolization for the treatment of varicocele.  Hum Reprod. 2005;  20(4) 1013-1017
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Donkol R H, Salem T. Paternity after varicocelectomy: preoperative sonographic parameters of success.  J Ultrasound Med. 2007;  26(5) 593-599
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Schiff J D, Li P S, Goldstein M. Correlation of ultrasound-measured venous size and reversal of flow with Valsalva with improvement in semen-analysis parameters after varicocelectomy.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  86(1) 250-252
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Jarow J P, Ogle S R, Eskew L A. Seminal improvement following repair of ultrasound detected subclinical varicoceles.  J Urol. 1996;  155(4) 1287-1290
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Kim E D, Leibman B B, Grinblat D, Lipshultz L. Varicocele repair improves semen parameters in azoospermic men with spermatogenic failure.  J Urol. 1999;  162(3 Pt 1) 737-740
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Pasqualotto F F, Sobreiro B P, Hallak J, Pasqualotto E B, Lucon A M. Induction of spermatogenesis in azoospermic men after varicocelectomy repair: an update.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  85(3) 635-639
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Esteves S C, Glina S. Recovery of spermatogenesis after microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men based on testicular histology.  Int Braz J Urol. 2005;  31(6) 541-548
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Zuckerman A M, Mitchell S E, Venbrux A C et al.. Percutaneous varicocele occlusion: long-term follow-up.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;  5(2) 315-319
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Madgar I, Weissenberg R, Lunenfeld B, Karasik A, Goldwasser B. Controlled trial of high spermatic vein ligation for varicocele in infertile men.  Fertil Steril. 1995;  63(1) 120-124
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Schlegel P N. Is assisted reproduction the optimal treatment for varicocele-associated male infertility? A cost-effectiveness analysis.  Urology. 1997;  49(1) 83-90
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Marmar J L, Agarwal A, Prabakaran S et al.. Reassessing the value of varicocelectomy as a treatment for male subfertility with a new meta-analysis.  Fertil Steril. 2007;  88(3) 639-648
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Nieschlag E, Hertle L, Fischedick A, Behre H M. Treatment of varicocele: counselling as effective as occlusion of the vena spermatica.  Hum Reprod. 1995;  10(2) 347-353
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Ficarra V, Cerruto M, Liguori G et al.. Treatment of varicocele in subfertile men: The Cochrane Review–a contrary opinion.  Eur Urol. 2006;  49(2) 258-263
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Dubin L, Amelar R D. Varicocelectomy: twenty-five years of experience.  Int J Fertil. 1988;  33(4) 226-228 231-235
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Watanabe M, Nagai A, Kusumi N, Tsuboi H, Nasu Y, Kumon H. Minimal invasiveness and effectivity of subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a comparative study with retroperitoneal high and laparoscopic approaches.  Int J Urol. 2005;  12(10) 892-898
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Schiff J, Kelly C, Goldstein M et al.. Managing varicoceles in children: results with microsurgical varicocelectomy.  BJU Int. 2005;  95(3) 399-402
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Samraj G P, Kuritzky L, Curry R W. Chronic pelvic pain in women: evaluation and management in primary care.  Compr Ther. 2005;  31(1) 28-39
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Mathias S D, Kuppermann M, Liberman R F, Lipschutz R C, Steege J F. Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates.  Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  87(3) 321-327
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Beard R W, Highman J H, Pearce S, Reginald P W. Diagnosis of pelvic varicosities in women with chronic pelvic pain.  Lancet. 1984;  2(8409) 946-949
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Soysal M E, Soysal S, Vicdan K, Ozer S. A randomized controlled trial of goserelin and medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of pelvic congestion.  Hum Reprod. 2001;  16(5) 931-939
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Taylor H J. Vascular congestion and hyperemia; their effect on function and structure in the female reproductive organs; etiology and therapy.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1949;  57(4) 654-668
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Beard R W, Reginald P W, Wadsworth J. Clinical features of women with chronic lower abdominal pain and pelvic congestion.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;  95(2) 153-161
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Cordts P R, Eclavea A, Buckley P J et al.. Pelvic congestion syndrome: early clinical results after transcatheter ovarian vein embolization.  J Vasc Surg. 1998;  28(5) 862-868
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Ahlberg N E, Bartley O, Chidekel N. Right and left gonadal veins. An anatomical and statistical study.  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1966;  4(6) 593-601
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Giacchetto C, Catizone F, Cotroneo G et al.. Radiologic anatomy of the genital venous system in female patients with varicocele.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989;  169(5) 403-407
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Reginald P W, Adams J, Franks S, Wadsworth J, Beard R W. Medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of pelvic pain due to venous congestion.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;  96(10) 1148-1152
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Scultetus A H, Villavicencio J L, Gillespie D L. The nutcracker syndrome: its role in the pelvic venous disorders.  J Vasc Surg. 2001;  34(5) 812-819
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 73 d'Archambeau O, Maes M, De Schepper A. The pelvic congestion syndrome: role of the “nutcracker phenomenon” and results of endovascular treatment.  JBR-BTR. 2004;  87(1) 1-8
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 74 Belenky A, Bartal G, Atar E, Cohen M, Bachar G. Ovarian varices in healthy female kidney donors: incidence, morbidity, and clinical outcome.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;  179(3) 625-627
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Park S J, Lim J W, Ko Y T et al.. Diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome using transabdominal and transvaginal sonography.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;  182(3) 683-688
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 Pagani J J, Thomas J L, Bernardino M E. Computed tomographic manifestations of abdominal and pelvic venous collaterals.  Radiology. 1982;  142(2) 415-419
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 77 Coakley F V, Varghese S L, Hricak H. CT and MRI of pelvic varices in women.  J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999;  23(3) 429-434
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 78 Kennedy A, Hemingway A. Radiology of ovarian varices.  Br J Hosp Med. 1990;  44(1) 38-43
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 79 Kwon S H, Oh J H, Ko K R, Park H C, Huh J Y. Transcatheter ovarian vein embolization using coils for the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;  30(4) 655-661
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 80 Edwards R D, Robertson I R, MacLean A B, Hemingway A P. Case report: pelvic pain syndrome–successful treatment of a case by ovarian vein embolization.  Clin Radiol. 1993;  47(6) 429-431
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 81 Ganeshan A, Upponi S, Hon L et al.. Chronic pelvic pain due to pelvic congestion syndrome: the role of diagnostic and interventional radiology.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;  30(6) 1105-1111
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 82 Venbrux A C, Chang A H, Kim H S et al.. Pelvic congestion syndrome (pelvic venous incompetence): impact of ovarian and internal iliac vein embolotherapy on menstrual cycle and chronic pelvic pain.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;  13(2 Pt 1) 171-178
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 83 Maleux G, Stockx L, Wilms G, Marchal G. Ovarian vein embolization for the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome: long-term technical and clinical results.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;  11(7) 859-864
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 84 Basile A, Marletta G, Tsetis D, Patti M. The Amplatzer Vascular Plug Also for Ovarian Vein Embolization.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;  31(2) 446-447
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 85 Gargiulo T, Mais V, Brokaj L, Cossu E, Melis G. Bilateral laparoscopic transperitoneal ligation of ovarian veins for treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome.  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;  10(4) 501-504
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 86 Beard R W, Kennedy R G, Gangar K F et al.. Bilateral oophorectomy and hysterectomy in the treatment of intractable pelvic pain associated with pelvic congestion.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;  98(10) 988-992
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 87 Farquhar C M, Rogers V, Franks S et al.. A randomized controlled trial of medroxyprogesterone acetate and psychotherapy for the treatment of pelvic congestion.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;  96(10) 1153-1162
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

Mark A BittlesM.D. 

Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Radiology, 2200 Children's Way

Room 1418, Nashville, TN 37232-9700

Email: markbittles@vanderbilt.edu