Surveillance of Hemodialysis Vascular Access

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

A mature, functional arteriovenous (AV) access is the lifeline for a hemodialysis (HD) patient as it provides sufficient enough blood flow for adequate dialysis. As the chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population is expanding, and because of the well-recognized hazardous complications of dialysis catheters, the projected placement and use of AV accesses for HD is on the rise. Although a superior access than catheters, AV accesses are not without complications. The primary complication that causes AV accesses to fail is stenosis with subsequent thrombosis. Surveying for stenosis can be performed in a variety of ways. Clinical monitoring, measuring flow, determining pressure, and measuring recirculation are all methods that show promise. In addition, stenosis can be directly visualized, through noninvasive techniques such as color duplex imaging, or through minimally invasive venography. Each method of screening has its advantages and disadvantages, and several studies exist which attempt to answer the question of which test is the most useful. Ultimately, to maintain the functionality of the access for the HD patient, a team approach becomes imperative. The collaboration and cooperation of the patient, nephrologist, dialysis nurse and technician, vascular access coordinator, interventionalist, and vascular surgeon is necessary to preserve this lifeline.

REFERENCES

• 1 United States Renal Data System .2007 Annual Data Report. Bethesda, MD; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health 2007
  Google Scholar
• 2 Astor B C, Eustace J A, Powe N R, Klag M J, Fink N E, Coresh J. CHOICE Study . Type of vascular access and survival among incident hemodialysis patients: the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for ESRD (CHOICE) Study.  J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;  16(5) 1449-1455
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Lee T, Barker J, Allon M. Tunneled catheters in hemodialysis patients: reasons and subsequent outcomes.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;  46(3) 501-508
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Maya I D, Oser R, Saddekni S, Barker J, Allon M. Vascular access stenosis: comparison of arteriovenous grafts and fistulas.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;  44(5) 859-865
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Vascular Access 2006 Work Group . Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;  48(Suppl 1) S176-S247
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Tonnessen B H, Money S R. Embracing the fistula first national vascular access improvement initiative.  J Vasc Surg. 2005;  42(3) 585-586
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Basile C, Lomonte C, Vernaglione L, Casucci F, Antonelli M, Losurdo N. The relationship between the flow of arteriovenous fistula and cardiac output in haemodialysis patients.  Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;  23(1) 282-287
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Miller C D, Robbin M L, Barker J, Allon M. Comparison of arteriovenous grafts in the thigh and upper extremities in hemodialysis patients.  J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;  14(11) 2942-2947
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Miller P E, Carlton D, Deierhoi M H, Redden D T, Allon M. Natural history of arteriovenous grafts in hemodialysis patients.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;  36(1) 68-74
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Lilly R Z, Carlton D, Barker J et al.. Predictors of arteriovenous graft patency after radiologic intervention in hemodialysis patients.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;  37(5) 945-953
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Beathard G A. An algorithm for the physical examination of early fistula failure.  Semin Dial. 2005;  18(4) 331-335
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Besarab A, Sherman R. The relationship of recirculation to access blood flow.  Am J Kidney Dis. 1997;  29(2) 223-229
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Alloatti S, Molino A, Bonfant G, Ratibondi S, Bosticardo G M. Measurement of vascular access recirculation unaffected by cardiopulmonary recirculation: evaluation of an ultrasound method.  Nephron. 1999;  81(1) 25-30
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Depner T A, Krivitski N M, MacGibbon D. Hemodialysis access recirculation measured by ultrasound dilution.  ASAIO J. 1995;  41(3) M749-M753
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Depner T A, Krivitski N M. Clinical measurement of blood flow in hemodialysis access fistulae and grafts by ultrasound dilution.  ASAIO J. 1995;  41(3) M745-M749
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Brancaccio D, Tessitore N, Carpani P et al.. Potassium-based dilutional method to measure hemodialysis access recirculation.  Int J Artif Organs. 2001;  24(9) 606-613
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Mercadal L, Coevoet B, Albadawy M et al.. Analysis of the optical concentration curve to detect access recirculation.  Kidney Int. 2006;  69(4) 769-771
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Alloatti S, Magnasco A, Bonfant G, Pellu V, Paroli V. Comparison of glucose pump test and urea test in measuring blood access flow.  J Nephrol. 2004;  17(4) 559-564
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Magnasco A, Alloatti S, Bonfant G, Copello F, Solari P. Glucose infusion test: a new screening test for vascular access recirculation.  Kidney Int. 2000;  57(5) 2123-2128
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Sherman R A. The measurement of dialysis access recirculation.  Am J Kidney Dis. 1993;  22(4) 616-621
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Krivitski N M. Theory and validation of access flow measurement by dilution technique during hemodialysis.  Kidney Int. 1995;  48(1) 244-250
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Besarab A, Lubkowski T, Frinak S, Ramanathan S, Escobar F. Detection of access strictures and outlet stenoses in vascular accesses. Which test is best?.  ASAIO J. 1997;  43(5) M543-M547
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Lindsay R M, Sternby J, Olde B, Persson R, Thatcher M E, Sargent K. Hemodialysis blood access flow rates can be estimated accurately from on-line dialysate urea measurements and the knowledge of effective dialyzer urea clearance.  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;  1(5) 960-964
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 May R E, Himmelfarb J, Yenicesu M et al.. Predictive measures of vascular access thrombosis: a prospective study.  Kidney Int. 1997;  52(6) 1656-1662
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Sands J, Glidden D, Miranda C. Hemodialysis access flow measurement. Comparison of ultrasound dilution and duplex ultrasonography.  ASAIO J. 1996;  42(5) M899-M901
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Huisman R M, van Dijk M, de Bruin C et al.. Within-session and between-session variability of haemodialysis shunt flow measurements.  Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;  20(12) 2842-2847
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Lacson Jr E, Lazarus J M, Panlilio R, Gotch F. Comparison of hemodialysis blood access flow rates using online measurement of conductivity dialysance and ultrasound dilution.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;  51(1) 99-106
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Lopot F, Nejedlý B, Sulková S, Bláha J. Comparison of different techniques of hemodialysis vascular access flow evaluation.  J Vasc Access. 2004;  5(1) 25-32
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Schneditz D, Bachler I, van der Sande F M. Timing and reproducibility of access flow measurements using extracorporeal temperature gradients.  ASAIO J. 2007;  53(4) 469-473
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Tonelli M, Klarenbach S, Jindal K et al.. Access flow in arteriovenous accesses by optodilutional and ultrasound dilution methods.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;  46(5) 933-937
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Wijnen E, Essers S, van Meijel G et al.. Comparison between two on-line reversed line position hemodialysis vascular access flow measurement techniques: saline dilution and thermodilution.  ASAIO J. 2006;  52(4) 410-415
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Depairon M, Ferrier C P, Tutta P, Descombes E, van Melle G, Wauters J P. Is there a place for duplex screening of brachial artery in haemodialysis patients with vascular access?.  Vasa. 2001;  30(1) 53-58
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Lomonte C, Casucci F, Antonelli M et al.. Is there a place for duplex screening of the brachial artery in the maturation of arteriovenous fistulas?.  Semin Dial. 2005;  18(3) 243-246
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Wiese P, Blume J, Mueller H J, Renner H, Nonnast-Daniel A B. Clinical and Doppler ultrasonography data of a polyurethane vascular access graft for haemodialysis: a prospective study.  Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;  18(7) 1397-1400
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Perazella M A, Rodby R A. Gadolinium-induced nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with kidney disease.  Am J Med. 2007;  120(7) 561-562
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Schwab S J, Raymond J R, Saeed M, Newman G E, Dennis P A, Bollinger R R. Prevention of hemodialysis fistula thrombosis. Early detection of venous stenoses.  Kidney Int. 1989;  36(4) 707-711
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Besarab A, Sullivan K L, Ross R P, Moritz M J. Utility of intra-access pressure monitoring in detecting and correcting venous outlet stenoses prior to thrombosis.  Kidney Int. 1995;  47(5) 1364-1373
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 White J J, Jones S A, Ram S J, Schwab S J, Paulson W D. Mathematical model demonstrates influence of luminal diameters on venous pressure surveillance.  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;  2(4) 681-687
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Frinak S, Zasuwa G, Dunfee T, Besarab A, Yee J. Dynamic venous access pressure ratio test for hemodialysis access monitoring.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;  40(4) 760-768
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Duijm L E, Liem Y S, van der Rijt R H et al.. Inflow stenoses in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulae and grafts.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;  48(1) 98-105
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Beathard G A. Percutaneous transvenous angioplasty in the treatment of vascular access stenosis.  Kidney Int. 1992;  42(6) 1390-1397
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Schwab S J, Saeed M, Sussman S K, McCann R L, Stickel D L. Transluminal angioplasty of venous stenoses in polytetrafluoroethylene vascular access grafts.  Kidney Int. 1987;  32(3) 395-398
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Aruny J E, Lewis C A, Cardella J F Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous management of the thrombosed or dysfunctional dialysis access.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;  14(9 Pt 2) S247-S253
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Allon M, Bailey R, Ballard R et al.. A multidisciplinary approach to hemodialysis access: prospective evaluation.  Kidney Int. 1998;  53(2) 473-479
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Cayco A V, Abu-Alfa A K, Mahnensmith R L, Perazella M A. Reduction in arteriovenous graft impairment: results of a vascular access surveillance protocol.  Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;  32(2) 302-308
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Daniels I D, Berlyne G M, Barth R H. Blood flow rate and access recirculation in hemodialysis.  Int J Artif Organs. 1992;  15(8) 470-474
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Safa A A, Valji K, Roberts A C, Ziegler T W, Hye R J, Oglevie S B. Detection and treatment of dysfunctional hemodialysis access grafts: effect of a surveillance program on graft patency and the incidence of thrombosis.  Radiology. 1996;  199(3) 653-657
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Windus D W, Audrain J, Vanderson R, Jendrisak M D, Picus D, Delmez J A. Optimization of high-efficiency hemodialysis by detection and correction of fistula dysfunction.  Kidney Int. 1990;  38(2) 337-341
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Bay W H, Henry M L, Lazarus J M, Lew N L, Ling J, Lowrie E G. Predicting hemodialysis access failure with color flow Doppler ultrasound.  Am J Nephrol. 1998;  18(4) 296-304
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Bosman P J, Boereboom F T, Eikelboom B C, Koomans H A, Blankestijn P J. Graft flow as a predictor of thrombosis in hemodialysis grafts.  Kidney Int. 1998;  54(5) 1726-1730
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Lindsay R M, Blake P G, Malek P, Posen G, Martin B, Bradfield E. Hemodialysis access blood flow rates can be measured by a differential conductivity technique and are predictive of access clotting.  Am J Kidney Dis. 1997;  30(4) 475-482
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 McCarley P, Wingard R L, Shyr Y, Pettus W, Hakim R M, Ikizler T A. Vascular access blood flow monitoring reduces access morbidity and costs.  Kidney Int. 2001;  60(3) 1164-1172
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Neyra N R, Ikizler T A, May R E et al.. Change in access blood flow over time predicts vascular access thrombosis.  Kidney Int. 1998;  54(5) 1714-1719
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Schwab S J, Oliver M J, Suhocki P, McCann R. Hemodialysis arteriovenous access: detection of stenosis and response to treatment by vascular access blood flow.  Kidney Int. 2001;  59(1) 358-362
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Singh N, Ahmad S, Wienckowski J R, Murray B M. Comparison of access blood flow and venous pressure measurements as predictors of arteriovenous graft thrombosis.  J Vasc Access. 2006;  7(2) 66-73
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Tonelli M, Klarenbach S, Jindal K et al.. Access flow in arteriovenous accesses by optodilutional and ultrasound dilution methods.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;  46(5) 933-937
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Asif A, Leon C, Orozco-Vargas L C et al.. Accuracy of physical examination in the detection of arteriovenous fistula stenosis.  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;  2(6) 1191-1194
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Leon C, Orozco-Vargas L C, Krishnamurthy G et al.. Accuracy of physical examination in the detection of arteriovenous graft stenosis.  Semin Dial. 2008;  21(1) 85-88
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Leon C, Asif A. Physical examination of arteriovenous fistulae by a renal fellow: does it compare favorably to an experienced interventionalist?.  Semin Dial. 2008;  21(6) 557-560
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Lindsay R M, Blake P G, Bradfield E. Estimation of hemodialysis access blood flow rates by a urea method is a poor predictor of access outcome.  ASAIO J. 1998;  44(6) 818-822
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Dember L M, Holmberg E F, Kaufman J S. Randomized controlled trial of prophylactic repair of hemodialysis arteriovenous graft stenosis.  Kidney Int. 2004;  66(1) 390-398
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Lumsden A, MacDonald M J, Kikeri D. Prophylactic balloon angioplasty fails to prolong the patency of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene arteriovenous grafts.  J Vasc Surg. 1997;  26 382-392
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Ram S J, Work J, Caldito G C, Eason J M, Pervez A, Paulson W D. A randomized controlled trial of blood flow and stenosis surveillance of hemodialysis grafts.  Kidney Int. 2003;  64(1) 272-280
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Ram S J, Nassar R, Work J, Abreo K, Dossabhoy N R, Paulson W D. Risk of hemodialysis graft thrombosis: analysis of monthly flow surveillance.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;  52(5) 930-938
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Moist L M, Churchill D N, House A A et al.. Regular monitoring of access flow compared with monitoring of venous pressure fails to improve graft survival.  J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;  14(10) 2645-2653
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Robbin M L, Oser R F, Lee J Y, Heudebert G R, Mennemeyer S T, Allon M. Randomized comparison of ultrasound surveillance and clinical monitoring on arteriovenous graft outcomes.  Kidney Int. 2006;  69(4) 730-735
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Malik J, Slavikova M, Svobodova J, Tuka V. Regular ultrasonographic screening significantly prolongs patency of PTFE grafts.  Kidney Int. 2005;  67(4) 1554-1558
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Tonelli M, Hirsch D, Clark T W et al.. Access flow monitoring of patients with native vessel arteriovenous fistulae and previous angioplasty.  J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;  13(12) 2969-2973
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Tessitore N, Lipari G, Poli A et al.. Can blood flow surveillance and pre-emptive repair of subclinical stenosis prolong the useful life of arteriovenous fistulae? A randomized controlled study.  Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;  19(9) 2325-2333
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Polkinghorne K R, Lau K K, Saunder A, Atkins R C, Kerr P G. Does monthly native arteriovenous fistula blood-flow surveillance detect significant stenosis—a randomized controlled trial.  Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;  21(9) 2498-2506
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Sands J J, Jabyac P A, Miranda C L, Kapsick B J. Intervention based on monthly monitoring decreases hemodialysis access thrombosis.  ASAIO J. 1999;  45(3) 147-150
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Smits J H, van der Linden J, Hagen E C et al.. Graft surveillance: venous pressure, access flow, or the combination?.  Kidney Int. 2001;  59(4) 1551-1558
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 73 Tonelli M, James M, Wiebe N, Jindal K, Hemmelgarn B. Alberta Kidney Disease Network . Ultrasound monitoring to detect access stenosis in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;  51(4) 630-640
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 74 Allon M. Do we really need periodic monitoring of vascular access for hemodialysis?.  NephSAP. 2007;  6 111-116
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Besarab A. Access monitoring is worthwhile and valuable.  Blood Purif. 2006;  24(1) 77-89
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 Paulson W D. Access monitoring does not really improve outcomes.  Blood Purif. 2005;  23(1) 50-56
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 77 Sands J J. Vascular access monitoring improves outcomes.  Blood Purif. 2005;  23(1) 45-49
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 78 White J J, Bander S J, Schwab S J et al.. Is percutaneous transluminal angioplasty an effective intervention for arteriovenous graft stenosis?.  Semin Dial. 2005;  18(3) 190-202
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 79 Wijnen E, Planken N, Keuter X et al.. Impact of a quality improvement programme based on vascular access flow monitoring on costs, access occlusion and access failure.  Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;  21(12) 3514-3519
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

William L WhittierM.D. 

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Rush University Medical Center

1426 W. Washington Blvd., Chicago, IL 60607

Email: william_whittier@rush.edu