Aktuelle Urol 2010; 41: S20-S23
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1224661
Original Paper

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Transvaginal Mesh (TVM) Reconstruction with TVT / TOT Sling for Vaginal Prolapse Concurrent with Stress Urinary Incontinence

Transvaginale Mesh (TVM) Rekonstruktion mit TVT / TOT Schlinge bei Vaginalprolaps in Kombination mit StressinkontinenzS. Takahashi1 , D. Obinata1 , T. Sakuma1 , T. Matsui1 , Y. Takenobu1 , T. Igarashi1 , T. Yoshizawa1 , K. Sato1 , J. Mochida1 , S. Sugimoto1
  • 1Department of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 January 2010 (online)

Abstract

We evaluated clinical efficacies of transvaginal mesh (TVM) reconstruction alone and those concomitant with a TVT / TOT sling for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Between January 2006 and February 2007, 138 female patients with POP under­went TVM reconstruction. The mean age was 66.6 years (range: 52–84). Fourteen individuals were qualified as grade II in the POP quantification (POP-Q) system, 85 and 39 were grades III and IV, respectively. One hundred and seventeen of 138 (85 %) cases showed SUI. Twenty-one patients without SUI underwent TVM alone, and 117 cases with SUI underwent TVM concomitant with TVT / TOT sling. Mean operation time and intra­operative bleeding was 79 min (range: 25–177) and 74 ml (range: 10–429), respectively. Mean follow-up period is 5.3 months (range: 1–14). The vaginal prolapses were cured (grade 0) in 129 cases (93 %) after the surgery. Total inter­national prostate symptom score (IPSS), its QOL score, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires Short Form (ICIQ-SF) significantly improved (from 12.6 to 3.9; p < 0.0001, from 5.0 to 1.0; p < 0.0001, and from 6.1 to 2.5; p < 0.01, respectively). Six of 21 cases (29 %) who underwent TVM alone showed postoperative de-novo SUI. In contrast, 116 cases (99 %) who underwent TVM concomitant with TVT / TOT, experienced a cure of SUI. Maximum flow rate did not change postoperatively in the both groups. In conclusion, the short-term efficacies of TVM reconstruction for POP are excellent, and a concomitant TVT / TOT sling prevents postoperative SUI.

References

  • 1 Olsen A L, Smith V J, Bergstrom J O et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.  Obstet Gynecol. 1997;  89 501-506
  • 2 Homma Y, Yamaguchi O, Hayashi K. Neurogenic Bladder Society Committee . Epidemiologic survey of lower urinary tract symptoms in Japan.  ­Urology. 2006;  68 560-564
  • 3 Gadonneix P, Ercoli A, Scambia G et al. The use of laparoscopic sacro­colpopexy in the management of pelvic organ prolapse.  Curr Opin ­Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  17 376-380
  • 4 Benson J T, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  175 1418-1421
  • 5 Maher C, Baessler K. Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidencebased literature review.  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;  17 195-201
  • 6 Iglesia C B, Fenner D E, Brubaker L. The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery.  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1997;  8 105-115
  • 7 Julian M. The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of severe, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  175 1472-1475
  • 8 Collinet P, Belot F, Debodinance P et al. Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors.  Int Urogynecol J. 2006;  17 315-320
  • 9 Bump R C, Mattiasson A, Bø K et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  175 10-17
  • 10 Digesu G A, Khullar V, Cardozo L et al. P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse.  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;  16 176-181
  • 11 Hiltunen R, Nieminen K, Takala T et al. Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.  Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  110 455-462
  • 12 Mellgren A, Anzen B, Nilsson B Y et al. Results of rectocele repair. A prospective study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 7-13
  • 13 Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L. Outcome after rectovaginal fascia re­attach­ment for rectocele repair.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;  181 1360-1364
  • 14 Dwyer P L, O’Reilly B A. Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh.  BJOG. 2004;  111 831-836
  • 15 Altman D, Väyrynen T, Engh M E et al. Short-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse.  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;  1 [Epub ahead of print] 1
  • 16 Kuan-Hui Huang K-H, Kung F-T, Liang H-M et al. Concomitant pelvic ­organ prolapse surgery with TVT procedure.  Int Urogynecol J. 2005;  17 60-65

S. TakahashiM. D. 

Department of Urology · Nihon University School of Medicine

30–1, Oyaguchikamimachi, Itabashi-ku

Tokyo, 173–8610

Phone: +81 / 3 / 39 72 81 11

Fax: +81 / 3 / 39 72 59 70

Email: tsatoru@med.nihon-u.ac.jp

    >